January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Submission PSNI: New PHY Measurement a subjective, comparative measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /1508r0 November 2014 Edward Reuss, UnaffiliatedSlide 1 Link Margin Comments on Letter Ballot 203 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1139r1 Submission September 2004 Joe Kwak Slide 1 Comment Resolution Summary Letter Ballot 71 Category: RCPI Joe Kwak InterDigital.
September 2002 Steve Pope, TISlide 1 doc.: IEEE /520r0 Submission Issues Related to RSSI Measurement Steve Pope Texas Instruments September.
Doc.: IEEE /0890r0 Submission July 2014 Youhan Kim, QualcommSlide 1 WLAN-3GPP Interworking Metric Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
1 Physical Layer ผศ. ดร. อนันต์ ผลเพิ่ม Asst. Prof. Anan Phonphoem, Ph.D. Computer Engineering Department.
Doc.: IEEE / p-r0 Submission Liu / Roebuck / Roy / Zhu July 2005 Slide 1 WRSS in p Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission September 2015 Hidetoshi Yokota and Ruben Salazar, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE /0079r1May 2005.
Doc: IEEE /0779r1September 2005 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 RSNI: Simple SNIR for TGk Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Submission Page 1 November 2002 doc.: IEEE /677r0 Daryl Kaiser, Cisco Systems Radio Measurement Actions Daryl Kaiser (Cisco Systems) 12 November.
Doc: IEEE /0435r0May 2005 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Support for Advanced Antennas & Techniques in TGk Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE /0079r0January 2005.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 RCPI: Improved RSSI Measurement a quantized power measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications.
September 2002 doc.: IEEE /568r0 David Skellern, Cisco SystemsSlide 1Submission RRM Architectural Framework David Skellern Wireless Networking.
Submission Page 1 January 2003 doc.: IEEE /029r0 Daryl Kaiser, Cisco Systems New Radio Measurement Actions within the h Framework Daryl.
Doc.: IEEE /618r0 Submission August 2002 Bobby Jose,Slide 1 RRM Requirements discussion on CCA Bobby Jose.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/004r0 Submission 23 January, 2001 James P. K. Gilb, Appairent Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 Retrieving MIB contents from STA’s Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /554r0July 2003.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 Two New MAC Measurements loading measurements for STA transmit traffic and AP service ability to support network management.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2010 Tim Schmidl (Texas Instruments), Emmanuel Monnerie (Landis & Gyr), Shusaku Shimada (Yokogawa Co.),
Doc.: IEEE /457 Submission May 2003 Hart/Ryan/Skellern CiscoSlide 1 Use of EVM to Measure Rx Output Signal Quality Brian Hart, Phil Ryan, David.
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
Support for Advance Antennas & Techniques in WNM
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRM related functions in ]
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: pureLiFi r1 proposal for High Speed.
AP Service Load: Improved Definition
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Summary of Proposed Text for Radio Measurement Requests and Reports
Support for Deferral Management in v
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
Broadcast of Neighbor Info
Signal Quality Measurements
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
EVM vs PER Plot Not Promising for PSNI
TGh Monitored Signal Strength Indication (MSSI)
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Simple SNIR for TGk 2005-JULY-21 Authors: Joe Kwak, InterDigital
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
May 2002 doc.: IEEE /299R0 May 2002 Slides to Assist with non-19 Comments (based on R1 Comment Resolution Excel Sheet) Terry Cole AMD.
TPC Comments Date: Authors: January 2005
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Comment Resolution Summary Letter Ballot 1 Category: RCPI
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
WRSS in p Date: July 2005 Month Year
Support for Advanced Antennas & Techniques in TGk
WLAN-3GPP Interworking Metric
<month year> doc.: IEEE s September 2019
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Patrick Worfolk (Kiwi Networks)
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
Presentation transcript:

January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation IEEE 802.11-03/100r1 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/224r2 March 2003 RCPI: Improved RSSI Measurement a quantized power measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital

Outline Need for improved RSSI measurement RSSI Limitations January 2003 IEEE 802.11-03/100r1 Outline Need for improved RSSI measurement RSSI Limitations RCPI Specification details Open Issues Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

802.11 defined PHY Measurements TGK is tasked with providing new interfaces, new measurements, and mechanisms to support higher layer functions for efficient network management. 802.11 currently has several PHY measurements, none of which seem suitable for handoff or network management purposes. RSSI: reportable parameter for each received frame, but unquantized and not fully specified. Can be used to compare frames from different AP sources. SQ: another unquantized indicator of code sync, but applicable only to DSSS PHY. RPI histogram: quantized and specified, but measures channel power from all sources: 802.11x, radars, and other interferers. Cannot target measurement on any AP using particular PHY . Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Network Management Needs Comparative PHY (clauses 15, 17, 18, 19) Measurements 1. To compare power levels on same channel, same PHY, in same STA 2. To compare power levels on same channel, same PHY, in different STAs 3. To compare power levels on different channels, same PHY, in same STA 4. To compare power levels on different channels, same PHY, in different STAs 5. To compare power levels on different PHYs in different STAs 6. To compare power levels on different PHYs in same STA Comparative measurements are crucial to QOS and handoff decisions for Network Management, as discussed at Tutorial at last meeting. Comparative measurements are important for load management and interference mitigation. RSSI, as currently defined, only addresses needs #1 and #3. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

RSSI definitions in 802.11 15.4.5.10.2 PMD_RSSI.indicate(RSSI): The RSSI shall be a measure of the RF energy received by the DSSS PHY. RSSI indications of up to 8 bits (256 levels) are supported. 17.2.3.2 RXVECTOR RSSI: The allowed values for the receive signal strength indicator (RSSI) parameter are in the range from 0 through RSSI maximum. This parameter is a measure by the PHY sublayer of the energy observed at the antenna used to receive the current PPDU. RSSI shall be measured during the reception of the PLCP preamble. RSSI is intended to be used in a relative manner, and it shall be a monotonically increasing function of the received power. 17.5.5.7.2 PMD_RSSI.indicate: This primitive shall provide the following parameters: PMD_RSSI.indicate(RSSI) The RSSI shall be a measure of the RF energy received by the OFDM PHY. RSSI indications of up to eight bits (256 levels) are supported. 18.4.5.11.2 PMD_RSSI.indicate: This primitive provides RSSI parameter as 0–8 bits of RSSI. The RSSI is a measure of the RF energy received by the High Rate PHY. 19.2 RSSI: The RSSI is a measure of the RF energy received by the ERP. The value depends on the value of the MODULATION parameter: CCK, ER-PBCC: the 8 bit value of RSSI as described in 18.4.5.11. ERP-OFDM, DSSS-OFDM, the 8 bit value is in the range of 0 to RSSI maximum as described in 17.2.3.2. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

RSSI Limitations In high interference environments, RSSI is not an adequate indicator of desired signal power level, since it indicates the sum of desired signal + noise + interference powers. RSSI is not fully specified: no unit definitions, no performance requirements (accuracy, fidelity, testability). Since so little about RSSI is specified, it must be assumed that widely variant implementations already exist. It is not possible to compare RSSIs from different STAs and perhaps not even from different channels/PHYs within same STA. RSSI may have limited use for relative power levels within a STA and within a given PHY, but not between PHYs. RSSI is rescaled between DSSS and OFDM PHYs. RSSI is clearly not useable by network management for handoff or load balancing. RSSI from one STA does not relate to RSSI from any other STA. Proposed RCPI overcomes these limitations by providing a quantized, comparative measure of power level for all channels/rates and among all PHYs and STAs. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Options for PHY measurements AGC Desired Input Power level at A (antenna connector) is normally measured indirectly by AGC value used for front end gain control. B C D Demodulator and tracking loops (PHY specific) E FEC Decoder (optional) Frame Check (CRC) A/D A Radio front end [Rx BW filter] A: RF power, RF S/(N+I) from each AP C&D: Bit Error Rate (BER) @each data rate B: BB S/(N+I) from each AP, (BB power constant by AGC) E: Frame Error Rate (FER) @each data rate Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Specified 802.11 PHY Dynamic Ranges Defined from Minimum Sensitivity Level at minimum data rate (low end of range) to Maximum Input Level (high end of range). Clause 15: -80 to -4 dBm for baseline DSSS Clause 17: -82 to -30 dBm for 11a OFDM Clause 18: -76 to -10 dBm for 11b DSSS Clause 19: -82 to -20 dBm for 11g OFDM/DSSS Superset range is from -82 to -4 dBm Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Received Channel Power Indication (RCPI) Specified like RSSI: 8-bit unsigned value, monotonically increasing with increasing signal strength. RCPI shall be logarithmically scaled in dB to total received power within defined channel bandwidth at the antenna connector. Includes signal, noise, interference, and impairments. RCPI values shall be quantified in dBm and accuracy shall be specified across entire RCPI range. The 256 RCPI values shall range from -110 dBm to 0 dBm with 2 units per dB. RCPI accuracy shall be +/- 5dB across the defined range, equivalent to accuracy specified by TGH for RPI histogram. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Draft Normative Text (add as para 18. 4. 5. x titled “PMD_RCPI Draft Normative Text (add as para 18.4.5.x titled “PMD_RCPI.indicate” after 18.4.5.15) RCPI: The RCPI indicator is a measure of the received RF power in the selected channel, measured at the antenna connector. This parameter shall be a measure by the PHY sublayer of the received RF power in the channel measured over the current frame. RCPI shall be measured over an entire received frame. RCPI shall be a monotonically increasing, logarithmic function of the received power level defined in dB. The allowed values for the Received Channel Power Indicator (RCPI) parameter shall be an 8 bit value in the range from 0 through 255, with indicated values rounded to the nearest .25 dB as follows: 0: Power < -110 dBm 1: Power = -109.5 dBm 2: Power = -109.0 dBm and so on 220: Power > -0 dBm 221-255: reserved Accuracy for each measurement shall be +/- 5dB. The measurement shall assume a receiver noise equivalent bandwidth of 22 MHz. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

RCPI May Supercede RSSI in Existing Specs The definition of RCPI meets the requirements for RSSI: 8-bit unsigned value Monotonically increasing function of received signal power TGK may specify that for STAs which comply with 802.11K, STAs may report RCPI (or PSNI) in any data field calling for RSSI. A new SME control variable could specify the use of the RSSI field: a) for RCPI, b) for PSNI, or c) for RSSI and so on. This makes the RCPI, and other new indicators, broadly reported and broadly applicable as frame quality measurements useful for all PHYs and STAs. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Tasks for Next Meeting Integrate normative text into new TGK draft spec. Discuss Nomenclature options RCPI vs RSPI vs others. Discuss RCPI accuracy spec: +/- 20 units == +/- 5.0 dB. Consider various receiver filter BW implementations on new RCPI measurement. Consider advanced antenna designs with respect to new RCPI measurement Consider feedback, criticism and alternate draft specification wording. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission