ICEOS 2013 At What Levels Are Free-Hand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children? Mark Heidenreich, BS Yaser M.K. Baghdadi, MD Amy L. McIntosh,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Safety and Effectiveness of Convex Anterior and Posterior Hemiepiphysiodesis for the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis Andrew Thome, Jr. 1, Roshan.
Advertisements

Intraoperative Iso-C C-arm navigation surgery for spinal and pelvic trauma Kobe Red Cross Hospital Yasuo Ito K. Koshimune, T. Takigawa, S. Nakahara, T.
Anton Borgers Lieven Moke Thibault Dewilde Pierre Moens U.Z. Leuven
F Schwab 1,2, JP Farcy 1,2, K Bridwell 2, S Berven 2, S Glassman 2,
Surgical treatment analysis of 809 thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult deformity cases by a new adult scoliosis classification system Zorab Symposium.
Done by : Abdulgadir F. Bugdadi Ahmed Al-Shinkiti Hassan Al-Fadda Blind Ventricular Catheter Placement in Experienced Hands: How Optimal is it?
MINIMIZE IMPLANTS, MAXIMIZE OUTCOMES
Surgery of Spinal Deformities Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute Bologna, Italy Surgical options in progressive scoliosis in pediatric patients with Neurofibromatosis.
Therapeutic and diagnostic protocol for the treatment of scoliosis associated with Syringomyelia Francesco Lolli, Konstantinos Martikos, Francesco Vommaro,
Copyright © 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized commercial reproduction of this slide is prohibited Supplemental PowerPoint Slides Positioning.
POSTOPERATIVE LEFT SHOULDER ELEVATION (LSE) IN PATENTS WITH NON-STRUCTURAL PROXIMAL THORACIC CURVES (PT): CAN IT BE PREVENTED IN PATIENTS WITH PREOPERATIVE.
Surgical Approaches for Various Pathologies LevelsDisc HerniationApproaches SOFT DISC T1 to T4Central, centrolateralTranssternal Central, centrolateralMedial.
Copyright © 2015 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized commercial reproduction of this slide is prohibited Supplemental PowerPoint Slides Prediction.
Thoracogenic Spinal Deformity: A Rare Cause of Early Onset Scoliosis International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis November 19 & 20, 2015 A. Noelle Larson,
©2015 MFMER | slide-1 How Does Patient Radiation Exposure Compare with Low Dose O-Arm vs. Fluoroscopy for Pedicle Screw Placement? a,b Alvin W. Su, MD,
Secondary Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome in None Ambulatory Myelodisplastic Children.
Growth Preserving Spinal Surgery for Scoliosis in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta Lawrence Karlin, MD, Amer Samdani, MD, Anna McClung, BSN, RN, Michael.
In the first 5 years of Treatment, the Charges for Guided Growth Constructs are 30% less than Growing Rods Lindsay M. Andras MD 1, Liam Harris BS 1, Scott.
Classification of Early Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS) Has Almost Perfect Inter and Intra Observer Reliability Micaela Cyr, BA Tricia St. Hilaire, MPH Zhaoxing.
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
Incidence of Proximal junctional kyphosis with Magnetic Expansion Control Rods in early onset scoliosis P Inaparthy, JC Queruz, C Thakar, D Rolton, C Nnadi.
Florence Nightingale Hospital
The Rib Construct (RC) has provided secure proximal fixation for management of patients with EOS and severe thoracic hyperkyphosis Alaa Azmi Ahmad – MD.
Authors: Pooria Hosseini MD MSc, Jeff Pawelek BS, Stacie Nguyen MPH, George H. Thompson MD, Suken A. Shah MD, John M. Flynn MD, John P. Dormans MD, Behrooz.
Scoliosis By: Aleks Olvera.
INTRODUCTION A major limitation of C-arm fluoroscopy is the inability to capture radiographic images in more than one anatomical plane at a time. The G-arm.
[2014]. 2 References 1. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine. 2007;32(3):E Gertzbein SB, Robbins.
Xingye Li, Jianxiong Shen, M.D.
Joseph A. Sclafani MD1,2, Kevin Liang PhD 2, Choll W Kim MD,PhD1
Olson EM, Sturm PF, Jain VV, Schultz LR, Glos DL, Bylski-Austrow DI
Swamy Kurra Stephen Albanese Patrick Cahill Randal Betz
Prospective clinical study of spine growth modulation using
Adam Margalit, BS Paul D. Sponseller, MD Richard McCarthy, MD
Clearing the Pediatric Cervical Spine
The surgical treatment aims to:
Retrospective Review of Shoulder Balance Comparing Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) to Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Patrick J. Cahill William Lavelle.
Nicole Michael, BA John Smith, MD Tricia St. Hilaire, MPH
Results of Growth Friendly Surgery Versus Casting for the Treatment of EOS in Patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome Jonathan Oore, Braydon Connell, Burt.
A. Kaye, G. Williams, A.P. Mollloy, C. Butcher, L.W. Mason
Postoperative Weight Loss and its Impact on Outcomes in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis after Spinal Fusion Roslyn Tarrant1,2, Mary Nugent3,
Hong Zhang, M.D. and Daniel J. Sucato, M.D., MS.
Children’s National Health System ICEOS 2016 – Utrecht, Holland
Surgical treatment of severe scoliosis in young children using magnetically controlled growing rods – initial experience in a prospective cohort Benny.
Risk of post-operative stroke in patients with known extra-cranial carotid artery disease undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Heart and Vascular.
Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Pediatric Deaths:
Advances in Spine Care Could Save the U.S. Healthcare System Billions
MIS Techniques Applied to Deformity:
Distraction-to-stall ensures spinal growth in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods Benny Dahl1), Casper Dragsted2), Søren Ohrt-Nissen2), Thomas Andersen2),
Richard Schwend, MD Robert Tung, BS Division of Orthopedic Surgery
E-Poster 159 VEPTR Implantation to Treat Children with Early Onset Scoliosis without Rib Abnormalities: A Prospective Multicenter Study Ron El-Hawary,
Top 3 Articles That Changed My Approach to EOS
Sara K. Fuhrhop, BS Mark J. McElroy, MS Harry C. Dietz, MD
Charles E. Johnston, MD Anna McClung BSN, RN Scott Paradise
Garrido E†, Bermejo F†, Tucker SK†‡, Noordeen HNN†‡, Morley TR‡
Dual Rods and Submuscular Rod Placement Reduce Complications and Unplanned Surgeries in the Growing Spine: Analysis of 910 Surgeries in 143 Patients Shay.
John A Heflin, MD John T. Smith, MD
Long-term results in surgical management of congenital scoliosis (CS): A minimum 10 years follow-up study Debnath UK Harshavardhana NS Hegarty J Grevitt.
M. Bulent Balioglu, Y. Emre Akman, Yunus Atici,
Classification of EOS Treatment
Sumeet Garg, MD The Children’s Hospital, Colorado
Nicholas D. Fletcher, MD¹ Charles E. Johnston III, MD²
Bylski-Austrow DI, Okonny M, Glos DL, Wall EJ, Crawford AH
Modeling Thoracic Volume To predict Pulmonary Function in Scoliosis
Anterior instrumentation and correction
Suken A. Shah, MD Jon Oda, MD William Mackenzie, MD
Sagittal alignment of the spine is changing!
Scoliosis surgery with hybrid system in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI)
Coombs MT, De Carvalho MF, Glos DL, Kim J, Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI
ARTHROGRYPOSIS AND VEPTR
Presentation transcript:

ICEOS 2013 At What Levels Are Free-Hand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children? Mark Heidenreich, BS Yaser M.K. Baghdadi, MD Amy L. McIntosh, MD William J. Shaughnessy, MD Anthony A. Stans, MD A. Noelle Larson, MD No Disclosures for the above authors.

Background Up to 5-10% of freehand pedicle screws in children reported to be malpositioned* 1 in 300 patients return to OR for screw malposition‡ We hypothesized that screw malposition would be more frequent in deformity and in the apical concavity Clinically helpful to know, what side should your trainee stand on, where should you spin the O-arm Figure out what side to stand on, premise that fewer malpositioned screws is better *Ledonio, Polly et al., 2011; Ughwanogho, Patel et al., 2012; ‡ Dede et al., SRS 2013; Parker, McGirt et al., Neurosurgery 2011, Hicks et al, Spine 2010, Di Silvestre et al., Spine 2007

Methods Of 333 pediatric patients, 85 patients (605 screws) had incidental CT after spine surgery Screws rated according to Kim & Lenke et al. 2004 Satisfactory interrater reliability for screw malposition (Cohen’s kappa 0.71 ± 0.16) We used the methodology of Kim et al. to describe screws as safe, probably safe, and questionably safe. < 2 mm Mild Safe 2 - 4mm Moderate Probably Safe > 4 mm Severe Questionably Safe?

Study Patients < 18 Yrs with CT 605 Screws No Coronal Deformity 355 Screws Coronal Deformity 250 Screws We used our medical registry to identify patients who were treated for AIS between 1975 to 1992, and found a cohort of 337 patients with curves greater than 35 degrees who were either braced, observed, or managed surgically.

Mean age at surgery (yr) Mean levels fused (range) Demographics Coronal Deformity (n=35) No Coronal Deformity (n=50) P-value Mean age at surgery (yr) 12.5 (2.2-17.7) 15.9 (7.3-17.9) <0.0001 Male/ Female 11/24 25/25 0.088 Mean screws /patient (range) 7.1 (2-25) (1-14) 0.99 Mean levels fused (range) 12.4 (3-17) 5.4 (2-12)

No Detected Difference in Severe Screw Malposition with Coronal Deformity 34 355 19 250 % Screw Malposition 9.6% 8.6% Breeches in coronal deformity more frequently medial (8/19 vs. 6/34 breaches, p=0.005)

No Detected Difference in Severe Screw Malposition at Apex/Apical Concavity 19 321 % Screw Malposition 17 208 19 2 42 Apical Concavity Apex

Limitations May be underpowered for apical concavity screws Possible screw drop out at apical concavity (lowering reported rate of malposition) Only incidental CTs (not all patients)

Rate of Screw Malposition (<4 mm) on CT by Spinal Level Mean Malposition 9%

Severe Malposition Most Common at T3-T8 19% 26 136 Odds ratio for malposition T3-8: 3.9 (2.2-6.9). 6% 27 469

Discussion Rate of freehand pedicle screw malposition: Ughwanagho, 2012 (intraop CT, AIS): 9% of screws with breaches of > 4mm Regions of pediatric pedicle screw malposition: Privitera et al., 2013: 14% in upper construct (esp. T1, T2) vs. 8% overall Larson, Santos, Polly et al., 2012 (CT-navigated screws, intraoperative revision): 4-10% rate in upper thoracic spine (T2-T8, 29/434) 6.7% vs. 1.2% (7/550) Current study: 19% rate T3-T8 vs. 6% (OR 3.9) Our reported rate of screw malposition is similar to the previously reported literature, which has found 5-10% of pedicle screws are malposition. Flynn et al. found 9% of pedicle screws placed by the freehand technique are potentially unsafe, based on intraoperative CT.

Conclusions Similar rates of severe malposition for coronal deformity and non-deformity patients More medial compared to lateral breeches in deformity patients T3-T8: Nearly 4x higher rate of screw malposition using free hand technique Consider additional measures at these levels Additional fluoroscopy Extra vigilance for trainees Navigation/Check-spin