Assessing an Expert-Led Three-Hour Fair Use Training Session

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Further Research There are plans in place to follow up on the questionnaire results by asking the students to evaluate the value of the instruction, use.
Advertisements

Choosing Your Primary Research Method What do you need to find out that your literature did not provide?
Measuring democracy: Can it be done?. Problem: How can we systematically assess whether a country is a liberal democracy or not?
Making a difference? Measuring the impact of an information literacy programme Ann Craig
Teaching Science Writing in a Research University: Students’ Experiences vs. Faculty Expectations P. Hirsch 1, B. Yalvac 2, J. Cline 1, K. Carmichael 1,
Division of Emergency Medicine Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
Outcome Data June Eating Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) Higher score indicates greater difficulty controlling your eating. (lower self-efficacy) The.

This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
Evaluation of Multimedia Software and a Workbook Designed to Improve 3-D Spatial Skills of Engineering Students Sheryl A. Sorby & Thomas Drummer Michigan.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: That students do not.
2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.
Technical requirement or technicality? Denise Louden MBC Final Project May 2006 Persuasive Presentations.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Evaluating Digital Equity Programs
Individualized research consultations in academic libraries: Useful or useless? Let the evidence speak for itself Karine Fournier Lindsey Sikora Health.
Ford Foundation International Fellowships Program - Philippines
Cheryl Ng Ling Hui Hee Jee Mei, Ph.D Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Interpreting, Editing, and Communicating MISO Survey Results
An agency of the Office of the Secretary of Education and the Arts
Drs. Pamela B. Payne & Naomi Brower
Librarian Class Attendance: Methods, Outcomes and Opportunities
WOREP: What we learned at CSUF?
Market Research.
Developing Problem Statement for Dissertation
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Logistics OUTCOMES EVALUATION.
HCS 465 Course Future Starts/ snaptutorial.com
Method.
Assessing Reading Apprenticeship
McCann A, Hannon-Fletcher M, Kerr D
Strategies to Promote Collaboration
Analysis of Variance Chapter 12 . McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Research Methodology: Instruments and Procedures
Research amongst Physical Therapists in the State of Kuwait: Participation, Perception, Attitude and Barriers Presented by Sameera Aljadi, PT, PhD Assistant.
HUD REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPING A HOUSING COUNSELING WORK PLAN
Secret Shopper Training: Odum Library
The Most Gracious and The Most Merciful.
Assessment & Evaluation workshop
Reading comprehension improvement through the blog
Qualitative and quantitative research for small business
HCS 465 GUIDE Education Your Life - hcs465guide.com.
HCS 465 GUIDE Education for Service-- hcs465guide.com.
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Assessing an Expert-Led Three-Hour Fair Use Training Session
Conclusion & Implications
PPG Open Meeting 4th June 2018.
Screener Administration
Final Test & Participant Evaluation
Pre- and Post-Test: Social Research Methods
Emma Senior & Mark Telford.
Exeter Policing, Evidence and Research Translation Project (ExPERT)
Strategies to Promote Collaboration
Key Dates for GEARS Spring 2018 All Faculty Selected Faculty
DISC Training - Overview
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
The impact of small-group EBP education programme: barriers and facilitators for EBP allied health champions to share learning with peers.
Learner motivation and individual differences in language learning Dr Louise Courtney Professor Suzanne Graham University of Reading Siena July 2017.
proposal making kit by Kobe Univ.
Where Do We Grow from Here?
Conclusions/ Future Directions
DREAM Developing Reading Education with Arts Methods
Trialling A Metacognitive Training Intervention
Copyright. Approaches to Population Health in 2015: A National Survey of Hospitals.
2017 Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) Results
Take home exercise.
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
How To Conduct Market Research For A Startup Idea?
Presentation transcript:

Assessing an Expert-Led Three-Hour Fair Use Training Session Sara Benson, Copyright Librarian

Methodology of the Study Qualitative and Quantitative Study Pre and Post Testing with a control group - Pre-test - 3 hour training session - Post-test - 2 week follow up questionnaire Rubric developed by copyright experts Pre test had demographics + fair use question + confidence testing Post test had fair use question + confidence testing Training session by Kyle Courtney from Office for Scholarly Communication at Harvard Library using part of his Copyright First Responders Curriculum. Rubric developed by Myself, Kyle Courtney, Brandon Butler and Ana Enriquez.

The participants were again asked the same questions about their confidence levels in the post-test immediately after having received the three hour fair use training session from a copyright expert. Regarding the first question, how much they currently know about fair use copyright law, the confidence levels rose. A similar gain in confidence is indicated by the answers to the second question about how well they could explain fair use copyright law to a colleague. Next, the responses to the question of confidence in assisting a patron with a fair use copyright question indicates a rise in the level of confidence post-training as well. Finally, when asked whether they could assist a patron with a difficult fair use copyright question, confidence levels continued the upward trend. The gap in results is significant for each of the four levels of confidence measured on a t-test scale.

The results of the mean scores of the pre-test (before the training) were 1.31 out of four. After the participants had been provided with training, the result increased to a mean score of 2.69 out of four. The score difference between the pre- and post-test was slightly more pronounced for individuals who had never before received formal copyright fair use training. Those individuals had an increase in their rubric score of 1.82, while those who had availed of some previous training had an increase in scores of just 0.83. Similarly, the increase in confidence levels of those who had no training before was greater than those who had been provided with training before, too. The control group mean score changed from a score of 1.44 in the pre-test to a score of 2.0 in the post-test, which was not statistically significant.

Results from the follow up survey 15 participants indicated that they used the fair use training in some way in their work 3 participants; develop a presentation/exhibit 2 participants; develop a workshop 2 participants; help a patron at help desk