Child Abuse and Neglect Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Advertisements

Practice Guidelines for Attorneys Representing Parents in Abuse, Neglect and Termination of Parental Rights Cases Cindi Wood, JD John Chambers, JD February.
1 During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training. You will answer questions based upon information.
Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
AMERICAN INNS OF COURT JANUARY 22, 2015 PRESENTER: HOWARD A. BELODOFF.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
On Behalf of the Parent’s – The ICWA - Transferring Proceedings to Tribal Court and Petitioning to Invalidate ICWA Proceedings.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
MODULE iii icwa key components
The Path to Permanency Melissa D. Carter Committee on Justice for Children Parent Attorney Conference May 8-9, 2007.
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
The INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT Grudging Compliance or Constructive Implementation? Child Abuse and Neglect: Essential Information for Practicing & Presiding.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Adoption & Safe Families Act
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Social Services Attorneys’ Conference March 9-10, 2006 Legislative Update: Juvenile Law Janet Mason Institute of Government.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Pennsylvania Indian Child Welfare Handbook Developed By The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
Termination of Parental Rights and Adoption: Where does the GAL fit in? The most important steps to know in the TPR process and how the GAL plays a role.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
Wisconsin Indian Child Welfare Act November 5, 2009.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Active Efforts Principles & Expectations Oregon Tribes Oregon Judicial Department Citizen Review Board Oregon Department of Human Services.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Permanency Planning From Day One. Every child is born with the beautiful potential to become wonderful human beings who experience love, joy, growth and.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
Permanency.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
The Indian Child Welfare Act (and the Minnesota Indian family preservation act) U.S.C. § 1901 et. seq. Minn. Stat. § et. seq.
Attorney Paul Stenzel Stenzel Law Office, LLC 24 th Annual Coming Together of the Peoples Conference Madison, WI March 19, 2010.
The Role of the Education Rights Holder (ERH)
The Changing World of Guardianships
Permanency Planning From Day One
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Resolving Foster Parent Concerns
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
Presented by Hill Country CASA
Court Proceedings and Staffings
ADOPTIONS.
Legal II: The Court Process
Removal and Placement FSFN
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Pennsylvania Indian Child Welfare Handbook
Removal and Placement FSFN
Open Adoption Agreements
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
Basics of the Indian Child Welfare Act
The Indian Child Welfare Act & State-Tribal Collaboration
Child Abuse and Neglect Institute
Ohio CASA Celebrate Kids Conference September 19, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Child Abuse and Neglect Institute Improving Outcomes for Children and Families MODULE: THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS HEARING National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges

Learning objectives Understand how to prepare for and conduct effective termination of parental rights hearings Discuss best practice strategies for improving termination of parental rights hearings

Termination of parental rights hearing Case Scenario

Some Questions to Consider: If the matter comes on for a Termination of Parental Rights Hearing, what key decisions and findings do you need to make to comply with federal and your state’s law? If you grant the Termination of Parental Rights, what post-TPR key decisions do you need to make?

Setting the Stage for Better Permanency Outcomes Hearing Best Practices …. Termination of Parental Rights Hearings

ASFA and TPR ASFA requires that filing for TPR must be instituted when: A child of any age has been in foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months (unless exceptions apply); The child is an abandoned infant; The parent has committed, aided, or attempted the murder or voluntary manslaughter of a sibling of the child; The parent has committed a felony assault resulting in serious bodily injury to the child or a sibling of the child

ASFA and TPR When addressing whether parental rights should be terminated involuntarily, ASFA requires that a Court: Determine, by clear and convincing evidence, that the parent is unfit Determine whether severing the parent- child relationship is in the child’s best interests

ASFA and TPR Most common statutory grounds for determining parental unfitness include: Severe or chronic abuse or neglect Abuse or neglect of other children in the household Abandonment Long-term mental illness or deficiency of the parent(s) Failure to support or maintain contact with the child Involuntary TPR of the parent to another child Felony convictions of parent(s) Length of time in foster care

ASFA and TPR Exceptions to TPR filing The child has been placed under the care of a relative The State Agency has documented in the case plan a compelling reason to believe that terminating the parent’s rights is not in the best interests of the child. The parent has not been provided with the services required by the service plan for reunification of the parent with the child.

Best Interest Burden In addition to the legal grounds for TPR it must be shown that TPR is in the child’s best interest. “Snowman Watching over My House” –Eric, Age 6

Best Interest Burden It is every child’s best interest to be in a permanent placement with at least one primary caregiver who is willing and able to meet the child’s physical, mental, emotional, and moral needs necessary to achieve normal development.

Needs’ Based Analysis Effective evidence on best interest focuses on the child’s needs and the parent’s ability to meet those needs. At the time of removal At the time of TPR trial Unfit means unable to meet the child’s needs (parent assessment) Neglect means the parent has failed to meet the child’s needs in the past (child assessment)

ICWA and TPR Differences between State and Tribal Child Welfare values and practice perhaps most evident with TPR and Adoption Tribal concept of community permanency Emphasis on permanency alternatives that help child stay connected to extended family and Tribe Many tribal communities do not agree with TPR and may use “customary adoption” instead

ICWA and TPR 25 U.S.C. 1912 (a) Notice Party seeking the foster care placement of, or TPR to, an Indian child shall notify the parent or Indian custodian and the Indian child’s tribe No foster care placement or TPR proceeding shall be held until at least 10 days after receipt of notice by the parent, Indian custodian or Tribe Upon request, parent or Indian custodian or tribe shall be granted up to 20 additional days to prepare for such a proceeding

ICWA and TPR 25 U.S.C. 1912 (f) Burden of Proof for TPR No TPR may be ordered in the absence of determination, supported by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, including testimony of qualified experts, that the continued custody of the child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child

ICWA and TPR 25 U.S.C. 1912 (d) “…any party seeking to effect a …TPR to, an Indian child under state law shall satisfy the court that active efforts have been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and that these efforts have proved unsuccessful.”

ICWA and TPR 25 U.S.C. 1915(b) establishes the following order of preference for foster care placement of an Indian child: A member of the Indian child’s extended family A foster home licensed, approved or specified by the Indian child’s tribe; An Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian licensing authority; or An institute approved by an Indian Tribe

TPR -The Court’s Response to Filing of Petition Ensure all parties represented by counsel Set a pre-trial date within 30 days Unless prohibited by statute, all proceedings should be scheduled before the same judge who handled case since original filing At pre-trial establish Date for completion of discovery, mediation, pre-trial settlement conference Trial dates (consecutive and begin within 90 days of petition filing)

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing What information should the Court have? In both cases of voluntary relinquishment and trial, court needs Reports, case plans, findings, orders and chronology of child’s out of home placements and treatment; Age of child and needs at removal; Current report of the child’s status and well-being; Circumstances leading to the filing of TPR petition; and Agency report of concurrent efforts to identify, recruit and place child with an adoptive family

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Questions that must be answered Voluntary Relinquishment Was parental consent to relinquishment voluntary and informed? Have both biological parents consented to relinquishment? Why is relinquishment and adoption in the best interests of the child? Is there a recommendation for adoption with contact? How is contact, or lack thereof, in the best interests of the child?

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Voluntary Relinquishment for Indian Children to comply with ICWA, 25 USC 1913 must be Executed in writing Recorded before a judge ad accompanied by presiding judge’s certificate that the terms and consequences of the consent were fully explained and understood Certified by the court that Indian parent or custodian understood the explanation in English or that it was translated and understood Any consent given prior to or within 10 days after the birth of the child shall not be valid

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing When the Case Goes to Trial - Questions that must be answered Were all parties properly identified and served? Does the evidence presented show that statutory grounds for TPR exist? Depending on the grounds alleged in the petition, were reasonable efforts made to reunify? Is TPR in the best interests of the child?

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing After court has determined whether ground exist for TPR and whether TPR and Adoption are in the best interests of the child, and TPR is granted …. In hearing without the birth parent, the court should proceed to determining whether reasonable efforts have been made and will be made toward adoption and finalization of the permanent plan

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Questions to ask when determining whether reasonable efforts have been made What are the child’s special needs? If plan is relative or foster home adoption What remains to be done to approve the home? Is there another person in the home involved with the family, and if so, has that person been interviewed for appropriateness? Full disclosure to relative or foster parent regarding child’s history and current or potential disabilities?

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Questions to ask when determining whether reasonable efforts have been made If plan is relative or foster home adoption What is the time frame for finalization? Have all appropriate subsidies been identified and paperwork completed? If an adoptive home has been recruited Detailed description of the home Is there another person in the home involved with the family, and if so, has that person been interviewed for appropriateness?

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Questions to ask when determining whether reasonable efforts have been made If an adoptive home has been recruited If Indian child, does home meet placement preferences in ICWA? What efforts has the agency made to identify a placement under ICWA? Has there been full disclosure to the adopting family of the child’s circumstances/ special needs? What remains to be done to approve the home? What is visitation and placement plan and timeframe?

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Questions to ask when determining whether reasonable efforts have been made If an adoptive home has been recruited If the family’s ethnicity is different from the child’s, what efforts will be made to ensure relationships between the child and others of same ethnicity? Does adopting family understand the special aspects of the child’s ethnicity? If home is in different location, what are plans to continue to meet child’s education and service needs?

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Questions to ask when determining whether reasonable efforts have been made If an adoptive home has been recruited Subsidies been identified and paperwork completed? What contact will child have with prior caretaker and others who have had positive relationships with the child? Is adoptive family agreeable to any contact plan that may have been recommended with the biological parent(s)?

Conducting the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Conducting the TPR Hearing Questions to ask when determining whether reasonable efforts have been made If an adoptive home must be recruited -What efforts are being made to identify potential adoptive homes both locally and in other jurisdictions? -What is the status of investigating adults with whom the child has had positive relationships re: their potential to becoming adoptive families? -How many potential families have expressed interest in the child and what is the status of the investigation of each family?

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing Final order should be issued within 14 days of the close of the hearing First set of findings Persons present and how absent parties were provided with notice If voluntary relinquishment, efforts made by court to ensure relinquishment was voluntary and informed How reasonable efforts were made to reunify the family

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing First set of findings If no efforts were reasonable -statement that based on family circumstances and child health and safety, all reasonable efforts were made If case went to trial, whether TPR is granted (if so, under what statutory grounds and specific reasons why statute applies) Indian children, findings must include special requirements of ICWA Why TPR and adoption is in best interests of the child

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing Second set of findings when TPR granted Additional findings addressing the plans to finalize a permanent placement should be made in a separate entry -what is being done to ensure that reasonable efforts are being made to find an adoptive home and to finalize the permanent placement with specific steps and timeframes that are to occur

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law at the TPR Hearing Second set of findings when TPR granted A description of any special factors or conditions of the child that are identified as special needs and what services are to be provided to address those needs and who is responsible for providing Date and time of the next review hearing set for within 90 days

Concluding the tpr hearing TPR HEARING BENCH CARD Concluding the tpr hearing Focus on permanency and mandatory timeframes. Set further reviews and permanency hearing and identify tasks to be accomplished. Make clear findings and orders on the record. Engage parents, children and other participants.

Summary: Best Practice Strategies for Improved Permanency Outcomes Front load the system- Call on experience and training to get a feel up front of where the case is going Understand the letter and the spirit of ASFA Conduct thorough investigations early on in the case Pre-Hearing Conferencing Conduct thorough hearings Conduct thorough searches for relatives and other persons demonstrating an ongoing commitment to the child (look for connections) Conduct effective family team meetings

Summary: Best Practice Strategies for Improved Permanency Outcomes Front load the system- Hold initial Review Hearing around 60 days following removal Review case plan Review relative search Review family time plan Review milestones Conduct first periodic review

Summary: Best Practice Strategies for Improved Permanency Outcomes Use Concurrent Planning – Should be used in most cases if you have a strong family preservation system Create presumptions at certain stages of a case Make the concurrent plan meaningful Hold the agency accountable (Judges and child advocates)

Conduct effective periodic reviews Best Practice Strategies for Effective TPR Hearings and Improved Permanency Outcomes Structured decision-making when selecting most appropriate Permanency Option for the child Conduct effective periodic reviews Develop a culture of “best practice” in Termination and Adoption cases Training Agency role, Judges, Counsel

Summary: Best Practice Strategies for Improved Permanency Outcomes Use Structured Decision-Making when selecting the most appropriate permanency option Conduct effective permanency hearing Reasonable efforts to reunify and finalize permanency plan Special needs of the child, services provided and by whom Permanent plan, why in best interests, steps and timelines to complete If plan is termination, date for filing and pre- trial Understand 15/22 and compelling reasons

Summary: Best Practice Strategies for Improved Permanency Outcomes Promote use of fost/adopt homes Effective counseling for all parties Relinquishment for parents Adoption/permanency counseling for children Effective CASA/GAL program Know and understand when agency is excused from providing services Effective calendaring

Summary: Best Practice Strategies for Improved Permanency Outcomes Post TPR Reviews – Not less frequently than every three months Expedite appeals Mediation and other pre-trial negotiations Adoption with contact “My Feelings, Painted” – Marcus, Age 12

TPR Practice Any Questions? ? ? ?