VT Transportation Project Selection and Project Prioritization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complete & Connected: Tools for Planning a Balanced Transportation System Technical Workshop.
Advertisements

“ Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs “ ~Bruntland Commission~
Vermont Agency of Transportation Performance Management Status FHWA Performance Management Workshop June 19, 2012 Warwick, RI Joe Segale, P.E./PTP Policy.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
PennDOT Next Generation: The Modernization of PennDOT’s Internal and External Operations Nolan R. Ritchie, Innovations Officer Transportation Innovations.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
NASTO ANNUAL MEETING JUNE 9-11, 2013 MEETING CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS THROUGH PERFORMANCE MEASURES: VERMONT’S PERSPECTIVE Richard M. Tetreault, P.E. Director/Chief.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Plan and TIP Prioritization Process September 2015.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
The Intersection of Transportation Resilience and Economic Opportunity UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT LEGISLATIVE SUMMIT NOV 17, 2015 SECRETARY CHRIS COLE VERMONT.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Investing in Infrastructure: Moving Massachusetts Forward Harvard 2015.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
The Intersection of Transportation Resilience and Economic Opportunity
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Transportation Initiative Sales Tax Prioritization
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
Performance-Based Planning:
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
To Create Bristol’s Comprehensive Plan
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Going beyond LOS: Towards a Performance Measure Framework for State DOTs January 9, 2016.
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
NVTA Countywide Pedestrian Plan of July 2016
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Update on Route 1 Efforts Transportation Advisory Committee October 20, 2015 Leonard Wolfenstein, FCDOT Jane Rosenbaum, FCDOT Doug Miller, FCDOT Department.
The Intersection of Transportation Resilience and Economic Opportunity
SANDY SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Draft OKI Prioritization Process
Capital Programming Committee South Coast Rail Phase 1 Service
Transit Systems Planning
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Commonwealth Transportation Board
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Integrated Bilateral Agreement (IBA) 2018 to 2028
Capital Improvement Plans
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Moving Forward with Positive Change
MPO Board Presentation
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011
Transportation Planning and Funding Overview
What follows after approval of Active Transportation
Presentation transcript:

VT Transportation Project Selection and Project Prioritization The way it was The way it is now Where we are heading – VPSP2 Overview Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission October 16, 2019 Joe Segale, P.E./PTP VTrans

Before there was Prioritization Capital Program The Project Delivery funnel was overflowing! Inconsistency in the way new projects were selected Unreliable project delivery times. In the mid 2000’s,we had more projects than we could deliver, resulting in many unkept promises. Each year, we were constantly delaying projects and as you can imagine, this impacted our credibility with our customers.. In 2006, legislation was adopted to establish a project prioritization system to determine which projects were worked on first. This was successful as it established rules and expectations to follow and it allowed us to focus on streamlining and improving our project delivery processes which have been instrumental in establishing an effective asset management program. Our current process is now about 12 years old. There is an opportunity within the next 3 to 4 years to accept more community driven projects into the Capital Program. However, currently there is not a defined process for an RPC/Municipality to get a project on to the Capital Program.

Traffic and Safety Program Current System- Highways 2007 - 2019 Pavement Programs Bridge Programs Roadway Program Traffic and Safety Program Regional Priority 20 15 Pavement Condition Index Bridge Condition 30 Hwy Sufficiency Rating 40 Intersection Capacity (LOS) Benefit-Cost 60 Remaining Life 10 Cost per Vehicle Mile Crash Rate   Functionality 5 Project Momentum Cost per Intersection Traffic Volume (AADT) Load Capacity and Use Waterway Adequacy & Scour Susceptibility Asset-Benefit Cost Total 100 110 This slide represents a snapshot of a few of the key transportation programs that we currently prioritize, we also prioritize for bike/ped programs, park-n-rides, aviation, rail, transit, etc. Each RPC is given 20 pts to prioritize and they each do it differently. Programs included identified in 19 V.S.A. § 10g(l)

Public Transit - New Service Current System – Aviation, PT and Rail 2007 - 2019 Aviation Public Transit - New Service Rail Local Interest/Support 20 mobility improvements General safety Number of operations and based aircraft 100 Environmenral Benefits Increase in ton-miles or car-miles Population served & local government support 24 Operating Efficiences Railroad passenger operation Economic Development 40 Project Coordination Line Conditions Project Type (runway type, paving, navigation, etc.) 120 Regional Connectivity Priority Route FAA Priority & Standards ranking Local financial commitment VT Based Activity Previous Federal/State Funding 200 Funding sustainability Cost/Benefit for Projects less than $75,000   Documented non-state funding opportunities Resource Impacts Environmental Resource Impacts Regional Scope Total 764 Utilization of resources

Current System – Competitive Grants 2007 - 2019 Bike and Pedestrian Facilities Transportation Alternatives Program Better Roads Municipal Mitigation Grants Town Highway Structures Class 2 Town Highways TH Federal Disasters TH Non-Fed Disasters

Vision Develop a performance-based, data driven project selection & prioritization framework that maximizes the “transportation value” delivered to Vermont taxpayers. Read the slide

Modernization & Expansion Goals Asset Management Modernization & Expansion Identify and define how regional ideas for transportation improvements can become transportation projects. Develop a fair, consistent, reliable, and standardized project selection and prioritization framework for use by all RPCs. Revise current processes to increase transparency, provide “best value” while communicating the “transportation” value to our customers. Develop processes and tools that guide the Agency towards holistic corridor management and planning. Identify a process that allows VTrans to remove candidate projects without legislative approval. Incorporate health and resiliency into VTrans’ project prioritization processes.

Customer Engagement Held 4 Stakeholder Workshops to assess current process and develop evaluation criteria. Cross Section of Workshop Participants Regional Planning Commissions (RPCs) Sister Agencies: VDH, ANR, ACCD, VEM Special Interests: VLCT, VCIL, AARP, AAA, Modal Interests: Rail Councils, Rail Operators, Bike / Ped Interest Groups, Transit Providers, VT Truck and Bus Association VTrans The workshops were attended by a diverse group of stakeholders representing the five modes. These 8 criteria resonated with the attendees and were also recognized as key components of VTrans’ current strategic plan and are also themes that have been independently verified, through public and internal outreach, during the early stages of the long range transportation plan development. Stakeholders helped to determine the initial weighting of the evaluation criteria.

MOBILITY / CONNECTIVITY FIVE MODES VPSP2 CRITERIA HIGHWAY RAIL SAFETY Max points = 20 ASSET CONDITION Max points = 20 MOBILITY / CONNECTIVITY Max points = 15 COMMUNITY Max points = 10 WALKS, TRAILS & PATHS ECONOMIC ACCESS Max points = 10 ENVIRONMENT Max points = 10 RESILIENCY Max points = 10 HEALTH ACCESS Max points = 5 TRANSIT AVIATION

Model Overview – How will it Work? Modernization & Expansion Projects VTrans Asset Driven Projects Model Overview – How will it Work? The VT Agency of Transportation budget is about $620 million, two thirds of that amount goes towards transportation projects and programs and 1/3 to maint/ops and admin. About 20% of the amount spent on projects is what we would consider to be modernization and expansion projects in the community driven path. There is an asset driven process (left side) and a community driven process (right side) which is mostly comprised of modernization & expansion type projects. These projects fall into one of the five modes. We are keeping track of the systems need and we will “harmonization” community driven needs with asset management projects when possible

Ideas  Needs  Projects Scoping IDEAS PROJECTS NEEDS GIS Mapped PE, ROW, Const. Projects that follow the Community Driven Path often start as ideas that are not yet well defined. At the projects stage….the concept is to identify the future modernization and expansion needs and the amount of budget available to address those needs and then SELECT the projects with the highest transportation value relative to cost. Asset Safety Resiliency Mobility Environment Economic Community Health Condition Connectivity Access Access VPSP2 Framework

Next Steps Refine Screening Method for Modernization & Expansion Project Path Finalize process for specific VTrans Asset Management & Safety Programs and Sub-Programs Pilot using current project list Implement no sooner than SFY 2022 Capital Plan Development

Questions?