Hearing Officer Guidelines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent External Review of Health Care Decisions in Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration.
Advertisements

The A to Z s of A & D A guide to conducting disciplinary hearings.
The Role of The Municipal Hearings Officer Steven P. Rourke, General Counsel Department of Fire Services.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process
WINNING YOUR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE HEARING Presented By D DeGROOT M MANAGEMENT S SERVICES, INC
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
Progressive Discipline. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives Apply progressive discipline steps fairly and consistently Identify laws.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process Presented by Katie Casada Hornberger Office of Clients’ Rights Advocacy.
© 2007 Robinson & Cole LLP How to Improve Land Use Decision-Making COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS OF CENTRAL NAUGATUCK VALLEY JANUARY 29, 2007.
2 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY ,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Interview.
Comparison of Health Laws Audrey Kaiser Manka, J.D. Minnesota Assistant Attorney General "The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Chapter is based on two parties battling to win the case, each acting as the adversary of the other. ROLE: to provide a procedure for the parties.
EPA’s ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION SYSTEM Environmental Appeals Board U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Kathie A. Stein, Judge.
2008 Commissioners Indaba 19 – 21 st November 2008 Sun City, North West Province HOW to CONDUCT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS RANDALL van VOORE.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The FERC Regulatory Process Dennis H. Melvin, Esq. Director – Legal Division (OAL) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Module 2 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 2 A The Independent Regulator.
Ethical Considerations for Self Help Center Staff Assisting Self Represented Litigants While Maintaining Neutrality June 10, 2011.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
G ENERAL P ROCEDURES IN H EARINGS. P ROCEDURES IN WRITTEN HEARINGS Notice and deadlines sent out by the tribunal Party with the burden of proof sends.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Legal Studies 3C.  People must be treated fairly  Right to be heard by an unbiased decision-maker  Know allegations made against you  Given a chance.
 We use the Adversary system of trial.  HOWEVER, the Coroner’s Court, Family Court, Children’s Cases Program, some tribunals and some alternative methods.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
GRIEVANCE HEARING ISSUES Presented by: C. Michael McInnish.
Derbyshire County Council PUBLIC HANDLING GRIEVANCES - BRIEFING FOR MANAGERS.
A&D 101 A Beginner’s Guide to understanding the A&D process.
1 Ruling on Objections Presented by Peter K. Halbach, Chief Hearing Officer North Dakota Department of Transportation.
Seminar on the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration Evidence & Hearings under the Swiss Rules Belgrade, 9 December 2015 University.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Student Judicial Affairs Conference Student Discipline: How to Prepare Written Reasons Katrina Haymond March 24, 2006.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
CHAPTER 7: Emond Montgomery Publications 1 Direct Examination of Witnesses.
SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
The Role of Experts in Construction Arbitration
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
US SOCCER NATIONAL APPEALS COMMITTEE
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
CLG Training Meeting Procedures and Making a Defensible Decision Spokane, WA September 26, 2017 Karen Gordon.
The Adversary System.
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
NHS Tribunal Training Alan D Miller April 2008 Depute Chairman
Sabrina Johnson and lisa kimble Educational Law
Legislative or Quasi-Judicial?
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
IBEW® The IBEW Grievance Process with TVA
The Independent Chair: The role and situations explored
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Civil Pretrial Practice
Enforcement History Prior to 1994 Notice of Violation
Approaches to Witness Evidence in International Arbitration
BC Council of Administrative Tribunals ADJUDICATOR BOOT CAMP
Due Process and the Peace Officer Bill of Rights
Developing an Impartial and Appropriate Factual Record
Panel Discussion on Hearings Case Management Projects
Presentation transcript:

Hearing Officer Guidelines Procedures for an Effective Hearing

Due Process Due Process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles, and that individuals be treated fairly

A Fair Hearing Means Individual requesting the appeal has: An opportunity to be heard The right to confront witnesses (cross-examination) The right to representation An impartial decision-maker A decision based only on the evidence presented at the hearing A decision that includes the reasons and evidence relied on

Who can be Hearing Officer? Internal hearing officers External hearing officers

Preparing for the Hearing Know the relevant HUD regulations (CFRs), case law, and PHA policies for holding hearings and for denials and terminations Read the hearing packet and note issues for inquiry at the hearing Avoid any ex parte communications Make sure your hearing room is ready Consider safety precautions as necessary. Arrange appropriate seating and work space Don’t forget to prepare yourself!

Holding the Hearing Start on time Introduce everyone in the room Briefly describe the procedure for the hearing and put the parties at ease. Describe the parties’ rights Explain the consequences of disruptive behavior Describe the issues to be covered Swear in those who will be testifying Keep the hearing orderly

Holding the Hearing (cont.) Monitor the time and conduct of the hearing The party with the burden of proof goes first to present their case No one interrupts, only one person speaks at a time Cross-examination is only allowed after a witness completes testimony Take notes Ask clarifying questions, as necessary Do not become an advocate for either party Limit irrelevant or repetitious evidence or witnesses Allow parties to sum up their positions and/or rebut evidence

Writing the Hearing Decision Conduct any additional research that’s needed Consult a subject matter expert (SME) on a regulation or policy if necessary Think about what you heard and identify the facts based on a preponderance of evidence. Your decision must be based solely and exclusively upon the facts presented at the hearing. Apply relevant regulations, case law, and PHA policies to the facts Analyze whether the PHA followed due process Analyze whether the PHA’s initial decision is supported by a preponderance of evidence.

Writing the Hearing Decision (cont.) The PHA’s initial decision must be in accordance with the law, HUD regulations, and PHA policies. Follow a regular format for the written decision Write a clear, reasoned, complete decision. Identify who was present at the hearing. State your findings of fact State your conclusions, identifying the relevant findings of fact (evidence), laws, regulations, and PHA policies supporting the conclusions Cover all the issues in the PHA notice Identify any findings or conclusions based on credibility Use appropriate citations for HUD regulations, PHA policies, lease, etc. State whether the PHA’s initial decision is upheld, overturned, or sent back for more information Sign the decision.

Questions? Todd Kriner, Esquire 717-299-1100 tpk@blakingerthomas.com Thank you! Questions? Todd Kriner, Esquire 717-299-1100 tpk@blakingerthomas.com