Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMPL Committee 15 July 2010 The ESF Committee Opinion on the future of the ESF and the 23/24 June conference Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and.
Advertisements

Workshop 4: Using the EU Structural Funds to support Independent Living Ines Bulic European Network on Independent Living Strasbourg Freedom Drive, 9 Sept.
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
EU support to social economy & social entrepreneurship Ciprian Alionescu DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
European Social Fund Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF Franz Pointner, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Employment Research and innovation Climate change and energy Education Fighting poverty.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
The European Structural and Investment Funds & the defence sector Paul Anciaux, Helsinki, 25 March 2014.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Interregional Cooperation State of play and future perspectives SHARP final conference – 10 October 2012 Katja Ecke|
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
1 Wladyslaw Piskorz Head of Unit ‘Urban development, territorial cohesion’ European Commission Directorate-General for Regional Policy Seminar organised.
Inese Vilcane Social inclusion department Senior expert
Lessons learned from the evaluation of the ESF
European Economic and Social Committee
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
Simplification in ESI funds for
Mid-Term Review Package on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)
Spanish Presidency: Priorities in the field of Cohesion Policy
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 10 October 2016
Multiannual Financial Framework review and post-2020 studies
Cohesion Policy Information and Communication rules The state of play
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Multiannual Financial Framework review and post-2020 studies
ESF and Social Partners
Dignity and Independent living
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 5 October 2017
LITHUANIAN EU PRESIDENCY PRIORITIES
JOINT COCOF – ESF TWG on Administrative Capacity Building Public Administration Reform – Thematic Objective 11 The Policy Context Stefan De Keersmaecker,
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
TÓTH Gábor DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
The European Social Fund Plus (ESF+)
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
The European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) and the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) #EUBudget.
Purpose of the presentation
Monitoring and evaluation provisions of the proposed ESF+ (and CPR)
State of play of OP negotiations
Progress of the negotiations on the CPR and ESF regulations
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN MALTA
DG EMPL studies on the ESF future
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Future of Cohesion Policy
The European Social Fund Plus (ESF+)
Kamil Valica Unit A.3 Impact Assessment and Evaluation
State of play of negotiations MFF, Regulations
How the proposed new delivery model for the CAP will provide the ground for the further development of Smart Villages’ approaches? Beata Adamczyk European.
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
FEAD Evaluation Partnership meeting 10 March, 2016 DG EMPL G4
Thematic workshop 2 – Smart Energy Systems Brussels, 8 November 2013
Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative – state of play
Brussels Berlaymont Building April 2010.
Support Tools for ESF Evaluation
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
European Social Fund and Social Partners Partnership Joint actions in all Members States Capacity building in Convergence Regions DG Employment,
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Social Inclusion Equal Opportunities Evaluation Partnership Meeting
Debrief of the workshop on indicators
Metropolitan areas WG Karlsruhe 14 March 2019
Proposed changes in ESF monitoring – Omnibus Regulation
European Social Fund February 2012
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

Debrief of ESF+ workshop on access to administrative registers and state of play of ESF+ proposal Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion ‚Evaluation and Impact Assessment’ and ‚ESF and FEAD: Policy and Legislation’ Units ESF Evaluation Partnership meeting, 18 February 2019, Brussels

Success factors Availability of register and existence of legal basis to use them Compatibility of the purpose of data collection of administrative registers with ESF purposes Strong mandate for statistical offices Single identification in the registers via e.g. the social security number as ID number. Strategy to reduce burden (“data minimisation”) Comparable: similar target group, similar objectives.

Main challenges Legal basis is needed for any data collection and this requires time Different purposes of the national register and ESF purposes Problems with data quality: missing data and time lags

Main challenges The administrative or registered based data do not always cover all indicators Register data may need to be combined with other sources Different levels of governance which makes the collection of data difficult Complexity of GDPR application in national context Participants’ consent or informing them might be required

State of play of the negotiations

ESF+

European Parliament On 22/1 the EP plenary adopted the draft report on the ESF+ proposal Key amendments: an increase of €20 billion to the ESF+ budget thematic concentration requirements: Social inclusion from 25% to 27%; ex-FEAD measures from 2% to 3%, additional to social inclusion; youth measures (compulsory 3% for all MS; 15% for MS with high NEET rate); 2% earmarking for capacity building of social partners and civil society Specific objectives are extended to certain target groups and specific actions but none were deleted or split New Indicators – Annex I - not in education or training (NEET)* - below 30years of age * -children below 18 years of age * - young people between 18-29 years of age, -participants from the Roma community**, - participants from rural areas* -participants from geographical areas with high levels of poverty and social exclusion* - participants transitioning from institutional to family and community based care** New Annex IIa - Common indicators for ESF+ support for promoting social inclusion for the most deprived people Merging these Union Instruments into one Fund will enhance the added value of EU funding in a range of activities in the policy fields relevant to investing in people and key for the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights: notably employment, social inclusion and tackling poverty, education and training, as well as health investments. Merging the funds allows a more clear link between the direct and indirect management strands and the ESF shared management strand of the ESF+. On the one hand, the ESF+ can be used to upscale projects which are initially funded by the direct and indirect management strands. On the other hand, the direct and indirect management strands may also be used to fund projects that complement action undertaken by Member States under the shared management strands. For citizens, but also beneficiaries, this should facilitate the access to funding opportunities. For managing and implementing authorities there is a significant simplification and consolidation of rules regarding funding opportunities in these policy areas into a common single legal base.

Council - SMWP AT PRES – only Art 4 ESF+ Specific Objectives RO PRES ESF+ Part II shared management 1st compromise text – discussed on 5/2 Deadline for drafting suggestions – 14/2 2nd compromise text – to be discussed on 28/2 ESF+ Parts 1 and 4 general and final provisons 1st compromise text – to be discussed on 28/2 Deadline for drafting suggestions – 6/3 2nd compromise text – to be discussed on 19/3 ESF+ Parts III EaSI & Health Strands 1st compromise text – discussed on 14/2 Deadline for drafting suggestions - 20/2 2nd compromise text – to be discussed on 12/3 AIM: Agreement at COREPER on 27 March

CPR

European Parliament On 13/2 EP plenary adopted the report on the post 2020 CPR Key amendments: Increase the budget for cohesion policy up to €378 billion; maintain the 7 year programming period (not 5 + 2); the increase of co-financing and pre-financing rates; maintain the n+3 rule; enhanced focus on transparency for the monitoring committees; enhanced focus on inclusion of partners as ref to in Art.6 CPR; kept data transmission at 6 x per year however the values of output and result indicators for selected operations and values achieved by operations should only be submitted 2x per year; the Commission’s retroactive evaluation of each Fund should include an evaluation of the socio-economic impact and the funding needs under the policy objectives Merging these Union Instruments into one Fund will enhance the added value of EU funding in a range of activities in the policy fields relevant to investing in people and key for the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights: notably employment, social inclusion and tackling poverty, education and training, as well as health investments. Merging the funds allows a more clear link between the direct and indirect management strands and the ESF shared management strand of the ESF+. On the one hand, the ESF+ can be used to upscale projects which are initially funded by the direct and indirect management strands. On the other hand, the direct and indirect management strands may also be used to fund projects that complement action undertaken by Member States under the shared management strands. For citizens, but also beneficiaries, this should facilitate the access to funding opportunities. For managing and implementing authorities there is a significant simplification and consolidation of rules regarding funding opportunities in these policy areas into a common single legal base.

Council Aim: Blocks 3 and 4 to be agreed at COREPER on 27 March TRILOGUES – 19 Feb + 6 March Block 1 – Programming (policy objectives, horizontal principles) Block 5 – Management and Control COREPER – 15 Feb Block 2 – mid term review, enabling conditions, ERDF and ESF+ Article 4 RO PRES Block 3 - Monitoring, Evaluation and Communication Block 4 - Forms of support including simplified costs options and eligibility rules /Financial Instruments Block 6 - Financial management Aim: Blocks 3 and 4 to be agreed at COREPER on 27 March Merging these Union Instruments into one Fund will enhance the added value of EU funding in a range of activities in the policy fields relevant to investing in people and key for the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights: notably employment, social inclusion and tackling poverty, education and training, as well as health investments. Merging the funds allows a more clear link between the direct and indirect management strands and the ESF shared management strand of the ESF+. On the one hand, the ESF+ can be used to upscale projects which are initially funded by the direct and indirect management strands. On the other hand, the direct and indirect management strands may also be used to fund projects that complement action undertaken by Member States under the shared management strands. For citizens, but also beneficiaries, this should facilitate the access to funding opportunities. For managing and implementing authorities there is a significant simplification and consolidation of rules regarding funding opportunities in these policy areas into a common single legal base.

Summary

THANK YOU