Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (February 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Initiation of Murine Embryonic Erythropoiesis: A Spatial Analysis
Advertisements

Paraxial mesoderm and somitogenesis
Dynamic Expression of Erbb Pathway Members during Early Mammary Gland Morphogenesis  Olivia Wansbury, Heena Panchal, Michelle James, Suzanne Parry, Alan.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Katherine Joubin, Claudio D Stern  Cell 
Eduardo A.P. Seleiro, David J. Connolly, Jonathan Cooke 
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
A Somitic Compartment of Tendon Progenitors
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2002)
Gabrielle Kardon, Brian D Harfe, Clifford J Tabin  Developmental Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Distinct Origins of Adult and Embryonic Blood in Xenopus
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 5-8 (April 1997)
Jan Schlueter, Takashi Mikawa  Cell Reports 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Radhika Atit, Ronald A. Conlon, Lee Niswander  Developmental Cell 
A Role for the Roof Plate and Its Resident TGFβ-Related Proteins in Neuronal Patterning in the Dorsal Spinal Cord  Karel F Liem, Gabi Tremml, Thomas M.
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Robert G. Kelly, Nigel A. Brown, Margaret E. Buckingham 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Somite Development: Constructing the Vertebrate Body
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1996)
Sara C. Ahlgren, Marianne Bronner-Fraser  Current Biology 
Eduardo A.P. Seleiro, David J. Connolly, Jonathan Cooke 
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Helge Amthor, Bodo Christ, Miguel Weil, Ketan Patel  Current Biology 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Neuropeptides: Developmental Signals in Placode Progenitor Formation
BMP4 Plays a Key Role in Left–Right Patterning in Chick Embryos by Maintaining Sonic Hedgehog Asymmetry  Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq, Nicole M. Le Douarin 
Christian Schröter, Andrew C. Oates  Current Biology 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Tbx5 and Tbx4 Are Not Sufficient to Determine Limb-Specific Morphologies but Have Common Roles in Initiating Limb Outgrowth  Carolina Minguillon, Jo Del.
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 1997)
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
MiR-219 Regulates Neural Precursor Differentiation by Direct Inhibition of Apical Par Polarity Proteins  Laura I. Hudish, Alex J. Blasky, Bruce Appel 
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
Distinct mechanisms regulate slow-muscle development
Åsa Apelqvist, Ulf Ahlgren, Helena Edlund  Current Biology 
Petros Ligoxygakis, Siegfried Roth, Jean-Marc Reichhart 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
Cell Movement Patterns during Gastrulation in the Chick Are Controlled by Positive and Negative Chemotaxis Mediated by FGF4 and FGF8  Xuesong Yang, Dirk.
Jonas Muhr, Thomas M Jessell, Thomas Edlund  Neuron 
Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Antagonistic Signaling by Caronte, a Novel Cerberus-Related Gene, Establishes Left– Right Asymmetric Gene Expression  Yuji Yokouchi, Kyle J Vogan, Richard.
Nigel P Pringle, Sarah Guthrie, Andrew Lumsden, William D Richardson 
Lefty-Dependent Inhibition of Nodal- and Wnt-Responsive Organizer Gene Expression Is Essential for Normal Gastrulation  William W. Branford, H.Joseph.
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (April 1997)
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Assigning the Positional Identity of Spinal Motor Neurons
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages (September 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 461-471 (February 1996) Lateral and Axial Signals Involved in Avian Somite Patterning: A Role for BMP4  Olivier Pourquié, Chen-Ming Fan, Monique Coltey, Estelle Hirsinger, Yuji Watanabe, Christiane Bréant, Philippa Francis-West, Paul Brickell, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Nicole M Le Douarin  Cell  Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 461-471 (February 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X

Figure 1 Sequence Comparison of bHLH Domains of Drosophila sim, mSim1, and cSim1 Residues conserved across species are boxed. Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 2 cSim1 Expression in the Paraxial Mesoderm Is Restricted to the Lateral Somitic Half The putative boundary between medial (M) and lateral (L) somitic domain is represented by the hatched line. (A–D) Transverse vibratome sections of a stage 14 chick embryo hybridized with the cSim1 probe (scale bar represents 100 μm). (A) At the level of the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm (pm)cSim1 is only detected in the Wolffian duct (wd) located between the paraxial mesoderm and the lateral plate. (B) At the level of somite I, no cSim1 expression is detected in the epithelial somite (S). (C) At the level of somite IVcSim1 is now clearly expressed in the lateral somitic cells. (D) At the level of somite VII, the somite has differentiated into its ventral (sclerotome, scl) and dorsal (dermomyotome, dm) components. The lateral part of both sclerotome and dermomyotome express cSim1. (E–F) Expression of cSim1 in E3 chick embryos. (E) Lateral view of the thoracic region of a whole embryo. Expression of cSim1 in the lateral somitic compartment is homogeneous along the anteroposterior axis. Dorsal is up and anterior to the right (scale bar represents 130 μm). (F) Transverse vibratome section at the leg level showing that cSim1 expression is now restricted to the lateral dermomyotome (scale bar represents 50 μm). (G) Medial segmental plate chimeras. The medial unsegmented paraxial mesoderm is taken from a 15-somite quail donor (1) and grafted orthotopically in a stage-matched chick host (2). In these chimeras, the derivatives of the medial segmental plate (epaxial progenitors) will be composed of quail cells while the hypaxial progenitors will be composed of chick cells. (H) Transverse section of an E3 chimera at the trunk level showing the quail medial derivatives recognized by the anti-QCPN antibody (in brown). The lateral dermomyotome is composed of chick cells and corresponds to the cSim1 positive domain (see F) and therefore to the hypaxial progenitors (scale bar represents 50 μm). Abbreviations: lp, lateral plate; n, notochord; nt, neural tube. Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 3 A Diffusible Factor(s) Produced by the Lateral Plate Is Required for cSim1 Expression in the Lateral Somite (A, D, G, and J) Schematic transverse sections of E2 chick embryos illustrating the surgical operations. Dorsal views (B, E, H, and K; scale bar represents 200 μm) and transverse vibratome sections (C, F, I, and L) of E3 chick embryos operated as described in (A), (D), (G), and (J) and hybridized in whole-mount with the cSim1 probe. dm, dermomyotome; nt, neural tube; n, notochord. (A) Surgical slit separating the paraxial mesoderm from the intermediate and lateral mesoderm. (B) On the operated side, lateral plate (lp) and Wolffian duct (wd) are absent. No cSim1 expression was detected in somites. (C) On the operated side, sclerotome and dermomyotome form, but the latter lacks the lateral cSim1-expressing domain. Arrowhead points to the lateral dermomyotome (scale bar represents 110 μm). (D) Insertion of an impermeable obstacle (vitelline membrane) between the paraxial mesoderm and the intermediate and lateral mesoderm. (E) No cSim1 expression is detected in the lateral somitic domain (between two arrowheads) facing the membrane. (F) On the operated sidecSim1 expression domain is absent from the lateral dermomyotome (arrowhead) that appears morphologically normal. The membrane is indicated by an asterisk (scale bar represents 70 μm). (G) Insertion of a nucleopore filter between the paraxial mesoderm and the intermediate and lateral plate mesoderm. (H) cSim1 expression in the lateral somite on the operated side is not affected by the presence of the filter (f). (I) On the operated side, the cSim1 expression domain abuts the filter and is restricted to the lateral dermomyotome as on the control side. Limits of the filter are indicated by arrowheads. (J) Blockade of Wolffian duct migration, resulting in unilateral absence of the duct. (K and L) The Wolffian duct is absent on the operated side, but the cSim1 expression pattern in the somite is not affected. Arrowhead points to the lateral dermomyotome in (L) (scale bar represents 120 μm). Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 4 Grafting of the Somatopleura or Splanchnopleura between the Neural Tube and the Paraxial Mesoderm Results in cSim1 Expression in Medial Somitic Cells (A, D, and G) Schematic transverse sections of E2 chick embryos illustrating the surgical operations. Lateral views (B, E, and H; scale bar represents 300 μm) and transverse vibratome (C and I) and cryostat (F) sections of E3 chick embryos operated as described in (A), (D), (G) and hybridized in whole-mount with the cSim1 probe. In (B), (E), and (H), the graft is located between the arrowheads. In (C), (F), and (I), the arrowheads point to the medial edge of the dermomyotome that is in contact with the grafted tissue (indicated by a star) on the operated side. (A) Graft of the somatopleura (in dark grey) between the neural tube (nt) and the paraxial mesoderm. (B) At the level of the graft, somitic cells of the medial half become cSim1 positive. (C) The dermomyotome (dm) that is reduced when compared with the control side is entirely cSim1 positive on the operated side (scale bar represents 90 μm). (D) Graft of the splanchnopleura (in light grey) between the neural tube and the paraxial mesoderm. (E and F) A similar effect to that described in (B) and (C) is observed in (F) (scale bar represents 90 μm). (G) Graft of clumps of the fibroblastic QT6 cell line between the neural tube and the paraxial mesoderm. (H and I) No extension of the cSim1 positive domain toward the medial side (M) of the somite is observed. The cSim1 positive (L, lateral domain) and negative domains of the dermomyotome were unaffected. Although the size of QT6 clumps and lateral plate grafts are equivalent at the time of the graft, 24 hr later the QT6 clumps appeared smaller probably due to a lower proliferation rate in (I) (scale bar represents 65 μm). Abbreviations: n, notochord; wd, Wolffian duct. Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 5 The Neural Tube Produces a Diffusible Factor Preventing the Extension of the cSim1 Domain to the Medial Somitic Half (A and D) Schematic transverse sections of E2 chick embryos illustrating the surgical operations. (B) Lateral view; (E) dorsal view (scale bar represents 210 μm); (C and F) transverse vibratome sections of E3 chick embryos operated as described in (A) and (D) and hybridized with the cSim1 probe. (A) Insertion of an impermeable obstacle between the neural tube (nt) and the paraxial mesoderm. (B) cSim1 expression domain extends into the medial somitic domain on the operated side. The caudal extension of the silastic membrane is indicated with an arrowhead. Anterior is up and dorsal is left. (C) cSim1 is strongly up-regulated in the dermomyotome (dm) on the operated side, including its medial part (arrowhead) (scale bar represents 60 μm). s, silastic. (D) Insertion of a porous membrane (nucleopore filter) between the neural tube and the paraxial mesoderm. (E) The presence of the filter does not modify cSim1 expression in the medial somite when compared with the control side. (F) Expression of cSim1 does not extend to the medial dermomyotome (arrowhead) despite the presence of the filter (scale bar represents 60 μm). Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 6 The Neural Tube Produces a Diffusible Factor Preventing the Extension of the cSim1 Domain to the Medial Somitic Half (A and E) Schematic transverse sections of E2 chick embryos illustrating the surgical operations. Dorsal views (B and F; scale bar represents 210 μm) and transverse sections (C and G) of E3 chick embryos operated as described in (A) and (E) and hybridized with the cSim1 probe. (A) Graft of E2 neural tube between the lateral plate and the paraxial mesoderm. (B) The cSim1 expression domain is absent in the region of the graft (limited by arrowheads). (C) On the operated side, the dermomyotome appears normal but lacks cSim1 expression in the lateral domain (arrowhead) adjacent to the graft (nt′) (scale bar represents 60 μm). (D) Graft of control QT6 cells instead of the neural tube. The Wolffian duct is absent and cSim1 expression in the lateral domain (arrowhead) is not affected by the graft (scale bar represents 60 μm). (E) Ablation of the neural tube. (F) This experiment results in the fusion of the somites at the operated level. These fused somites appear entirely cSim1 positive. (G) The fused somites segregate into a single sclerotome (scl) and a dermomyotome (dm) that is entirely cSim1 positive (scale bar represents 120 μm). (H) When the ablation is performed in a chimera operated as in Figure 2G, quail cells (recognized by the QCPN antibody) deriving from the medial unsegmented plate contribute to the dermomyotome and to the sclerotome on the operated side, indicating that in the absence of the neural tube, cells normally fated to the medial dermomyotome activate the cSim1 gene (scale bar represents 120 μm). Abbreviations: n, notochord; nt, neural tube. Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 7 BMP4 Expression in the Lateral Plate Mesoderm Slightly Anticipates cSim1 Expression in the Lateral Somite Caudal region of stage 11, 12, 13, and 14 embryos hybridized with BMP4 (A–C) (scale bar represents 400 μm) and with cSim1 (D–F) probes. (G–I) Higher magnification of the transition zone between unsegmented and segmented paraxial mesoderm in the embryos shown in (D)–(F) (scale bar represents 130 μm). The asterisk marks the position of the most recently formed somite. In stage 11 embryosBMP4 is expressed in the caudal most region of the embryo and extends anteriorly in the lateral plate (lp) facing the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm (pm) (A). At this stagecSim1 is strongly expressed in the Wolffian ducts (wd), but is absent from the somites (D and G) (scale bar in [D] represents 260 μm). (B) In stage 12 embryosBMP4 expression domain has now extended anteriorly and is found in the lateral plate up to the somitic region. Note the few BMP4 expressing cells in the dorsal midline of the neural tube. In embryos of the corresponding stage, no expression of cSim1 is detected yet in the somite (data not shown). cSim1 is first expressed weakly in the lateral somite (arrowhead) of slightly older embryos (stage 13) (E and H). Its expression is more intense in the caudal somites (scale bar in [E] represents 400 μm). (C) In stage 14 embryosBMP4 is strongly expressed in the lateral plate all along the anteroposterior axis. At that stagecSim1 is homogeneously expressed in the lateral domain (arrowhead) of all somites except the newly formed (F and I) (scale bar in [F] represents 310 μm). Abbreviations: nt, neural tube. Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 8 Grafted QT6-BMP4 and Splanchnopleura Produce BMP4 but Not Control QT6 Cells Dorsal views of E3 chick embryos grafted between the neural tube and the paraxial mesoderm as described in Figure 4 with a QT6-BMP4 cell clump and hybridized with the mouse BMP4 probe (A), or grafted with control QT6 cells (indicated by arrowheads) and hybridized with the mouse BMP4 probe (B) and with the chick BMP4 probe (C), and grafted with an E2 splanchnopleura and hybridized with chick BMP4 probe (D). In (A), the grafted cells strongly express the mouse BMP4 messenger RNA, whereas control QT6 cells do not (B), nor do they express chick BMP4 (C) (the chick BMP4 probe cross-reacts with quail embryos). The mouse probe does not cross-react with the chicken BMP4. In (D), the grafted tissue (bracketed by arrowheads) expresses also BMP4 messenger RNA. Note the endogenous expression of BMP4 in the limb buds that derive from the lateral plate (scale bar represents 300 μm). Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)

Figure 9 BMP4 Is Able to Confer Lateral Properties to the Medial Somitic Cells Transverse vibratome sections of E3 embryos grafted between the neural tube (nt) and the paraxial mesoderm as described in Figure 4with control QT6 cells (A, C, and E) and with QT6-BMP4 cells (B, D, and F) and hybridized with the lateral markers cSim1 (A and B)Pax3 (D and E) and the medial marker MyoD (G and H) (scale bar represents 60 μm). Arrowheads point to the medial edge of the dermomyotome and the grafted cells are indicated by the star. (A) Graft of QT6 cells has no effect on cSim1 expression in the somite. The dermomyotome (dm) is reduced but remains subdivided in a medial (M) cSim1 negative domain and a lateral (L) cSim1 positive domain. (B) Graft of QT6-BMP4 cells strongly upregulates cSim1 in the somites adjacent to the grafted clumps. The dermomyotome (dm), including its medial domain is now entirely cSim1 positive on the operated side. Note that sclerotome (Scl) formation occurs normally in these grafted embryos. (C) Graft of control QT6 cells. Pax3 expression is slightly downregulated on the operated side, but expression remains more intense in the lateral (L) than in the medial domain (M). (D) Graft of QT6-BMP4 expressing cells has dramatic effects on Pax3 expression. The somites are reduced and upregulate Pax3 in the whole dermomyotome. (E) Graft of control QT6 cells. MyoD expression is not affected. Note that QT6 cells express MyoD at a low level (F) Graft of QT6-BMP4 expressing cells. MyoD expression has disappeared on the operated side and within the grafted cells. Abbreviations: n, notochord. Cell 1996 84, 461-471DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81291-X)