Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting 2016-07-22 Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting 2016-07-22.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Advertisements

Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
The IR lattice design and optimization of the dynamic aperture for the ring Yiwei Wang, Huiping Geng, Yuan Zhang, Sha Bai, Dou Wang, Tianjian, Jie Gao.
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
Preliminary Result on L*=1.5m CEPC Interaction Region Yiwei Wang, Dou Wang, Sha Bai Yingshun Zhu, Teng Yue CEPC acc. meeting, 5 September 2014.
CEPC DA due to magnets' error Sha Bai, Dengjie Xiao, Yiwei Wang, Huiping Geng, Dou Wang, Tianjian Bian, Feng Su, Jie Gao The first IHEP-BINP CEPC Accelerator.
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
MDI Study for CEPC Sha Bai, Hongbo Zhu On behalf of CEPC MDI sub-group The first IHEP-BINP CEPC Accelerator Collaboration Workshop Institute.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance? -2
Large Booster and Collider Ring
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
CEPC pretzel scheme study
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Beam-Gas Inelastic scattering in CEPC partial double ring
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
The design of interaction region
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
Comparison of the final focus design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Optimization of partial double ring optics
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
CEPC parameter and DA optimization
CEPC optics and booster optics
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Ion Collider Ring Chromatic Compensation and Dynamic Aperture
Analysis of Chromaticity of WD-PDR4
Lattice design for CEPC
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Presentation transcript:

Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting 2016-07-22 Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting 2016-07-22

Magnet field error on DA in CEPC single ring no error With all (B,Q,S) B*L field errors, whole ring including FFS. Tune has changed a lot: μx=0.0510854 μy= 0.1526778 Orbit correction and tune adjust are needed Bend set to bend, and Quad and Sext set to be MULT Tracking in 240 turns, coupling factor κ=0.003 for εy Could be cured by adjusting the current during commissioning

Multipole errors effect on DA in CEPC single ring Bend multipole errors (whole ring including FFS) Quad multipole errors (whole ring including FFS) Sextupole multipole errors(whole ring including FFS) (B,Q,S)multiple errors Off-momentum DA is not changed obviously, with 2% (1σx, 7σy), on-momentum DA is reduced to one third of the original. Tune is kept, no effect on tune Orbit is kept to be zero, no effect on orbit Bend is set to be bend, but quadrupole and sextupole are set to be MULT Tracking in 240 turns, Coupling factor =0.003 for emitty Multipole errors can not be cured during commissioning, but could be accepted due to the not obvious change of off-momentum DA.

Magnet field error on DA in CEPC partial double ring Main effect coming from the bending magnet With bend B*L error (whole ring including FFS) μx= 0 μy= 0 Orbit in X Orbit in Y no error With bending magnet field errors, horizontal orbit has changed a lot, but vertical has no change Tune has changed to be an integer resonance, beam is not stable. Orbit correction is needed in horizontal Tracking in 240 turns, coupling factor κ=0.003 for εy Could be cured by adjusting the current during commissioning

Multipole errors effect on DA in CEPC partial double ring Multipole errors of all magnets Multipole errors of bend Multipole errors of quadurpoles Multipole errors of sextupoles Multipole errors reduce DA a little bit , but not much. It seems to have not much effect on DA, especially of off-momentum DA. Orbit has no change due to multipole errors.

Orbit correction result Before correction After correction Lattice版本: CEPC-ARC1.0-PDR1.0-FFS (WD1.0)

BPM readings and correctors strength statistic BPM readings statistic Correctors strength statistic X CORRECTION: about 1700 correctors used Max strength ~ 23urad RMS ~ 0.77urad X CORRECTION SUMMARY: RMS before correction 2.127 mm RMS after correction 0.0009987 mm Y CORRECTION: about 1700 correctors used Max strength ~ 6.7urad RMS ~ 0.37urad Y CORRECTION SUMMARY: RMS before correction 0.6423 mm RMS after correction 0.0009935 mm

CEPC partial double ring IR layout Background study in the preliminary lattice design: radiative Bhabha scattering, beamstrahlung, synchrotron radiation, Beam-gas scattering, beam thermal photons scattering. Solenoid compensation was first tried in the preliminary lattice design,13T compensating solenoid was under designing.

RBB Generator Generate 100000 particles ~ energy spread 蒙卡随机投点法 dσ/dp Radiative Bhabha scattering 蒙卡随机投点法 dσ/dp . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 dp The RBB generator using a Monte-Carlo random point method: randomly generate a two-dimention coordinate, x/y without any relationship Energy spread can only be used when point within the function curve

Lost particles statistic RBB generated at IP1, tracking for one turn in SAD Lattice版本:CEPC-ARC1.0-PDR1.0-FFS(WD1.0) Gaussian distribution energy spread adding to the 100000 particles generated by RBB generator Only set aperture in Final doublet ~ 1.7cm in radius The number of particle lost in the downstream of 1th turn is: 5153 The number of particle lost in the upstream of 1th turn is: 5651

Beamstrahlung events 与RBB输出的粒子的能散相比,beamstrahlung效应随能散呈指数增加,所以绝大多数的粒子的能散都分布在略大于百分之二的区域里 Generate 100000 particles ~ energy spread

Lost particles statistic BS generated at IP1, tracking for one turn in SAD Gaussian distribution energy spread adding to the 100000 particles generated by BS generator Only set aperture in Final doublet ~ 1.7cm in radius The number of particle lost in the downstream of 1th turn is: 0 The number of particle lost in the upstream of 1th turn is: 8728 Most of particles lost at the entrance of QF1 Particles lost too much, no need to do multi-turn tracking IR lattice should be improved Lattice版本:CEPC-ARC1.0-PDR1.0-FFS(WD1.0)

Synchrotron radiation from bending magnets Lattice版本:CEPC-ARC1.0-PDR1.0-FFS(WD1.0) Critical energy of bending magnets in FFS are about ~ 100keV Could be accepted by detector and radiation protection

Beam-Gas Inelastic scattering generated events Generator model: particles energy change but direction no change. Generate 100000 particles ~ energy spread

Lost particles statistic Events generated in each ~1m region , tracking for one turn in SAD Lost particles statistic in ~200m Paticles lost little near IP region Most particles lost in upstream Put in detector to do next analysis

Final Focus layout-sketch of solenoids Compensating solenoid is located between IP and QD0 crossing angle α = 30 mrad Radius of: Length: - compensating solenoid R = 0.1 m L=0.7m - screening solenoid R = 0.15~0.2 m L=2.6m

Compensating and screening solenoids Item Compensating Solenoid Screening-Solenoid(QD0) Central field (T) 7.5 5.25 3.5 Length (m) 0.7 1 2.6 Conductor Type NbTi-Cu Conductor 4×2mm Coil turns 2450 2500 6500 Current density (A/mm 220 210 137.5 Coil inner diameter (mm) 200 300 Coil out diameter (mm) 256 240 340

Field distribution on the R=0(axis),R=0. 05m,R=0. 1m and R=0 Field distribution on the R=0(axis),R=0.05m,R=0.1m and R=0.15m @ L_comp=0.7m

Variation of main and compensating solenoids lengths Area of residual field B_comp_max Geom.length: L1 = 0.7m L2 = 1m Conditions: B_main*L_main+B_comp*L_comp=0 L* = L_main +L_comp = 1.5m

Solenoid compensation effect βx βy Horizontal dispersion Vertical dispersion With no solenoid βx βy Horizontal dispersion Vertical dispersion With solenoid & anti-solenoid ~slice 0.01m

Conclusion and Prospect The error effect on DA was studied, and orbit correction was done. The DA after orbit correction will be worked out in near future. Background was simulated, which is depend on the lattice IR design. 13T compensating solenoid is under designing, which is to shorten the length of compensating solenoid to avoid influence on Lumical.