Test & Evaluation (CBTE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Hypersonic Weapon Flight Test Overview to the Space & Missile Defense Conference 14 August 2012 Ms. Debra G. Wymer Director, Technical Center.
Advertisements

MILITARY AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
Overview An emerging challenge A belated response Debating the alternatives – Air-Sea Battle – A distant blockade – Maritime denial Conclusions.
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
International Surface Warfare Officer School
Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel
F/A-18E/F SUPER HORNET BLOCK II MULTI-YEAR PROCUREMENT
Tomahawk Cruise Missile
Combat Air Operations.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
4 March 2015 Steven Szilagyi PEO IWS D4
Aircraft Recognition Lecture Leading Cadet Training Airmanship 2 5.
Presented by - Patrick Hay MODERN FIGHTERS PRESENTED BY: PATRICK HAY.
Navy International Program Office
Naval Weapons Systems Introduction to Naval Weapons.
JOINT FIRES AND EFFECTS TRAINER SYSTEM (JFETS). We currently rely on service component schools to inform on service capabilities, and train component.
Collaboration to Meet Future T&E Needs ITEA 14 September Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director, Air Warfare Operational Test and Evaluation.
NOVEMBER SHIPBUILDING AND SHIP PROCUREMENT FOR THE SPANISH NAVY BRIEFING FOR: SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BRIEFING FOR: SCHOOL OF.
San Diego Wounded Warrior Roundtable
Cooperative Experience Employment Education (Co-Op) Program Earn While You Learn Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division Patuxent River, Maryland February.
UNCLASSIFIED Bill McCarthy Bill McCarthy Deputy Director 15 September September 2010 COTF Perspectives.
Strike Warfare MIDN 3/C Draper and MIDN 4/C Hollis.
STEP 3 EVALUATE THE ADVERSARY. Sequence of Presentation Disposition of Adversary Doctrinal Templates Enemy Tactics HVTs COG Analysis.
Force Packaging. Overview Principles of War Process of Force Packaging Developing Packages.
Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved From Throw Away.
DRONES HISTORY CLASSIFICATION AND USES
Training for a Network Enabled Capability
Tomahawk® Cruise Missiles
MIDN 4/C Coleman and MIDN 4/C Thompson-James
CAPT RUSTY STILES Deputy Fleet Surgeon U.S. Fleet Forces Command
Being There Matters Your Navy: Forward, Engaged, Ready 1.
JLENS The Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System.
Detachment 645, The Ohio State University Integrity - Service - Excellence Military Capabilities.
Doing Business with the Naval Air Systems Command Presented to: SMART PROC 2015 Presented by: Ken Carkhuff Deputy Associate Director NAVAIR Office of Small.
Mine Warfare - A Total Force Approach for the Future
JNTC Joint Management Office
UNCLASSIFIED 2/6/2016 7:56:41 PM UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 7 Pages Space Policy Issues - Space Warfare Definitions - 15 June, 2010.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML MARK R. MILLIKEN Navy International Program Office.
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 10/7/09 Autonomous Systems Sensors – The Front End of ISR Mr. Patrick M. Sullivan SPAWAR ISR/IO.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML Mark R. Milliken Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, International Programs (DASN IP)
Protecting Against Cyber Challenges Pacific Operational Science & Technology Conference 15 March 2011 Rob Wolborsky Chief Technology Officer Space and.
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter America’s Next Generation Strike Aircraft.
FLTLT Matthew Murphy Growler Transition Office – Air Force Headquarters UNCLASSIFIED.
2 Agenda Command Mission ……………………………… Command Relationships ……………………..…….4 Fleet Assets……………………..……………………. 6 Sailors and Civilians………..……………………….
Strengthen Naval Power At and From Sea Sea-Air-Space 17 May 2016.
Life Cycle Logistics.
Estimating the Cost of the Aegis Flight III Test Platform
Naval Weapons Systems NSC 201
OUTPACING THE THREAT East Coast Chapter of SAFE RDML Shane Gahagan
Analysis Capabilities Developed in Support of WTIC Research
Missile Model Development
Air Power Royal Air Force
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment
Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #
Combat Air Operations.
Military Aircraft Systems
Military Aircraft Systems
International Surface Warfare Officer School
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
13 November 2018.
Introduction Dr. Alfred Lynam
Force Packaging.
MiG-29 aircraft upgrade.
20 Years of DOT&E What Have We Learned & How Can We Make It Better
Bush/Rumsfeld Defense Priorities/Objectives A Mandate For Change
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Customer Advocate Airborne Electronic Warfare Systems 29 MAR 2011 Tim.
OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION PERSPECTIVE
DDR&E Advanced Capabilities Overview
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
Institutionalizing a Culture of Statistical Thinking in DoD Test & Evaluation: The Role of the Statistician in Leading Change Dr. Laura Freeman.
Presentation transcript:

Test & Evaluation (CBTE) Capabilities Based Test & Evaluation (CBTE) Kenneth senechal NAWCAD Release 2019-277. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

USN vs PLA(N) Capability Fielding Trends DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile J-15 Carrier Based Strike Fighter Cooperative Engagement Capability Hypersonics YJ-12/18 Anti-Ship Cruise Missile LUYANG III Anti-Satellite Capability Type 055 Cruiser Fielding Initial Estimate Observed/Expected How? Acquiring Designs – No DOD 5000 – No Bureaucratic Process Requirements We’re Slower! Naval Integrated Fire Control -Counter Air Joint Strike Fighter (F-35) Standard Missile - 6 High Altitude Anti-Submarine Warfare Weapon Next Generation Jammer Air and Missile Defense Radar CG(X) Maritime Strike Tomahawk Initial Operational Capability POM-08 POM-17 Open Source Information USN Warfighting Advantage Against PLA(N) has Steadily Eroded

The Reality of Urgency & Complexity China is testing a new long-range, air-to-air missile that could thwart U.S. plans for air warfare The hypersonic missile reaches can take down aircraft from 200 miles. The J-16 carries two VLRAAM for a test firing. In November 2016, a Chinese J-16 strike fighter test-fired a gigantic hypersonic missile, successfully destroying the target drone at a very long range. Looking at takeoff photos, we estimate the missile is about 28 percent of the length of the J-16, which measures 22 meters (about 72 feet). The puts the missile at about 19 feet, and roughly 13 inches in diameter. The missile appears to have four tailfins. Reports are that the size would put into the category of a very long range air to air missile (VLRAAM) with ranges exceeding 300 km (roughly 186 miles), likely max out between 250 and 310 miles. (As a point of comparison, the smaller 13.8-foot, 15-inch-diameter Russian R-37 missile has a 249-mile range). This is a big deal: this missile would easily outrange any American (or other NATO) air-to-air missile. Additionally, the VLRAAM's powerful rocket engine will push it to Mach 6 speeds, which will increase the no escape zone (NEZ), that is the area where a target cannot outrun the missile, against even supersonic targets like stealth fighters. (Source: Popular Science) VLRAAM AMRAAM Engine Solid-fuel rocket motor Wingspan 20.7 in (530 mm) AIM-120A/B Operational Range • AIM-120A/B: 55–75 km (30–40 nmi)[3][4] • AIM-120C-5: >105 km (>57 nmi)[5] • AIM-120D (C-8): >180 km (>97 nmi)[6] [full citation needed] Speed Mach 4 (4,900 km/h; 3,045 mph) Guidance System Inertial guidance, terminal active radar homing (Source: Wikipedia) AEGIS DESTROYER Deficiency Report Simple problem…. …impacted the whole network!

Warfighting Has Changed Network Centric Increasing Complexity Digital Wpns Digital Wpns Multi-Role A/C Multi-Role A/C Multi-Role A/C Digital FBW A/C Digital FBW A/C Digital FBW A/C Digital FBW A/C TACTICS TACTICS TACTICS TACTICS TACTICS Task 1 P1 P2 P3 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 How We Fight – Today F/A-18 Example: Multiple Platforms performing Mission Tasks in an Integrated Fashion E-2 Weapon 60’s 70’s 80’s 90’s 00’s Increased weapon system complexity enables changes in warfighting requiring evolution in testing across platform boundaries

NOTIONAL What is CBTE? Top Down Bottom Up Integration with COTF's Warfare Analysis Red Forces and Blue Forces CONEMPs System of Systems Rqmts Top Down SURVEIL DETECT TRACK ID ENGAGE ASSESS LAUNCH WEAPON AA MISSILE F-35 F/A-18 E-2D Integration with COTF's Mission Based Test Design (MBTD) NOTIONAL Platform Rqmts (CDD, CPD, TEMP, specs) Add Mission Context (CONOPs, ROC / POE) Bottom Up Weapons Schools CBTE evaluates the effects chain in a mission context

COTF’s Commitment Truly Integrated Test is the goal—a single process defining the data needs supporting independent assessments using side by side execution Better Test Designs, More Efficient Execution, More Meaningful Results—Faster!

Test Program Introduction Document Mission Based Test Design CBTE “Strategy” Test Program Introduction Document Mission Based Test Design Engineering / Test Collaboration Test Planning Strategy Meeting 5.1 / 5.2 / 5.3 / 5.4 / COTF/DOT&E Early identification of LVC, range, and target needs NAWCAD Release 2019-277. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Mission Based Test Design Process 1 – Define SUT/SoS 2 – Identify Mission Areas 3 – Decompose Subtasks 4 – Establish Conditions/ Link to Subtasks 5 – Identify Specified Measures 6 – Collect Derived Measures 7 – Create Other Measures 8 – Derive Data Requs/Link to Measures and Conditions 9 – Statistical Design/DOE 10 – Build Vignettes 11 – Devise Test Method for Each Vignette 12 – Determine Resource Requirements 1 Mission Analysis 3 Test Design To execute these missions... Performing these tasks... Under these conditions... Test this system’s capability 2 Requirements Analysis Assessed by these measures… By collecting this data… Data collection organized into vignettes and these resources. using these methods …

Capability View (Conceptual) 6.1 - Prepare/ Configure 6.2 - Search 6.3 - Detect 6.4 - Track 6.5 - ID 6.6 - Engage 6.7 - Assess 6.8 - Defend 6.9 - Post Mission Tasks 6.1.1 - Plan Mission 6.2.1 - Patrol/ Maneuver 6.3.1 - Detect with Organic/ Onboard Sensors 6.4.1 - Track with Organic/ Onboard Sensors 6.5.1 - ID with Organic/Onboard Systems 6.6.1 - Conduct Long Range Missile Strikes 6.7.1 - Perform Battle Damage Assessments 6.8.1 - Conduct Evasive Maneuvers 6.9.1 - Conduct Special Evolutions 6.1.2 – Prepare for Movement 6.2.2 - Manage and Employ Sensors 6.3.2 - Cue 6.4.2 - Track using Offboard/ Inorganic Data 6.5.2 - ID using Offboard/ Inorganic Data from Surveillance Assets 6.6.2 - Conduct Air to Ground Engagement(s) 6.8.2 – Detect and ID Threats 6.9.2 - Transit/ Navigate 6.1.3 - Arm 6.2.3 - Provide Electronic Protection (EP) 6.3.3 - Acquire with Organic/ Onboard Sensors From Cue 6.4.3 - Correlate Organic/Onboard and Offboard/ Inorganic Tracks 6.5.3 - Correlate Organic/ Onboard and Offboard/ Inorganic ID 6.6.3 - Execute Surface/ Submarine Cruise Missile Strike(s) 6.8.3 - Conduct Electronic Attack (EA) 6.9.3 - Land A/C 6.1.4 - Take-off/ Launch 6.6.4 - Conduct Surface Major Caliber Gun Engagement(s) 6.8.4 - Provide ID in Support of Combat Identification 6.9.4 - De-arm 6.1.5 - Transit/ Navigate 6.6.5 - Maintain Positive Control/ Terminate Engagements 6.8.5 - Deliver Suppressing/ Neutralization Fires 6.9.5 - Conduct Post-Flight Checks and Maintenance 6.1.6 - Conduct Special Evolutions (In-Flight Refueling) 6.1.7 - Initialize and Configure Systems

Closing the Loop Desired Capability Projected Capability Delivered Capability Projected Capability Actual Performance Intelligence Gaps Evolving Technologies Warfare Analysis

Benefits of CBTE 1 2 3 Speed to the Fleet Reduce development time and cost through early discovery of mission-related technical issues Reduce overall test time by collaboratively testing with COTF 1 Systems of Systems Testing Specifically addressed via test design and planning 2 Closing the Loop with Warfare Analysis Answers the big “so what” question on whether the delivered system meets fleet needs 3

CBTE Enablers Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) Mission Based Test Design (MBTD) Design of Experiments (DoE) Mission T&E During System Development System of Systems Testing Human Performance Mission Analysis Mission Training

On-Ramping Opportunities Mission Thread Subtask Mapping Effects Chains with performance measures mapped in Test Plans ON-RAMP Full or Hybrid MBTD ON-RAMP Provide feedback loop to 4.0M for System of Systems and/or Platform or Weapons System Performance Shortfalls as it related to their Warfare Models ON-RAMP Map IEF Measures and Conditions to the signed Test Plans ON-RAMP Identify Mission Subtasks in the DRs Map the DRs to Mission Threads/Effects Chains ON-RAMP Use Data and Deficiency Reports to conduct an initial System of Systems Analysis Use CBTE enablers

Capabilities-Based Acquisition Integrated Warfare Analysis Fleet operators work with engineering to develop concepts of employment (CONEMPS), effects-chains & required attributes System Model Systems are developed in a model-based integrated digital environment (SE Transformation) Capabilities-Based T&E Virtual Constructive Live Industry Models Hardware In the loop Integration Laboratory Installed Systems Test Facility Single Source of Truth 001010 1010 0001 010 00010 010010 Digital Modeling Flight Test LVC-based Training CONEMPS and effects-chains are modeled at the System of Systems (SoS) level System models form “Constructive” Basis for LVC M&S environment SoS Models Data Feedback Loop SoS Model Required for Fleet Integrated Ops Results in optimized capability development document Results in optimized capability development document

Memo From DOT&E to ASN(RDA)

Points of Contact CBTE Director Kenneth Senechal 301-757-9530 Deputy kenneth.senechal@navy.mil Deputy Alex Ordway 805-989-3653 Alex.ordway@navy.mil (WD duty station) CBTE Execution Paul Fonua 805-989-0434 paul.fonua@navy.mil Ron Crescini 301-757-5706 ronald.crescini@navy.mil Jen Daniel 301-342-0141 jennifer.daniel@navy.mil CBTE Analyst Amanda Wood 301-342-6666 amanda.m.wood@navy.mil CBTE LVC Lead Lori Jameson 301-757-2736 lori.jameson@navy.mil WD LVC Lead Viki Prusia 760-939-8069 Viki.prusia@navy.mil CBTE Processes Jim Carroll 301-757-6496 james.n.carroll@navy.mil COTF Dave Beyrodt 757-282-5546 x3168 david.beyrodt@cotf.navy.mil CAPT Wade Harris 757-282-5546 x3388 benjamin.harris@cotf.navy.mil