Proposal for optional procedure of All Electric Range test (BEV)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP drive trace normalization
Advertisements

1 EVE Session 5 US Response to Regulatory Reference Guide Questionnaire April 12,
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
DATE CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY Shorten range Test Procedure: Impact of constant speed on Range determination.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by Japan the 16 th DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 15 th Jan Palais.
1 WLTP-DTP- E-LabProc-005 Test Procedure for Electrified Vehicles presented by Japan 24&25 November 2010.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-088 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by DHC Secretary the 18 th DHC meeting under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 th Jun.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP.
National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory JAPAN NTSEL OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
under GRPE/WLTP informal group
1 Discussion paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2 Prepared by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group November 2011 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-108.
1 Mr H A Nakhawa, ARAI, Pune, India 13 th DHC Informal Group Meeting 64 th GRPE Session, June 2012 Geneva Validation 1 results of Indian Vehicles on LPVC.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
Lab Process-EV sub group
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
WLTP validation test results for BEV(i-MiEV) & OVC-HEV (Prius PHV)
25 January 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC)
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
1. If you travel at 10mph for 1 hour, how far do you travel?
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
Fuel consumption measurement in LDVs WLTP 2nd act Working Group
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012
Drive Trace Indices in WLTP
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
30 miles in 1 hour 30 mph 30 miles per hour
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-077
Current status of WLTP-DHC
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
Speed, Distance and Time
Vehicle warm up and stabilisation – RLD and dyno
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-209
Vehicle classification for Electrified vehicle
Speed, Distance, Time Calculations
ACEA Comments from ACEA welcomes the idea to develop a shortened range test procedure based on MCT However, ACEA does not support JP proposal.
WLTP Validation3 test result ~ Road load determination ~
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Speed, Distance, Time Calculations
Mode Construction during Validation2
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Analysis for WLTP UF development
Discussion document on Mode Construction
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Palais des Nations, Geneva
OIL# 52: End of PEV range criteria
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Presentation transcript:

Proposal for optional procedure of All Electric Range test (BEV) WLTP-DTP-E-labproc-072 Proposal from JAPAN

All electric range test for BEV It is necessary to conduct each phase range (Low, Middle, High and ex-high) test separately due to more precise information for customer and in line with conventional vehicle sampling strategy. However, this sequence is testing burden for laboratories. SAE has been working on to establish the effective test procedure. Japan propose to have a study whether this shorten procedure can also be applied for WLTC.

Test sequence of shorten test (MCT) by SAE J1634 UDDS1 7.5mile (12.08km) 22min 52s HFEDS1 10.26mile (16.52km) 12min 45s UDDS2 7.5mile (12.08km) 22min 52s CSCM 55mph (89km/h) UDDS3 7.5mile (12.08km) 22min 52s HFEDS2 10.26mile (16.52km) 12min 45s UDDS4 7.5mile (12.08km) 22min 52s CSCE 55mph (89km/h) *CSC: Constant speed cycle The distance excluding CSC UDDS HFEDS Total 30.00 20.52 50.52 mile 48.30 33.04 81.34 km

The proposal of shorten test for WLTC (Proposal 1) 1) To have equivalent driving distance for each phase, # of L and M phase driving cycle are double of H and Ex-H driving. 2) During later stage of test sequence, lower driving energy cycle (i.e. L and M) is appropriate to secure cycle traceability. Low1 (3.09km) 9min 49s Middle1 (4.76km) 7min 13s High1 (7.16km) 22min 52s Ex-High1 (8.25km) 22min 52s Middle2 (4.76km) 7min 13s Low2 (3.09km) 9min 49s CSCM 55mph (89km/h) Ex-High2 (8.25km) 22min 52s Low3 (3.09km) 9min 49s Middle3 (4.76km) 7min 13s High3 (7.16km) 22min 52s Middle4 (4.76km) 7min 13s Low4 (3.09km) 9min 49s CSCE 55mph (89km/h) The distance excluding CSC Low Middle High Ex-High Total 12.36 19.04 14.32 16.5 62.22 km 2356 1732 910 646 5644 sec Low+Middle High+Ex-High 31.40 30.82 Constant speed [ xx km/h ] will be decided later

The proposal of shorten test for WLTC (Proposal 2) 1) In case of Ex-high phase exemption. 2) To have equivalent driving distance for each phase, # of L and M phase driving cycle are double of H driving. Low1 (3.09km) 9min 49s Middle1 (4.76km) 7min 13s High1 (7.16km) 22min 52s Middle2 (4.76km) 7min 13s Low2 (3.09km) 9min 49s CSCM 55mph (89km/h) Low3 (3.09km) 9min 49s Middle3 (4.76km) 7min 13s High3 (7.16km) 22min 52s Middle4 (4.76km) 7min 13s Low4 (3.09km) 9min 49s CSCE 55mph (89km/h) The distance excluding CSC Low Middle High Ex-High Total 12.36 19.04 14.32 ー 45.72 km 2356 1732 910 4998 sec Low+Middle High+Ex-High 31.40

The proposal of shorten test for WLTC (Proposal 3) 1) More shorten test sequence Low1 (3.09km) 9min 49s Middle1 (4.76km) 7min 13s High1 (7.16km) 22min 52s Ex-High1 (8.25km) 22min 52s Low2 (3.09km) 9min 49s CSCM 55mph (89km/h) Ex-High2 (8.25km) 22min 52s High2 (7.16km) 22min 52s Middle2 (4.76km) 7min 13s Low3 (3.09km) 9min 49s Low4 (3.09km) 9min 49s CSCE 55mph (89km/h) The distance excluding CSC Low Middle High Ex-High Total 12.36 9.52 14.32 16.5 52.7 km 2356 866 910 646 4778 sec Low+Middle High+Ex-High 21.88 30.82