Preparing for upgrade Dr Alex Mermikides 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to survive your viva Chris Park – Director, Graduate School.
Advertisements

Inclusivity in the research community and academic staff development Dr Stan Taylor, Academic Staff Development Officer.
Dr Casey Wilson, 2009 Panels and Reviews. 1 st year Panels Dr C. Wilson, 2009 Format: (check details with your Dept) Chair, supervisor(s) and at least.
Preparing for Confirmation of Candidature
TAA1 Advisor Workshop Learning and Innovation. Program Outline Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process Break TAA.
Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B PREPARING FOR CONFIRMATION OF CANDIDATURE 2014 School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences.
School of Physiotherapy Curtin University of Technology You are considering undertaking PhD or MSc by research study at the School of Physiotherapy Read.
Managing your supervisor(s) Gita Subrahmanyam, TLC Louisa Green, RDU 19 January 2010.
PhD Processes Pete Meissner for SCAH Research Committee April 17 th, 2012.
Master of Psychiatric Nursing program. A Thesis …  Is a formal, comprehensive, written description of original research on a chosen subject  Is used.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
Postgraduate Research Forum “The viva examination – a personal reflection.” 18 May 2011 Dr. Andrew Scott Crines -
1 Use and content of the RFP  Request for Proposals (RFP) is similar to bidding documents and include all information of the assignment, selection of.
Registration and Assessment There are 3 periodic assessments throughout the PhD: Assessment 1: the Research Plan (by 8 weeks) All students must complete.
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Graduate Program Graduate Skills Workshop October 20, 2010 The PhD Candidacy Examination: Preparing for Success Tara.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Academic Progress & Exclusion Information Sessions.
NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way SELECTION PANEL PROCEDURES FOR SCHOOL TEACHERS 2009 Procedural.
Senior Honors Thesis Program Office of Undergraduate Research.
Dr C. Wilson, 2009 Surviving Vivas. PhD Vivas Dr C. Wilson, 2009 Format Conducted in a similar manner to panels but some important differences. May or.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
Research Examiner/ Independent Chair Training Programme
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
Preparing for a Viva Tristram Hooley Postgraduate Training Co-ordinator Student Learning Centre.
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Independent Chairs for Research Degree Examinations.
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures There are 3 stages of internal assessment during the PhD: Research Plan 8 weeks after registration date Early.
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
Regulations and Procedures Please ensure you are familiar with the regulations surrounding examination as laid out in the Research Degree Regulatory Framework.
TAA2 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
Academic Progress & Exclusion Information Sessions.
Dr Kate Mahoney Preparing for your Viva What is it? What can you expect?
BTEC Level 3 National Extended Certificate in Business ) Induction, 29 th June, 2016.
Dissertation Guidelines for Students MSc in Econ; MSc EIFE 2016/2017
Cynthia Holcomb Education Specialist
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Well Trained International
Progression Monitoring
Progress Review.
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Accounting: Graded Unit 2 F8KF 35
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Registration and Assessment
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Senior Honors Thesis Program
BUSINESS INDUCTION (SINGLE) – Room 72
Chair of Chemistry Graduate School
Annual Assessment of Progress 2017/18 Briefing for Research Students Research Student Registry Mar/Apr 2018.
— How To Apply For A Research Degree And Scholarship
Review of Professional Standards A National Conversation
PRC Information Session
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
BSc Computing Dissertation
Linking assurance and enhancement
Preparing for your Viva
Clinical Legal Education as Qualifying Work Experience
Senior Honors Thesis Program
Progress Review.
Annual Progress Review: purpose and outcomes
Progression and Advancement
Progress Review.
Clinical Legal Education as Qualifying Work Experience
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures
Research Degree Independent Chair Workshop 4 April 2019
Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019
Levels of involvement Consultation Collaboration User control
Guildhall School of Music & Drama Doctoral Student Induction
Presentation transcript:

preparing for upgrade Dr Alex Mermikides 1

session aims to understand the purpose of the upgrade to go through relevant regulations and suggest strategies to start preparing for upgrade, including opportunities to share ideas and strategies …so that you can start preparing for upgrade with your supervisor (timing and format) So by the end of the session, you should be in a position to start planning your upgrade with your Main message is…

and how do you feel about it? What are your main concerns?

To confirm that the project being undertaken is of sufficient scope, originality and theoretical interest to constitute a genuine contribution to the subject at doctoral level We need to know this to ensure that you are on the right pathway and that you are more likely than not to be able to complete your doctorate Of course it’s not an absolute guarantee: your aim is to convince the examiners that you meet the listed criteria – we’ll go through these in a bit.

practical written viva Need to do that through: Submission of work you done so far which always includes a written element and usually a practical component Followed by a viva And if the examiners aren’t fully convinced 3) Revisions and/or additional material Decision made on range of criteria that test the project and the skills that you have to do it (hence the mix of formats)

Possible outcomes proceed to doctoral route (with/out minor amends) resubmission (with/out another viva) submit for MPhil termination of registration Resubmission is a common outcome Mphil is not a fail Termination has never happened in my lifetime.

when to upgrade Aim to submit… Full-time students: January of your 2nd year Part-time students: May of your 3rd calendar year Viva are usually within 2 months of submission. Key points: the regulations might change – It’s your choice (in consultation with your examiner) but the deadline (or rather, range of deadlines) is pre-set Make it useful for yourself

timeline 12 upgrade supervision: format; feedback; mock; examiners 8 doctoral clinic (if required) 6 notify office with proposed examiners 2 submit (to Sarah) Numbers are weeks to intended viva date – eg 6 here means 6 weeks before approximate time you want to upgrade. It’s surprisingly difficult to find a date when student, chair & 2 examiners can meet so at this point the deadline is bit of a moveable feast. THESE ARE VERY BENDY FIGURES.

upgrade supervision approximate submission date (give a range) schedule of draft submissions including feedback mock viva format of submission + viva (separate performance?) schedule for recording/documentation etc research ethics proposed examiners These are the things you should discuss – and keep discussing - with your supervisor(s) EXAMINERS: 2 internal members of staff usually including the relavant HoD or nominated equivalent. 1 can be external eg for members of staff and where specialist support is needed NOT your supervisor or anyone who has had major exposure to the project They can’t be re-used for your final viva! I suggest we start the conversation about the FORMAT now

examiners Usually 2 internal members of Guildhall staff 1 can be external for staff student or where specialist expertise is needed NOT your supervisor or anyone who has had major exposure to the project Appropriate practice/research expertise across panel They can’t be re-used for your final viva!

what to submit (guidelines) PRACTICAL WRITTEN 20 minute composition (recording & score) 5-7000 words Project plan 20 minute music performance 20 minute theatre performance Portfolio of documented practice Any other combination approved by DPL Thesis only: 11-15,000 These are GUIDELINES – submission format is case by case basis depending on the discipline and research project. Can you work with 1 or 2 people with similar methodologies to you. Talk through the balance of practical and written elements esp the format for the practical. Some comments: *written element: no less than 5 K words. No more than 15K * Performance: if you are doing something bespoke for your upgrade, then we’re looking at 20 minutes very small-scale/tech-light. Something you can do in one of available rooms with absolutely minimal tech support. Often just for the examiners and immediately before the viva If you’re already doing (or can plan) a public performance as part of your research and/or professional practice, either at the school or outside, then that can be considered for upgrade submission. No more than 4 weeks before the viva. At least 1 examiner needs to see it live with good recording output for the other Composition As well as the score, it’s advisable to also arrange a good quality recording (another reason to think ahead) – speak to your supervisor Documented practice Eg workshops rehearasals practice sessions data collection etc.

criteria HAND – OUT: look at criteria and have a discussion about what you might submit.

viva EXERCISE: What do you want to convey to the examiners during your viva? Can you find a way of sitting that supports that? Stance, body language, level of tension What question are you most dreading? Hear them. Can you prepare an an