Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
ABET PRIMER What is ABET, What Does ABET Do, How Do We Do Well With ABET.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Mentor Overview.
Internet password: aea8success Conceptbasedinstruction.weebly.com Password: Consortium1.
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
1 University of the State of New York State Education Department Differentiated Accountability School Quality Review (SQR)
Pre-Review Orientation Conference Call Bureau of Health Workforce HRSA Health Careers Opportunity Program June 29 – July 1, am Review Administrator.
Pre-Review Orientation Conference Call Maternal and Child Health Bureau Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program HRSA National Technical Resource.
A Possible SE 685 Project Automated Reviewers’ Report For ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)
Concept Analysis Document Executive Summary Template, (To view template instructions – Save this template to project files, reopen and then select View,
Two Questions Coaching Program [Your Name] [Your Address] [Date] [please name the file: your-name-2questions.pptx] —e.g. bill-marshall-2questions.pptx.
Blackboard Course Design and Quality Matters
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Tips For Writing Your Learning Experience The most common problems and some suggestions.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
Developing a Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plan for the Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) Adapted from the Virginia Department of Education Division.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
The Big Picture Getting Started The Process Follow-Up – 5 Year Action Plan Program Review.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Overview of a Recommended Course Development Process.
RPED 250 Fall Semester 2014 Dr. Phillip Bogle, Ph.D. Program Coordinator.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
2013 Common Block Development Evaluation and Feedback February 26, 2014.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
MODULE 7 The Visit Report 1 CAPTE: On-site Reviewer Training This module discusses the report that the team submits at the conclusion of the on-site visit.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Submission Requirements & Instructions
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Welcome. BSI Parent Night October 13, 2016 Mrs
Welcome. BSI Parent Night September 19, 2017 Mrs
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Thinking with Technology Course Module 9
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting.
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Electronic Presentation Hall (EPH)
COM 373 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
NPQonline - Final Assessment
Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Validation Team Exit Report
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Tips For Writing Your Learning Experience
Validation Team Exit Report
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Validation Team Exit Report
College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Teams November 2014
The Process for Final Approval: Remediation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Instructions: PLEASE DELETE BEFORE PRESENTATION
Introducing the AIM Website
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Giving Feedback and Evaluating Academic Writing
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Cyclical Program Review
Directed Numbers – Adding – Pyramids
Surds – Adding & Subtracting – Pyramids
Validation Team Exit Report
Validation Team Exit Report
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Care Partners Annual Meeting September 30, 2019 Davis, CA
Presentation transcript:

Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting presentation. The template aligns with the APR criteria outlined in the Review Team Worksheet (APR Manual, Appendix E). Additional slides may be added as needed for feedback and/or comments. If a criterion is met no comments/feedback are necessary. Please skip the slide or include “N/A” for not applicable. Comments/Feedback should be detailed with reference to evidence provided in the APR self-study report and/or during the site visit. They should highlight the program’s strengths and/or shortcomings. Reviewers should avoid providing remedies, recommendations, and/or solutions they believe should be applied in order for the program to correct any shortcomings. The program and its own constituents, after sufficient opportunity for discussion and thought, must determine their own path forward. Please send a copy of the presentation to the APR Specialist (apr@unm.edu) prior to the scheduled exit meeting. Please delete this slide before sending the final version of the presentation to the APR Specialist.

Academic Program Review (APR) Exit Meeting Presentation Exit Meeting Date: Site Team Reviewers:

Overall Program Strengths:

Criterion 1: Student Learning Goals/Outcomes Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 2: Teaching & Learning: Curriculum Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 3: Teaching & Learning: Continuous Improvement Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 4: Students Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 5: Faculty Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 6: Resources & Planning Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Criterion 7: Facilities Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 7: Facilities Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 8: Peer Comparisons Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings: