From Sewers to Sanddabs: Orange County Sanitation District

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Advertisements

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Proposed Revisions to MWRA’s Ambient Monitoring Plan: Introduction Andrea Rex Director Environmental Quality Dept.
The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
Greater Vancouver Regional District’s Liquid Waste Management Plan.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
1 Susan Cormier and Charles Lane Environmental Protection Agency Scott Neimela and Joel Chirhart, U.S. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, U.S.A. Design.
Southern California Bight Regional Marine Monitoring Program Ken Schiff
The Importance of Coastal Waters - Recent Reports National Coastal Condition Report National Coastal Condition Report Heinz Center’s State of the Nation’s.
Coastal Ocean Monitoring and Research: A Local Agency’s View George Robertson, Senior Scientist Orange County Sanitation District George Robertson, Senior.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Permit.
WP3: identifying & quantifying the main driving forces of ecosystem changes influencing the aquaculture sector and developing the appropriate environmental.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 Monitoring Plan Mike Mickelson and Ken Keay Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
Overview 1.Types of monitoring 2.Partnership monitoring needs 3.Current monitoring coordination efforts.
SCCOOS Goals and Efforts Within COCMP, SCCOOS aims to develop products and procedures—based on observational data—that effectively evaluate and improve.
History and Progress of DEQ’s Mercury Programs Albert E. Hindrichs.
Monitoring Principles Stella Swanson, Ph.D.. Principle #1: Know Why We Are Monitoring Four basic reasons to monitor:  Compliance Monitoring: to demonstrate.
Marine and coastal thematic assessment for the EEA’s 2010 State of the Environment report Trine Christiansen (EEA)
Chapter 15, Proposed Amendments to Article IV Water Quality Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection Division April 9, 2013 Presented by.
Water Quality in the South Coast Study Region MLPA South Coast Scientific Advisory Team Water Quality Work Group Dominic Gregorio, SAT Member January 14,
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System SCCOOS me? –You want input from the users? –What products will help EPA with its mission? Relationship.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Climate Limnos / Ocean Biota Global –> Regional Climate Models (e.g. CGCM -> Great Lakes down-scaled projections) Air Temperature, Humidity, Precipitation,
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-18, Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level.
Draft South Coast MPA Monitoring Plan California Fish and Game Commission Stockton, 29 June 2011.
PIFSC External Review, June 24, 2008 Integrated Coral Reef Ecosystem Assessments in the U.S-affiliated Pacific Islands.
Indiana Environmental Management Conference October 16, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management 1.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT (SCCWRP) Stephen B. Weisberg Executive Director.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Marine Sciences Oceanography Marine Biology Geosciences Using the sciences and technology to solve problems and answer questions related to oceans, coasts.
Regional Workshop on Approaches to the Implementation and monitoring of Community-based Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (CEAFM) Noumea, New.
Future needs and plans for ocean observing in the Arctic AOOS Arctic Town Hall Futur Zdenka Willis Integrated Ocean Observing System National Program Office.
IDEM FIELD HEARING Renewal of ASU Operating Permit December 15 th, 2015 Protect Our Ground Water and the Indian Creek Watershed STOP!
Catherine Kuhlman June 28 OPC Meeting. Problem Statement There is a growing concern that nutrient inputs may be contributing to increasing frequency and.
By Will Holoman. University of North Carolina – Wilmington - B.A. in Environmental Science – Marine Science Emphasis University of Utah - B.S. in Civil.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
EPA Ocean and Coastal Protection Programs in New England Melville P. Coté, Jr., Manager Ocean and Coastal Protection Unit U.S. Environmental Protection.
Ecological Interactions -Consumption of economically important or endangered fishes and squid -Competition for marine and terrestrial resources -Predation.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Advanced Environmental Management (AEM) Training Phase I
Highlights of the New NPDES Permit
Module 17: MIXING ZONES A limited area or volume of water where initial dilution of a discharge takes place and where numeric water quality criteria.
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
President’s Report Robert B. Gagosian October 15, 2009
ENV 320 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ENV 320 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
Monitoring and Research:
California’s Plan to Deal With Once-Through Cooling At
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Southern California Stormwater Monitoring Coalition
Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme
Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association March 22, 2017
EPA Region IV and ADEM NPDES Permit Coordination
Marine Biology A viable career choice?.
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT
Interpretation of Descriptor 8
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

From Sewers to Sanddabs: Orange County Sanitation District Ocean Monitoring Program Not just the Ocean Team All LMC division sections are involved (explain) Dr. Jeff Armstrong Environmental Supervisor June 12, 2019

Reclamation Plant 1 Treatment Plant 2

Program History Began in 1969 Expanded in 1973 with passage of CWA Rudimentary, mostly water quality Expanded in 1973 with passage of CWA Began quarterly sampling for fish trawls, sediment quality, water quality Intensified in 1985 with 301(h) waiver Program outsourced (“Fox watching the henhouse”) Added sediment quality stations, enlarged water quality sampling grid, fish tissue contaminant analysis, fish liver histopathology Insourced in 1999

Regulatory Basis/Mandate Clean Water Act – National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit issued in five-year intervals Codifies the ocean monitoring program (Appendix E) California Ocean Plan Issued by State Water Resources Control Board Controls discharges into the ocean Anti-degradation mandate Triennial review (2018)

OCSD’s Ocean Monitoring Program Must Demonstrate: Water Quality – safe to swim Sediment Quality – healthy ecosystem Fish health – safe to eat fish We must demonstrate that these criteria are met with scientifically defensible data.

Program Elements Regional Monitoring Strategic Process Studies Compliance Monitoring

M/V Nerissa Custom built in 2004 58’ long, 69 tons R/V Yellowfin (SCMI) = $319.3/Hr sampling + 2 hrs for set-up and break-down + transit time from SCMI to sampling and back = $3,832 for a max of 6 hours sampling. $3,832 x 90 days = $344,844 Custom built in 2004 58’ long, 69 tons 97 days at sea in 2018-19

Water Quality

Physical Oceanography

Benthic (Sediment) Quality

Trawl Communities

Fish Health Trawl fish tissue contaminant Environmental health risk assessment Rig fish tissue contaminants Human health risk assessment Trawl fish liver histopathology Contractor

Toxicology Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity – Monthly Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity – Quarterly Whole Sediment Toxicity – Annually at 10 stations

Data Analysis and Reporting Outfall vs. Reference comparisons Sediment Quality Triad Spatial and temporal trending Multivariate statistical analysis Geospatial mapping analysis Delineating outfall impacts from other sources Aerial deposition of contaminants Rivers, harbors, and storm channels Natural environmental variability El Nino/La Nina California Current / Decadal Oscillation Climate change

Marine Monitoring Annual Report Published on March 15th each year A compliance report Primary audience are our regulators Covers all permit-related ocean monitoring activities Includes SPS and Regional Monitoring Has changed significantly from 301(h) monitoring to full-secondary treatment monitoring

Regional Monitoring Mandated in NPDES permit Value to OCSD Allows us to put our monitoring results into a regional context Regional Monitoring Studies: Bight Studies: Bight’18 SCCOOS: Southern California Coastal Ocean Observation System CRKSC: Central Region Kelp Survey Consortium CBWQ: Central Bight Water Quality

Strategic Process Studies Mandated in NPDES Permit Studies and OCSD level of effort approved by regulators Two purposes: Answer questions raised by core monitoring Address issues of concern to OCSD and/or regulators e.g., CECs in wastewater/receiving environment, climate change, harmful algal blooms, nutrients, ocean acidification GWRS Expansion (changes in effluent quality, lower flow rate) Climate Change (sea level rise, changing ocean temperature, species composition changes) Mechanisms OCSD Team Collaborations Contractors

Future of the Ocean Program Core Monitoring Paradigm Shift Less static and more adaptive monitoring Some current monitoring requirements are either not relevant any longer or are overkill Goal is to free up agency resources to address more “meaningful” information needs e.g., GWRS expansion, climate change, ocean acidification, CECs Changes to monitoring program sought in NPDES Permit renewal

Questions?