Agenda for 11th Class Handouts Slides Readings: “Common Law II”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q3 LAW NOTES 1 TORTS.
Advertisements

1 Agenda for 15th Class Admin –Handouts 1995 Exam question slides –Name plates –F 2/28 is mock mediations Class will go until noon Appeals Next class –Any.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Chapter 18 Torts.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
Private Wrongs: Torts Negligence and Strict Liability Chapter 14.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Chapter 51 Accountants’ Duties and Liability
Business Law. Your neighbor Shana is using a multipurpose woodcutting machine in her basement hobby shop. Suddenly, because of a defect in the two-year.
7-1Duress and Undue Influence 7-2Mistake, Misrepresentation, and Fraud.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 31 Professional Liability.
Under what common law theories may professionals be liable to clients? Under what common law theories may professionals be liable to clients? What are.
1 Agenda for 17th Class Admin – Slide Handout – Thank you for electing me PILF Bake Sale judge – Exam: Tues 12/ AM (in class / multiple choice) 1-9PM.
BUSINESS LAW AND ETHICS Chapter 19. WARRANTIES  EXPRESS WARRANTY  The statement of the seller in which the article sold Is warranted or guaranteed is.
Interpretation of past decisions
Tues. Jan. 19. traditional choice-of-law approach.
Torts: A Civil Wrong Chapter 18. The Idea of Liability Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
CHAPTER 18 PART I Torts: A Civil Wrong. A Civil Wrong In criminal law, when someone commits a wrong, we call it a crime. In civil law, when someone commits.
Negligence SLO: I can understand the three types of torts, including negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability. I can identify relevant facts.
HSA Review: Civil Law.
Negligence Mr. Lugo.
Civil Law An overview of Tort Law – the largest branch of civil law
BELL QUIZ ON CHAPTER 11 What is it called when a contract has been properly and completely carried out? What does the court ask when determining if the.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why does conflict develop?
Agenda for 11th Class Admin Handouts Slides German Advantage
Chapter 42 Liability of Accountants & Other Professionals
Agenda for 9th Class Admin Name plates out Slide Handout
Agenda for 5th Class Misc Review of statutory interpretation
How To Find and Read the Law and Live to Tell (and Talk) About It
Agenda for 2nd Class Misc. Nameplates out Use Sharpie
Agenda for 4th Class Misc. Name plates Weber (continued)
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Chapter 7 Strict Liability and Product Liability
Assignment for Next Class
Agenda for 8th Class Admin Name plates Handouts
Rules and Laws An introduction.
Assignment for Next Class
Chapter 25 PRODUCT LIABILITY: WARRANTIES AND TORTS
Chapter 9 Strict Liability and Product Liability.
Assignment for Next Class
Prepared by Leng kimhok
Agenda for 1st Class Distribute Finders handout Administrative Stuff
Agenda for 19th Class Admin stuff Name plates Handouts Slides
Agenda for 2nd Class Admin stuff Review of Monday’s class Finders
Agenda for 5th Class Admin stuff Handouts Right to Exclude Slides
Agenda for 8th Class Admin stuff Handouts Slides Easements Nuisance
STRUCTURE OF THE PRESENTATION
Assignment for Next Class
Agenda for 3rd Class Misc. Name plates National Society
Agenda for 1st Class Handouts Slides Readings Writing Groups
Lesson 6-1 Civil Law (Tort Law).
Torts A Civil Wrong.
Agenda for 1st Class Handouts Syllabus Slides Readings Name plates
Agenda for 14th Class Handouts Slides Readings: “Common Law II”
Contract II Today looking at Contract II
Agenda for 9th Class Handouts Slides
Agenda for 18th Class No new handouts Common Law (continued)
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases.
Agenda for 21th Class Handouts Slides Product Liability Handout
Agenda for 5th Class Misc Review of statutory interpretation
Agenda for 15th Class Handouts Slides Name plates Castle Doctrine
Part D-I The Economics of Tort Law
Unit 3.
Agenda for 2nd Class Misc. Name plates Handouts Smith v US (continued)
Agenda for 17th Class Handouts Slides Readings: MacPherson v Buick
Agenda for 19th Class Handouts Slides Readings: Levi, Escola
Agenda for 20th Class Handouts Slides Product Liability Handout
Agenda for 22th Class Handouts Slides The Freedom of Speech
Differences and similarities
Presentation transcript:

Agenda for 11th Class Handouts Slides Readings: “Common Law II” 2nd Writing Assignment Name plates Lunch sign-up Tuesday, 10/8, 12:15-1:15, Law Library 214 Finders Common Law Langridge v Levy Winterbottom v Wright

Assignment for Next Class Review any questions from today’s assignment that we don’t discuss in class Read “Common Law II” packet Questions to think about / Short papers Everyone should be prepared to discuss all the questions on the last page of the “Common Law I” handout Mandatory writing Group 5. Qs 1 & 4 Group 6. Qs 2 & 4 Group 7. Qs 3 & 5 Group 8. Qs 3 & 5 Optional writing -- All questions that are not mandatory 2nd Writing Assignment Due Friday, 10/11 at 5PM

Review of Last Class Finders Holding stated in Armory v Delamirie Does not cover all future possible cases (e.g. finder v finder) May need to be modified to cover new situations (e.g. finding on private property) Theory of common law Each court can only decide case in front of it No power to set rules for future cases That’s a legislative function Each court must decide case in way that the OUTCOME is consistent with prior cases Need not be consistent with all the WORDS in the prior cases So can create an exception to rule that finder has right superior to all but rightful owner to cover finding on private property That is consistent with OUTCOME in Armory v Delamirie, because that finding did not happen on private property It is not consistent with the WORDS in Armory v Delamrie, because…

Common Law Cases Langridge v Levy Father purchased gun. Seller stated & warranted that gun was safe Implicit that seller knew gun was not safe Son was injured and sued Court: Son can recover damages from seller Injured person cannot sue for breach of contract unless s/he was a party to the contract “Privity of contract” rule Exception for fraud where person making misrepresentation knew another might be harmed Winterbottom v Wright Wright supplied mail coaches to Postmaster Contract required them to be “safe” Atkinson contracted with Postmaster to supply drivers Winterbottom was employed by Atkinson Winterbottom was injured, allegedly because the coach was not safe Court: Winterbottom cannot recover from Wright Because of privity of contract rule Class list for preferences and sign in Digital voice recorder Nameplates and marker Handouts of PowerPoint slides IP chart

Questions 1. The judges were concerned that if they allowed the plaintiff to prevail in Winterbottom v Wright there would be “the most absurd and outrageous consequences” and “an infinity of actions.” What sort of cases were they concerned to prevent? Why? 2. The case most favorable to the plaintiff is Levy v Langridge. If you were the plaintiff’s lawyer in Winterbottom v Wright, how would you have used that case to argue that the defendant in this case should be liable to your client? If you were the defendant’s lawyer, how would you respond? 3. Why do you think the plaintiff won in Levy v Langridge, but the plaintiff lost in Winterbottom v Wright? Consider both legal and social reasons. 4. What is the holding in Winterbottom v Wright? That is, state in a sentence the legal rule established by this case. 5. Judge Rolfe says that judges should not be influenced by the hardship that the plaintiff suffers on account of the absence of a remedy. Why not? What should influence a judge? What influenced the judges in this case? Class list for preferences and sign in Digital voice recorder Nameplates and marker Handouts of PowerPoint slides IP chart

Questions 6. If Wright had sold a defective coach to Langridge, and Langridge’s wife had been injured while riding in the coach, would Wright be liable to Langridge’s wife? 7. If the Postmaster had told Wright that the mail-coach would be used by coachmen, and Wright had said that the mail-coach could be safely used by coachmen, would Wright be liable to any coachman injured by a defective coach? 8. If Wright had put explosives under the mail-coach seat, which had gone off while Winterbottom had been sitting on the mail-coach seat, would Wright be liable to Winterbottom? Class list for preferences and sign in Digital voice recorder Nameplates and marker Handouts of PowerPoint slides IP chart