Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Advertisements

A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
FOG-1 represses GATA-1-dependent FcϵRI β-chain transcription: transcriptional mechanism of mast-cell-specific gene expression in mice by Keiko Maeda, Chiharu.
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Hirotaka Matsui, Hiroya Asou, Toshiya Inaba  Molecular Cell 
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
The interferon regulatory factor ICSBP/IRF-8 in combination with PU
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages e6 (November 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Tomoyasu Hattori, Lukasz Stawski, Sashidhar S
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Transcriptional Regulation of ATP2C1 Gene by Sp1 and YY1 and Reduced Function of its Promoter in Hailey–Hailey Disease Keratinocytes  Hiroshi Kawada,
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ravindra Majeti, Christopher Y. Park, Irving L. Weissman 
Volume 143, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
SOCS1 Links Cytokine Signaling to p53 and Senescence
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Transcriptional Repression of miR-34 Family Contributes to p63-Mediated Cell Cycle Progression in Epidermal Cells  Dario Antonini, Monia T. Russo, Laura.
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
Akihiko Yokoyama, Michael L. Cleary  Cancer Cell 
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
NF-κB Is Required for UV-Induced JNK Activation via Induction of PKCδ
Shipra Das, Olga Anczuków, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 370-380 (March 2008) Mutations in Growth Factor Independent-1 Associated with Human Neutropenia Block Murine Granulopoiesis through Colony Stimulating Factor-1  Adrian Zarebski, Chinavenmeni S. Velu, Avinash M. Baktula, Tristan Bourdeau, Shane R. Horman, Sudeep Basu, Salvatore J. Bertolone, Marshal Horwitz, David A. Hildeman, John O. Trent, H. Leighton Grimes  Immunity  Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 370-380 (March 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.020 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Wild-type Gfi1 Induces, whereas N382S Mutant Blocks, Granulopoiesis In Vitro (A) Transient transcription assay with reporters, empty MSCV control (V), and MSCV vectors encoding Gfi1 (WT) and Gfi1N382S transfected into 293 cells. Results ± SD from three independent experiments depicted as transcriptional repression (Gfi1-responsive reporter versus control reporter) are shown. The inset shows immunoblot analysis with a Gfi1-peptide-specific rabbit polyclonal antisera for detecting expression of MSCV vector-encoded proteins in transfected 293 cells. (B) Methylcellulose colony formation of Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV expressing either Gfi1 WT or Gfi1N382S. Results of CFU assays are displayed as the percentage of CFU-G-, -M, and -GM from three independent wells ± SD with total number of colonies ± SD. (C) Cytospin from 4 day G-CSF-stimulated liquid cultures of Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV expressing either Gfi1 WT or Gfi1N382S. Human GFI1N382S patient sample cultured with human recombinant G-CSF from (Person et al., 2003). (D) Flow-cytometric analysis of liquid cultures in (C) with 7/4 and F4/80 for denoting neutrophil, mixed, and monocytic phenotypes. (E) Methylcellulose colony formation of Lin− bone-marrow cells from wild-type and Gfi1+/− littermates. (F) Methylcellulose colony formation of Lin− Gfi1−/− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV expressing either Gfi1 WT or Gfi1N382S. Immunity 2008 28, 370-380DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Predicted Gfi1-DNA Interactions (A) Computational model of Gfi1 zinc fingers 3 (contact residues in red), 4 (contact residues in blue), and 5 (contact residues in orange) interacting with the “R21” synthetic high-affinity DNA-binding site (violet). (B) Graphic representation of interactions between amino acids and nucleotides predicted by the model in (A). The line over DNA sequence indicates the AATC core of the Gfi1 binding site. Predicted contact nucleotides are shown in blue. Zinc finger amino acids that normally interact with DNA are in bold. (C) Interaction of Gfi1N382 with DNA. Numbers indicate distances in angstroms. (D) Interaction of Gfi1N382S with DNA. Numbers indicate distances in angstroms. Immunity 2008 28, 370-380DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gfi1 DNA Binding Is Required for G-CSF Induced Granulopoiesis (A) Amino acid sequence depicting Gfi1 zinc finger 3, 4, and 5. Amino acids predicted (by the computational model in Figure 2) to interact with DNA are in bold and large font. (B) Alanine-substitution mutants or a luciferase control (Luc.) were in vitro transcribed and translated (IVT, bottom), then incubated with a radiolabeled “R21” oligonucleotide. EMSA (middle panel) revealed shifted oligonucleotides (arrow). Panels are derived from an autoradiogram of a single gel that has been divided for clarity of presentation. (C) Methylcellulose colony formation of Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV expressing Gfi1 WT or alanine substitution mutants. Results of CFU assays are displayed as the percentage of CFU-G-, -M, and -GM from three independent wells ± SD with total number of colonies ± SD. (D) Cytospin and 7/4 versus F4/80 flow-cytometric analyses of 4 day G-CSF-stimulated liquid cultures of Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V), Gfi1 WT, and Gfi1 alanine-substitution mutants. Immunity 2008 28, 370-380DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 N382S Functions as a SNAG-Domain-Dependent Dominant Negative (A) Methylcellulose colony formation of Gfi1−/− Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV encoding Gfi1P2A (P2A). Results of CFU assays are displayed as the percentage of CFU-G-, -M, and -GM from three independent wells ± SD with total number of colonies ± SD. (B) Methylcellulose colony formation of wild-type Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV encoding Gfi1P2A or Gfi1P2A+N382S; ∗p < 0.01. (C and D) Cytospin (C) and 7/4 (D) versus F4/80 flow-cytometric analysis of 4 day G-CSF-stimulated liquid cultures of Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV encoding Gfi1P2A or Gfi1P2A+N382S. (E) Wild-type Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with CMMP empty vector (V) or CMMP encoding Gfi1 WT or Gfi1N382S were stimulated with G-CSF and then analyzed by flow cytometry for GFP and then for Annexin V versus 7AAD. The average percentage of GFP+ early apoptotic (Annexin V+ 7AAD−) cells from three independent experiments ± SD is shown. Immunity 2008 28, 370-380DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Gfi1N382S Suppresses Granulopoiesis by Deregulating Csf1 and Csf1r (A–C) Taqman analyses of steady-state gene expression in RNA from wild-type (WT) or Gfi1−/− (KO) littermate Lin− bone-marrow cells (which were not cultured ex vivo). Taqman values were normalized to Gapdh, and the average fold expression from at least three independent samples + SD is shown. (D–F) Taqman analyses of steady-state gene expression in Lin− cytokine-expanded bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV encoding Gfi1 or Gfi1N382S. (G) EMSA analyses of in vitro-transcribed and -translated Gfi1 binding to Csf1 promotor sequences. (H) Fold enrichment of Csf1 promoter sequences in chromatin-immunoprecipitation templates with a Gfi1-specific monoclonal antibody versus control mouse IgG from quantitative PCR amplification. The inset shows the ethidium-bromide-stained products of the amplification reactions for specific (Csf1) versus nonspecific (β-actin) targets. (I) Taqman analyses of human CD34+ bone-marrow cells from three normal donors (average normalized to one) versus a Gfi1N382S mutant patient. (J and K) Methylcellulose colony formation with cytospin from colonies of Lin− bone-marrow cells transduced with MSCV empty vector (V) or MSCV encoding Gfi1 or Gfi1N382S and then incubated with a Csf1-inactivating monoclonal antibody or an isotope-matched control IgG1κ. Results of CFU assays are displayed as the percentage of CFU-G-, -M, and -GM from three independent wells ± SD. (L and M) Methylcellulose colony formation with cytospin from colonies as in (J) and (K) with Csf1−/−(op/op) bone-marrow cells. Immunity 2008 28, 370-380DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions