Wallis Goelen – October 2019

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
Advertisements

Integrated Territorial Investments
The political framework
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Cross-border cooperation and regional development
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
Leader as a part of the new CAP
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
URBACT INFODAY FINLAND TOWARDS URBACT III Helsinki, 05 November 2014.
How the European Social Fund can contribute to social enterprises? Workshop 7: Structural funds (ESF, ERDF) for social enterprises Strasbourg, 16 January.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Deprived Urban Areas and Cohesion Policy URBACT Seminar – Deprived Urban Areas Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ, Senior Policy Officer, Directorate.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Call for Expressions of Interest for Targeted Analyses.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion European Territorial Cohesion and regions with geographic specificities Brussels,
The Territorial Dimension in the legislative proposals for cohesion policy Zsolt SZOKOLAI Policy Analyst, Urban development and territorial cohesion.
European & Structural Funds Programme SELEP CLLD Workshop Church House, London 3 December 2013
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
The place-based approach for territorial cohesion in the EU policies 5 November, Rome Patrick Salez DG REGIO, Directorate for Policy conception and coordination.
Regional Policy ESI Funds' Policy in European Trade Unions Confederation Brussels – 13 March 2014 Diego Villalba de Miguel – DG Regional and.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Template and guidance for the content of the Partnership Agreement 24 May
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Territorial development.
How to focus CLLD on the things it does best? Clarifying the strategic role of CLLD in the Partnership Agreements Seminar on Community-led Local Development.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Main elements of the templates for the Partnership Contract and the operational programme.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) Zsolt SZOKOLAI European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Fostering the urban dimension Analysis of Operational Programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
Metropolitan areas within EU Multi-Level Governance Cities of Tomorrow and the future urban dimension European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
3 Pat Henry Department of the Environment, Community & Local Government Rural Development Programme Ireland LEADER Pat Henry Department of the.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
Regional Policy Integrated Territorial Approaches Madrid, 22 February 2013.
1 Wladyslaw Piskorz Head of Unit ‘Urban development, territorial cohesion’ European Commission Directorate-General for Regional Policy Seminar organised.
Joint Principles for Adaptation (JPAs) By Marlene/Rudolf
EU Commission - DG Regional and Urban Policy 16
ATLANTIC STRATEGY and EU Cohesion Policy
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
European Structural and Investment Funds Community-led local development EU Commission - DG Regional and Urban Policy Peter Takacs –
Evaluation : goals and principles
Leader as a part of the new CAP
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Cohesion Policy and Cities
Eurostat Management Plan for Regional and Urban statistics
ODRAZ - Sustainable Community Development / EESC
Purpose of the presentation
Purpose of the CSF and Staff Working Document
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Future of Cohesion Policy
Integrated Territorial Investment
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
Embedding Governance & Participation in the European Structural Funds
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
The Urban Agenda for the EU
on future Cohesion Policy
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

PO5 Europe closer to citizens Programming integrated territorial development in 2021-2027 Wallis Goelen – October 2019 Senior expert attached to the Deputy Director General of DG REGIO

1. Understanding PO5: Objective? Method? Tool?

Policy objective 5 Objective? Method? Tool? PO5 is a cross-cutting territorial policy objective to address the diverse and interlinked territorial and local needs and challenges. PO5 entails a specific method of integrated territorial development, that requires place-based and integrated strategies, local empowerment and partnership. PO5 must be achieved via territorial tools: CLLD, ITI, or other territorial tools. Other territorial tools only possible under PO5 and ERDF (or under any funds and/or PO – PGA). Must also comply with the minimum requirements CLLD and ITI also available outside PO5 and can be multi-fund

The territorial policy objective Foster economic, social, and environmental sustainability and resilience in all places. Urban context: to benefit from agglomeration economies and positive spill-overs towards the wider functional urban areas and rural areas close to cities to address negative effects of concentration (traffic congestion, pollution, urban sprawl, affordable housing, poverty etc) Other territories: to build on the potentials and specific assets of remote rural areas and local communities (beyond compensatory measures) to overcome the negative effects of low density and peripherality (access to jobs and services, pooling resources)

The method Integrated Territorial Development What is integrated? Multi-sectoral Multi-level Multi-stakeholder Multi-territorial Community-led Shared management (Partnership + Multi-level governance) COHESION POLICY Integrated Place-based Macroregional strategies Transnational/cross-border Partnership Agreement National Programmes Regional/national Territorial strategies (Art. 23) Functional (Functional urban area) Local strategies (Art. 26) Subregional (Metropolitan region) Local admin (City/town/suburb) Community (Urb. neighbourhood) What is Integrated Territorial Development? (Art. 22) Territorial tools ITI (PO1-5) CLLD (PO1-5) Other (PO5) Cohesion Policy plays a central role in bringing Europe closer to its citizens and connects local development needs and potentials with European and global objectives to trigger economic, social and territorial cohesion in all regions. Through its shared management mode based on partnership and multi-level governance, Cohesion Policy is already integrated and place-based at European, national and regional level. Policy objective 5, together with the territorial instruments, aims to go one-step further in bringing the EU closer to the citizens, and provides incentives for integrated territorial development strategies beyond the traditional operational level of Cohesion Policy (national and regional). SUD 6%

Minimum requirements for 2021-2027 Key requirements to operationalise Cohesion Policy support to Integrated Territorial Development (CPR Art 23 for all territorial strategies and Art 25-28 for CLLD local strategies) Interventions linked to territorial or local strategies drawn up by local or territorial bodies Definition of the targeted area according to needs (must be urban for 6%) Locally coordinated interventions through an integrated approach (cross-sectoral, multi-territorial or multi-stakeholder) Relevant local or territorial bodies involved in project selection Partnership with relevant actors to be ensured at local level This slide is about the method – mínimum requirements that all interventions under PO5 and 6% need to comply with.

Rationale for integrated and place-based approach The EU must be able to respond to the expectations of its citizens, irrespective of where they live The number of place-based sectorial initiatives, notably targeting cities, is booming rapidly, but nor national, nor regional, nor local sectoral measures can alone deliver sufficient results. Need for economic, social, and environmental sustainability and resilience in all places Different territories and communities require differentiated and tailor-made policy mixes The rationale of Policy Objective 5 and Integrated Territorial development: In the reflection papers on the future of Europe it became clear, that the EU must be able to respond to the expectations of its citizens, irrespective of where they live in all regions. This is also evident from a growing number of place-based sectorial initiatives (e.g. Smart Cities, Smart Villages, Clean Islands etc) But it is also evident, that to achieve sustainable and resilient development, the economic, social and environmental dimension must work together in a more integrated way, where different territories and communities require differentiated and tailor-made policy mixes

The territorial tools in 2021-2027 Support from the Funds to be provided for integrated territorial and local development in forms of: Other territorial tool: Allowed when a territorial strategy receives funding only through PO5 priority or programme (CPR Art 22(c)) ITI: Necessary when territorial strategy receives funding from multiple priorities or even programmes, funds or POs (not exclusive to PO5), (CPR Art 24) CLLD: Specific delivery method to enhance the participatory approach (not exclusive to PO5), (CPR Art 25-28)

Support only through PO5 (other territorial tool, CLLD) ERDF/CF Programme Territorial strategy PO1 PO2 PO5 Provides continuation for the multi-thematic urban and CLLD priority axis and other national tools More suitable for experimentation and integrated local projects All intervention fields and indicators are available to monitor thematic inputs, outputs and results Special attention: Coordination with sectoral policies Scenario PO5: A country/region with high thematic concentration and/or small amount might decide to concentrate the ERDF support to a limited number of locally relevant themes identified in an integrated urban/territorial strategy. The strategy must be multi-sectoral also in this case. Special attention should be given to the integrated nature of the strategies and that interventions are relevant to the local development needs and potentials. Available territorial delivery mechanism: ITI, CLLD

Support through PO5 and other POs (ITI, CLLD) A very comprehensive way to provide support to a territorial strategy Can be suitable for a territorial strategy with a substantial support from Cohesion Policy Suitable to ensure the link with sectoral policies (enabling conditions, TC) Can include multiple tools and strategies (e.g. CLLD strategies within ITI strategy) Special attention: coordination across the different strands, governance and monitoring need to be adapted ERDF/CF Programme ESF Prog. Territorial Strategy PO1 PO2 PO4 PO3 PO5 Scenario ITI: A country/region which would like to support integrated territorial and urban strategies in the most comprehensive way can provide support through multiple strands, combining different policy objectives, programmes and funds. Special attention should be given to the appropriate administrative capacity an arrangements to coordinate across the different strands. Available territorial delivery mechanism: ITI, CLLD

Support outside PO5 (ITI, CLLD) Concentrate the ERDF support to a limited number of locally relevant themes Suitable for a country/region with high thematic concentration and/or small allocation At least two priority, and the local strategy must be integrated also in this case Special attention: integrated approach and the role of local level (minimum requirements) need to be ensured PO2 ERDF/CF Programme Territorial Strategy PO1 Scenario 1: A country/region with high thematic concentration and/or small amount might decide to concentrate the ERDF support to a limited number of locally relevant themes identified in an integrated urban/territorial strategy. The strategy must be multi-sectoral also in this case. Special attention should be given to the integrated nature of the strategies and that interventions are relevant to the local development needs and potentials. Available territorial delivery mechanism: ITI, CLLD

Thematic concentration and PO5 programming ERDF/CF Programme Territorial Strategy PO1 PO2 PO5 Contributes to thematic concentration Does not contribute to thematic concentration

ERDF thematic concentration Requirements refer to ‘budgetary allocations’ at priority level and NOT indicative types of intervention Policy objective 5 is outside the thematic concentration (types of actions falling within the scope of PO 1 and 2, but programmed under PO5 do not count for the thematic concertation) ITI and CLLD (or other territorial tools – PGA), which implement actions programmed under priorities related to PO1 and PO2 count into thematic concentration

Summary of main changes 2014-2020 Integrated territorial development treated horizontally (SUD, ITI, areas affected by poverty, geographic specificities etc.) Different set of rules for strategies depending on the territorial tools (SUD ITI, non-SUD ITI, CLLD, urban priority axis etc.) Specific role and obligatory IB status for urban authorities Guidance: integrated if strategy has at least two contributing thematic obj. ITI tool and multi-thematic priorities to draw funding from multiple thematic objectives Proposed for 2021-2027 Integrated territorial development has its own cross-cutting policy objective - Europe closer to citizens (PO5) Same basic requirements for all territorial and local strategies, introduced in the regulation (only CLLD requires a different method) Specific role without IB status for all tools Programmes to define integrated approach for strategies No multi-fund within PO5 priority (only with ITI and CLLD) No thematic concentration within PO5 priority (only with ITI and CLLD)

Thank you for your attention