Border Forces and Friction Control Epithelial Closure Dynamics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages (May 2017)
Advertisements

Precision and Variability in Bacterial Temperature Sensing
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Velocity Fields in a Collectively Migrating Epithelium
Unsteady Motion, Finite Reynolds Numbers, and Wall Effect on Vorticella convallaria Contribute Contraction Force Greater than the Stokes Drag  Sangjin.
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Differential Dynamics of Platelet Contact and Spreading
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Physical Properties of Escherichia coli Spheroplast Membranes
The Transfer Functions of Cardiac Tissue during Stochastic Pacing
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Susanne Karsch, Deqing Kong, Jörg Großhans, Andreas Janshoff 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Tianhui Maria Ma, J. Scott VanEpps, Michael J. Solomon 
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Hirokazu Tanimoto, Masaki Sano  Biophysical Journal 
Modes of Diffusion of Cholera Toxin Bound to GM1 on Live Cell Membrane by Image Mean Square Displacement Analysis  Pierre D.J. Moens, Michelle A. Digman,
Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Quantitative Analysis and Modeling Probe Polarity Establishment in C
Cellular Contraction Can Drive Rapid Epithelial Flows
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Aida Ebrahimi, Laszlo N. Csonka, Muhammad A. Alam  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Formed by Hybrid Films of Agarose and Lipids Display Altered Mechanical Properties  Rafael B. Lira, Rumiana Dimova, Karin A.
Emergent Global Contractile Force in Cardiac Tissues
Excitable Actin Dynamics in Lamellipodial Protrusion and Retraction
Jan Ribbe, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Confinement-Dependent Friction in Peptide Bundles
Flow-Enhanced Stability of Rolling Adhesion through E-Selectin
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Statistics of Active Transport in Xenopus Melanophores Cells
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Motility at High Pressure
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Dynamics of Mouth Opening in Hydra
Felix Kohler, Alexander Rohrbach  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Long-Range Nonanomalous Diffusion of Quantum Dot-Labeled Aquaporin-1 Water Channels in the Cell Plasma Membrane  Jonathan M. Crane, A.S. Verkman  Biophysical.
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
The Role of Network Architecture in Collagen Mechanics
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Quantitative Analysis and Modeling Probe Polarity Establishment in C
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Jocelyn Étienne, Alain Duperray  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Border Forces and Friction Control Epithelial Closure Dynamics Olivier Cochet-Escartin, Jonas Ranft, Pascal Silberzan, Philippe Marcq  Biophysical Journal  Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 65-73 (January 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.015 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Epithelization of small circular wounds (wild-type MDCK cells). (A) Field of view (Rw = 50 μm). Between two and four such fields are recorded in a typical experiment. Several adjacent MDCK wounds are visible at t = 0 (left) and t = 3 h (right) after removal of the PDMS pillars. Note the intrinsic diversity of closure dynamics. The typical cell size is of the order of 15 μm. (B) Timelapse zoomed on a single wound ( Rw = 37.5 μm). (C) Wound fixed at t = 30 min (Rw = 25 μm) and stained for phosphomyosin II light chain (red), F-actin (green), and nuclei (blue) by immunofluoresence. Note the presence of a pluricellular actomyosin cable and of lamellipodia (stars). For this size, we observed between zero and two lamellipodia whose area ranged between 20 and 175 μm2 (N = 10). Scale bars, 20 μm. (D) Section of a live wound (MDCK-LifeAct-GFP, Rw = 25 μm, t = 30 min) imaged by confocal microscopy. The position of the cable on both sides is indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 25 μm. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 65-73DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.015) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effect of Rac1-inhibitor on closure dynamics. (A) Closure time (Rw = 50 μm) in MDCK wild-type (red) and Rac− (blue) assay. Rectangular boxes show the first quartile, the median, and the last quartile. (B) Rac− assay, fraction of MDCK wounds proceeding to full closure within 18 h for initial sizes of Rw = 25 μm (N = 8), Rw = 50 μm (N = 39), and Rw = 100 μm (N = 16). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 65-73DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.015) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Measurements at the scale of the epithelium. (A) Snapshot of the epithelial velocity field (wild-type MDCK wound, Rw = 50 μm, t = 1 h). (B) Plot of the ensemble-averaged ratio 〈rVr/RV〉N versus radius, r (solid green line, N = 21), where Vr is the angle-averaged radial velocity component, and R(t) and V(t) = R.(t), respectively denote the effective margin radius and velocity. The shaded area gives the mean ± SD. The radial velocity profile of an incompressible epithelial flow reads rVr(r,t)/(R(t)V(t)) = 1 (Eq. S5), plotted as a dashed red line for comparison. (C and D) Phase-contrast (C) and epifluorescence (D) views of MDCK cells expressing histone-mCherry. Scale bar, 100 μm, Rw = 75 μm. (E) Radial cell density profile at t = 0 h and t = 6 h. The shaded areas give the mean ± SD. (F) Plot of the mean cell density in the entire field of view as a function of time for two wounds (Rw = 75 μm). The relative increase in density is of the order of 10% during closure. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 65-73DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.015) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Physical model of epithelial closure. (A) Sketch of a closing circular wound, of initial radius R0 = R(t = 0). Two border forces may drive closure: σp is the protrusive stress produced by lamellipodia and γ the line tension due to the contractile circumferential cable (see the stress boundary condition (Eq. S4)). (B–F) Model predictions. Plots of the closure time, tc, as a function of the initial effective radius, R0. (B) Effect of the variation of D while Rmax = 110 μm is fixed, inviscid rheology without cable (Eqs. 1 and S27). (C) Effect of the variation of Rγ = γ/σp while D = 200 μm2 h−1 and Rmax = 110 μm are fixed, inviscid rheology with a cable (Eq. S28). (D) Effect of the variation of Rη=η/ξ while D = 200 μm2 h−1, Rmax = 110 μm, and Rγ = 10 μm are fixed, viscous rheology (Eq. S29). (E) Effect of the variation of μ/σp while D = 200 μm2 h−1, Rmax = 110 μm, and Rγ = 100 μm are fixed, elastic rheology (Eq. S30). When μ/σp = 1, closure is complete and characterized by a finite closure time only below a value of R0 above which elastic forces are strong enough to stop epithelization. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 65-73DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.015) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Physical parameters of epithelization. (A and B) Closure time tc (solid circles) as a function of the initial effective radius, R0, fitted by Eq. 1 (solid curves) with the constraints D,Rmax ≥ 0. Each circle corresponds to one wound. (A) MDCK wounds. Wild-type (D = 353 ± 38 μm2 h−1, Rmax = 117 ± 11 μm, N=130), Rho− assay (D = 278 ± 40 μm2 h−1, Rmax = 114 ± 9 μm, N = 30), and Rac− assay (σp/ξ = 198 ± 22 μm2 h−1, Rmax = 105 ± 11 μm, N = 34). (B) HEK-HT assay (σp/ξ = 572 ± 57 μm2 h−1,Rmax = 132 ± 12 μm, N = 653) and HEK-RasV12 assay (σp/ξ = 1531 ± 363 μm2 h−1, Rmax = 223 ± 77 μm, N = 65). (C–F) Epithelization coefficient, D, and cutoff radius, Rmax, for MDCK (C and D) and HEK wounds (E and F). Error bars correspond to a 95% confidence level. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 65-73DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.015) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Trajectories. Model predictions: Plots of individual trajectories of the wound radius R(t), R0 = 50 μm. (A) Contribution of border forces for an inviscid fluid. Plots of R(t) as given by Eq. S11, D = 200 μm2 h−1, Rmax = 110 μm (without cable, black curve); and Eq. S10, with the same values of D and Rmax, Rγ = 10 μm (with cable, red curve). (B) Rheology. Plots of R(t) as given by Eq. S10 (inviscid liquid, as in A (red curve)); Eqs. S16 and S17, with Rη = 10 μm (blue curve, viscous liquid); Eqs. S23 and S24, with 2μ/σp=0.1 (solid green curve, elastic solid, closing); Eq. S26, with Re = 15 μm (elastic solid, nonclosing, dashed green curve,); The values of D, Rmax, and Rγ are the same as in A. Experimental data and fits (C) Normalized effective radius, R(t)/R0, is plotted as a function of time t for MDCK wild-type wounds. For clarity, we show only two trajectories (circles) and their fits by Eq. S11 (solid curves) per pillar size, Rw, corresponding to the shortest and longest closure time observed at a given Rw. (D) Normalized effective radius, R(t)/R0, is plotted as a function of time t for nonclosing wounds of the MDCK Rac− assay. For illustrative purposes, we show only two trajectories t(R) per pillar size Rw (solid curves) and their fit by Eq. S26 (dashed curves), with the constraints Ds ≥ 0, Rmax ∈ [96,114] μm (confidence interval obtained from closure-time data) and Re = min R(t). Note that (Eq. S26) is defined only for R > Re. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 65-73DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.015) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions