by Sanha Kim, Yijie Jiang, Kiera L. Thompson Towell, Michael S. H

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. 4 3D reconfiguration of liquid metals for electronics.
Advertisements

Fig. 5 MicroLED array with 3D liquid metal interconnects.
Fig. 2 Reconfiguration of liquid metals into 3D structures.
Fig. 1 Characterization of the device structure.
Fig. 1 High-resolution printing of liquid metals.
Fig. 3 The electrical contact of direct-printed and reconfigured liquid metals. The electrical contact of direct-printed and reconfigured liquid metals.
Fig. 2 Global production, use, and fate of polymer resins, synthetic fibers, and additives (1950 to 2015; in million metric tons). Global production, use,
Fig. 1 Precursor suspensions for spin coating and the obtained monolayer films. Precursor suspensions for spin coating and the obtained monolayer films.
Fig. 1 Crystal and electronic structure of WTe2.
Fig. 4 First-principles DFT calculations.
Fig. 2 Self-assembly of NPs in the Ch-CNC droplets.
Fig. 1 Examples of experimental stimuli and behavioral performance.
Fig. 1 NP-free Ch-CNC droplets.
Fig. 3 Adhesion of water on two kinds of hot hydrophobic nanotexture.
Fig. 6 Comparison of properties of water models.
Fig. 2 Reference-fixing experiment, results.
Fig. 2 Ferroelectric domains resolved in WTe2 single crystals.
Fig. 3 Swarm material properties.
Interactive morphogenesis in Ch-CNC droplets laden with magnetic NPs
Fig. 1 The structure of the 3DGraphene foam.
Fig. 2 Mineralization and surface colonization of films of three PBAT [poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)] variants during a 6-week soil incubation.
Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.
Fig. 1 Structure of L10-IrMn.
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration and atomic-scale rendering of a silica AFM tip sliding up and down a single-layer graphene step edge on an atomically flat.
Fig. 1 Operation mechanism and scanning electron microscopy images of MTC device. Operation mechanism and scanning electron microscopy images of MTC device.
Fig. 2 EUV TG signal. EUV TG signal. Black lines in (A), (B), and (C) are the EUV TG signals from Si3N4 membranes at LTG = 110, 85, and 28 nm, respectively,
Fig. 6 WPS imaging of different chemical components in living cells.
Fig. 3 Load dependence of friction force and corresponding COF.
Fig. 2 Gate and magnetic field dependence of the edge conduction.
Near-infrared light–responsive dynamic wrinkle patterns
Characteristics of ultrathin single-crystalline semiconductor films
Fig. 3 HfSe2 transistors. HfSe2 transistors. (A) Schematic of HfSe2 device, back-gated through 90-nm SiO2, and with ALD alumina used as both protective.
Fig. 4 The mechanical performances of thermally stable click-ionogels.
Fig. 4 Evolution of fraction of sickled RBCs under hypoxia.
Fig. 1 Microstructure of bulk UFG/nanocrystalline Cu-containing distributed WC nanoparticles. Microstructure of bulk UFG/nanocrystalline Cu-containing.
Fig. 2 Folding motions of the TCO with strain-softening behavior.
Fig. 4 SPICE simulation of stochasticity.
Fig. 1 Schematic view and characterizations of FGT/Pt bilayer.
Dipole-like electrostatic asymmetry of gold nanorods
Fig. 2 Characterizing the performance of msTENG.
Fig. 5 Comparison of the liquid products generated from photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions (CO2RR) and CO reduction reactions (CORR) on two catalysts.
Fig. 2 Construction of a mimetic biomineralization frontier for epitaxial crystal growth by using CPICs. Construction of a mimetic biomineralization frontier.
Fig. 5 Thermal insulation performance of nanowood in comparison with a silica aerogel, a Styrofoam, and a natural wood. Thermal insulation performance.
Fig. 3 FTIR spectra of plastic standards and sediment samples.
Fig. 2 Investigating the interactions between the n-type polymer and the enzyme, which lead to efficient electrical communication. Investigating the interactions.
Fig. 4 Comparison of fracture toughness by three-point bending test.
Fig. 1 Structural and electrical properties of Bi2Se3/BaFe12O19.
Multiplexed four- and eight-channel devices for rapid processing
Fig. 3 MXene TLs and their attenuations.
Long-range structural order control of SS-annealed cylinder patterns
Fig. 4 The relationship between the total mean absolute momentum disturbance 〈∣p∣〉zB (in units of ℏ/D) and fringe visibility V. The relationship between.
Fig. 5 Simulation of the mechanical properties of the 3DGraphene foam in a wide temperature range down to the cryogenic region. Simulation of the mechanical.
Fig. 3 Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from 1982 to Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from.
Fig. 2 Polarized emission from printed perovskite nanocomposites.
Fig. 3 Device architecture, photovoltaic performance, and operational stability of 3D/2D bilayer PSCs. Device architecture, photovoltaic performance, and.
Fig. 4 Single-particle contact angle measurements.
Fig. 6 MD simulations of assembled binary supraballs.
Fig. 3 Supraballs and films assembled from binary 219/217nm SPs/SMPs.
Fig. 2 Supraballs and films from binary SPs.
Fig. 2 Growth kinetics of borophene on silver.
Fig. 4 Behavior of resistance peak near density nm = 5.
Fig. 1 Structure and basic properties of EuTiO3 (ETO) films.
The combined signal spectra of PSD for protons and helium nuclei
Fig. 1 Design principle and SEM characterization of super-origami DNA nanostructures with n-tuples. Design principle and SEM characterization of super-origami.
Manipulation of multiple micro/nano objects using patterned SNE
Fig. 2 Fibrous structure, roughness, and softness of SNE surface enabling switchable adhesion. Fibrous structure, roughness, and softness of SNE surface.
Fig. 3 Rubbery strain, pressure, and temperature sensors.
Fig. 3 Switchable adhesion influenced by structural design and object conductivity. Switchable adhesion influenced by structural design and object conductivity.
Fig. 1 Doping schematics and optical properties.
Fig. 3 Underwater adhesion performance of adhesive coatings made of mammalian LC domain proteins. Underwater adhesion performance of adhesive coatings.
Presentation transcript:

Soft nanocomposite electroadhesives for digital micro- and nanotransfer printing by Sanha Kim, Yijie Jiang, Kiera L. Thompson Towell, Michael S. H. Boutilier, Nigamaa Nayakanti, Changhong Cao, Chunxu Chen, Christine Jacob, Hangbo Zhao, Kevin T. Turner, and A. John Hart Science Volume 5(10):eaax4790 October 11, 2019 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 1 Picking and placing micro objects using a ceramic-carbon SNE. Picking and placing micro objects using a ceramic-carbon SNE. (A) Schematic of a pick-and-place procedure wherein a micrometer-sized object in contact with an SNE surface can be picked up, while an external voltage is applied and placed back when the voltage is removed. (B) Schematics and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of a 200-μm SNE composed of Al2O3-coated carbon nanotubes (CNTs). (C) Snapshots of picking and placing an unpackaged LED chiplet (170 μm by 170 μm by 50 μm) using the Al2O3-CNT nanocomposite electroadhesive (200 μm by 200 μm by 50 μm). (D) Schematic of pull-off force measurement system using a colloidal AFM tip and load-displacement curves for a Al2O3-CNT SNE measured using a ~4-μm-diameter Pt-coated spherical tip with and without a bias voltage of 10 V. The inset SEM image shows the Pt-coated spherical tip. (E) Measured pull-off forces using the Pt-coated spherical tip against a reference surface (flat Al2O3-coated TiN; ~0.8 μN; black dashed line) and against the Al2O3-CNT SNE at different applied voltages (e.g., ~0.02 μN at 0 V and ~2.3 μN at 30 V; blue dashed line), measured by a conductive AFM. Error bars represent the SD in the set of force measurements with each applied voltage. Sanha Kim et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaax4790 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 2 Fibrous structure, roughness, and softness of SNE surface enabling switchable adhesion. Fibrous structure, roughness, and softness of SNE surface enabling switchable adhesion. (A) An SEM image of SNE showing the top entangled surface and vertically aligned fibers underneath. (B) Schematics showing structural behavior of the top surface when a microsphere is compressed and retracted (left) and showing the van der Waals force that scales with few contacting nanofibers and electrostatic attraction that scales with all the nanofibers on the SNE surface (right). (C) AFM images of the top SNE surface composed of entangled Al2O3-coated CNT fibers. The root mean square roughness within the 100-μm2 area is ~35 nm. (D) Load displacement of Al2O3-coated surfaces with and without SNE, measured by nanoindentation using a ~10-μm-diameter sapphire tip. (E) Pull-off forces of Al2O3-coated surfaces with and without SNE measured by AFM using the ~4-μm-diameter Pt-coated spherical tip. (F) Attractive pressure at distances from the Al2O3-CNT SNE surface measured using the 1.2 mm by 1.2 mm Au-coated flat tip. Sanha Kim et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaax4790 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 3 Switchable adhesion influenced by structural design and object conductivity. Switchable adhesion influenced by structural design and object conductivity. (A) Adhesion on/off ratio (ratio of pull-off force with an external voltage to that without voltage) of Al2O3-CNT SNE with different Al2O3 coating thicknesses (approximately 0.2, 1, and 10 nm) and different fiber densities (sparse and dense). (B) AFM images (top) images of CNTs coated with Al2O3 via ALD with 10 (left) and 50 (right) deposition cycles, respectively, and SEM images (bottom) of SNE top surfaces with different densities. (C) Pull-off forces against a conductive (Pt-coated; ~4 μm diameter) and a nonconductive (uncoated SiO2; ~10 μm diameter) spherical tip. (D) Schematics of polarization of conductive and dielectric objects when the SNE is in contact with the external voltage on. Sanha Kim et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaax4790 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 4 Manipulation of multiple micro/nano objects using patterned SNE. Manipulation of multiple micro/nano objects using patterned SNE. (A) A micro–pick-and-place map showing the capable object size range that can be picked (by the adhesion force estimated from Eq. 1; blue solid and dashed lines) and placed (estimated from the first term of Eq. 1; red solid line) against a general flat surface with the same coating material (estimated from eq. S2; black solid line) at different operating voltages (30 and 100 V). The dots on the top x axis are the demonstrated materials in this study. (B) An SEM image (60° tilted) of a micropatterned Al2O3-CNT SNE. (C) Optical microscope images of transfer printed polystyrene (PS) microspheres (500 nm in diameter) and (D) Ag nanowires (20 nm in diameter and <12 μm in length) on a SiO2 (thermally oxidized, 300 nm)/Si wafer. (E) An optical microscope image (30° tilted) of 5-μm SiO2 microspheres transfer printed on a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film. Sanha Kim et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaax4790 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).