J. Clin PhD, C.E. Aubin Ph.D., P.Eng. S. Parent MD, PhD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) In 2014
Advertisements

Spinal Posture Analysis technique using Diagnostic Imaging
SPINAL DEFORMITIES Dr. ABDULMONEM ALSIDDIKY, MD, SSC-Orth. Consultant ped. Ortho., ped. Spine & spinal deformities KKUH Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Orthotic Management of the Geriatric Spine
© 2011 The SpineCorporation Limited Pediatric Treatment Goal SpineCor Custom Scoliosis Brace The SpineCor ® Dynamic Corrective Brace.
What is Biomechanics Biomechanics is a branch of science which employs mechanical and engineering principles to study biological systems The objectives.
By Dr Jeb McAviney BSc., MChiro., MPainMed., FCBP.
Surgery of Spinal Deformities Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute Bologna, Italy Surgical options in progressive scoliosis in pediatric patients with Neurofibromatosis.
Copyright © 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized commercial reproduction of this slide is prohibited Supplemental PowerPoint Slides Biomechanical.
SPINAL DEFORMITIES.
Fusionless Correction for Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Emma Orton BME 281.
ICEOS: Nov. 19 th – Nov. 20 th École Polytechnique of Montreal (Canada) 2 Sainte-Justine Research Hospital Center (Canada) 3 Faculty of Dentistry,
Chapter 22 Chapter 22 Biomechanics of Hip and Vertebral Fractures Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
In the first 5 years of Treatment, the Charges for Guided Growth Constructs are 30% less than Growing Rods Lindsay M. Andras MD 1, Liam Harris BS 1, Scott.
Reliability and validity of the adapted Spanish version of the Early Onset Scoliosis-24 questionnaire María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD Hiroko Matsumoto PhD.
Comparison of deformity correction and complications with VEPTR and early primary posterior spinal fusion in young children with idiopathic scoliosis:
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
ICEOS: Nov. 19 th – Nov. 20 th École Polytechnique of Montreal (Canada) 2 Sainte-Justine Research Hospital Center (Canada) 3 Faculty of Dentistry,
Does posterior fusion prevent parasol deformity of the chest in inmature patients (Risser sign 0 and open triradiate cartilage of pelvis) with MSA type.
Biomechanical Testing of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs Emily Brown Advisor: Dr. Gary Bledsoe REU, Summer 2009 Saint Louis University.
ANDREA LEBEL, M.PT., Schroth Certified Physiotherapist, Ottawa, Canada
Dr. ABDULMONEM ALSIDDIKY , MD , SSCO.
Xingye Li, Jianxiong Shen, M.D.
ASYMMETRICAL ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION EFFECT OVER THE IMMATURE SPINE
Olson EM, Sturm PF, Jain VV, Schultz LR, Glos DL, Bylski-Austrow DI
M Eltoukhy, M Ziff, S Elmasry, F Travascio and S Asfour
Prospective clinical study of spine growth modulation using
Pediatric orthopedic surgeon – Ramallah - Palestine
Idiopathic and normal lateral lumbar curves: muscle effects interpreted by 12th rib length asymmetry with pathomechanic implications for lumbar idiopathic.
Clinical Application of Growth Modulation
Retrospective Review of Shoulder Balance Comparing Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) to Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Patrick J. Cahill William Lavelle.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Sumeet Garg, MD Jack Flynn, MD Nicole Michael, BA
A. Aoude, L. Simoes, S. Aldebeyan, J. Ouellet McGill University
Early Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Pediatric orthopedic surgeon – Ramallah - Palestine
The Axial Skeleton The Vertebral Column
3Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX, USA
M. Williams1, S. Martelli1, N. Sancisi2, M. Conconi2, V
Richard Schwend, MD Robert Tung, BS Division of Orthopedic Surgery
Fredrick G. Reighard, MPH
Distraction-Based Surgeries Increase Spine Length for Patients with Non-Idiopathic EOS - 5 Year Follow up Yehia ElBromboly, Jennifer Hurry, Kedar Padhye,
R. Vazquez B.Ing. C.E. Aubin Ph.D., H. Labelle M.D.
Julien Clin, Carl-Éric Aubin, Hubert Labelle
The Potential Use of Axial Spinal Unloading in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case Series  Catherine A. Chromy, DPT, Michael T. Carey,
The Use of MAGEC Growing Rods as a temporary distraction rod in Severe Kyphoscoliosis: 2 Case Reports. John T. Smith, MD Mary Scowcroft Perry Presidential.
Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
A 3D Analysis of Scoliosis Progression in Non-Idiopathic Scoliosis: Is it similar to Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Keith R. Bachmann, MD; Burt Yaszay,
Evaluation of Pulse Oximetry in Pre- and Post Casting
Adolescent Scoliosis and the Use of an Oral Appliance. A Case Report.
Spinal Growth In Normal Children Between 3 And 11 Years Old Using 3D Reconstruction: A Longitudinal Study Patrick Tohmé, Leonie Tremblay; Marjolaine Roy-
Glen Ginsburg, M.D. ∆ Richard M. Schwend, M.D. ∫ John Schmidt, PhD Φ
Charles E. Johnston, MD Anna McClung BSN, RN Scott Paradise
BRACING FOR EOS 6TH ICEOS . DUBLIN 2012 F.SANCHEZ PEREZ-GRUESO
B Ilharreborde, S Moreau, K Mazda
Dual Rods and Submuscular Rod Placement Reduce Complications and Unplanned Surgeries in the Growing Spine: Analysis of 910 Surgeries in 143 Patients Shay.
John A Heflin, MD John T. Smith, MD
Long-term results in surgical management of congenital scoliosis (CS): A minimum 10 years follow-up study Debnath UK Harshavardhana NS Hegarty J Grevitt.
M. Bulent Balioglu, Y. Emre Akman, Yunus Atici,
Classification of EOS Treatment
Pulmonary Outcomes after VEPTR Intervention
Z. Deniz Olgun, Houman Ahmadiadli, Muharrem Yazici
Latalski Michal MD, Fatyga Marek MD
Bylski-Austrow DI, Okonny M, Glos DL, Wall EJ, Crawford AH
Modeling Thoracic Volume To predict Pulmonary Function in Scoliosis
Anterior instrumentation and correction
ICEOS 2009, Istanbul Natural History of Spine in Patients with Esophageal Atresia -A Long-Term Population-Based Follow-up Study Ilkka Helenius, Saara J.
The Classification for Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS) Predicts Timing of VEPTR Anchor Failure Michael G. Vitale, MD MPH Associate Chief, Division of.
Coombs MT, De Carvalho MF, Glos DL, Kim J, Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI
Simultaneous Vertebral Column Resection (VCR) and Growing Rods (GR) or Shilla for Severe Early Onset Spinal Deformity (EOS) John Emans, MD; Ashley Goldthwait,
Presentation transcript:

J. Clin PhD, C.E. Aubin Ph.D., P.Eng. S. Parent MD, PhD Biomechanical analysis of scoliosis correction using a novel fusionless intravertebral epiphyseal device J. Clin PhD, C.E. Aubin Ph.D., P.Eng. S. Parent MD, PhD

Disclosures PRESENTER: C.E. Aubin Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (a), Polytechnique Excellence Chair (a), Medtronic (a, b, c), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (a), BostonBrace (a), Lagarrigue / Rodin4D (a) Co-authors: J. Clin No disclosure S. Parent Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (a), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (a), Medtronic (b, c), Depuy Spine (c), Spinologics (f) (a) Grants/Research Support b) Other Financial Support (c) Consultant (d) Honorarium (e) Board of medical organization and/or orthopedic publisher (f) Stock/Shareholder

Introduction Many fusionless growth sparring instrumentation devices have been developed. Their influence on intervertebral disc and growth plate health, and on the control of the growing spine still remains a subject of attention. A new device (the “hemi-staple”; US 8,409,258) which locally compresses the growth plate without spanning the disc was developed and successively tested on two different animal models (1,2,3) : Rat tail model (1) Pig model (2,3) Vertebral wedging Schmid EC , Aubin CE et al. ,"A Novel Fusionless Vertebral Physeal Device Inducing Spinal Growth Modulation for the Correction of Spinal Deformities", Eur Spine J, 2008, Oct; 17(10):1329-35. Driscoll M , Aubin CE ,et al. "Spinal Growth Modulation Using a Novel Intravertebral Epiphyseal Device in an Immature Porcine Model.", Eur Spine J, 2012 Jan; 21(1):138-44 Driscoll M , Aubin CE et al. "Novel Hemi-staple for the Fusionless Correction of Pediatric Scoliosis: Influence on Intervertebral Discs and Growth Plates in a Porcine Model", J Spinal Dis Tech, 2013 Mar 18. [Epub ahead of print]

Objective To further analyze the hemi-staple biomechanical action on a human finite element model

Cases 10 thoracic scoliosis cases (11.7± 0.9 yr; MT Cobb: 35°±7°; TL/L: 24°±6°) For each case: Spine, pevis and rib cage reconstructed in 3D Finite Element Model (FEM): Vertebrae, Discs; Articular joints; Ligaments; Rib cage; Soft tissues; Pelvis; Growth plates bi-planar calibrated radiographs 3D Reconstruction Finite Element Model

Growth Dynamics Modeling 2 Compute Stresses on Growth Plates 3 Simulate hemi-staple & Apply Gravitational loads 1 Update Growth Rate 24 months / iterations Growth dynamics governed by the Hueter-Volkmann principle integrated in FEM Controlling equation: (based on Stokes 90 & Villemure 02): G = Gm [1 - β (σ - σm)] Gm= growth rate (0.8-1.1 mm/year) β = bone sensitive factor (1-3 MPa-1) σ = stress in pathologic spine σm = normal stress Validated model to predict scoliotic progression (Villemure 2002, Stokes 2007, Lin 2011) 4 Update Geometry Cobb, Wedging angles & other indices 6 6

Growth Modeling Validation (2 yrs growth simulation; case #1) Sept. 2004 April 2006 Sept. 2006 MT Cobb vs. Simulated MT Cobb Initial + 2 yrs growth 7 Simulation 2 yrs growth

Instrumented FEM Hemi-staple model (shell elements)

5 instrumented levels (MT spine) Tested configurations Config #1: 5 instrumented levels (MT spine) Single growth plates Config #2: 5 instrumented levels (MT spine) Both growth plates Config #3: 9 instr. levels (MT & TL/L spines) Single growth plates Config #4: 9 instr. levels (MT & TL/L spines) Both growth plates

Case #1 – 2 yrs simulation Natural Growth Conf #1 Conf #2 Conf #3 29º 20 º 43 31 Axial rot. 7 ° Case #1 – 2 yrs simulation Natural Growth Conf #1 Conf #2 Conf #3 Conf #4 Initial

Synthesis (average for all cases)

Discussion & Conclusion Biomechanical potential of the hemi-staple device to control the scoliosis progression Relevant alternative for the early treatment of idiopathic scoliosis Importance of the instrumentation configuration to correct the spinal deformity: a ‘two hemi-staples per vertebra’ strategy is more effective Model limitations: spinal loading due to gravity (no muscle), linear growth modulation, … An extended validation is necessary.