Measurements of sin(2b + g) / sin(2f1 + f3)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Feasibility of sin  Measurement From Time Distribution of B 0  DK S Decay Vivek Sharma University of California San Diego.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 1 Lausanne –  measurements with Guillaume Thérin LPNHE – Paris Lausanne BaBar Measurements of  detector at SLAC.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
Beauty 06, Oxford, 27 Sept Marco Zito1 Measurements of gamma using ADS, GLW and other methods & future projections Marco Zito CEA-Saclay, Dapnia-SPP.
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
1. Outline 2 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
A window for New Physics in B s →KK decays Joaquim Matias Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona David London & JM, PRD (2004) David London &JM & Javier Virto,
Max Baak1 Impact of Tag-side Interference on Measurement of sin(2  +  ) with Fully Reconstructed B 0  D (*)  Decays Max Baak NIKHEF, Amsterdam For.
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
Interpreting CP asymmetries in. B   CP asymmetries Tree diagram: Penguin diagram: need |P/T| and  =arg(P/T) R t /R c R u /R c   
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma1 B Decays to Measure  Stephen Bailey Harvard University for the BaBar Collaboration PASCOS 2003.
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
Measurements of gamma & future projections
Present status of Charm Measurements
Tagir Aushev For the Belle Collaboration (EPFL, Lausanne ITEP, Moscow)
CP violation and D Physics
Reaching for  (present and future)
Hadronic B Decays at BELLE and BABAR
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
measuring the CP angle  at Babar
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Measurements of a and future projections
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
Max Baak, NIKHEF on behalf of the BABAR and BELLE Collaborations
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
Search for CP Violating Decays of theU(4S)
Measurements of the UT Angle a from BABAR
new measurements of sin(2β) & cos(2β) at BaBar
Measurements of g and sin(2b+g ) in BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
BESIII 粲介子的强子衰变 周晓康 中国科学技术大学 BESIII 粲介(重)子物理研讨会.
Misure dell’angolo a del Triangolo Unitario
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
How charm data may help for φ3 measurement at B-factories
Constraints on α from B Decays at BaBar
Measurement of the CKM-angle g at BABAR and Belle
f3 measurements by Belle
Sin(2β) measurement with b→c transitions in BaBar
Time dependent measurements of gamma at LHCb Angelo Carbone (INFN-Bologna) on behalf of LHCb collaboration CKM 2008 Roma, 12 September 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Measurements of sin(2b + g) / sin(2f1 + f3) Belle BaBar Results from and Guillaume Therin LPNHE – Paris XLème rencontres de Moriond Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

CP violation in standard model CKM matrix Unitarity triangle VudVub * a/f2 VtdVtb * g/f3 b/f1 sin (2b) = 0.725 ± 0.037 HFAG ICHEP04 VcdVcb * Experimental constraints on a Need direct measurements of g Talk on time dependent analysis to constraint sin(2b+g) Experimental results on B0  D(*) p/r Partial reconstruction Full reconstruction B0  D(*)0K(*)0 branching ratio See P.Krokovny’s talk for a review of g measurements. http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

CP violation in B0D(*)p/r g Favored b  c decay Suppressed b  u decay Strong phase difference Determines the sensitivity of the method CKM angle Large branching fraction for favoured decay (~3x 10-3) Small BR for suppressed decay (~10-6) Small CP violating amplitude r(D(*)p) ≡ r(*) = A(B0 → D(*)- p+) ≈ 0.02 Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Time-dependent decay rate distributions - K+ -s Tag B K+ U(4s) Reco B z Dt @ Dz/gbc + Dz Mixing-Decay interference ∞ P(B0 → D(*) p ,Dt) 1 C cos(Dmd Dt) + S sin(Dmd Dt) ± ± ± ± ± P(B0 → D(*) p ,Dt) 1 C cos(Dmd Dt) - S sin(Dmd Dt) ± ± ∞ ± C = 1 – r2 1 + r2 ≈ 1 neglecting terms in o(r2) S± ≈ 2r sin ( 2b+g ± d ) , |S±| 0.04 < ~ Measurements of S+ and S- determine 2b+g and d if r is an external input Experiment : tag the flavour of the B with lepton and kaon categories l+ K+ lepton tag kaon tag Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Possible CP violation on the tag side Long, Baak, Cahn, Kirkby, PRD68, 034010 Potential competing CP violating effects in B decays used for flavour tagging K+ K+ ’ + Kaon tag : expect CP violation comparable to signal → Modified time distributions signal side tag side ∞ P(B0 → D(*) - p+ ,Dt) 1 + C cos(Dmd Dt) + sin(Dmd Dt) [± 2r sin(2b+g+d) + 2r’ sin(2b+g±d’)] Kaon and other flavour tags Lepton tags Observables : S+, S- Observables a, b, c Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) Determination of r I. Dunietz, Phys. Lett. B 427, 179 (1998) Simultaneous determination of sin(2+) and r from time-evolution is not possible with current statistics  Need r as external inputs Estimate amplitude ratios from B0Ds(*)+- using SU(3) symmetry SU(3) r(D) = 0.020 ± 0.003 r(D*) = 0.015 ± 0.005 r(Dr) = 0.003 ± 0.006 Assuming several hypotheses : Assuming factorisation in SU(3) symmetry W-exchange and annihilation diagrams neglected without any theoritical errors Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

B0→D*-p+: partial reconstruction Babar BaBar Collaboration,hep-ex/0408038 (previous reference) fast Lepton Tags 227MBB Find events with two pions and examine the missing mass mmiss Preliminary All available statistics Preliminary kaon Tags Signal Combinatoric BB Peaking BB Continuum D*r ACP= N(B0 tag) - N(B0 tag) N(B0 tag) + N(B0 tag) Preliminary Lepton Tags 18710 ± 270 lepton tags Mean value 70580 ± 660 kaon tags Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) B0→D*-p+: partial reconstruction (interpretation) Babar BaBar Collaboration,hep-ex/0408038 (previous reference) 227MBB Adding 30% theoretical error on r(D*p) for different hypotheses Using the Feldman Cousins method r-h plane whith experimental constraints on sin(2β+γ) and β (from BaBar). r = 0.015 ± 0.005 ± 0.005 1 - CL Preliminary 68 % 90 % Preliminary |sin(2β+γ)|>0.62 (0.35) @ 68 (90)%CL Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) B0→D*-p+: partial reconstruction (lepton tag) Belle Collaboration,hep-ex/0408106 154MBB SF : Sign(pfast) = Sign(l) OF : Sign(pfast) = - Sign(l) Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary helicity angle calculated with psoft Fit : Signal + Background 2823 Same Flavour (SF) 10078 Opposite Flavour (OF) S+ = 0.035 ± 0.041 ± 0.018 S- = 0.025 ± 0.041 ± 0.018 Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) 110MBB Babar B0→D(*)-p+/r+: full reconstruction BaBar Collaboration,hep-ex/0408106 D*- p+ D*+ p- B → D* p ± ± D*- p+ D*+ p- 7611 ± 97 B → Dp 7068 ± 89 B → D*p 4400 ± 79 B → Dr Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) 154MBB B0→D(*)-p+: full reconstruction Belle Collaboration, PRL 93 (2004) 031802 D*p Dp Use kaon and lepton tags Estimation of CP violation on the tag side with B→D*l n D*+ p- D*- p+ Assuming δ = 0 or π (factorisation) : D*+ p- D*- p+ Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Summary of sin(2b+g) results with B0 → D(*)p/r 227 MBB 110 MBB 152 MBB 152 MBB Partially rec. Fully rec. Partially rec. Fully rec. a(D*p) –0.049 ± 0.031 ± 0.020 0.060 ± 0.040 ± 0.019 -0.034 ± 0.014 ± 0.009 –0.031 ± 0.028 ± 0.018 c(D*p) -0.019 ± 0.022 ± 0.013 0.044 ± 0.054 ± 0.033 –0.004 ± 0.028 ± 0.018 0.049 ± 0.040 ± 0.019 a(Dp) –0.032 ± 0.031 ± 0.020 –0.062 ± 0.037 ± 0.018 c(Dp) –0.059 ± 0.055 ± 0.033 –0.025 ± 0.037 ± 0.018 a(Dr) –0.005 ± 0.044 ± 0.021 c(Dr) –0.147 ± 0.074 ± 0.035 a = 2 r sin(2b+g) cos (di) c = 2 r cos(2b+g) sin (di) r(D) = 0.020 ± 0.003 r(D*) = 0.015 ± 0.005 r(Dr) = 0.003 ± 0.006 without any errors coming from theoretical hypotheses Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Interpretation of sin(2b+g) assuming SU(3) Assign 30 % theoretical error on r(D*p), r(Dp) and r(Dr) Bayesian approach www.utfit.org h 68 % 90 % 68 % 90 % r 2b+g |sin(2b+g)|>0.74 @68% CL Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Constraining sin(2b+g) with B0→D(*)0Ks bc amplitude bu amplitude r0 = A(B0 → D0 K0) ≈ 0.4 Small branching fraction for favoured decay (~3x 10-5) Large asymmetry B0D(*)0Ks with any D0 measures sin2b+g with time dependent analysis B0D(*)0K*0 with D0CP eigenstate measures g (self-tagging mode ,not this talk) For r0=0.4, an error of 0.5 on sin(2b+g) is expected with 550 MBB . Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Branching ratios of B0→D(*)0Ks 124MBB Babar 274MBB Branching ratios of B0→D(*)0Ks D0 mass sideband Preliminary mes (GeV) BaBar Collaboration,hep-ex/0408052 Belle Collaboration,hep-ex/0408108 B → D0 K0 B( ) = 6.2 ± 1.2 ± 0.4 B( ) = 3.72 ± 0.65 ± 0.37 B0 → D0 K0 B( ) = 3.18 ± 0.32 B0 → D*0 K0 +1.25 -1.12 B → D*0 K0 B( ) = 4.5 ± 1.9 ± 0.5 r0( ) < 0.39 @ 90% D0 K*0 Average of B0 and B0 Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) Conclusions Many different approaches to measure g have been investigated with similar sensitivity. Limits on | sin(2b+g) | with time dependent analysis were updated Measurements on sin(2b+g) still statistics limited. Some analyses need to be updated with all available statistics Need to estimate CP violation on the tag side to use completely kaon tag Results on g can be combined with other DK measurements (also no penguin contribution) With higher statistics, methods to constraint sin(2b+g) with B0 → D(*)0 Ks will play a role as well ( r ≈ 0.4 ) |sin(2b+g)|>0.74 @68% CL Assuming SU(3) symmetry www.utfit.org Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) SU(3) breaking and Dsp0 SU(3) has been proven to hold at a few % level for factorizable processes, but here the heavy meson is emitted and factorization does not hold Note that the use of the form-factors automatically assumes factorization In the future BR(D+p0) will be measured expected to be ~10-6 SU(2) partner of D+p- SU(3) partner of Dsp0  will be able to test SU(3) First search of BDsp0 Consistent with SU(2) prediction from Br(Dsp ) Br(BDsp0) = 1.6 10-5 Small statistics Annihilations around Br(BDsp0)<2.8 10-5@90% C.L. Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) W-exchange diagrams B0D(*)+p- has contributions also from W exchange Constrained by smallness of Br(B0Ds-K+)/Br(B0D-p+)=(1.4±0.5)10-2 c D(*)-, Ds(*)- d,s d,s p+,K+ u Unfortunately this sets a limit only on the annihilation on the cabibbo allowed process. Assuming it is the same is controversial Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

D(*)+Ks : probing annihilations SU(2) partner of D0K+ Expected to be ~10-7 but could get large contributions from rescattering Br(B D+Ks) < xxx 10-6 Br(B D*+Ks) < 7 10-6 Note: Br(B D0K+) =(3.7±0.6)10-4 Br(B D*0K+)=(3.6±1.0)10-4 Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Avoiding colour suppression : B0→D±KSp± (88 MBB) bc amplitude bu amplitude mixing Method has two advantages : Avoids colour suppression in b→u Integrating over Dalitz plane removes ambiguities in eventual g extraction First experimental step complete : Branching fraction measurement Currently, Too few events for TD analysis 1/3 of events are NOT in the K* region D±K*± → Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Data samples collected with Belle and BaBar BELLE @ KEK-B Accelerator BaBar @ PEP-II Accelerator 350 fb-1 integrated luminosity 275 million BB events 254 fb-1integrated luminosity 227 million BB events Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)

Measurements of sin(2b+g) sin(2b+g) in Pictures No Interference  CP Violation CP Violation only in fully reconstructed B0: r  0 CP Violation in both tag and fully reconstructed B0s: r  0 and r’  0 r exaggerated (x5 expectation) to enhance visual effect Small values of r significantly reduce sensitivity of the method Moriond EW 2005 Measurements of sin(2b+g)