A Federal US Carbon Tax: Major Design Decisions and Implications

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How T Cells Earn the Follicular Rite of Passage Carola G. Vinuesa, Jason G. Cyster Immunity Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011) DOI: /j.immuni
Advertisements

Individualized Medicine from Prewomb to Tomb Eric J. Topol Cell Volume 157, Issue 1, Pages (March 2014) DOI: /j.cell Copyright.
The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy Joseph W. Kable, Paul W. Glimcher Neuron Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009) DOI:
Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Macroeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra,
What We Talk About When We Talk About Fat Evan D. Rosen, Bruce M. Spiegelman Cell Volume 156, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014) DOI: /j.cell
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Net energy analysis: a policy analysis perspective Net Energy Analysis.
The Pathobiology of Vascular Dementia Costantino Iadecola Neuron Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013) DOI: /j.neuron Copyright.
Decision Making as a Window on Cognition Michael N. Shadlen, Roozbeh Kiani Neuron Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages (October 2013) DOI: /j.neuron
Distribution of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines: Who, When, and Where Jennifer B. McCormick, Jason Owen-Smith, Christopher Thomas Scott Cell Stem Cell.
Fiscal Policy 2012 Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Macroeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University.
The Economics of Climate Change Policy Prepared for: CEO Climate Change Task Force Meeting American Public Power Association Washington, D.C. December.
Fate Restriction and Multipotency in Retinal Stem Cells Lázaro Centanin, Burkhard Hoeckendorf, Joachim Wittbrodt Cell Stem Cell Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages.
Adaptation to Natural Binocular Disparities in Primate V1 Explained by a Generalized Energy Model Ralf M. Haefner, Bruce G. Cumming Neuron Volume 57, Issue.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Paasha Mahdavi, Georgetown University Michael L. Ross, UCLA
Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra, Australia
Implications of alternative metrics on mitigation costs and agricultural GHG emissions Andy Reisinger1 Petr Havlik2,3 Keywan Riahi2 Oscar van Vliet2 Michael.
Public Funding of Energy Research
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (December 2017)
The Expanding Energy Prospects of Metal Organic Frameworks
A Reliability Look at Energy Development
Enhancing NIH Grant Peer Review: A Broader Perspective
Essential Question: How do we create low-cost "Green" energy resource(s)? Investigation Question: How do we determine if an energy source is economical?
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (December 2017)
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Glucagon and Thyroid Hormone: A Championship Team
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Fang Song, Jordan Katz, Xile Hu  Joule 
Serotonin and the Orchestration of Energy Balance
The Evolution of the Algorithms for Collective Behavior
Metabolic Complications in Elderly Adults With CKD
Division of Energy Resources
Volume 2, Issue 10, Pages (October 2018)
Jason Bordoff, Policy Director Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution
Photoelectric Solar Power Revisited
The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions
Bitcoin's Growing Energy Problem
Rajesh Patel, MD, MPH, Tammy Chang, MD, MPH, MS, S
Assessing the ENVI report
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
The Case against Carbon Prices
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Effect of development assistance on domestic health expenditures
Public Funding of Energy Research
Changing with the Times
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Electrification and Decarbonization of the Chemical Industry
Ashok Sekar, Eric Williams, Roger Chen  Joule 
Clara Franziska Heuberger, Niall Mac Dowell  Joule 
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
D – H are Negative Emission Technologies
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Proteins in Plant Brassinosteroid Signaling
Modeling Functionality with Use Cases
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Opportunities and Challenges in Utilizing Metal-Modified Transition Metal Carbides as Low-Cost Electrocatalysts  Brian M. Tackett, Wenchao Sheng, Jingguang.
MicroRNA-155 Function in B Cells
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Chapter 103 Long-Term Care: The Global Impact
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Research Challenges in Avoiding “Showstoppers” in Developing Materials for Large- Scale Energy Applications  Krista S. Walton, David S. Sholl  Joule  Volume.
Jay S. Kaufman, PhD, Sam Harper, PhD  The American Journal of Medicine 
Navigating the Deubiquitinating Proteome with a CompPASS
David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel
Organic Photovoltaics: Focus on Its Strengths
Room-Temperature Conversion of Methane Becomes True
Presentation transcript:

A Federal US Carbon Tax: Major Design Decisions and Implications Jason Bordoff, Noah Kaufman  Joule  Volume 2, Issue 12, Pages 2487-2491 (December 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.020 Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 United States Net Economy-wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2030 United States greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are expected to decline modestly under current policies over the next decade, but a carbon tax could cause emissions to decline far more rapidly. Under the Republican Proposal, 2030 net economy-wide GHG emissions fall to 30%–40% below 2005 levels. Emissions fall further under the Democratic Proposal due to the higher carbon tax rates, to 39%–46% below 2005 levels. Sources: Larsen et al.,3 Kaufman et al.9 Joule 2018 2, 2487-2491DOI: (10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.020) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Per Capita Energy Expenditures Carbon taxes increase energy prices. The Democratic Proposal would increase per capita energy expenditures by about 19% above the current policy scenario in 2025. The Republican Proposal would increase per capita energy expenditures by much less, by about 6% in 2025, due to its lower carbon tax rates and the elimination of the fuel excise taxes. Sources: Larsen et al.,3 Kaufman et al.9 Joule 2018 2, 2487-2491DOI: (10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.020) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 US Gross Domestic Product The effects of a carbon tax on macroeconomic outcomes are small under both the Democratic and Republican Proposals. Estimated impacts on US gross domestic product range from slightly negative to slightly positive, and far less than 1% compared with the current policy scenarios in all years. These impacts exclude any economic benefits of emissions reductions. Sources: Diamond and Zodrow,4 Kaufman et al.9 Joule 2018 2, 2487-2491DOI: (10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.020) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Joule 2018 2, 2487-2491DOI: (10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.020) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Joule 2018 2, 2487-2491DOI: (10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.020) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions