AOTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) Scoring Guidance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Advertisements

Curriculum, Courses, Syllabi By Sue Field DNP, RN, CNE.
WRITING SITE-SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES FOR THE FWPE FORMS Roberta Wimmer, OTR/L Pacific University Forest Grove, OR 2004 AOTA Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Copyright 2002, Delmar, A division of Thomson Learning.
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
An Introduction to Understanding the OT and OTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluations (FWPEs) Karen Atler, MS, OTR Colorado State University, Fort Collins,
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
Develop site-specific learning objectives. Why Site-Specific Objectives? The FWPE can be used across all practice settings…………… ……………however, site specific.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data 1 I know it is in here somewhere Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
CCSSO Criteria for High-Quality Assessments Technical Issues and Practical Application of Assessment Quality Criteria.
Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Dale.
 Field Experience Evaluations PSU Special Educator Programs Confidence... thrives on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful.
Using the Fieldwork Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapy Students: By Elizabeth DeIuliis, OTD, OTR/L Academic Fieldwork Coordinator Duquesne.
Core Competencies for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Performance Assessment and Human Resources Toolkit.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland The Oral Health Improvement Team Supporting Caring for Smiles.
CORRELATION OF THE COPM AND OCCUPATION-BASED TREATMENT WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PRACTICE FRAMEWORK Nancy Dusing, OTR/L Capstone Project Chatham University.
Presented By Copyright 2011 Concord Associates Pte Ltd ConSASS Audit and Auditor’s Key Observations.
OT 460 Week One Fall  Evaluation Process:  What client wants and needs to do  Determination of what the client can do and has done  Identify.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Clinical Quality Improvement: Achieving BP Control
Data Conventions and Analysis: Focus on the CAEP Self-Study
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
Title of the Change Project
Clinical Evaluation Tools
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Orientation to Practicum/Internship
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data
Patient Centered Medical Home
Web CPI Quick reference
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
How did WE work? Assessing Collaborative Projects in the Online or Hybrid Classroom
Please sit at the appropriate table with your IC/Principal.
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
Yr 10 Candle Holder.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
The Assessment Process Part II
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Training & Program Delivery Gear Meeting 2 presentation
Web CPI Quick reference
Performance Review for County Educators
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Employee Performance Management System
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Performance Review for County Educators
KEEP2 Training and Updates
Rules & Instructions Three teams
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, & Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report Program Director: Deborah Molnar Date of.
Simulated Clinical Placement (DATES)
Develop site-specific learning objectives
Treating Anxiety From an Integrated Approach
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
AOTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) Scoring Guidance
Competency Models and Performance Audit Practice
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Students can fail professionally if they:
Presentation transcript:

AOTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) Scoring Guidance

Sara Clark, AFWC, Western Michigan University Holly Grieves, Assistant Fieldwork Coordinator, Western Michigan University Wayne Doyle, AFWC, Baker College Muskegon

Objectives Explain differences between OT and OTA FWPE forms (2002) Define rating scale for the FWPE Discuss challenging items to score on the FWPE Discuss “evidence-based” FW evaluation Provide updates: new electronic FWPE

AOTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluation FWPE

Current FWPE Versions (2002) Booklet $ SAMPLE Electronic Modifiable PDF

Layout: FWPE Cover Page Directions/Scoring Items Summary Page References/Glossary Terminology reflects OTPF

OT: Domain and Process Figure 3. Occupational therapy’s domain and process. Source: American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl.). Used with permission. Copyright © 2014, by the American Occupational Therapy Association. All rights reserved.

FWPE Item Comparison OT (42 items) OTA (25 items) Fundamentals of Practice Basic Tenets Evaluation and Screening Intervention Management Communication Professional Behavior Fundamentals of Practice Basic Tenets Evaluation and Screening Intervention Communication Professional Behavior

What methods do you use for scoring OTA items without having an OTA at your facility?

FWPE Rating Scale (2002) Number Description 4 Exceed standards 3 Meets standards 2 Needs improvement 1 Unsatisfactory

Common Scoring Errors half scores N/A Safety item = 2 + “Pass” final score half scores N/A addition errors

“Evidence Based” Scoring FWPE Score Site Specific Objectives Week-By- Week Expectations Weekly Meeting Sheets

Two or More FW Educators Tips for FWPE

Student Self-Assessment IMPORTANCE

Small Group Activity Read the case scenario. https://www.aota.org/Education-Careers/Fieldwork/Supervisor/Inservice.aspx Read the case scenario. Individually score and provide support for your scoring on each FWPE item. Work with your team to score and provide support for scoring on each FWPE item. When you’ve completed scoring the scenario as a team, request an answer key. Compare your team scores to the answer key and discuss differences in scoring.

Large Group Discussion FWPE Scoring Case Scenarios Summary John Mary Sandra David OT Student OTA Student Week 6 out 12 Week 7 of 10 Week 8 of 8 Week 4 of 8 Conducting an evaluation with Mrs. Erwin who recovering from a total hip replacement. Planning and implementing basic life skills activities to at-risk youth in collaboration with an on-site supervisor and FWEd. Assist in the screening process of George, a Hispanic client with bipolar disorder under her OT FWEd’s supervision. Slowly progressing Sylvia’s function w/ self-care and homemaking through pacing and work simplification. Skill Nursing Facility School State Hospital Home Health FWPE Evaluation items FWPE Intervention Items FWPE Intervention items

Validation Process: new Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) 2015: Subcommittee of the COE completed revisions of the FWPE content items after surveying stakeholders 2016 – 2018: AOTA appointed the University of Illinois at Chicago to validate the new FWPE: Phase I = Content Validity Phase II = Pilot Testing for Internal Scale Validity (electronic version will be developed for new form)

AOTA: New Electronic FWPE Next Steps in 2019: AOTA to determine: electronic format/vendor – will most likely use PT CI evaluation vendor cut-off score criteria for pass/fail dissemination and training

AOTA FWPE Scale Comparison Number New Current (2002) 4 Exemplary Performance Exceeds Standards 3 Proficient Meets Standards 2 Emerging Needs Improvement 1 Unsatisfactory

FWPE Rating Scale Descriptions Revised Number New Label New Description 4 Exemplary Performance Demonstrates satisfactory competence is specific skills consistently; demonstrates substantial breadth and depth in understanding and/or skillful application of fundamental knowledge and skills. 3 Proficient Performance Demonstrates satisfactory competence in specific skills; demonstrates adequate understanding and/or application of fundamental knowledge and skills. 2 Emerging Performance Demonstrates limited competence in specific skills (inconsistencies may be evident); demonstrates limited understanding and/or application of fundamental knowledge and skills (displays some gaps and/or inaccuracies). 1 Unsatisfactory Performance Fails to demonstrate competence in specific skills; performs in an inappropriate manner; demonstrates inadequate understanding and/or application of fundamental knowledge and skills (displays significant gaps and/or inaccuracies).

Changes to FWPE: 2002 vs. 2018 Minimized overlapping/redundant items Provided examples (separate from the item) Aligned OT and OTA versions Combined: Communication and Professional Behaviors Updated terminology: electronic documentation

Sample Item: New OT FWPE Evaluation and Screening Determines the client’s occupational profile and occupational performance through interview and other appropriate evaluation methods. Occupational profile: Summary of the client’s occupational history and experiences, patterns of daily living, interests, values, and needs. Occupational performance: Act of doing and accomplishing a selected action (performance skill), activity, or occupation that results from the dynamic transaction among the client, the context, and the activity. Improving or enabling skills and patterns in occupational performance leads to engagement in occupations or activities.

Sample Item: New OTA FWPE Evaluation and Screening Assists with interpreting information in relation to the client’s needs, factors, and performance. Examples: record or chart reviews, observations, interviews, standardized and non-standardized assessments

THANK YOU