Objectives & Outcomes Chuck Cone ERAU Oct 30, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

On the Search of New Engineering Curriculum Model for the 21st Century
Standard 22A Curricular Structure HT Accredited Curriculum.
National Academic Reference Standards
ABET Accreditation Workshop on Innovations in ICT Education Beijing, China Oct. 22, 2012 Michael Lightner, Prof. and Chair ECEE University of Colorado,
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
ABET Introduction of ABET to CE 203 Tim Ellis, Ph.D., P.E.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 14,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.1 Guidelines on: I- Department’s Mission, PEOs and SOs II- The Preparation of.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
David L. Spooner1 IT Education: An Interdisciplinary Approach David L. Spooner Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
The Influence of the University/College/Department Mission How your university and department’s missions influence your engineering degree requirements.
The Influence of the University/College/Department Mission How your university and department’s missions influence your engineering degree requirements.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
Assessment at UW-Platteville What we are doing to assess student learning? What improvements we have made as a result?
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
OBE Briefing.
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Eportfolio: Tool for Student Career Development and Institutional Assessment Sally L. Fortenberry, Ph.D., and Karol Blaylock, Ph.D. Eportfolio: Tool for.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
EENG 1920 Chapter 1 The Engineering Design Process 1.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle.
The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
ALUMNI SURVEY AT QUB SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL & MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY BELFAST.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ECE Assessment Program Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Preparing Mechanical Engineering Students for Collaborations Across Distance and Disciplines (CADD) Nina Robson California State University, Fullerton.
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ABET Outcomes - Definition Skills students have graduation.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
ABET Definitions Objectives Outcomes Broad Statements
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering Program
What is “Employability” and how do I develop it?
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Accepted Students Program
Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
Mechanical Engineering
Learning outcomes in higher education
Computing and Mathematics
Presentation on CAPSTONE PROJECT presented by Cdr MD Masum-ul-Haque, (E), BN ME DEPT MILITARY INSTITUTE of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY (MIST)
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Suggested TALKING POINTS:
Presentation transcript:

Objectives & Outcomes Chuck Cone ERAU Oct 30, 2010

Objective I I. Math, Science, and Engineering Fundamentals Alumni working in the engineering field will demonstrate skills in math, science, and engineering with an emphasis on solving problems utilizing fundamental engineering principles including engineering logic, traditional analytical methods, modern software, and experimental apparatus. Additionally and more specifically: Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering alumni will: A. be competent in fundamental engineering areas that include statics, dynamics, solid mechanics, circuits, materials science, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and experimental techniques and instrumentation. B. utilize appropriate software that would enable analysis, simulation, and design of aerospace systems (e.g. Excel, MATLAB, ANSYS, CATIA).   Computer Engineering alumni will be: A. competent in the fundamental areas of digital and computer systems, software development, and modeling of physical systems. B. able to use or learn to use software tools and programming. C. able to apply mathematically based physical laws to solve problems presented them. Electrical Engineering alumni will be: A. competent in the fundamental areas of statics/dynamics, thermo/heat transfer, and digital/linear circuits as appropriate for a generalized systems education. B. able to use or learn to use software tools and programming

Objective II II. Professional and Social Context of Engineering Practice   Alumni working in the engineering field will demonstrate an understanding and philosophy that promotes engineering practice founded in technical integrity, ethics, social, economic, and environ-mental responsibility, and global awareness. Alumni will recognize the importance of preparing themselves for continued education and independent thought. This objective is overarching and applicable to all our engineering disciplines.

Objective III III. Design and Teamwork   Alumni working in the engineering field will demonstrate the ability to assimilate topics from multiple sources, design a system or process, communicate that design effectively though verbal and written means, and work effectively on a team. Aerospace Engineering alumni will: A. have a broad understanding of the interrelations of the aerospace disciplines and their impact on aerospace designs. B. understand the importance of teamwork, the value of multiple experiences and be able to communicate to a broad array of technical and non-technical audiences. C. bring design expertise to the work environment within a chosen subset of aerospace engineering disciplines. Computer Engineering alumni will: A. foster a sense of citizenship, positive group dynamics, team participation, and team responsibility in a global community and economy. B. demonstrate leadership where appropriate within their work groups. C. be able to plan, schedule and carryout projects assigned to them. D. be able to work together on an interdisciplinary team such as found in the aerospace culture. Electrical Engineering alumni will: Mechanical Engineering alumni will: A. understand the importance of teamwork, the value of multiple experiences and be able to communicate to a broad array of technical and non-technical audiences. B. bring design expertise to the work environment within the context of a developing a complex, multidisciplinary engineering system.

Objective IV IV. Discipline Specific Depth   Alumni working in the engineering field will demonstrate depth in their discipline and exposure in related areas. Aerospace Engineering alumni will: A. have demonstrated depth in aerospace structures, propulsion, and either aeronautics or astronautics. B. have depth in theoretical, computational, and experimental methods. Computer Engineering alumni will: A. have depth in embedded and real-time control systems, software design, or computer architecture. B. show an aptitude for independent work accomplishing the tasks they are assigned. C. demonstrate an ability to develop a deeper understanding of a particular area of CE or to learn about a new area. D. be able to use software tools appropriate to their jobs, including MATLAB, VHDL, IDE, etc. E. be capable of immediate productivity upon their graduation. Electrical Engineering alumni will: A. have developed depth in communications theory, control theory, power electronics, or analog/ digital circuits. B. show an aptitude for independent work accomplishing the tasks they are assigned. C. demonstrate an ability to develop a deeper understanding of a particular area of EE or to learn about a new area. D. be able to use software tools appropriate to their jobs including C; MATLAB; HDL; OrCAD Layout, Capture and Pspice; etc. Mechanical Engineering alumni will: A. have demonstrated depth in machine design, thermal-fluid systems, robotics, and gas turbine engines.

Objective Comments 2. Program Educational Objectives Program educational objectives are defined as “broad statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the program is preparing the graduates to achieve.” Criterion 2 requires that programs have in place “an assessment and evaluation process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which these objectives are attained.” Many of the current program educational objectives are similar to outcomes and address attributes students should have at the time of graduation. The program has a functional process for assessment of its objectives which includes surveys of alumni and employers. However, surveys focus primarily on skills students acquire as they matriculate through the program rather than their accomplishments following graduation. The potential exist that this criterion may not be satisfied in the future.

Outcomes A. Our graduating students will have experienced a core of humanities, social sciences, and communications and demonstrate the use of this core to support the technical content of their engineering curriculum. B. Graduating seniors will be competent in fundamental math/basic science subjects. C. All graduating engineering students will be competent in a subgroup of core engineering fundamentals. D. Engineering students graduating from our programs will demonstrate proficiency in core topics in their program. E. Graduating students will have had the opportunity to specialize and demonstrate competence in a sub-discipline within their chosen field, to provide depth in a subject area or prepare them for graduate education. F. All engineering students will be proficient in engineering design. G. All engineering students will demonstrate design competence through a major design (capstone) experience. H. All engineering students will be laboratory and computer proficient with modern equipment and current laboratory and computer methods.

Outcomes 3. PROGRAM OUTCOMES Criterion 3 states that “There must be an assessment and evaluation process that periodically demonstrates the degree to which program outcomes are attained.” While there is a process in place, the distinction of which instruments assess outcomes or objectives is not clear. Changes in the instruments used and timing of these instruments appear not to have been consistent. Although the department attempts to utilize a number of assessment techniques some have such a low response rate that the data obtained may not be adequate to assess the outcomes. Also, a great effort is expended in mapping course coverage to be sure the outcomes are sufficiently covered within the curriculum, but there is little evidence of evaluation of the actual student attainment of the outcome. Without clarification of the use of the instruments, the potential exists that this criterion may not be satisfied in the future.

Evaluation Assessment Tools