© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Background Collection of S & O Information Data: – CC, HPI, PMH, PSHx, Demographics – Medication history including compliance etc. – VS, ROS, Lab, other.

Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

before and after rehabilitation

Dose and range (mg/kg body weight)

Intermediate-level learner

Figure 2. Patient`s 12 Lead Electrocardiogram when she presented with palpitations and cardiac device firing on her latest hospital admission this year.

Table 4. Medications (drugs) used for self medication

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Do not desire to have child

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Result of intention to use

Total Number of persons Tested

Figure 1. Serum creatinine trend in the patient

Table 3. Number of MS patients/ Year of diagnosis / Current Residence

Table 2. Number of MS patients/ Year diagnosis /Place of Birth

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)

Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6

Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Distribution of the various organisms according to prevalence

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

% Asian/Pacific Islander

Table 1. The Demographic Characteristics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Intensity of statin treatment and possible lipid lowering treatment intolerance and/or ineffectiveness issues among patients with type 2 diabetes (aged.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Educational Attainment

Table 5. Comparison of Outcome of 138 patients

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Drug use among family members and friends of the students

Cumulative Percentage

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Laboratory values

institution N Mean S.D SEM df t P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

post intervention (n=60)

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff

MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

S. No. Product Name yield content

Table 6. Compliance to the Use of ITNs in the LGAs

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 5. Common causes of each DTP identified among T2DM patients in WSU teaching hospital, from February to April, 2016(N=202) S.NO DTPs Category and causes Frequency(N=202) (%) 1 Needs additional drug therapy 137(67.8) Preventive drug therapy required 126(92) To attain synergistic effect 10(7.3) There is a medical condition that requires treatment 1(0.7) 2 Non compliance 127(52.3) Forgets to take medications 64(50.4) Fear of side of effects 36(28.3) Drug unavailability 15(11.8) Others* 12(9.5) 3 Dose too low 65 (26.7) The dose is too low to produce the desired effect 56(86) The dosing is too infrequent to produce the desired effect 7 (4.6) There is drug interaction which reduces its effect 2(9.4) 4 Unnecessary drug therapy 16 (6.5) Duplicative drug therapy 14(87.5) There is no valid medical condition 2(12.5) 5 Dose too high 14(5.7) The dose given is too high 12(85.7) Drug interaction 2(14.3) 6 Adverse drug reaction 11(4.5) The drug is C/I due to risk or safer drug is available 4(41.7) The drug produces an undesirable effect(hypoglycaemia) ** 7(33.3) 7 Ineffective drug therapy 8(3.30) The drug is not the most effective drug 1(12.5) The medical condition is refractory 7(87.5) * Unclear drug instruction, cost, and patient preference. ** At least one episode of hypoglycaemia prior to enrolment in the study. Hailu Chare Koyra et al. Epidemiology and Predictors of Drug Therapy Problems among Type 2 Diabetic Patients at Wolaita Soddo University Teaching Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 2, 40-48. doi:10.12691/ajps-5-2-4 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.