5b. Presentation for Reviewing Photos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer English For Computer Major Master Candidates
Advertisements

BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
Research Project or Thesis Proposal MT, MA and PhD
WRITING THE ClASS REPORT
White Plains City School District March 9, By the end of the session, you will be able to Describe each component of the lesson plan template Use.
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Lecture 8A Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations English Study Program FKIP _ UNSRI
Preceptor Orientation
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1 Fostering Networks for academic sharing Prof. Muhammad Aslam Adeeb The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
1.  Interpretation refers to the task of drawing inferences from the collected facts after an analytical and/or experimental study.  The task of interpretation.
Facilitate the Development of Healthcare Delivery Skills.
Facilitate Group Learning
TAA2 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
Ian F. C. Smith Preparing a thesis document. 2 Disclaimer This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other ways to prepare a thesis.
ON-LINE TOPIC THE ROLE OF THE TUTOR.  Spend a few minutes thinking about and making notes of all the different roles you fulfil as a tutor. Once you.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
1Clinical Training Skills - Delivering Interactive Presentations DELIVERING INTERACTIVE PRESENTATIONS.
Advanced Higher Computing Science
Business and Management Research
Development Project Dr Kris Welsh Dr Raheel Nawaz.
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
PhD Program Requirements
Math 6-8: The Standards in Practice: A Common Core Lesson
Technical Session for Preparing MELP Report
Chapter 12 Handling Problems, Conflicts, and Mistakes
Implementing the NHS KSF Action Planning and Surgery Session
Getting the most from lectures presented by:
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
School Community Council Implementation Timeline Checklist
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Present and Facilitate with style and tact
Chapter 16 Communicating Research Results: Research Report, Oral Presentation, and Research Follow-Up.
Writing the Methods Section
Transforming the Patient Care Experience
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 11
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
READING A PAPER.
Implementation in a Transition Year
Implementation in a Transition Year
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
Implementation in a Transition Year
Implementation in a Transition Year
Accessibility Supports Training
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
SESSION FOUR Storyboards
Research Methods Technical Writing Thesis Report Writing
A Review of Effective Teaching Skills
Determining Eligibility
Session 1, Program Introduction and Overview
Team Check-Up Orientation Briefing
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
Session 2: Building Relationships
Accessibility Supports Training
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Jaeliza Morales CUR/516 Dr. Mary Poe
DTM Field Companion for Location Assessment Sectoral Questions
COMP564 paper review <title & authors of the paper>
Exercise draft for training cluster/partners
DTM Field Companion for Location Assessment Sectoral Questions
Experts by Experience Group Observations.
Presentation transcript:

5b. Presentation for Reviewing Photos [This slide to be removed before presentation is used.] This presentation is one component of a larger resource package titled Photographing Eyelids Before and After Trachomatous Trichiasis (TT) Surgery. The presenter/facilitator should read and be familiar with the other components of the resource package before delivering this presentation – particularly 5a. Facilitator’s Guide for Reviewing Photos with Forms. To effectively deliver this content, the presenter/facilitator must have technical knowledge of TT surgery, equivalent to that of a technical supervisor or national trainer, that enables him/her to assess operated eyelids and provide detailed technical feedback to surgeons.

Reviewing Photos of Eyelids Before and After Trachomatous Trichiasis (TT) Surgery

Session 1: Group Review of Photos Facilitated by a technical supervisor

Introduction To discuss: What are the objectives of integrating photo taking into the surgical process? The facilitator begins by asking the participants to state what they feel are the objectives of integrating photo taking into the surgical process and writes the responses on flip chart paper. When all participants have contributed, the facilitator reviews the responses, asking for comments from each participant who explains his/her agreement with the suggestion and the ‘why’ or ‘why not.’ If not mentioned by participants, facilitator should introduce the following potential objectives into the discussion: To increase the potential for higher quality outcomes of TT surgery To improve individual surgeon awareness of areas in need of strengthening To provide an opportunity for surgeons to assess their own performance and identify areas to strengthen To predict the surgical outcome based upon immediate post-surgical result To be able to assess the results of the surgery while the operated case is still available to make necessary adjustments to improve long-term outcome and avoid complications

Example 1: Overcorrection Immediate Postoperative Photo The facilitator presents the first example IPO photo, asking the participants to take a few minutes to observe. The facilitator asks the participants how they would assess the surgery, highlighting any positives or potential problems while writing responses on flip chart paper. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What are the positive surgical aspects of this eyelid? What potential problems are present in this eyelid? The facilitator should be prepared to draw the participants’ attention to critical details of the IPO photo if they are not mentioned by participants. The facilitator asks the participants what, based on the potential problems identified, they would expect to see when the operated case is followed up with 3-6 months later.

Example 1: Overcorrection Follow-up Photo (one year later) The facilitator presents the FPO photo, asking the participants what they observe and discussing the expectations they named during the previous step. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What can one observe about this eye 3-6 months post-operatively? How do these observations agree with the expectations based on the IPO photo?

Example 1: Overcorrection Both Photos The facilitator presents the IPO and FPO photos side-by-side and asks the participants what, given the FPO photo results, could have been done either during surgery or immediately post-operatively to reduce the chances of a poor outcome. Sample questions to pose to the group include: In looking at this photo, what could have been done while the patient was on the table to allow for a better outcome?

Example 2: Under correction Immediate Postoperative Photo The facilitator asks the participants how they would assess the surgery, highlighting any positives or potential problems while writing responses on flip chart paper. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What are the positive surgical aspects of this eyelid? What potential problems are present in this eyelid? The facilitator should be prepared to draw the participants’ attention to critical details of the IPO photo if they are not mentioned by participants. The facilitator asks the participants what, based on the potential problems identified, they would expect to see when the operated case is followed up with 3-6 months later.

Example 2: Under correction Follow-up Photo (one year later) The facilitator presents the FPO photo, asking the participants what they observe and discussing the expectations they named during the previous step. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What can one observe about this eye 3-6 months post-operatively? How do these observations agree with the expectations based on the IPO photo?

Example 2: Under correction Both Photos The facilitator presents the IPO and FPO photos side-by-side and asks the participants what, given the FPO photo results, could have been done either during surgery or immediately post-operatively to reduce the chances of a poor outcome. Sample questions to pose to the group include: In looking at this photo, what could have been done while the patient was on the table to allow for a better outcome?

Example 3: Incorrect Suture Tension Immediate Postoperative Photo The facilitator asks the participants how they would assess the surgery, highlighting any positives or potential problems while writing responses on flip chart paper. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What are the positive surgical aspects of this eyelid? What potential problems are present in this eyelid? The facilitator should be prepared to draw the participants’ attention to critical details of the IPO photo if they are not mentioned by participants. The facilitator asks the participants what, based on the potential problems identified, they would expect to see when the operated case is followed up with 3-6 months later.

Example 3: Incorrect Suture Tension Follow-up Photo (one year later) The facilitator presents the FPO photo, asking the participants what they observe and discussing the expectations they named during the previous step. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What can one observe about this eye 3-6 months post-operatively? How do these observations agree with the expectations based on the IPO photo?

Example 3: Incorrect Suture Tension Both Photos The facilitator presents the IPO and FPO photos side-by-side and asks the participants what, given the FPO photo results, could have been done either during surgery or immediately post-operatively to reduce the chances of a poor outcome. Sample questions to pose to the group include: In looking at this photo, what could have been done while the patient was on the table to allow for a better outcome?

Example 4: Tarsus Exposed Immediate Postoperative Photo The facilitator asks the participants how they would assess the surgery, highlighting any positives or potential problems while writing responses on flip chart paper. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What are the positive surgical aspects of this eyelid? What potential problems are present in this eyelid? The facilitator should be prepared to draw the participants’ attention to critical details of the IPO photo if they are not mentioned by participants. The facilitator asks the participants what, based on the potential problems identified, they would expect to see when the operated case is followed up with 3-6 months later.

Example 4: Tarsus Exposed Follow-up Photo (one year later) Eyelid contour abnormality is visible The facilitator presents the FPO photo, asking the participants what they observe and discussing the expectations they named during the previous step. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What can one observe about this eye 3-6 months post-operatively? How do these observations agree with the expectations based on the IPO photo?

Example 4: Tarsus Exposed Both Photos The facilitator presents the IPO and FPO photos side-by-side and asks the participants what, given the FPO photo results, could have been done either during surgery or immediately post-operatively to reduce the chances of a poor outcome. Sample questions to pose to the group include: In looking at this photo, what could have been done while the patient was on the table to allow for a better outcome?

Example 5: Under correction and Overcorrection Immediate Postoperative Photo The facilitator asks the participants how they would assess the surgery, highlighting any positives or potential problems while writing responses on flip chart paper. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What are the positive surgical aspects of this eyelid? What potential problems are present in this eyelid? The facilitator should be prepared to draw the participants’ attention to critical details of the IPO photo if they are not mentioned by participants. The facilitator asks the participants what, based on the potential problems identified, they would expect to see when the operated case is followed up with 3-6 months later.

Example 5: Under correction and Overcorrection Follow-up Photos The facilitator presents the FPO photo, asking the participants what they observe and discussing the expectations they named during the previous step. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What can one observe about this eye 3-6 months post-operatively? How do these observations agree with the expectations based on the IPO photo? 6 weeks after excision 1 year after surgery

Example 5: Under correction and Overcorrection Both Photos The facilitator presents the IPO and FPO photos side-by-side and asks the participants what, given the FPO photo results, could have been done either during surgery or immediately post-operatively to reduce the chances of a poor outcome. Sample questions to pose to the group include: In looking at this photo, what could have been done while the patient was on the table to allow for a better outcome?

Example 6: Tarsus Exposed Immediate Postoperative Photo The facilitator asks the participants how they would assess the surgery, highlighting any positives or potential problems while writing responses on flip chart paper. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What are the positive surgical aspects of this eyelid? What potential problems are present in this eyelid? The facilitator should be prepared to draw the participants’ attention to critical details of the IPO photo if they are not mentioned by participants. The facilitator asks the participants what, based on the potential problems identified, they would expect to see when the operated case is followed up with 3-6 months later.

Example 6: Tarsus Exposed Follow-up Photo Eyelid contour abnormality is visible The facilitator presents the FPO photo, asking the participants what they observe and discussing the expectations they named during the previous step. Sample questions to pose to the group include: What can one observe about this eye 3-6 months post-operatively? How do these observations agree with the expectations based on the IPO photo?

Example 6: Tarsus Exposed Both Photos The facilitator presents the IPO and FPO photos side-by-side and asks the participants what, given the FPO photo results, could have been done either during surgery or immediately post-operatively to reduce the chances of a poor outcome. Sample questions to pose to the group include: In looking at this photo, what could have been done while the patient was on the table to allow for a better outcome?

Session 2: Individual Surgeon Review of Photos Describe for participants the sequence of steps that will take place during this session: The technical supervisor asks each surgeon to review his/her photos and to complete the appropriate form for each eye photographed (either Form 1: Immediate Post-Operative (IPO) Photo Review Form and Form 2: Follow-up Post-Operative (FPO) Photo Review Form). The technical supervisor sits one-on-one with the individual surgeon and presents the photos from Session 1, referring back to the discussions. The technical supervisor reviews with each individual surgeon each eyelid for which there is an IPO and FPO photo. As part of the discussion, the technical supervisor reviews each component of the forms that were completed for each eyelid (either Form 1: Immediate Post-Operative (IPO) Photo Review Form or Form 2: Follow-up Post-Operative (FPO) Photo Review Form). The supervisors and surgeon should discuss all questions, including those where their responses differed.

Methodology Obtain 1) the photos of your surgeries and 2) the standardized forms to fill out. Use a computer to conduct a review of the photos. Complete a form for each photo. Completely fill out the form for the immediate postoperative photo before reviewing the follow-up photo. Wait for a supervisor to come by to discuss your photos. After discussing with the supervisor and finalizing the forms, submit the forms to the designated representative.

Session 3: Collection of Feedback and Group Discussion on Photo Taking Suggestions and recommendations for the photo taking process

Methodology Administration of questionnaire Discussion Submit the questionnaire to the designated representative Discussion Describe for participants the sequence of steps that will take place during this session. The facilitator administers Form 3: Questionnaire on Photo Taking Utility, Feasibility, and Quality to participants, collecting all forms once participants have completed the exercise. The facilitator asks the participants if they felt that the photo taking and review of photos were valuable and, if so, why. The facilitator lists the responses on the flip chart. The facilitator asks the participants what challenges they encountered during the IPO photo taking and lists these on the flip chart. Addressing the challenges one by one, the facilitator asks the participants to brainstorm how these challenges might be overcome. The facilitator documents relevant points on the flip chart. The facilitator leads a discussion on whether photo taking should be considered standard operating procedure for surgical camps, documenting relevant points on the flip chart. If the consensus is to adopt photo taking, the facilitator leads a discussion on how it might be used in addition to the objectives discussed in Session 1: Group Review of Photos.