Update on Operations planning & Data rights Robert Blum Acting Director for LSST Operations 12 August 2019.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Advertisements

The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
Previous Lecture Kinds of Contract Formal, Simple Quasi Contract
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
March Leadership Webinar March24, :00-11:30am To access this meeting by voice, please dial , participant code #
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
Open Public Meeting February 28, pm – 5 pm 1 Ashburton Place, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.
IANA Stewardship Transition & Enhancing ICANN Accountability Panel and Audience discussion | WSIS Forum | 5 May 2016.
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
LSST CORPORATION Patricia Eliason LSSTC Executive Officer Belgrade, Serbia 2016.
5H COMMUNITY READ Keegan Sulecki, Head of Adult Services Chelsea District Library Amount Requested: $3000 Intervention also funding in:  Year 1: $6900.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
CBETA Project ALD’s Cost and Schedule Review February 6, 2017
Baltimore Summer Funding Collaborative
LSST Data Management System Science Team Meeting Mario Juric, University of Washington LSST Data Management Subsystem Scientist Joint Technical Meeting.
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Regional Forum October 2016
Purpose of this discussion
Well Trained International
D I S C O V E R Y Challenge.
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
WP1 - Consortium coordination and management
LSST Commissioning: FY18 Planning
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities th August 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European.
Sponsored Programs (SP)
S4 will be a “big” Collaboration:
Helpful Hints & Fatal Flaws
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Session One – NSF Grants 101 May 23, :00 am – 12:00 pm EST
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
GMAS Preproposal Entry
Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Investment
TGn PSMP Ad-hoc July 2007 Date: Authors: July 2007
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
How do we carry out the election process last year?
Advisory Council of Instruction
MMU Project Management Community of Practice
Generic Terms & Conditions Information Session
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parental Involvement Policy
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Key Value Indicators (KVIs)
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
North American ALMA Development Program
Community Investment Grant
IMT-Advanced Status Report
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals
Agenda and minutes TGn PSMP ad hoc
PHMSA Update for the API RP1162 Rewrite Team
TGmb – Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 May 2007
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Notes on TGu liaison November 2005 Date: Authors:
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Neil Burke, Program Manager Erin Kinne, Principal Planner
Commissioning Data – Who and Why?
Practice Standards, Program Guides, and CES Operations Manual
Presentation transcript:

Update on Operations planning & Data rights Robert Blum Acting Director for LSST Operations 12 August 2019

Status of LSST Operations New Operations Funding and Data Rights Model Pre-Operations and Commissioning

LSST Survey is coming over the horizon

LSST Operations: Pre-operations Pre-operations began 2018 October 01 LSST, AURA, and SLAC developed a 16 year proposal for operations submitted to NSF in 2017 under AURA and to DOE from SLAC. Proposal was positively reviewed by DOE and NSF Pre-operations is a 4 year program to stand up the LSST operations team, develop the full operations survey plan, and begin supporting the LSST science community in advance of the full survey by serving existing data sets, commissioning, and science verification data products. NSF has awarded AURA a three year CSA for pre-operations (FY19-21) based on 2017 proposal. DOE is fully supporting pre-operations. We expect to have a Joint Operations Review in early CY20 to gain approval for the full survey operations

LSST Operations: Pre-ops Team Current team members Bob Blum, Acting Director of Operations Phil Marshall, Deputy Director of Operations at SLAC Wil O’Mullane, Associate Director for Science Operations Michelle Butler, Associate Director for Data Facility Amanda Bauer, Head of Education and Public Outreach Cathy Petry and Christine Soldahl, program coordinators Other effort for FY20 Chuck Claver, John Swinbank, Leanne Guy, Margaret Johnson, various pipeline and data facility scientists (NCSA, SLAC, BNL, FNAL, UW, Princeton), administrative support

Preview of tomorrow’s session. Presidio III/IV, 11 am Releasing pre-survey LSST data is the Operations team’s primary activity that connects to the community The Project will produce images and catalogs from the commissioning (ComCam and LSSTCam Science Validation [SV] survey) raw images The Commissioning Team will perform verification studies with these data, to check that the LSST system and science requirements are met The Operations Team will use them to develop and demonstrate their readiness to process and serve the LSST survey data Successful data service involves providing documentation and user support Community feedback will be vital both during the survey (to enable optimization of the system) and during commissioning (to help us make sure the system is set up well in the first place) Preview of tomorrow’s session. Presidio III/IV, 11 am

New NSF and DOE Funding Model In May of 2019, NSF and DOE announced the following regarding operations of LSST: NSF and DOE have reached agreement on LSST Data Rights and Funding model. NSF and DOE acknowledge the value of international partnerships for LSST. NSF and DOE are working to revise the partnership model to focus on in-kind contributions instead of monetary contributions. Original model sought 25% operations funds from International Contributors, but to date sufficient funding has not been identified. To ensure operations planning moves ahead smoothly, a new model for Data Access Rights and Operations Funding is being developed by NSF and DOE to ensure full support of LSST Operations.

New NSF and DOE May 2019 Memo Following careful consideration of potential approaches, NSF and DOE agree on the following points to move LSST operations planning forward: LSST will maintain the proprietary period for LSST data release and the open LSST alert stream with no proprietary period as previously planned---i.e., no change. The agencies have no plans to de-scope LSST operations and are working with their awardees (AURA and SLAC) on updated budget and operations planning. Following agencies' approval, the LSST project team will soon publish data rights and data access policies for LSST. International participants may enjoy the same data access rights as US scientists in exchange for in-kind contributions to the LSST construction project, facility operations, and/or related astrophysical resources as considered and agreed to jointly by the agencies (NSF and DOE). A new LSST Resource Board, led by NSF and DOE, will oversee and coordinate in-kind contributions and provide a forum for project contributors to participate in the LSST resource planning. The details of that Resource Board will be developed over the next year.

NSF’s and DOE’s Solely Authorized Points of Contact for LSST for International Participants NSF and DOE have directed their awardees, AURA and SLAC, to work directly with potential international participants. In their initial focus, AURA and SLAC will work directly with the potential international participants, who have previously engaged a clear interest in LSST data and a commitment to the success of the project through a planned monetary contribution, to develop an alternate approach through in-kind contributions to LSST. AURA and SLAC will work with the potential international participants to prepare in-kind contribution proposals for subsequent consideration and approval by NSF and DOE. Blum and Marshall are Point of Contact for for planning in-kind contributions.

Implementing In-Kind Partnerships I Final consideration and approval of in-kind agreements will be by NSF and DOE. The agreements will provide data rights and access. Partnerships for In-kind offsets to LSST operations will not be sought broadly. LSST will work directly with certain potential large partners (with MOAs with LSSTC) to develop operations offset agreements. Such in-kind agreements will be agreed to by AURA and SLAC. LSST will solicit further in-kind contributions from international participants that would enhance LSST operations or science. These could provide “other resources” like access to telescope time or data sets of interest to the U.S. community, or they could “add value” via contributions deemed to have scientific value to the U.S. beyond the basic operation of the LSST facility. Letters of Intent will be solicited this fall, with proposals for the contents of the new agreements to be developed in 2020.

Implementing In-Kind Partnerships II In-kind contributions of added value or other resources will be assessed and recommended by LSST through a TBD process for scientific impact, support to US science, and will be agreed to by AURA and SLAC. New agreements will be made with international partners for approved in-kinds. NSF and DOE will determine if agreements may be delegated to/signed by AURA and SLAC, or if agreements are to be made directly with NSF and/or DOE. NSF and DOE prioritize in-kind contributions in the following order (highest first): Operations offsets, other resources, added value. NSF and DOE have approved this basic implementation plan.

MOA Holders For a duration of up to two years from May 2019, and while in-kind contributions are negotiated and codified in new agreements, LSST will provide the anticipated benefits to international contributors as identified in MOAs with LSSTC (as of May 2019). LSST does not consider extant MOAs with LSSTC to incur any financial obligations to LSST (LSST is not expecting or planning to take money from international partners). Benefits principally include data rights and ability to be in or join LSST Science Collaborations If you are an international partner with an MOA, LSST will solicit in-kind contributions from you even if you need to end your MOA with LSSTC before a new agreement is finished. Unsolicited proposals for in-kind contributions from non-MOA holders will be a) welcome and b) in some cases targeted by LSST as appropriate or desired. All things being equal, LSST would prioritize MOA holders (as of May 2019) over non-MOA holder for the same or similar in-kind contribution.

Timeline Proposed timeline subject to modification We’ve begun talking to some international partners about in-kind offsets to Operations LOI solicitations to MOA holders October 2019 LOI’s accepted through March 2020 From now – Q1 2020, working on setting up process to include AURA, SLAC, NSF, DOE in offsets, other resources, and added value. Other resources and added value vetting process to be run by LSST. We are discussing how to add SAC and Science Collaborations to process directly. Approval held at AURA/SLAC and NSF/DOE (ultimate) Finish all new agreements by June 2021.

Data Rights The Data Rights Policy (DRP) is nearly complete. Will be handing a version to NSF and DOE for approval very soon Policy is evolved from LPM-261 that community provided broad input to last fall Changes, combined with new Funding/In-kind Model, make policy generally more liberal with respect to LSST data rights holders collaborating on their science The DRP will be a public document. Stay tuned. The policy document will be put under Operations Change Control and can be modified in advance of the survey as appropriate.

Tuesday Session Please join us on Tuesday at 11am in Presidio III/IV, for a session on “Data Rights & Pre-Operations Data Release Scenarios” We will have BlueJeans Connection (shared risk); tell your friends. Agenda: Q&A about funding model and data rights (30 min) Presentation on scenarios for data previews during commissioning (20 min) Open discussion about your data needs and desires for data previews during commissioning/pre-ops. (40 min)

End of Presentation Photo credit Kevin Reil