Smith v. Hostess WHY ARE WE HERE?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
Advertisements

Voir Dire in Trucking/Auto Accident Cases - Nov. 1, 2013 Robert B. Hirschhorn, Esq. Jury and Trial Consultant Cathy Bennett & Associates 5+ Tips to Motivate.
Write here your company details Write here your company details Write here your company details.
Maglica v. Maglica Case for the Plaintiff Opening Statement.
Civil Cases. Civil Lawsuits Why do some people file civil suits? – Plaintiff claims to have suffered a loss or injury to themselves and usually seeks.
Argumentation Creating an Argumentative Thesis. Expectations  An argumentative paper makes a claim about a topic and justifies this claim with specific.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH Today’s Objective: C-3 To gather information on the structure of the judicial branch and the ideological tendencies of the Supreme.
US Securities Class Actions: Business Risks and Litigation Strategies Marc J. GottridgeMichael M. Yi Lovells Yi Cho & Brunstein, LLC New York OfficeNew.
WHAT ARE SOME REASONS WHY YOU THINK YOU MAY NEED TO CONTACT A ATTORNEY/ LAWYER?
Article III Federal Court System. Article III Creates our national judiciary.
MGT 448 Week 1 DQ 3 Discuss the following theory: The study of global business is relevant if you work or plan to work in a large multinational company,
Family lawyers in sydney Divorce and Family Lawyers In Sydney.
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
National Survey Part I – February 2016
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 1 – PTAB Basics and Procedure
Bell Work: What is an adversarial system?
Enhanced Damages for Patent Infringement: Halo v. Pulse
College of Nursing December 13, 2006 John O. Cates
The Argumentative Thesis
What’s your favourite saying?
TYPES OF BUSINESS MESSAGES
Smartphone questionnaire
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Civil Cases
How to critique a journal article
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute
Civil Cases Chapter 16 Section 1.
Conflicts of Interest in IP: Particularities of IP Practice
ACCT 540 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
تجاری سازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
+ Shantea Winrow English 1301 CRN Prof. Jeannine Horn
School Climate Survey 2008.
Character Analysis: Simon
Challenge Statement Academic freedom for K-12 Teachers should be more carefully controlled than their colleagues in colleges or universities.
Thinking Like An Economist
Chapter 15: Courts, Judges and Laws.
Expressing your opinion
Antigone Anticipation Guide
Claims, Reasons and Evidence
90% 72% Jurors are influenced by litigation ads
Does the board perform all of its duties?
Public Communication Apprehension Capstone Marshall University
Civil Law: Trial Procedures
Title Learning activity – Rating (Likert scale) MONASH LIBRARY
THE NEGATIVE NEWS.
The Courts AP US Government.
Please have out one sheet of paper and title it “Going for the Look”
Civil Pretrial Practice
Agenda for 12th Class Admin Name plates Handouts Slides
Big Ideas WC 15th May.
Final year employment slides
Defending & Withdrawal of Suits
What do you think… Statement 1: Level of agreement (using your polling tools to answer): Reasoning before reading: Did your level of agreement change due.
Each state has its own judicial system that hears nonfederal cases
Inequality Take a Stand.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases.
Remember a hypothesis is an educated guess that predicts the outcome of something like an experiment.
Standards: Determine themes and central ideas
Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:
Why News Matters.
WHAT IS THIS CASE ABOUT? TRUST MANIPULATION GREED
(Plaintiff’s Name) Caterpillar and Holt CAT VS..
2nd Progress Meeting, Progress Meeting Evaluation, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel, April 2018.
Designing Questionnaires
Argument Writing: Defend, Refute, Qualify.
Nature of Science Warm Up
Family Law
Experienced Family Attorneys in Milwaukee
Joel Smith v. Emerald Drilling Company
Presentation transcript:

Smith v. Hostess WHY ARE WE HERE? One is not greater than the other, it is a matter of competing rights.

A. FINDING A PATENT INVALID Smith v. Hostess A. FINDING A PATENT INVALID How strongly do you agree with this statement: If proven by clear and convincing evidence, I could find a patent invalid. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

B. FAVORING SMALL COMPANY Smith v. Hostess B. FAVORING SMALL COMPANY How strongly do you agree with this statement: In a case where a small company has sued several large companies, I would start off favoring the small company. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree

C. PATENT OFFICE MAKES MISTAKES Smith v. Hostess C. PATENT OFFICE MAKES MISTAKES How strongly do you agree with this statement: The Patent Office sometimes makes a mistake and grants a patent. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

Smith v. Hostess D. GENERAL QUESTIONS Has anyone on the panel ever worked for a company that was involved in patent litigation? Other than a divorce, has anyone ever been a plaintiff in a lawsuit? Anyone know, ever hire, or ever work for any of the plaintiff attorneys or law firms? Anyone starting out favoring the plaintiff?

Smith v. Hostess E. Hostess What number below best describes your opinion of Hostess? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Very Negative Neutral Very Positive