Chapter 11 Lecture 2 Section: 11.3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide Slide 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Tenth Edition and the.
Advertisements

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved The Chi-Square Test of Independence.
Chapter Goals After completing this chapter, you should be able to:
11-2 Goodness-of-Fit In this section, we consider sample data consisting of observed frequency counts arranged in a single row or column (called a one-way.
11-3 Contingency Tables In this section we consider contingency tables (or two-way frequency tables), which include frequency counts for categorical data.
Presentation 12 Chi-Square test.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 11 Applications of Chi-Square.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Inference on Categorical Data 12.
Chapter 11: Applications of Chi-Square. Chapter Goals Investigate two tests: multinomial experiment, and the contingency table. Compare experimental results.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Procedures 11.3 Chi-Square Test for Independence; Homogeneity of Proportions.
Chi-square test or c2 test
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc LEARNING GOAL Interpret and carry out hypothesis tests for independence of variables with data organized.
CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTORY CHI-SQUARE TEST This chapter introduces a new probability distribution called the chi-square distribution. This chi-square distribution.
1 Pertemuan 11 Uji kebaikan Suai dan Uji Independen Mata kuliah : A Statistik Ekonomi Tahun: 2010.
Chi-Square Procedures Chi-Square Test for Goodness of Fit, Independence of Variables, and Homogeneity of Proportions.
Other Chi-Square Tests
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Chi-Square Distributions. Recap Analyze data and test hypothesis Type of test depends on: Data available Question we need to answer What do we use to.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Eleventh Edition and the Triola.
Other Chi-Square Tests
Section 10.2 Independence. Section 10.2 Objectives Use a chi-square distribution to test whether two variables are independent Use a contingency table.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill CHAPTER 11 Other Chi-Square Tests.
CHAPTER INTRODUCTORY CHI-SQUARE TEST Objectives:- Concerning with the methods of analyzing the categorical data In chi-square test, there are 2 methods.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
Slide 1 Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc..
11.2 Tests Using Contingency Tables When data can be tabulated in table form in terms of frequencies, several types of hypotheses can be tested by using.
Section 12.2: Tests for Homogeneity and Independence in a Two-Way Table.
CHAPTER INTRODUCTORY CHI-SQUARE TEST Objectives:- Concerning with the methods of analyzing the categorical data In chi-square test, there are 3 methods.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial.
Statistics 300: Elementary Statistics Section 11-3.
Chi-Squared Test of Homogeneity Are different populations the same across some characteristic?
Slide 1 Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Multinomial Experiments and Contingency Tables 11-1 Overview 11-2 Multinomial Experiments:
Section 10.2 Objectives Use a contingency table to find expected frequencies Use a chi-square distribution to test whether two variables are independent.
Goodness-of-Fit and Contingency Tables Chapter 11.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc LEARNING GOAL Interpret and carry out hypothesis tests for independence of variables with data organized.
Copyright ©2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Statistical Significance for 2 x 2 Tables Chapter 13.
Comparing Counts Chi Square Tests Independence.
Other Chi-Square Tests
Test of independence: Contingency Table
Chi-Square hypothesis testing
Chi-Square Test Section 12.1.
Presentation 12 Chi-Square test.
Chi-square test or c2 test
5.1 INTRODUCTORY CHI-SQUARE TEST
10 Chapter Chi-Square Tests and the F-Distribution Chapter 10
CHAPTER 11 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Hypothesis Testing II: The Two-sample Case
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
Chapter 5 Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 11 Goodness-of-Fit and Contingency Tables
Inference on Categorical Data
Elementary Statistics
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Tenth Edition
AP Stats Check In Where we’ve been… Chapter 7…Chapter 8…
Chapter 11: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Chapter 10 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables
Contingency Tables: Independence and Homogeneity
Statistical Analysis Chi-Square.
Overview and Chi-Square
Inference on Categorical Data
Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables
CHAPTER 11 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Goodness of Fit.
Section 11-1 Review and Preview
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
Lecture 46 Section 14.5 Wed, Apr 13, 2005
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 11 Lecture 2 Section: 11.3

In the previous lecture we considered categorical data summarized with frequency counts listed in a single row or column. We used a method called one-way frequency tables. In this section we again consider categorical data summarized with frequency counts, but the cells correspond to two different variables. The tables we consider in this section are called contingency tables, or two-way frequency tables. Definition: A contingency table or two-way frequency table is a table in which frequencies correspond to two variables. One variable is used to categorize rows, and a second variable is used to categorize columns. One use of a contingency table is Test for Independence. A test of independence tests the null hypothesis that there is no association between the row variable and the column variable in a contingency table. For the null hypothesis, we will use the statement that “the row and column variables are independent.”

Test Statistic for a Test of Independence: Assumptions: 1. The sample data are randomly selected. 2. H0: Row and Column variables are independent; H1: Row and Column variables are dependent. 3. For every cell in the contingency table, the expected frequency E is at least 5. There is no requirement that every observed frequency must be at least 5. 4.There is no requirement that the population must have a normal distribution or any other specific distribution. Test Statistic for a Test of Independence: Critical Values 1. The critical values are found in Table A-4 by using df = (r – 1)(c – 1) where r is the number of rows and c is the number of columns. 2. In a test of independence with a contingency table, the critical region is located in the right tail only. Expected Frequency =

1. We are testing to see if the habits of smoking and gender are independent. We have collected a random sample of 250 people as they appear in the following table. Test the claim at 0.05 level of significance.

2. Winning team data were collected for the teams in different sports, with the results given in the accompanying table. Use a 0.1 level of significance to test the claim that home/visitors wins are independent of the sport. Baseball Basketball Hockey Football Total Home Team Wins 53 127 50 57 Visiting Team 47 71 43 42

We also have another test that uses contingency tables We also have another test that uses contingency tables. This test is called the Test of Homogeneity. When some samples are drawn from different populations, and we want to determine whether those populations have the same proportions of the characteristics being considered we will use this particular test. The word homogeneous means “having the same quality,” and in this context, we are testing to determine whether the proportions are the same. Definition: In a Test of Homogeneity, we test the claim that different populations have the same proportions of some characteristics. (The process to test a hypothesis will remain the same.)

Pass Fail Total Group A 10 14 Group B 417 145 3. In a judicial case, employment practices were challenged. A minority group (group A) and a majority group (group B) took the Fire Captain Examination. The results are shown in the table below. At a 0.05 level of significance, test the claim that the proportion of minority candidates who pass is the same as the proportion of majority candidates who pass. Pass Fail Total Group A 10 14 Group B 417 145

Gender of Interviewer Man Woman Men who agree 560 308 Does a pollster’s gender have an effect on poll responses by men? A U.S. News & World Report article about polls stated: “On sensitive issues, people tend to give ‘acceptable’ rather than honest responses; their answers may depend on the gender or race of the interviewer.” To support that claim, data were provided for an Eagleton Institute poll in which surveyed men were asked if they agreed with this statement: “Abortion is a private matter that should be left to the woman to decide without government intervention.” We will analyze the effect of gender on male survey subjects only. The table below is based on the responses of surveyed men. Assume that the survey was designed so that male interviewers were instructed to obtain 800 responses from male subjects, and female interviewers were instructed to obtain 400 responses from male subjects. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that the proportions of agree/disagree responses are the same for the subjects interviewed by men and the subjects interviewed by women. Gender of Interviewer Man Woman Men who agree 560 308 Men who disagree 240 92