Start writing full proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
Advertisements

PDR Process Level B and C. UC PERFORMANCE & DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2009 – Academic Staff Staff member preparation (Academic staff) Supervisor preparation.
Biennial Review 1. Timeframe: August 1, 2011 – July 30, 2013.
PhD PROPOSAL AND SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT FORM
February 19, 2015 Guelph, Ontario. 1. Advisory Committee on University-Industry Grants (ACUIG) 2. Review Process: Things to Focus On 3. Don’t do the Following.
Registration and Assessment There are 3 periodic assessments throughout the PhD: Assessment 1: the Research Plan (by 8 weeks) All students must complete.
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Responding to Student Behavioral Concerns Christine Reed Davis, Dean of Students Thursday, August 11, 2014 New Faculty Orientation.
ARTICLE X, DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION PROCEDURES GOVERNING TENURE, PROMOTION, AND CONTRACT RENEWAL contract, unchanged for
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.
Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.
ENROL PhD PROPOSAL AND SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT THESIS SUBMISSION ORAL EXAMINATION Suspension of study Change of supervisor Study away from Christchurch Extension.
The Committee will: Assess and report on technology resources, status and needs. Create concept papers in support of strategic directions approved by.
Update to Members Analysis Team Update on current activities for comment List of proposed new project ideas Opportunity for Members to suggest new projects.
Submitting and Accessing 5-year Post- Tenure Review Materials in Vibe.
BUS 611 Week 4 Assignment Integrated Project Management To purchase this material link
FACULTY GRANTS AND LEAVES
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, 2014
Submitting and reviewing promotion applications in Vibe
Working with Your Chair and Mentor
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Oral Exam Information Session
* 07/16/96 *.
Their role within Schools and Colleges
A Bill Becomes A Law House of Representatives Senate.
Promotion in Extension Presented by: Ken Martin, Ph. D
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Stage 4: Implementation*
Request for Proposal - Best Value
Faculty Performance Review
Faculty Evaluation Plan
A Bill Becomes A Law House of Representatives Senate.
Request for Proposal - Best Value
Proposal for new modules for inclusion in Regulation 691/2011
Objectives What is the P & T process?
Training for Faculty Reviewers
SNIA Technical Council
How a bill becomes a law.
Bell ringer Write three facts from this video. They must pertain to how a bill becomes a law.
Buy now at
* 07/16/96 *.
The Road to Success: A Scaffolded Process
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
WKU’s Transitional Retirement Plan for Faculty
* 07/16/96 *.
Project Name Team Members.
Concept Proposal template for presentation by Dean to evaluation panel
A Bill Becomes A Law House of Representatives Senate.
Grad Affairs Report Feb. 2008
Project Name Team Members.
ELE 491 Senior Design Project Proposal
* 07/16/96 How a Bill Becomes a Law *.
Scientific Panel Study Approval Process
How to Propose a Class First, you will need to ensure that you have the support of the department and the chair for the proposal.
Their role within Schools and Colleges
* 07/16/96 *.
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
I’m doing a project; how do I know if I need to go through the IRB?
* 07/16/96 *.
Current Proposal Reviewed and approved by Graduate Council
May is Coming !!! January 31st: Project approval (16 days from now) • Brainstorming, team formation, successful RFA February 7th: Project proposal (+7.
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
Emerging Issues and Outreach
Requirements Status: Thesis Dashboard Milestones
* 07/16/96 How a Bill Becomes a Law *.
Training for Faculty Reviewers
Sabbatical and Difference-in-Pay Leaves Office of Faculty Advancement
Concept Screening Template
Budget Update April 29, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Start writing full proposal New program – Idea generation – Incubator Process Need further clarification Milestone 1 Start Proposal form (Fill in at least 1 – 4) Review 1 - 4 Go Milestone 2 Start writing full proposal Pre-proposal (Fill in 5 - 12) Review 5 - 12 Go Buy-in Proposer(s) Dept. Chair Dean Academic Affairs Need further clarification Notes: Review process – For now, as needed. Milestone 1 and 2 are consultative steps at which members of the new-program incubator support team collaborate with the proposer(s) and discuss proposal responses and determine additional clarifications and/or information that may be needed to fully understand and garner buy in for the proposed program. Proposer(s) will work with new-program support team member(s) to gather additional information (if needed). Buy-in is final step before proposer(s) start writing the full proposal. Proposer(s), Dept. Chair, Dean, Academic affairs are in agreement that program can be supported and proposal should be written. Proposal will be sent through the existing approval process (UCC, GCC etc.)