Was “the kid” guilty or innocent?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An American folktale by Ana Martinez. Page 1 Once upon a time a girl named Linda wish to get married to a wonderful man named Oscar that works as a teacher.
Advertisements

Preparation Read the script from your textbook again, and think of the following: Describe the 12 jurors (&) Argumentation & persuation Crucial scenes.
STEm Forensics Investigation 1
E-folio Personal 12 Angry Men To compare and contrast 1957 jury to now Guilty or not guilty. I choose Guilty because their was an eye witness saying that.
Aileen Wuornos By: Lauren Carter.
Allegra Pantoni Period 3
Macbeth Act II.
John 8:1,2 (ch 7:53 Everyone went to his home.)
‘Twelve Angry Men’ by Reginald Rose
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
October 7, 2009 Take out your homework (timeline) Take out your evidence tracker and your notebook. Consider the evidence and take a stance: Guilty or.
Courtroom Terms / Justice System
Argumentative Essay Is Queenie guilty or innocent?
Mike Mazzalongo BibleTalk.tv Gospel of John Jesus the God/Man #17 The Pharisees’ Attack.
Witness #1 The old man who lived on the second floor under the room where the murder took place. The old man who lived on the second floor under the room.
Twelve Angry Men By Reginal Rose. The Case Teenage boy is on trial for the murder of his father. The boy supposedly stabbed his father to death. Teenage.
Chapter XVIII.  Frankenstein couldn't bring himself to start on the second monster because it repulsed him.  It depressed him and the family thought.
Race, Interrogation and the Perception of Guilt Meredith Elliott Seyram Kekessie.
Characters Justice System PlotQuotes Short Answer.
By: Deyanna Barksdale. Emma runs Emma and her mother got in an argument. Emma decides to runaway Emma runs in the rain into the forest and gets lost.
Unit 5 Twelve Angry Men Chang Yan. Jury Jury: is a group of up to 12 people, called “Jurors”whose duty it is to listen to the evidence given in a court.
October 5, 2010 Take out your evidence tracker and your book. Consider the evidence and take a stance: Guilty or Not Guilty? Write a paragraph explaining.
Witness for the Prosecution By Agatha Christie. Leonard Vole  The young man, 27, accused of murder.
Planning your body paragraphs What’s your plan? 11.
Dolphin Ambassadors For Peace. A Conflict Resolution Program using the Dean and JoJo Anti-bullying DVD.
A Video Guide Introduction By Mrs. Russell
- A broker - He in tie and jacket, so he seems to be a man of wealth and position. - Have responsibility and seriously about this case: ‘ If we’re going.
Themes Characters Background Twelve Angry Men Reginald Rose: born December 10, 1920 – died April 19, 2002 He was an American film and television writer.
Sight Words.
“The First Day” Edward P. Jones.
Twelve Angry Men An Introduction. Twelve Angry Men Written by Reginald Rose Written by Reginald Rose Inspired by Rose’s own experiences on jury duty of.
BLOODY CHRISTMAS BY:De’Ja Thompson Early 2015 is when the life of Shalie Scott took a turn for the worst, well it wasn’t like her life was much better.
LS507 Understanding Criminal Responsibility Defenses Unit 8 Dr. Christie L. Richardson Kaplan University.
IB 7-8: 1/13/14 Agenda: –1) Bellwork: At your table, talk for a few minutes about what you know about the real Lizzie Borden. Have you seen anything on.
Getting the Facts v. Opinion  During the first 20 minutes of the film, take notes as a member of the jury, get only facts eliminate the opinions.
Reading: Language focus. Match the words with the correct definitions academic deliberately tease dilemma brilliant yell outgoing guilty make jokes and.
Unit 6 Reading. check the area two bullets a half-eaten apple evidence.
John 8:1  But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives..
Direct Examination Direct is when you tell your side of the story
Inference= to figure out something based on evidence
What to Do?.
THE DAILY NEWS DON’T ASK
Unit 4 Word power.
Twelve Angry Men Sit in your seats from Friday 
Do Now – 9/20/16 12 Angry Men – Anticipation Questions
UNIT 6 – DETECTIVE STORIES
Angry Men Act I Act II Act III Jurors
Unit 5 Twelve Angry Men Chang Yan.
BOOK THIEF MARKUS ZUSAK.
Alejandro Avila - Sometimes referred to as “Alex” or “Alexander”
17 The Pharisees’ Attack.
Warm Up 10/5 Solve this murder:
A Jury of her Peers By susan Glaspell.
Important Legal Vocabulary for Twelve Angry Men
NOT REAL UNREAL SITUATIONS UNIT 8 PAGE 78.
UNIT 6 – DETECTIVE STORIES
October 5, 2010 Take out your evidence tracker and your book.
Unit 2: The Court System Kinds of Laws
Warm-Up: Take a ¼ sheet. Copy the following word on the paper and use the rules for chunking to slash it apart. Avenger.
Define key terms by using them in an original sentence using frames
The of and to in is you that it he for was.
Casey Anthony Trail The Tell-Tale Heart. Summary of Casey Anthony Trail  Casey Anthony was charged with the murder of her 2 year old daughter in 2002.
Timeline of events on the night of the murder
12 Angry Men Long Composition.
To Kill a Mockingbird Chapter 21.
English Angry Men Unit Exam Review Copyright ©2004 MathBits.com.
Rules of Evidence and Objections
Exculpatory evidence is any evidence that clears an accused individual from blame. The movie “12 Angry Men” tells the story of a young man who is accused.

Was “the kid” guilty or innocent?
Presentation transcript:

Was “the kid” guilty or innocent? 12 Angry Men Was “the kid” guilty or innocent?

Was “the kid” guilty or innocent? Here’s the evidence that The Kid committed murder, as discussed by the jury in the film:

A few hours before the murder, The Kid was heard loudly arguing with his father, at one point shouting words to the effect of, “I’m gonna kill you!”

An elderly man in an adjacent apartment testified that he saw The Kid flee the murder site immediately after he heard the old man scream.

A woman who lives across the street from the murder site testified that she actually saw The Kid stab his father to death through the windows of a passing elevated train.

The Kid’s alibi for the time of the murder was that he was at the movies, but when questioned the very same night, he couldn’t remember any details of the pictures he saw—titles, stars, anything.

The murder weapon—a switchblade knife—was, by The Kid’s own admission, identical to one he owns, and had been seen in his possession. The Kid claimed to have lost his knife that very night.

Here’s what has to be true in order for The Kid to be innocent of the murder:

He coincidentally yelled “I’m gonna kill you He coincidentally yelled “I’m gonna kill you!” at his father a few hours before someone else killed him. How many times in your life have you screamed that at your own father? Is it a regular thing?

The elderly man down the hall, as suggested by Juror No The elderly man down the hall, as suggested by Juror No. 9 (Joseph Sweeney), didn’t actually see The Kid, but claimed he had, or perhaps convinced himself he had, out of a desire to feel important.

The woman across the street saw only a blur without her glasses, yet positively identified The Kid, again, either deliberately lying or confabulating.

The Kid really did go to the movies, but was so upset by the death of his father and his arrest that all memory of what he saw vanished from his head. 

Somebody else killed The Kid’s father, for reasons completely unknown, but left behind no trace of his presence whatsoever.

The actual murderer coincidentally used the same knife that The Kid owns.

The Kid coincidentally happened to lose his knife within hours of his father being stabbed to death with an identical knife.