Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.

Advertisements

OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF

Dr. G. Heess, DC AG, st meeting EVSC electronic vehicle stability control Ad hoc working group of GRRF Technical University of Budapest Hungary.

Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.

Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF

1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF

Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF

Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)

Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF

Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.

5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.

1 Survey on the transition time from ACSF to Manual Driving Toyota Motor Corporation Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the expert of Japan.

Connected Vehicle Research: Enabling Transportation Analysis of the Future HCQS Mid-year Meeting June

Informal Document: ACSF-06-16

August 10th Enrollment for new 1st and 2nd grade students.

Discussion paper – Major Issues

Calculus Section 3.7 Find higher ordered derivatives.

Stopping a vehicle.

7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016

Presentation of ACSF C tests

Submitted by the experts of Japan Informal Document: ACSF-06-25

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system

Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

Conducting the performance appraisal

Lane change driver reaction times

Lane change driver reaction times

Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

the courses already assigned to you,

Conducting the performance appraisal

Electronics: Demod + 4Q FE

Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)

GRSG-113 Agenda point 5 – Awareness of Vulnerable Road Users proximity

Informal document GRRF-86-36

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy

on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system

ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris

Submitted by the Expert of Sweden

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

AEBS 4th Meeting UK Position Paper December 18 OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017

Chapter 1 Introduction.

Signalling of information and warnings

Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan

ACSF B1+C functional description

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin

Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1

Submitted by the Secretary

ACSF B1+C functional description

Injector/Linac Design Status C. E

IT Managed Services Transition Weekly Activity Report: May 21st, 2019

Interpretation of CSF warnings #2

ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation

ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3

Driver initiated transition demand and system reaction

ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting

Electronic Stability Control Systems

Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre

6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI

Automated Lane Keeping Systems

Presentation transcript:

Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases Submitted by Germany Informal Document - ACSF-23-12 Case 0: Deactivation via „system button“ (single action) Case 1: Deactivation with/ without previous transition demand Juli 2019

Deactivation of the ALKS system Case 0: Deactivation via „system button“ (single action) Case 1: Deactivation with/without previous transition demand pre condition 1st step Driver action None 1st input: system button System action React to 1st input System status Active Deactive (= no continuous lateral & longitudinal control) Juli 2019

Deactivation of the ALKS system steering Case 0: Deactivation via „system button“ (single action) Case 1: Deactivation with/without previous transition demand pre condition 1st step 2nd step Driver action None 1st input: steering* *significant steering input (intentional!) 2nd input: braking, accelerating, positive confirmation driver monitoring & hands-on, direction indicator System action None/ TD React to 1st input + Transition demand React to 2nd input + End Transition demand System status Active Deactive (= no continuous lateral & longitudinal control) Deactivation phase Deactivation phase can be very short. Juli 2019

Deactivation of the ALKS system braking/ accelerating Case 0: Deactivation via „system button“ (single action) Case 1: Deactivation with/without previous transition demand pre condition 1st step 2nd step Driver action None 1st input: braking*, accelerating** *only higher values **only within system limits 2nd input: steering***, positive confirmation driver monitoring & hands-on, direction indicator ***significant steering input (intentional!) System action None/ TD React to 1st input*/** + Transition demand React to 2nd input + End Transition demand System status Active Deactive (= no continuous lateral & longitudinal control) Deactivation phase Deactivation phase can be very short. Juli 2019

Deactivation of the ALKS system direction indicator Case 0: Deactivation via „system button“ (single action) Case 1: Deactivation with/without previous transition demand pre condition 1st step 2nd step Driver action None 1st input: direction indicator 2nd input: steering*, braking, accelerating, positive confirmation driver monitoring & hands-on *significant steering input (intentional!) System action None/ TD React to 1st input + Transition demand React to 2nd input + End Transition demand System status Active Deactive (= no continuous lateral & longitudinal control) Deactivation phase Deactivation phase can be very short. Juli 2019