OCS: Putting the Assessment Pieces Together

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Advertisements

Pennsylvania Department of Education Get R. Pennsylvania Department of Education Presented By: June Tran, IRF Kirkbride School December 6, 2010.
Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
ELA SAS Overview. Objectives Understand the key changes to the SAS documents and interim assessments and how these changes support.
Reading and Writing and the Common Core Standards Jen Fiegen Laura Norris Eva Petersen.
ELA STRANDS.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Common Formative Assessment Inquiry & Action RESEARCH & EVALUATION BAKERSFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SEPTEMBER, 2013.
The Common Core State Standards A Districtwide Dialogue for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
OCS Standards-based Education Aug 7, 2014 GAINS Education Group, Ltd Committed to Student Achievement Dr. Marilynn Kulieke Ms. Rosemary Jacot Mr. Evan.
Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Instructional Shifts Activity 1.
Aligning Curriculum Standards, Instructional Practices and Assessment.
Office of Curriculum and Instruction Division of Language Arts/Reading.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Principles of Assessment
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
1 Investigating the Standards: K-12 English Language Arts Bruce Bufe, Ann Craig, Kathy Learn, Leigh McEwen, Nicole Peterson, Pat Upchurch, Martha Yerington.
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Overview of the Common Core ELA Learning Standards Dennis Atkinson Christine Cutler IES E2BOCES
The Common Core State Standards and the English Language Learners Wen Ma, Ph.D. Le Moyne College.
Using myON Reader Literacy Skills Development. ELA Common Core Develop comprehension strategies for grade-level texts of appropriate complexity Communicate.
Design and Organization The ELA Standards Reading Writing Speaking & Listening Language Grade-Specific Standards K College and.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Planning Focus Workshop Facilitated by: Sandy Sanford.
1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 1: Standards-Based Education and the New GPS.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Idaho State Department of Education Accessing Your ISAT by Smarter Balanced Data Using the Online Reporting System (ORS) Angela Hemingway Director, Assessment.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
OVERVIEW OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS): Focus on English, Language Arts & Literacy Presented by Jane Cook to the East Hartford High School.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
English Language Arts Common Core Standards and Model Curriculum Marcia Barnhart Associate Director of English Language Arts.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Common Core State Standards English Language Arts.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
State Support for Classroom Assessment Fen Chou, Ph.D. Louisiana Department of Education National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
Module 4—Literacy Strands Arts Education. Learning Outcomes Participants will: explore the relationship between the new Essential Standards and the Common.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Getting Started  Role  Experience with Common Core 1 – Novice 5 – Preparing to lead this work  Agenda  Materials on Wiki – 
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
District Literacy Program A Summary of the.  The Henderson County School District Literacy Program includes elements mandated in Senate Bill 1.  The.
Do Now  You have given your beginning of the year diagnostic assessment. Your 30 students produce these results:  20 score below 50%  7 score between.
Standards Based Grading. Why Standards Based Grading? Standards-Based Grading (SBG) is based on current research of best practices in grading SBG is designed.
Proof of Concept: Contextualizing the Data
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Unpacking Smarter Balanced Score Reports
Parent University # 2 Grades K-5 Reading and Language Arts
New York State Learning Standards 2011 (Common Core State Standards)
Shift Happens Or does it? Leadership Summit Thursday, November 10
Comprehensive Balanced
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Interpreting and Using the ACT Aspire Interim Results
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) &
Purpose: to refine our understanding of formative and summative assessment. Focus: to interpret data to drive instructional practice.
Finally! Utilizing Student Involvement to Prepare for Final Exams
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
The PARCC Vision PARCC states have committed to building a K-12 assessment system that:
Cooperating Teacher Training
Common Core Vs Kansas Standards
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Balanced Literacy Writing
Curriculum and Assessment
AGS A Level 20 marker Feedback sheet
Presentation transcript:

OCS: Putting the Assessment Pieces Together Dr. Marilynn Kulieke Rosemary Jacot GAINS Education Group CAC Meeting October 1, 2019

OCS Reading Standards Important Standards Addressed by Aspire Key Ideas and Details (KID) Craft and Structure (CAS) Integration of Knowledge and Ideas (IKI) Important Standards but Not Addressed by Aspire Foundational Skills: Print Concepts, Phonological Awareness, Phonics and Word Recognition, Fluency

Summative and Formative Assessments Summative Assessment (Assessment of Learning) Formative Assessment (Assessment for Learning) Point-in-time assessments that measure a predetermined set of benchmark skills in order to determine student achievement. An intentional process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement

ACT Aspire-Aligned Assessments

OCS Assessments Measure the Common Core State Standards Key Ideas and Details: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.3.1 Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers.  

OCS Assessments Measure Specific Skills Framework for Assessments

ACT Aspire Assessment: Summative (Required) The main use of the summative Aspire test is to evaluate overall reading achievement over time.   Limitations: small number of items, not available below Grade 3, results are not benchmark-based, are given in a constrained time period, timed test problematic completion, results are delayed

OCS Proficiency Scale Assessment (Introduced) Target goals: Demonstrate written and spoken understanding of a text. Create questions based on key details about the text. Use text evidence to support understanding and responses. The main purpose of the Proficiency Scales is to provide an overall evaluation of a student skills on reading tasks related to priority standards.   Limitation: Doesn’t provide teachers with information on skills, requires training for consistent ratings and the development of tasks, covers a broad range of skills

GAINS Formative Assessments K-8 (Optional) The main purpose of the Formatives is to analyze student performance three times a year for progress monitoring of skills related to the Aspire summative test. Supporting the OCS priority standards, the school receives benchmark-based reports, school, classroom, and individual reports. Limitations: Takes time to administer; requires teacher training to fully utilize reports in teaching; open ended items are scored by teachers  

Aspire Interim Assessments 3-8 (Optional) The main purpose of the ACT Interims is to analyze student performance four times a year in preparation for the Aspire summative test. Limitations: Not based on the priority standards; does not report on specific benchmarks that can be used in instruction 

i-Ready Assessments K-8 (Optional) The main purpose of i-Ready is to individualize adaptive instruction.   Limitations: Not closely aligned to the Common Core; is not specific to the OCS Priority Standards.

GAINS Quizlet Assessments K-8 (Available) The main purpose of the GAINS quizzes is to monitor student progress on the OCS priority standards. Teachers can modify the Word documents to create their own quizzes.   Limitations: Teacher scored

Teacher-Created Assessments K-8 (Teacher Discretion) The main purpose of a teacher created quiz is to give a snapshot of students’ performance on an instructional lesson or unit. Limitations: May be not be based on OCS benchmarks; item quality can vary; difficult to use for progress monitoring

Aspire Classroom Assessments 3-8 (Optional) The main purpose of the Aspire Classroom Assessments is to familiarize students with the Aspire.   Limitations: Too few items lead to poor reliability and limited application to instruction.

Create a few notes what you notice and what you still wonder about the ACT Aspire-Aligned Assessments

Introducing the OCS Standards and Benchmarks for Reading Literature and Text Includes ACT Aspire Performance Level Descriptors at Reading Level (PLD) and OCS Proficiency Target Goals with Their Rating

ACT PDL OCS Standards OCS Target Goals OCS Standards and Benchmarks for Reading Literature and Text Includes ACT Aspire Performance Level Descriptors at Reading Level (PLD) and OCS Proficiency Target Goals with Their Rating Performance Level Descriptors for each category at each grade level 3-8 ACT PDL Standards from CCSS and the unpacked benchmarks OCS Standards Level 3 (Target Goals) are included for each priority standard OCS Target Goals

ACT PDL Performance Level Descriptors for each category at each grade level 3-8 To demonstrate comprehension of texts with these elements, a student performing at this level: • identifies central ideas. • summarizes texts. • connects ideas, events, and characters to make logical inferences. • uses key details to draw conclusions about character traits and actions.

Unpacked Benchmarks from the OCS Standard OCS Standards Standards from CCSS and the unpacked benchmarks OCS Standard from CCSS Unpacked Benchmarks from the OCS Standard Priority Standard

OCS Target Goals Level 3 (Target Goals) are included for each priority standard Target goals: Demonstrate written and spoken understanding of a text. Create questions based on key details about the text. Use text evidence to support understanding and responses.

Create a few notes what you notice and what you still wonder about the OCS Standards and Benchmarks.

Next Steps: Helping to Put the Pieces Together at Your School