ХВТ Fracturing fluid.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nano Technologies for Improved Oil & Gas Recovery.
Advertisements

PRODUCT PURIFICATION PRECIPITATION
2012 Williston Basin Petroleum Conference
Preformed Particle Gel (PPG) for Conformance Control
Definition of the problem Objectives of the project Engine oil Grease Experimental work Economic study Layout of the plant Results Discussion of the results.
Properties of Starches and Gums
Soft cosmetic products, creams. Suspensions, gels.
Separation of molecules and determination of there molecular weight by gel filtration chromatography. Experiment 7 BCH 333.
Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard.
Ionic Liquids for Natural Product Extraction
Shear rheometry characterization of fracture-healing behavior displayed by a physically associating gel Abhishek Bawiskar and Prof. Kendra A. Erk School.
Flame photometry.
July 29, Bench Top Tests for Surfactant Selection Ayantayo Ajani The University of Tulsa.
MUD SYSTEMS, MUD DATA & HYDRAULICS A.Fresh Water Muds B.Inhibited Muds C.Water Base Emulsion D.Oil Base & Synthetic Muds I- MUD SYSTEMS.
Petroleum & Natural Gas Eng. Dept.
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
Unconventional Gas: Shale Gas Shale Gas  Unconventional gas (hydrocarbons) found in subsurface shale formations  Replacement to coal, oil, and natural.
Gels. Gels are defined - as semisolid systems consisting of dispersions made up of either small inorganic particles or large organic molecules enclosing.
Rock Coring Obtain undisturbed samples of solid, fractured, or weathered rock formations.
Verifying the Use of Specific Conductance as a Surrogate for Chloride in Seawater Matrices Rob Mooney Technical Marketing Manager In-Situ ® Inc.
Ion-Exchange Resins as Drug Delivery Carriers Resins used are polymers that contain appropriately substituted acidic groups, such as carboxylic and sulfonic.
Principal Investigators: Ding Zhu and A. D. Hill
The determination of lead by MD-HG-AFS in APMP*-QM-P3 comparison Lu Xiaohua, Lu Hai, Ma Liandi, Cui Yanjie National Research Center for Certified Reference.
07/ This document is the property of SNF. It must not be reproduced or transfered without prior consent Enhanced Oil Recovery Optimizing Molecular.
Eagle Ford Shale Stimulation Demands:
NFSI Super System Our Mission Is to provide our customers the best new technologies and select existing technologies with honesty and integrity. NFSI.
Bringing Value to Russian Federation Fracturing Business:
Nitrogen Foam Fracturing in the Hugoton Gas Field Marietta College Dept. of Petroleum Engineering and Geology ENGL 406 Project 4: Proposal March 16, 2005.
Module 1, Part 3: Process validation Slide 1 of 22 © WHO – EDM – 12/2001 Validation Part 3: Process validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing.
MODELLING THE PULLOUT OF HOOKED STEEL FIBERS FROM CEMENTITIOUS MATRIX Edmunds Zīle, Olga Zīle Institute of Polymer Mechanics Riga, Latvia.
Platzhalter Titelbild Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP) as Water-Blocking Components in Cables Martin Tennie ICC Meeting November.
First Sildril-K trial in Russia. Background. Region:Western Siberia, Russia Oil field:Samotlor Operator:TNK-Nizhnevartovsk Drilling contractor:NBN Drilling.
TECHNIQUES OF POLYMERIZATON
Solution Chemistry Test Review Work Stations. Station 1 – Solubility Concepts 1.Identify the three factors that affect the rate of solution formation.
Snorre in-depth water diversion using silicate Arne Stavland, Hilde Jonsbråten, Olav Vikane, IRIS Kjetil Skrettingland and Herbert Fischer, Statoil FORCE.
22nd International Petroleum Environmental Conference November 17-19, 2015, Denver, CO Review of Industry Methods for Sourcing and Storing Water, and Treating.
Polymer Synthetic Lubricants Additives. Lubricants and Their Additives  What are Synthetic Lubricants?  What Additives are in Synthetic Lubricants?
AN ANALYSIS OF SLICKWATER SOLUTIONS IN HYDRAULIC FRACTURING By Andrew Campbell and Aaron Johnson Chart of the common breakdown of fracking fluid composition,
Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals: An Overview July 2, 2014 Presenter: Jason Winegarden District Technical Manager Jane Lew, WV.
1 ● Well Completions (casing protocols) ● Acidizing ● Fracture treatments.
Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with
SPE AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR FILTER CAKE FORMATION IN FRACTURES Randy Seright New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center.
DNA extraction.
Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking)
Anatoly Stoyanov UKOILSERVICE LIMITED. Water production is one of the major technical, environmental, and economical problems associated with oil and.
DEVELOPMENT, OPTIMIZATION AND PROCESS VALIDATION OF THE MODIFIED QUASSI EMULSION SOLVENT DIFFUSION METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION OF MICROSPONGES Rishabh Srivastava*,
KY-MF-1.
Polymerization techniques Homogeneous systems Bulk polymerization Solution polymerization Heterogeneous systems Suspension polymerization Emulsion.
Ghazanfar Abbas Medical technologist (SIUT)
LAL: Choice of Test Method
The Release Of Curcumin From Alginate Beads In Different Media
Oil-Field Hydraulics Chapter 4 Completion and Workover Fluids
Nanoparticle-stabilized emulsions for improved oil recovery Steven Bryant, The University of Texas at Austin Nanoparticles with appropriate coatings can.
Unconventional Reservoirs
CARBOMED 940 ACRYLIC ACID POLYMER FOR PERSONAL CARE DRY, SYNTHETIC, HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYMER OF ACRYLIC ACID CROSS-LINKED WITH ALLYL ETHERS OF.
KNOW YOUR CONTROL FLUID
Chip Seal Quality Assurance Guide
Basic Seminar Rheology March 22th to 23th 2017
Novel Toughening Technology for Epoxy Thermosets Steve Hoyles, Nikhil Verghese, Michael Ross, Marv Dettloff and Ha Pham The Dow Chemical Company 11/22/2018.
Treatment of Produced Fluids:
Basic Seminar Rheology May 15th and 16th 2018
Mohr Separations Research, Inc.
Starch and Carbohydrates
Hemin J Majeed MSc. Pharmaceutical sciences
Ionic Liquids for Natural Product Extraction
Chapter 16 Solutions.
Presentation transcript:

ХВТ Fracturing fluid

Content ХВТ Introduction Goal ХВТ fluid system description Comparison of gelling agents Conclusion and proposal Auxiliary materials

Frac gellant agents in Russian market: Introduction ХВТ Frac gellant agents in Russian market: Short-term outlook for Russian market. Guar based frac fluids 99% Other (VES). 1% Implementation of frac fluid based on synthetic polymer materials.

Goal ХВТ Goals of the project. Expectations: Pilot frac job with synthetic polymer. Result evaluation. Implementation of the new technology into Russian market. Expectations: Increase in production up to 15% with no increase of proppant quantaty. Price stabilization for gelling agents in Russian market by limiting monopoly of international producers of guar (price sensitivity range= 10 times). Reduction of dependences by localizing of production in Russia.

Description of ХВТ ХВТ ХВТ is a fluid system based on modified polyacrylamide gelling agent. Base components: Recommended fluid design: 6кг/м³ ХВТ-3, 2,4кг/м³ ХВТ-XL, 0,01-0,3кг/м³ braker Type Components % ХВТ-3 (gelling agent) acrylamide, sodium acrylate, N-16 alkyl copolymer acrylamide, ammonium chloride 75 25 ХВТ-XL (crosslinker) Dodecane sulphonates, isopropyl alcohol, Water 20 60

ХВТ fluid system description ХВТ No insoluble precipitates; Fast gelation (less than 5 minutes); Insensitive to bacteria, salt concentrations, water temperature; Wide temperature range (20 -180°С); Perfect shear elasticity; Perfect post stress recovery (in perforation); Significant reduction of friction (76% less, than for fresh water); High proppant load at 20-50 сР.

Comparison of gelling agents systems ХВТ Type Advantages Disadvantages Guar availability proven technology price (in stable market) Formation damage (up to 30% insoluble precipitates, fisheye) High requirements to water quality and temperature (long frac preparation) Limitation by formation temperature High viscosity (high pressure, equipment ware) Instable quality (guar from formed SU republics) Unstable price (depends on USD/RRUB rate) Complicated mixing (up to 10 additives) SAS (VES) No formation damage (if formation fluid compatible) No insoluble particles Sensitive to formation fluid High requirements to water quality Required additional treatments (before and after pumping) Limited proppant load (800 кg/м3) Unstable at high formation temperature Sanctions to Russia High pricing

Comparison of gelling agents systems ХВТ type advantages disadvantages ХВТ No formation damage (perfect flowback) No insoluble residuals Perfect post stress recovery Wide formation temp range (20-180С) High proppant load range at low viscosity (low pressure) Low requirements to water quality and temp (reduced frac preparation) Simple mixing (3 components) Low frac cost No records in Russia Inadequate production volume

Conclusion and Proposal ХВТ XBT frac fluid system has been successfully implemented in more than 3000 wells in China and in the USA. Number of laboratory tests has been taken in Russia (results are on auxiliary slides). Advantages: Less contamination of formation – increase in production. Simpler frac preparation process (delivery, heating) Significant frac time reduction (25%). Less time to maximum well production. Proposal: To run 10-15 pilot jobs for OGC.

Auxiliary material - 1 ХВТ Sensitivity to concentration of crosslinker ХВТ rheology. Recommended crosslinker concentration 0,24 %. Taken lab experiment with concentration 0,22, 0,24 and 0,28% - no affect on gel stability.

Auxiliary material - 2 ХВТ Sensitivity to breaker ХВТ rheology. Sensitivity to not life breaker. Min required viscosity 20сР. Gel stability vs concentration of life breaker. Fluid design: 0,6% - gelant, 0,24% - crosslinker. Concentration of life breaker 0,01-0,05 кг/м³.

Auxiliary material - 3 ХВТ Sensitivity to incapsulated breaker ХВТ rheology. Sensitivity to incapsulated breaker. Gel stability vs concentration of incapsulated breaker. Fluid design: 0,6% - gelant, 0,24% - crosslinker. Breaker concentration 0% - 0,3кg/м³.

Auxiliary material - 4 ХВТ Sensitivity to shear rate ХВТ rheology. Sensitivity to shear rate. High stability, high recovery.

Auxiliary material - 5 ХВТ Compatibility to formation fluid Compatibility to formation fluid (Samotlor oilfield). Left. broken emulsion ХВТ. 90% of emulsion broken in 30 min at 90°С. Right. Broken emulsion with broken ХВТ fluid. 90% of emulsion broken in 10 hour at 90°С.

Auxiliary material - 6 ХВТ Conditions of broken gel Insoluble residues. Frac fluid based: guar (left) (gelant 3,6 кg/м³). ХВТ (right) (concentration 6 кg/м³).

Auxiliary material - 7 ХВТ Results from producer. Core test analysis. Formation damage ХВТ Results from producer. Average value of formation damage from 4 ХВТ samples - 12.07% Average value of formation damage from guar - 28.3%