ISAT Effect Sizes Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (SBAC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polynomial Inequalities in One Variable
Advertisements

Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
This presentation provides some guidance on how to interpret the tables and graphs provided in your Clinical Indicator Trend Report. Most indicators have.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Scale Score Distributions Reading, Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science ISAT, Spring 2009 State Department of Education Boise, Idaho.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Reading and Writing Testing Results USD 244 Board of Education March 12, 2001.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Scale Score Distributions Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (ISAT) Reading, Language Usage, Mathematics, and Science Spring 2010 Idaho State Department.
Box and Whisker Plots and Quartiles Sixth Grade. Five Statistical Summary When describing a set of data we have seen that we can use measures such as.
Context Data Variation
HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.
Graphing Tier2/3 Interventions. Graphing For Whole Group The purpose of whole group graphs is to get a quick picture of who is all in an intervention.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
In 2009, the mean mathematics score was 21 with a standard deviation of 5.3 for the ACT mathematics section. ReferenceReference Draw the normal curve in.
SY PVAAS Scatterplots State to IU Region to LEA Public Schools/Charter Schools/Comprehensive CTCs Math, Reading, Writing, Science Template Contact.
SY PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, 11 Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS contact.
PVAAS – Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System added_assessment_system_(pvaas)/8751.
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
SAT 10 (Stanford 10) 2013 Nakornpayap International School Presentation by Ms.Pooh.
Salford: How well are we doing?. Early Years Foundation Stage.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
2.1 – Writing Equations. The Language of Mathematics 2.1 – Writing Equations.
ISAT Science Achievement Level Percentages (Below Basic, Basic, Proficient, Advanced) Grades 5, 7 and 10.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Year % qualified for 5N BBSSNational
How did Idaho students perform in the NCLB years when compared with their peers nationwide? All Students – White Students - Hispanic Students NAEP Reading.
Graphing Fitness Scores. Name:______________________________________ GRADING RUBRIC Use of Bar OR Line Graph5 Individual Fitness scores are clearly.
EWS Indictors: Middle Grades and High School Thresholds 1 Indicators Thresholds Middle Grades High School Incoming Indicator.
Data Table and Graphing Notes. What information needs to be on the Data Tables? A) Number of Trials B) Column for the IV C) Column for the DV D) Units.
A Close Look at Don’t Fail Idaho’s Student Achievement Message June 25, 2013 Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D. K-12 Research Idaho
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
GRAPHS AND CHARTS ..
Types of School Value-Added Reports
Calculating Median and Quartiles
Day 46 & 47 – Cause and Effect.
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
The Art of Problem Solving
2.1 – Writing Equations.
Riverside County Regional Assessment Meeting December 8, 2017
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
Understanding your PreACT scores
Tell a Story with the Data
Theme 7 Correlation.
Delaware Department of Education
Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results
Hyperbola - Graphing Recall that the equations for a hyperbola are ...
The Art of Problem Solving
ACT ASPIRE UNDERSTANDING
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
CAASPP Results Kern County.
Descriptive and Inferential
Understanding your PreACT scores
Education Services October 3, 2017.
How to Start This PowerPoint® Tutorial
How did Idaho students perform in the Obama years when compared with their peers nationwide? All Students – White Students - Hispanic Students NAEP.
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
ISAT Effect Size Results for Idaho English Language Arts & Mathematics Grades 3-8 and Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D. K-12 Research Idaho
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
Draw Scatter Plots and Best-Fitting Lines
2008 MCAS Results Wednesday, September 17, 2008 Burlington, MA.
Understanding the CAASPP Student Score Reports
Scatterplots and Two-Way Tables
Presentation transcript:

ISAT Effect Sizes 2015-2019 Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (SBAC) Mathematics and English Language Arts Idaho Public Schools, Grades 3-8 and 10 Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D. K-12 Research Idaho Idaho Ed Statistics December 11, 2019

Important notes: The effect size used for this PowerPoint represents the practical significance of the difference between two means, not a statistical significance between two means. The effect size acts like a z-score. If this year’s mean is higher than last year’s mean, the effect size is indicated by a positive bar (“above the x-axis”). If lower this year than last year, a negative bar is seen (“below the x-axis”). If there is no difference in the mean between this year and last year, there is no bar (the x-axis “stands alone”). CAUTION: Compare the magnitude or size of the annual effect sizes ONLY on one graph at a time, not with graphs for other grades or the other subject. Excel 2019 selects a y-axis scale that best fills the plot area. This means that bars for large annual effect sizes or a large trend effect size are “reduced in size” to FIT the plot area. On the other hand, bars for small annual effect sizes or trend effect sizes are “increased in size” to FILL the plot area. December 11, 2019

Excel spreadsheet was used to calculate effect sizes (screen shot). http://k12researchidaho.com/pdf/calculators-effectsizes-percentiles.zip December 11, 2019

Mathematics Effect Sizes December 11, 2019

Summary of Statewide Effect Sizes for Mathematics Statewide from 2015 to 2019, trend effect size for ISAT Mathematics were positive for all grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10) Statewide from 2015 to 2016, the ISAT Mathematics effect sizes were positive for all grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10). Statewide from 2016 to 2017, the ISAT Mathematics effect sizes were positive for three grades (5, 6, and 10), and negative for four grades (3, 4, 7, and 8). Statewide from 2017 to 2018, the ISAT Mathematics effect sizes were positive in six grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10), and zero for one grade (7). Statewide from 2018 to 2019, the ISAT Mathematics effect sizes were positive for all seven grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10) December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

English Language Arts Effect Sizes December 11, 2019

Summary of Statewide Effect Sizes for English Language Arts Statewide from 2015 to 2019, trend effect sizes for ISAT English Language Arts were positive for six grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), and negative for one grade (10). Statewide from 2015 to 2016, the ISAT English Language Arts effect sizes were positive for all seven grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10). Statewide from 2016 to 2017, the ISAT English Language Arts effect sizes were negative for all seven grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10). Statewide from 2017 to 2018, the ISAT English Language Arts effect sizes were positive in six grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10), and zero for one grade (7). Statewide from 2018 to 2019, the ISAT English Language Arts effect sizes were positive for six grades (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), negative in one grade (10). December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

December 11, 2019

Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D. K-12 Research Idaho P.O. Box 5912 Idaho Ed Statistics P.O. Box 5912 Boise, Idaho 83705 Email bert@k12researchidaho.com Visit http://k12researchidaho.com K-12 Research Idaho is a personal public service project funded entirely from retirement benefits. December 11, 2019