Hong Xing You, Xiaoyang Qi, Gregory A. Grabowski, Lei Yu 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Advertisements

Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Vishwanath Jogini, Benoît Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Antonio Cruz, Luis Vázquez, Marisela Vélez, Jesús Pérez-Gil 
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Differential Dynamics of Platelet Contact and Spreading
Sequence-Dependent DNA Condensation and the Electrostatic Zipper
Nanostructure of Cationic Lipid-Oligonucleotide Complexes
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Regulation of Airway Ciliary Activity by Ca2+: Simultaneous Measurement of Beat Frequency and Intracellular Ca2+  Alison B. Lansley, Michael J. Sanderson 
Single Vesicle Assaying of SNARE-Synaptotagmin-Driven Fusion Reveals Fast and Slow Modes of Both Docking and Fusion and Intrasample Heterogeneity  Sune.
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Simulation Studies of Protein-Induced Bilayer Deformations, and Lipid-Induced Protein Tilting, on a Mesoscopic Model for Lipid Bilayers with Embedded.
A 3-D Model of Ligand Transport in a Deforming Extracellular Space
H.M. Seeger, G. Marino, A. Alessandrini, P. Facci  Biophysical Journal 
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Following the Formation of Supported Lipid Bilayers on Mica: A Study Combining AFM, QCM-D, and Ellipsometry  Ralf P. Richter, Alain R. Brisson  Biophysical.
Gel-Assisted Formation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles
Structure of Supported Bilayers Composed of Lipopolysaccharides and Bacterial Phospholipids: Raft Formation and Implications for Bacterial Resistance 
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages (November 2014)
Thermodynamic Profiling of Peptide Membrane Interactions by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: A Search for Pores and Micelles  J.R. Henriksen, T.L. Andresen 
Using Atomic Force Microscopy to Study Nucleosome Remodeling on Individual Nucleosomal Arrays in Situ  H. Wang, R. Bash, J.G. Yodh, G. Hager, S.M. Lindsay,
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Andre F. Palmer, Philip Wingert, Jonathan Nickels  Biophysical Journal 
Michel Grandbois, Hauke Clausen-Schaumann, Hermann Gaub 
Actin Assembly at Model-Supported Lipid Bilayers
V.P. Ivanova, I.M. Makarov, T.E. Schäffer, T. Heimburg 
Obstructed Diffusion in Phase-Separated Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined Atomic Force Microscopy and Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching Approach 
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (September 2017)
Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Chang-Chun Lee, Yen Sun, Huey W. Huang  Biophysical Journal 
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Interactions between Adsorbed Hydrogenated Soy Phosphatidylcholine (HSPC) Vesicles at Physiologically High Pressures and Salt Concentrations  Ronit Goldberg,
Shelly Tzlil, Diana Murray, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 96, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 97, Issue 8, Pages (October 2009)
Inhibition of αβ Epithelial Sodium Channels by External Protons Indicates That the Second Hydrophobic Domain Contains Structural Elements for Closing.
The Role of Cholesterol in Driving IAPP-Membrane Interactions
Interaction of Lung Surfactant Proteins with Anionic Phospholipids
Philip J. Robinson, Teresa J.T. Pinheiro  Biophysical Journal 
Lipid Asymmetry in DLPC/DSPC-Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined AFM and Fluorescence Microscopy Study  Wan-Chen Lin, Craig D. Blanchette, Timothy V.
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Ralf Richter, Anneke Mukhopadhyay, Alain Brisson  Biophysical Journal 
Alternative Mechanisms for the Interaction of the Cell-Penetrating Peptides Penetratin and the TAT Peptide with Lipid Bilayers  Semen Yesylevskyy, Siewert-Jan.
Bending and Puncturing the Influenza Lipid Envelope
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Drug-Induced Changes of Cytoskeletal Structure and Mechanics in Fibroblasts: An Atomic Force Microscopy Study  Christian Rotsch, Manfred Radmacher  Biophysical.
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Pulmonary Surfactant Model Systems Catch the Specific Interaction of an Amphiphilic Peptide with Anionic Phospholipid  Hiromichi Nakahara, Sannamu Lee,
Main Phase Transitions in Supported Lipid Single-Bilayer
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Frequency-Dependent Shear Impedance of the Tectorial Membrane
Structure and Response to Flow of the Glycocalyx Layer
Temperature Dependence of the Surface Topography in Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine/Distearoylphosphatidylcholine Multibilayers  Marie-Cécile Giocondi,
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Membrane Perturbation Induced by Interfacially Adsorbed Peptides
Probing the Lipid Membrane Dipole Potential by Atomic Force Microscopy
William J. Galush, Jeffrey A. Nye, Jay T. Groves  Biophysical Journal 
Domain Growth, Shapes, and Topology in Cationic Lipid Bilayers on Mica by Fluorescence and Atomic Force Microscopy  Ariane E. McKiernan, Timothy V. Ratto,
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Phospholipid Membrane Interactions of Saposin C: In Situ Atomic Force Microscopic Study  Hong Xing You, Xiaoyang Qi, Gregory A. Grabowski, Lei Yu  Biophysical Journal  Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 2043-2057 (March 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7 Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic illustration of Sap C amino acid sequence and function. (A) The structural and functional domains are indicated by dashed and solid lines, respectively (Qi and Grabowski, 2001b). The shaded amino acid residues are critical to the indicated function. (B) Helical wheel models of Sap C's α-helical domain 1 and 2 represented by the H1 and H2 peptides. Cysteine residues are boxed, and hydrophobic residues are set in italics. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Time-sequence AFM deflection (A–F) and height (a–f) images of DSPC/POPS (molar ratio 10:1) phospholipid membranes on mica, showing Sap C-induced formation of patch-like domains. Images were obtained before Sap C addition (A, a) and 4min (B, b), 15min (C, c), 18min (D, d), 44min (E, e), and 90min (F, f) after adding 0.84μM Sap C. In (A), the white arrow points at a hole, a typical growth defect, at which the edge of the membrane is exposed; the black arrow points at an aggregate of vesicles. In (E), the black arrows indicate the smaller, second type of structures appearing at the crest of the newly formed Sap C-lipid domains. The thickness of the patch-like domains was measured at 3.03±0.37nm (n=168). Image size: 4×4μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Time-sequence AFM deflection (A–F) and height (a–f) images of DSPC/POPS (molar ratio 10:2.5) phospholipid membranes on mica, showing a novel membrane restructuring process induced by Sap C—membrane destabilization. Images were obtained before Sap C addition (A, a) and 4min (B, b), 7min (C, c), 16min (D, d), 40min (E, e), and 59min (F, f) after adding 1.68μM Sap C. Image size: 4×4μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 High-magnification AFM images showing the two types of membrane restructuring induced by Sap C—formation of patchlike domains and membrane destabilization. (A–D) Enlargements of Fig. 3, B–E, respectively, from the area marked by the white box in Fig. 3 B. (E–G) Line profiles taken from the corresponding height images of A, B, and C, respectively, at the position indicated by the white line. In C, the substrate mica surface, the membrane, and the patchlike domains induced by Sap C are marked as “s,” “m,” and “p,” respectively. In F, the membrane destabilization process resulted in two distinct layers at the edge of the phospholipid membrane, marked as “upper” and “lower.” The two layers are also visible adjacent to the Sap C-lipid patch domains (patch) in G. Thickness of the upper and lower layers was measured at 2.43±0.33nm and 1.58±0.38nm (n=98), respectively. The arrows in B, C, and D indicate the edge of the lower layer, the location of which remained unchanged during the restructuring process. Image size: 1.60×1.60μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Time-lapse series of AFM deflection (A–F) and height (a–f) images of DSPC/POPS phospholipid membranes (molar ratio 10:5), showing that the highest POPS molar ratio tested gave the most extensive Sap C-induced membrane destabilization. Images were obtained before Sap C addition (A, a) and 5min (B, b), 9min (C, c), 13min (D, d), and 17min (E, e) after adding 1.68μM Sap C. (F, f) The central area (3×3μm) was scanned at a high force (>5 nN) and high scanning rate (>15Hz) before returning to the previous scanned area (6×6μm) under normal scanning conditions. Image size: 6×6μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Quantitative analysis of Sap C-induced restructuring of DSPC/POPS membranes with molar ratios of (A) 10:1, (B) 10:2.5, and (C) 10:5, respectively. Surface coverage of the initial surface membrane (A0) and of structures (At) including the patchlike domains (A) and the upper layers (B, C) were each calculated by grain analysis of typical series of complete AFM images. In the graphs, At data for each time point have been normalized to A0. The arrows indicate the time of Sap C addition. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Time-sequence AFM height images of DSPC/POPS (molar ratio 10:2.5) phospholipid membranes on mica with sequential addition of H1 peptide and Sap C. The images presented were obtained at (A) 0min, (B) 5min, (C) 30min, (D) 63min, (E) 67min, (F) 79min, (G) 95min, and (H) 119min. At ∼5min, 9.84μM H1 peptide was added, and at ∼67min, 1.68μM Sap C was added. The line profiles were obtained from the images directly above at the location indicated by the black line in (A). The units of x and y axes in the line profiles are μm and nm, respectively. Image size: 6×6μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Quantitative presentation of H1 peptide and Sap C effects on DSPC/POPS phospholipid membranes with a molar ratio of (A) 10:2.5 and (B) 10:5, showing a lack of effect by H1 peptide alone. The surface coverage (%) of the membrane at each time point was calculated and plotted. Arrows indicate the time of addition of H1 peptide and Sap C, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Quantitative presentation of H2 peptide and Sap C effects on DSPC/POPS (molar ratio 10:2.5) phospholipid membranes, showing the inhibition of Sap C-induced membrane destabilization by H2 peptide. The surface coverage (%) of the membrane at each time point was calculated and plotted. Arrows indicate the time of addition of H2 peptide and Sap C, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Time-sequence AFM height images of DSPC/POPS (molar ratio 10:5) phospholipid membranes on mica with sequential addition of H2 peptide and Sap C, showing patch formation and absence of Sap C-induced membrane destabilization. The images presented were obtained at (A) 0min, (B) 4min, (C) 11min, (D) 21min, (E) 44min, (F) 48min, (G) 51min, and (H) 73min. At ∼4min, 10.02μM H2 peptide was added and late at ∼48min, 1.68μM Sap C was added. The line profiles were obtained from the image directly above at the location indicated by the black line in A. The units of x and y axes in the line profiles are μm and nm, respectively. In (C), the letters “s,” “m,” and “p” denote the substrate mica, the membrane, and the patchlike domains induced by Sap C, respectively. The thickness of the patchlike domains was measured at 2.14±0.51nm (n=130). Image size: 6×6μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 Time-sequence of AFM deflection (A–F) and height (a–f) images of DSPC/POPS (molar ratio 10:2.5) phospholipid membranes on mica with sequential addition of H1 and H2 peptides. Images were obtained at (A, a) 0min, (B, b) 12min, (C, c) 29min, (D, d) 39min, (E, e) 71min, and (F, f) 92min. At the end of obtaining image (A, a), 9.84μM H1 peptide was added and at ∼33min, 10.02μM H2 peptide was added. (G and H) Line profiles taken from the positions indicated by the black line in images (a) and (f), respectively. Thickness of the upper and lower layers was measured at 1.73±0.30nm and 3.09±0.43nm (n=65), respectively. Image size: 4×4μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 Time-sequence of AFM deflection (A–F) and height (a–f) images of DSPC/POPS (molar ratio 10:5) phospholipid membranes on mica with sequential addition of H1 and H2 peptides. Images were obtained at (A, a) 0min, (B, b) 27min, (C, c) 34min, (D, d) 42min, (E, e) 89min, and (F, f) 119min, respectively. At the end of obtaining image (A, a), 9.84μM H1 peptide was added and at ∼34min, 10.02μM H2 peptide was added. In A, the black arrows indicate two large and one small piece of vesicle aggregate, which disappeared under continued AFM scanning. The black arrow in D indicates the appearance of membrane destabilization, as two layers appear. G and H Line profiles taken from the positions indicated by the black line in images (a) and (f), respectively. Thickness of the upper and lower layers was measured at 1.59±0.22nm and 3.79±0.23nm (n=110), respectively. Image size: 5×5μm. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 13 Thickness of the patchlike domains (A) and thickness of the upper and lower layers (B). (A) The thickness measurements of the patchlike domains (solid bars) were taken from the complete series of AFM images presented in Figs. 2, 3, 10, and 12, respectively. Thickness of pure DSPC/POPS membrane bilayers (open bars) at molar ratios of 10:1, 10:2.5, and 10:5 is also given. (B) The thickness measurements of the upper (open bars) and lower (solid bars) layers were taken from the complete series of AFM images not presented and presented in Figs. 3, 11, and 12, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 14 Model for the Sap C-induced membrane restructuring starting at the edge of the membrane defects. As Sap C interacts with the membrane, the outer and inner leaflets in the original membrane bilayer are transformed into two new layers, i.e., the “upper” and “lower” layers. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 2043-2057DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75012-7) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions