Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages (October 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Michael A. Geeves, Sherwin S. Lehrer  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetics of the Triplex-Duplex Transition in DNA
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
High-Density 3D Single Molecular Analysis Based on Compressed Sensing
Urea-Induced Unfolding of the Immunity Protein Im9 Monitored by spFRET
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
M.C. Murphy, Ivan Rasnik, Wei Cheng, Timothy M. Lohman, Taekjip Ha 
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
SAXS versus FRET: A Matter of Heterogeneity?
Demetrio J. Santiago, Eduardo Ríos, Thomas R. Shannon 
GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Calcium Regulation of Myosin-I Tension Sensing
Sonja Schmid, Markus Götz, Thorsten Hugel  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Hiromasa Tanaka, Tau-Mu Yi  Biophysical Journal 
Single Vesicle Assaying of SNARE-Synaptotagmin-Driven Fusion Reveals Fast and Slow Modes of Both Docking and Fusion and Intrasample Heterogeneity  Sune.
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism
Physiological Pathway of Magnesium Influx in Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Veena Venkatachalam, Adam E. Cohen  Biophysical Journal 
Regulation of Contraction by the Thick Filaments in Skeletal Muscle
CW and CCW Conformations of the E
Macromolecular Crowding Modulates Actomyosin Kinetics
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
SAXS-Oriented Ensemble Refinement of Flexible Biomolecules
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Janin Glaenzer, Martin F. Peter, Gavin H. Thomas, Gregor Hagelueken 
Quantifying the Interaction between EGFR Dimers and Grb2 in Live Cells
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Richa Dave, Daniel S. Terry, James B. Munro, Scott C. Blanchard 
Mariana Levi, Kien Nguyen, Liah Dukaye, Paul Charles Whitford 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Measuring Actin Flow in 3D Cell Protrusions
Volume 114, Issue 7, Pages (April 2018)
Mediha Esra Altuntop, Cindy Tu Ly, Yuhong Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Synergy between CaMKII Substrates and β-Adrenergic Signaling in Regulation of Cardiac Myocyte Ca2+ Handling  Anthony R. Soltis, Jeffrey J. Saucerman 
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Intramolecular Proton Transfer in Channelrhodopsins
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
David Naranjo, Hua Wen, Paul Brehm  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages 1812-1821 (October 2013) Phosphorylated Phospholamban Stabilizes a Compact Conformation of the Cardiac Calcium-ATPase  Sandeep Pallikkuth, Daniel J. Blackwell, Zhihong Hu, Zhanjia Hou, Dane T. Zieman, Bengt Svensson, David D. Thomas, Seth L. Robia  Biophysical Journal  Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages 1812-1821 (October 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.045 Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Single molecule fluorescence spectroscopy of two-color SERCA. (A) CY-SERCA comprises a Cerulean FRET donor fused to the N-terminus of SERCA (gray) in the actuator, or A-domain, and an intrasequence YFP inserted in the nucleotide-binding, or N-domain (16). (B) RG-SERCA is an analogous construct composed of a TagRFP acceptor fused to the N-terminus in the A-domain and GFP (green) donor inserted in the N-domain. Changes in SERCA conformation alter the distance between the N- and A-domains, changing intramolecular FRET efficiency. (C) Fluorescence bursts from single molecules of detergent-solubilized two-color SERCA. (D) Histogram of the fluorescence lifetime measurements obtained from two-color RG-SERCA (red) or control GFP-SERCA (black). (E) Histogram of FRET efficiency calculated from the lifetime measurements shown in panel D. Gaussian fit revealed subpopulations consistent with four discrete conformations of SERCA. (F) CY-SERCA also exhibited four discrete FRET states. The reduced FRET of these states (compared to panel E) was consistent with a shorter R0 for the Cer-YFP FRET pair. (G) RG-SERCA single-molecule FRET time trajectory. (Horizontal lines indicate States I–IV (orange through green) identified by Gaussian analysis, as in panel E). The pump is observed to transiently sample the low FRET state (at arrow), before returning to higher FRET conformations, suggesting that State I does not represent denatured protein. (H) Analysis of dwell time for SERCA-sampling States I–IV revealed a biphasic distribution of dwell times characterized by fast (80 μs) and slow (690 μs) kinetics. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1812-1821DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.045) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Two-color SERCA expressed in adult ventricular cardiac myocytes. (A) Localization of RG-SERCA GFP fluorescence in adult ventricular myocytes. (B) Localization of RG-SERCA TagRFP fluorescence. (C) FRET distribution of two-color SERCA in electrically paced myocytes, during the relaxation phase (diastole). (D) Systole (during the contraction phase). (E) Diastole, plus isoproterenol. (F) Systole, plus isoproterenol. (G) Summary of FRET subpopulations during diastole before (solid bars) or after addition of isoproterenol (striped bars). (H) Systole, before (solid bars) or after addition of isoproterenol (striped bars). (I) FRET distribution after addition of Tg. (J) Summary of data in panel I. Panels C–F and I are representative data obtained from individual cells; each histogram integrates multiple consecutive contraction/relaxation cycles. Panels G, H, and J are mean ± SE of all data. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1812-1821DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.045) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Expression of two-color SERCA in AAV-293 cells. (A) Localization of RG-SERCA GFP fluorescence in AAV-293 cells. (B) Localization of RG-SERCA TagRFP fluorescence. (C) FRET distribution of two-color SERCA and nonphosphorylatable PLB in intact cells. (D) As in panel C, plus ionophore. (E) Two-color SERCA plus phosphomimetic PLB. (F) As in panel E, plus ionophore. (G) Summary of FRET subpopulations from intact cells expressing two-color SERCA and nonphosphorylatable PLB (solid bars) or phosphomimetic PLB (striped bars). (H) Plus ionophore, with nonphosphorylatable PLB (solid bars) or phosphomimetic PLB (striped bars). (I) FRET distribution after addition of Tg. (J) Summary of I. Panels C–F and I are representative data obtained from individual cells. Panels G, H, and J are mean ± SE of all data. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1812-1821DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.045) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of FRET histogram Gaussian fit width versus center position data obtained from cardiac myocytes. (A) States I–IV for RG-SERCA showed that the population Gaussian width decreased with increasing population Gaussian center value. This relationship was not detectably altered by Tg (triangles) or iso (squares) compared to control (circles). The data suggest that low FRET (open) conformations are more dynamically disordered than high FRET (solid) structures. (B) Average RG-SERCA peak parameters (black) compared with CY-SERCA (blue). The shorter R0 of the Cer/YFP pair yielded decreased FRET (decreased center values), but similar Gaussian widths for each state. Data are mean ± SE. Proposed novel conformation of SERCA: (C) open E2 (Ca-free) SERCA, characterized by a dynamically disordered cytoplasmic headpiece; and (D) proposed closed E1 (Ca-bound) SERCA, with a rigidly ordered headpiece. The conformation represents a unique E1 state that is stabilized by phosphorylated phospholamban. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1812-1821DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.045) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions