Safety and immunogenicity of a multivalent HIV vaccine comprising envelope protein with either DNA or NYVAC vectors (HVTN 096): a phase 1b, double-blind,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HVTN 702: A pivotal phase 2b/3 multi-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ALVAC-HIV.
Advertisements

RV305 Linear Epitope Mapping
Safety and immunogenicity of the rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP Ebola virus vaccine candidate in healthy adults: a phase 1b randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
Volume 378, Issue 9791, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 385, Issue 9984, Pages (June 2015)
Supplementary Figure 2. Kinetics of HIV-specific IgG in the plasma over time in the tenofovir and placebo arms from 3 months to 39 months post-infection.
Volume 389, Issue 10081, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 386, Issue 10008, Pages (November 2015)
The Lancet Global Health
A mindfulness-based intervention to increase resilience to stress in university students (the Mindful Student Study): a pragmatic randomised controlled.
Volume 389, Issue 10069, Pages (February 2017)
Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled.
Reduced TH1/TH17 CD4 T-cell numbers are associated with impaired purified protein derivative–specific cytokine responses in patients with HIV-1 infection 
Immunity duration of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine and a homologous prime-boost immunisation in healthy adults in China:
CD154 Expression Is Associated with Neutralizing Antibody Titer Levels Postinfluenza Vaccination in Stem Cell Transplant Patients and Healthy Adults 
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 385, Issue 9977, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Hans-Peter Raué, Carol Beadling, Jennifer Haun, Mark K. Slifka 
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A in healthy adults infected with HIV-1: a randomised, placebo-controlled,
Closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel- group trial  Hood Thabit, PhD, Sara Hartnell, BSc, Janet M Allen,
Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and activity of the novel long-acting antimalarial DSM265: a two-part first-in-human phase 1a/1b randomised study 
Maternal-Derived Hepatitis B Virus e Antigen Alters Macrophage Function in Offspring to Drive Viral Persistence after Vertical Transmission  Yongjun Tian,
Volume 379, Issue 9816, Pages (February 2012)
Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and activity of the novel long-acting antimalarial DSM265: a two-part first-in-human phase 1a/1b randomised study 
Volume 388, Issue 10061, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 384, Issue 9942, Pages (August 2014)
Efficacy and safety of praziquantel in preschool-aged and school-aged children infected with Schistosoma mansoni: a randomised controlled, parallel-group,
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages (October 2013)
Safety and immunogenicity of a parenteral P2-VP8-P[8] subunit rotavirus vaccine in toddlers and infants in South Africa: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled.
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Low-level lead exposure and mortality in US adults: a population-based cohort study  Prof Bruce P Lanphear, MD, Stephen Rauch, MPH, Peggy Auinger, MS,
Volume 389, Issue 10081, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 385, Issue 9984, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 378, Issue 9791, Pages (August 2011)
Safety and immunogenicity of the rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP Ebola virus vaccine candidate in healthy adults: a phase 1b randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages e366-e378 (July 2018)
Volume 386, Issue 10011, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 388, Issue 10058, Pages (November 2016)
The effect of dose on the safety and immunogenicity of the VSV Ebola candidate vaccine: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial 
Volume 386, Issue 10008, Pages (November 2015)
A novel therapeutic cytomegalovirus DNA vaccine in allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages e230-e239 (April 2019)
Volume 393, Issue 10172, Pages (February 2019)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e35-e44 (January 2018)
Volume 393, Issue 10172, Pages (February 2019)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 384, Issue 9942, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2018)
Vaccine-induced mucosal immunity to poliovirus: analysis of cohorts from an open-label, randomised controlled trial in Latin American infants  Prof Peter.
Safety and immunogenicity of the rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP Ebola virus vaccine candidate in healthy adults: a phase 1b randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
Effect of standard dose paracetamol versus placebo as antipyretic therapy on liver injury in adult dengue infection: a multicentre randomised controlled.
Volume 367, Issue 9518, Pages (April 2006)
Safety and immunogenicity of a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored Ebola vaccine in healthy adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding,
Filtered sunlight versus intensive electric powered phototherapy in moderate-to-severe neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia: a randomised controlled non-inferiority.
Safety and immunogenicity of an oral, replicating adenovirus serotype 4 vector vaccine for H5N1 influenza: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
Effectiveness of a triple-drug regimen for global elimination of lymphatic filariasis: a modelling study  Michael A Irvine, PhD, Wilma A Stolk, PhD, Morgan.
Volume 376, Issue 9737, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Point of care Xpert MTB/RIF versus smear microscopy for tuberculosis diagnosis in southern African primary care clinics: a multicentre economic evaluation 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (August 2018)
Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of ten-valent versus 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines among infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a randomised.
Efficacy of live oral rotavirus vaccines by duration of follow-up: a meta-regression of randomised controlled trials  Andrew Clark, PhD, Kevin van Zandvoort,
Effect of a Russian-backbone live-attenuated influenza vaccine with an updated pandemic H1N1 strain on shedding and immunogenicity among children in The.
Volume 394, Issue 10193, Pages (July 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Safety and immunogenicity of a multivalent HIV vaccine comprising envelope protein with either DNA or NYVAC vectors (HVTN 096): a phase 1b, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial  Prof Giuseppe Pantaleo, MD, Holly Janes, PhD, Shelly Karuna, MD, Shannon Grant, MS, G Laissa Ouedraogo, MD, Mary Allen, MS, Georgia D Tomaras, PhD, Nicole Frahm, PhD, Prof David C Montefiori, PhD, Guido Ferrari, MD, Song Ding, MSc, Carter Lee, MBA, Merlin L Robb, MD, Mariano Esteban, PhD, Prof Ralf Wagner, PhD, Pierre-Alexandre Bart, MD, Nils Rettby, MSc, Prof M Juliana McElrath, MD, Peter B Gilbert, PhD, James G Kublin, MD, Prof Lawrence Corey, MD  The Lancet HIV  DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30262-0 Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Trial profile C=control. T=treatment. BAMA=binding antibody multiplex assay. ICS=intracellular cytokine staining. The Lancet HIV DOI: (10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30262-0) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 T-cell responses at different timepoints after vaccine administration CD4 (A) and CD8 (B) T-cell responses were measured by intracellular cytokine staining and expressed as the percentage of cells producing IL-2, IFN-γ, or both in the different treatment groups (T1–T4) and the control group (C). CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses and magnitudes of response among positive responders to any HIV PTEg are shown 2 weeks after the month 1 (month 1·5), month 3 (month 3·5), and month 6 (month 6·5) vaccinations and 6 months after the month 6 vaccination (month 12). The proportion of positive responders for every study group is shown at the top of every panel. Horizontal lines depict median responses. Boxplots represent the distribution of responses. Circles denote positive responders. Triangles represent negative responders. T1=two doses of NYVAC vector followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T2=four doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T3=two doses of DNA vector followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T4=two doses of DNA vector and gp120 Env protein followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. C=placebo groups (C1–C4), comprising matched injections. IFN=interferon. IL=interleukin. PTEg=global potential T-cell epitope. Env=envelope. The Lancet HIV DOI: (10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30262-0) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Antibody responses at different timepoints after vaccine administration (A) Neutralising antibody magnitude–breadth curves are shown against a panel of six Env-pseudotyped tier 1 HIV-1 isolates (BaL.26, MN.3, SF162.LS, MW965.26, NP03.13, and TH023.6) 2 weeks after the month 1 (month 1·5), month 3 (month 3·5), and month 6 (month 6·5) vaccinations and 6 months after the month 6 vaccination (month 12). The AUC, interpretable as the geometric mean ID50 titre across viruses, was used to compare groups. Individual participants are dashed lines and treatment group averages are solid lines. (B) IgG binding antibody responses and magnitudes among positive responders were measured by binding antibody multiplex assays 2 weeks after the month 1 (month 1·5), month 3 (month 3·5), and month 6 (month 6·5) vaccinations, and the durability of the antibody response was measured 6 months (month 12), 9 months (month 15), and 12 months (month 18) after the month 6 vaccination. IgG binding antibodies were measured against three vaccine-matched antigens (aggregate vaccine-matched responses) and three V1/V2 antigens. Responses to aggregate vaccine-matched antigens were judged positive if a positive response was seen to any of the vaccine-matched antigens. Errors bars show 95% CIs (upper panels) or IQRs (lower panels). (C) IgG binding magnitude AUC values are shown against aggregate vaccine-matched antigens and three V1/V2 antigens. Net MFI values are shown, and net MFI values less than 100 were truncated for MFI calculation. The AUC from months 0–18 (month 0 vaccination to 12 months after the month 6 vaccination) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule for every fully vaccinated participant. Boxplots represent the distribution of positive responders with net MFI values greater than 100. T1=two doses of NYVAC vector followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T2=four doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T3=two doses of DNA vector followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T4=two doses of DNA vector and gp120 Env protein followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. C=placebo groups (C1–C4), comprising matched injections. Env=envelope. AUC=area under the curve. ID50=number of virus particles needed to produce infection in 50% of people. MFI=mean fluorescence intensity. The Lancet HIV DOI: (10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30262-0) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity Responses (upper panels) and AUC net percentage of granzyme B activity (lower panels) are shown for three different antigens in the study groups. The AUC was the non-parametric area under the net percentage granzyme B activity versus log10 (dilution) curve and was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Circles show positive responses; negative responses are shown as triangles. Boxplots represent the distribution of positive responders only. Clade C gp120 was 96ZM651_D11gp120.avi/293F; clade AE gp120 was AE.A244_gDneg_gp120/293F; and clade B was MN_gp120gDneg/293F Monomer. As control, serum samples from the treated groups were incubated with target cells not coated with gp120. T1=two doses of NYVAC vector followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T2=four doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T3=two doses of DNA vector followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. T4=two doses of DNA vector and gp120 Env protein followed by two doses of NYVAC vector and gp120 Env protein. C=placebo groups (C1–C4), comprising matched injections. AUC=area under the curve. Env=envelope. The Lancet HIV DOI: (10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30262-0) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cross-protocol comparisons of HVTN 096, RV144, and HVTN 100 studies (A) Comparison of V1/V2 antigens common across the three protocols at peak timepoints (with study groups of HVTN 096 pooled): AE.A244 V1V2 Tags 293F (matched), gp70_B CaseA_V1_V2 (not matched), and gp70_B CaseA2 V1/V2/169K (not matched). (B) Comparison of IgG responses to gp120 antigens across the three protocols at peak timepoints (with study groups of HVTN 096 pooled): Con 6 gp12/B and Con S gp140 CFI. Boxplots show the distribution of positive responses. Circles show positive responses; negative responses are shown as triangles. The proportion of positive responders at peak timepoints (2 weeks after the month 6 vaccination) are shown at the bottom of each panel. p.rate=p value for difference in response. p.mag=p value for difference in magnitude of response. HVTN=HIV Vaccine Trials Network. MFI=mean fluorescence intensity. The Lancet HIV DOI: (10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30262-0) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Terms and Conditions