DIALOG Pan London Training package.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Talking about work Trainer: Insert name here. Aim of today To provide [Employment Specialists] with a short training session to be able to support recovery.
Advertisements

IndeServe’s Partnership Programme Creating and maintaining working relationships that deliver continuous and worthwhile outcomes for all parties.
PEER SPECIALIST Consumer Workgroup Proposal. Introduction SAMHSA Grant Consumer Workgroup Agenda for today’s meeting Discuss peer specialist roles at.
Healthcare for London is part of Commissioning Support for London – an organisation providing clinical and business support to London’s NHS. Healthcare.
Promote Person-Centred Approaches in Health and Social Care
Care Planning in RiO This presentation will take you through the process of adding a care plan to RiO, editing it and using the CPA functions.
Open Dialogue. Listening to what patients and their families want Communication just didn’t happen at the time we needed it Professionals don’t always.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Hope – Recovery – Opportunity. New Dawn – Purpose Hope Recovery Opportunity.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Sue Huckson Program Manager National Institute of Clinical Studies Improving care for Mental Health patients in Emergency Departments.
Intensive Residential Treatment (Level III.7, III.5) Long Term Residential Treatment (Level III.3, III.1) Intensive Outpatient Treatment (Level II.1)
100 ways to support recovery A guide for mental health professionals Rethink recovery.
How to promote empowerment experiences of mental health service users and carers in Europe? Indicators and good practices Lille, January 2014 John.
NES/SSSC Promoting Excellence Programme and Human Rights.
July 2014 – March 2019 Emotional Wellbeing and Mental Health: Everybody’s Business OUTCOME OF CONSULTATION.
Implementing Clinical Governance COMPASS Consultant Outcome Indicators Programme.
TES (training, education, support) Presented by: John Chiocchi, Paula Slevin, Mark Sampson,
CHIME Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, Empowerment
A model for implementing health outcomes
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
Hope, Agency & Opportunity
DIALOG and DIALOG+ - News
Developing teaching, learning and assessment in education and training
ACT Comprehensive Assessment
A Blueprint for Service Delivery
Items in red require your input
Focused Conversation for TTA
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Screening for Psychological Distress
Readiness Consultations
Person Centred Care in NHS Wales
Evaluation of HR – Why evaluate?
Orientation to Palliative Care Assessments
Kate Yorke, Project Manager – MECC
Items in red require your input
Welcome SPIRAL Main title slide page Somerset Partnership
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
WELCOME Introduce myself – intro’s in a moment
Red Bag Hospital Transfer Pathway:
Technology Enabled Care and Support in Devon
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Big Mental Health Survey: Senedd Briefing
Student placements in private practice; the case for and against!
Stephen Bennett Sarah Holmes Pearl Barker Mark Wilkinson
Getting Knowledge into Action for Person-Centred Care
Background The following slides display the most recent NHS Staff Survey data (2016), for the questions that were deemed most relevant to the NHS QUEST.
Alison Brabban & Sally Smith
Policy and Procedure Impacts
Self Management Rhona Millar Marianne Brennan
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Paul O’Halloran Gaza, April 2010
Our operational plan 2018/19.
Welcome SPIRAL Main title slide page Somerset Partnership
Paul O’Halloran Gaza, April 2010
Moving Forward Together Programme Overview
ComQuol: Users Focused Outcomes
Claire Holmes Programme Lead Dr Katina Anagnostakis Clinical Lead
Lecturette 2: Planning Change
Human Resources Division
Supporting a family member or friend living with mental illness
Why should we tackle loneliness?
Brent Mental Health User Group
Peer Support in Forensic Services & Community Navigators
Student placements in private practice; the case for and against!
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Office of the Chief Mental Health Nurse, DHHS
Approach to adult social care
Presentation transcript:

DIALOG Pan London Training package

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 What is DIALOG? How to rate DIALOG DIALOG and DIALOG+ When should DIALOG be completed? Why DIALOG was agreed as the London PROM DIALOG as an outcome measure Recovery principles Useful examples of how data is starting to be used How to use DIALOG on EPR How you can access DIALOG online Using DIALOG+ in the care plan Patient feedback on DIALOG and DIALOG+

Section 1

What is DIALOG? DIALOG is a set of 11 simple questions that cover different area of a persons life. Relationships with friends and family Meeting with your mental health professional Practical help you receive Accommodation Medication Mental health Physical health Leisure activities Job situation Personal safety Friendships

To find out more information see the Operational Manual DIALOG + DIALOG+ uses the scores identified by the person to take a structured approach to exploring their identified needs and wishes. It’s a person-centred approach that can support care planning, find solutions and solve problems between the person and healthcare professional. DIALOG+ uses a 4 step approach Agreeing on actions agreeing on defined actions to improve the patient’s condition and/or social situation. This step involves an agreement on specific and defined actions from the patient or the clinician or both. The agreed actions are briefly documented. Exploring options Looking forward Asking the patient about what practical actions might help to bring about the desired change. This covers actions taken by the patient, the clinician or someone else. directing the patient from a description of the problem to considering desired alternative scenarios. The patient is asked to imagine what changes he/she would like to see to replace the current undesirable situation. This can focus on long-term preferred outcomes and more short term small changes. Understanding Exploring both positive and negative aspects of the situation in the given domain. The person is first asked to explain the reasons for dissatisfaction and wishes for more help (or distress/concern in case of MH). Then the person is encouraged to consider existing strengths or coping strategies. To find out more information see the Operational Manual

How to rate DIALOG Section 1 How satisfied are you with…. Your mental health? Your physical health? Your job situation? Your accommodation? Your leisure activities? Your relationships with your partner/family? Your friendships? Your personal safety? Your medication? he practical help you receive? Your meeting with your mental health professionals? How satisfied are you with your mental Health? How satisfied are you with your physical health? How satisfied are you with your job situation? The first eight questions cover different areas of your life… How satisfied are you with your accommodation? How satisfied are you with your leisure activities? How satisfied are you with your relationship with your partner/family? How satisfied are you with your friendship? How satisfied are you with your personal safety? How satisfied are you with your medication? …and the last three are about your treatment How satisfied are you with your practical help you receive? How satisfied are you with your meetings with mental health professionals? DIALOG can help facilitate a person-centred approach by supporting meaningful conversations between service users and the healthcare professional about what aspects of their mental health are priorities for them.

How to rate DIALOG … with one being totally dissatisfied and seven being totally satisfied. The survey is designed to measure how a person rates their quality of life and experience of the care that they receive. Totally dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Fairly satisfied Totally satisfied 1 2 3 6 4 5 7 Very dissatisfied Very satisfied In the middle

When should DIALOG be completed? London has agreed minimum time points in which DIALOG should be completed to ensure a standardised process Every 4 weeks for acute treatment – inpatients and crisis teams; no longer than 6 months – ongoing treatment in community services and outpatient clinics). At the start of a new treatment episode i.e admission to an inpatient treatment, home treatment service, or other community service; referral to new provider organisation.) For acute treatment DIALOG should be carried out within 48 hours, for community setting– obtained within first or second meeting Review Episode start For acute treatment DIALOG should be carried out within 48 hours, for community setting– obtained within first or second meeting More frequent DIALOGs maybe carried out if embedded within CPA process or when carrying out DIALOG is clinically indicated At the end of treatment episode (discharge from a team, service or provider organisation). Episode end

1 2 3 4 5 6 DIALOG was agreed to be used because…….. Why has DIALOG been chosen as a London Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM)? London mental health partners came together to agree that DIALOG should be the London Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM). DIALOG was agreed to be used because…….. 1 2 3 The information can be used for planning for individual patients and whole services. The scale has been shown to have good psychometric properties. It is simple to use. 4 5 6 It can be used to evaluate treatment and has the advantage that each item is meaningful. The use of DIALOG + has been shown to improve quality of life through a solution focused approach. Service users report satisfaction in using it.

DIALOG as an outcome measure PROMS provide services with a measure of the subjective impact of our services on a persons health and wellbeing. Healthcare professionals call this a patient reported outcome measure (PROM). It is an assessment of health status and health-related quality of life that comes directly from the patient. In London DIALOG has been agreed to be used for Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) and Care Programme Approach (CPA) services. DIALOG can be used in wider mental health service in the future.

CHIME framework Hope & Optimism Connectedness Having hope and optimism that recovery is possible and relationships that support this. Characterised by: motivation to change; positive thinking and valuing success; having dreams and aspirations Having good relationships and being connected to other people in positive ways. Characterised by: peer support and support groups; support from others; community. Identity Meaning Regaining a positive sense of self and identity and overcoming stigma Living a meaningful and purposeful life, as defined by the person (not others). Characterised by: meaning in mental ‘illness experience’; spirituality; meaningful life and social goals.. Empowerment Having control over life, focusing on strengths, and taking personal responsibility. Source: Leamy et al 2011

Section 2

Patient feedback on DIALOG and DIALOG+ Service users have described the benefits of using DIALOG and DIALOG+ Watch this short video to hear what service users who have used DIALOG think [Placeholder] Trusts to invite service users to provide their perspective on how DIALOG/+ has supported their recovery.

Section 3

Useful examples of how data is starting to be used The data can be understood at an individual level. Here you can see that at the same time point satisfaction with physical health and accommodation has decreased which has also had an impact on the individuals mental health. Useful examples of how data is starting to be used There are different ways that the data can be understood and used to support a persons mental health and improve the quality of the service. The data can be used to better understand team needs. Here this shows why patients come in to the service beyond their mental health such as physical health, job situation and leisure activities. This can be used to direct focus around patients needs or for example staff skills and expertise. Source: this data is anonymised data taken from ELFT

When DIALOG data is collected it can be used to shape and inform and make improvements to the service. Analysing DIALOG data Used for an assessment of the personal problems and areas of strength Mean scores allows for review of data across every item For subjective quality of life scores below 4 require particular attention When evaluating treatment, any improvement in subjective quality of life is a meaningful increase Patients in long term care – unrealistic to expect consistent and ongoing improvements – personal context important Service Scores of single items of people in a service can be shown as means =average satisfaction scores or as a % of patients who have explicit dissatisfaction/satisfaction When considering changes over time global mean scores and single item analysis can be used depending on analysis Average subjective quality of life score of ALL patients in a service should not improve yet scores for the same patients should A change of overall means scores of >0.125 reflects an average improvement at least one scale point in at least one domain and may be a guide for overall meaningful improvement Treatment scores should consistently stay above 4 and % of patients with dissatisfaction kept to a minimum Follows same principles as the interpretation for all patients in a service. Aggregating up means patient groups are very large, differences between mean scores tend to become smaller. % of explicit dissatisfaction or satisfaction rather than mean scores may be more informative Organisation Individual High initial levels of satisfaction scores provide less scope for improvement (so called ceiling effect) whilst very low scores make improvements more likely (so called regression to the mean). For treatment satisfaction, absolute scores at a given time point more relevant than changes over time, ratings should consistently stay above 4 demonstrating a fair degree of satisfaction Reflection of scores: 1-3 = explicit dissatisfaction, 4 neutral middle, 5-7 explicit satisfaction DIALOG data can be analysed at an individual items level or represented as mean scores

How to use DIALOG on EPR [Placeholder] Trusts to add in EPR information e.g screenshots and instructions of how to navigate your EPR system in relation to DIALOG

How to access DIALOG online [Placeholder] Trusts to add in EPR information e.g screenshots and instructions of how to navigate your EPR system in relation to DIALOG

Using DIALOG+ in the care plan [Placeholder] Trust might want to add examples of their care plans. DIALOG can improve the care plan process Where Trusts move towards DIALOG+ there may be an opportunity to streamline this process.