Example: PI-control of integrating process. Simulink, tunepid4.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PID Control Loops Guy Zebrick.

Advertisements

FIGURE 12.1 Two variable process-control loops that interact.

Closed-Loop Transfer Functions

PID Control for Embedded Systems

Model-based PID tuning methods Two degree of freedom controllers

Tuning of PID controllers

Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013

1 ChE / MET Apr 12. Feedback Controller Tuning: (General Approaches) 1)Simple criteria; i.e QAD via ZN I, t r, etc easy, simple, do on existing.

PID control. Practical issues

© 2002 QxDesign, Inc. Tuning a PI Controller This unit discusses Zone-based tuning for a PI controller Adjusting gains with Live Constants Visual ModelQ.

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS

The control hierarchy based on “time scale separation” MPC (slower advanced and multivariable control) PID (fast “regulatory” control) PROCESS setpoints.

Chapter 4: Basic Properties of Feedback

Figure 19: Plot and frequency analysis for modifications to Skogestad’s settings for G 1 (s). (setpoint step = 1, disturbance step = 1)

Specialization project 2012 Temperature control of an unstable chemical reactor By Ola Sæterli Hjetland Supervisors: Sigurd Skogestad, Krister Forsman.

Wien-Bridge Oscillator Circuits. Why Look At the Wien-Bridge? It generates an oscillatory output signal without having any input source.

K.N.Toosi University of Technology 1. 2  The Interconnection of two subsystems.

5.4 Disturbance rejection The input to the plant we manipulated is m(t). Plant also receives disturbance input that we do not control. The plant then can.

Lecture 7: PID Tuning.

Professor of Electrical Engineering

Practical plantwide process control: PID tuning

Plantwide process control with focus on selecting economic controlled variables («self- optimizing control») Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU 2014.

Practical plantwide process control Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU Thailand, April 2014.

1 CBE 491 / Oct 12 Model of Stirred Tank Heater Goal: set up models to simulate and see effect of tuning parameters 1 st principles (Chaps 3 – 6);

PID Feedback Controllers PID 反馈控制器

2008 Indication Product Workshop Temperature / PID Controls.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Course Review Part 3. Manual stability control Manual servo control.

Alternative form with detuning factor F

Simple rules for PID tuning Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.

1 H Preisig 2006: Prosessregulering / S. Skogestad 2012 First-order Transfer Function Transfer function g(s): -Effect of forcing system with u(t) -IMPORTANT!!:

Chapter 14 Frequency Response Force dynamic process with A sin  t, Chapter

Input-output Controllability Analysis Idea: Find out how well the process can be controlled - without having to design a specific controller Reference:

PID controller Time domain Laplace domain

ME 132 Summary –Intro and motivation of Feedback Control Following a reference (lectures, sec 1, pp1-3, sec 5) Rejecting a disturbance (lectures, sec 1,

Control Theory D action – Tuning. When there’s too much oscillation, this can sometimes be solved by adding a derivative action. This action will take.

Lec 11. Common Controllers Some commonly used controllers –Proportional Controller –Integration Controller –Derivative Controller Reading: 5-8. TexPoint.

1 The improved SIMC method for PI controller tuning Chriss Grimholt Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway Reference: C. Grimholt and S. Skogestad, “The.

Ch. 13 Frequency analysis TexPoint fonts used in EMF.

PID Feedback Controllers Lei XIE Department of Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China 2013/3/20.

Problem:05-01 x points: -7, -4+3i HW- 05 In the control system as shown in the figure, a) Write the MATLAB program to plot root-locus diagram for the closed.

Optimal PI-Control & Verification of the SIMC Tuning Rule

1 PID Feedback Controllers PID 反馈控制器 Dai Lian-kui Shen Guo-jiang Institute of Industrial Control, Zhejiang University.

ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems PID Control Dr. Tony E. Grift Dept. of Agricultural & Biological Engineering.

Practical plantwide process control: PID tuning

PID Control for Embedded Systems

Probably© the smoothest PID tuning rules in the world: Lower limit on controller gain for acceptable disturbance rejection Sigurd Skogestad Department.

Salman Bin Abdulaziz University

Model SIMC-tunings Tight control Smooth control Level control

Intrnal guide Asst. Prof. J.G.bhatt

PID-tuning using the SIMC rules

Practical plantwide process control: PID tuning

Feedback Control System

Introduction to PID control

Tuning of PID controllers

Practical plantwide process control: PID tuning

Model of Stirred Tank Heater

Model SIMC-tunings Tight control Smooth control Level control

Figure 19: Plot and frequency analysis for modifications to Skogestad’s settings for G1(s). (setpoint step = 1, disturbance step = 1)

4.1 Stability Routh Tabulation Example 4.1

Fundamental Operation

Figure 9: Response and frequency analysis of G2(s).

For -G7 programing language Teacher / Shamsa Hassan Alhassouni.

Example : Optimal blending of gasoline

7. Stability [Ref:Rao] 7.1 System stability

Should we forget the Smith Predictor?

Proportional Control and Disturbance Changes

Henrik Manum, student, NTNU

Performance and Robustness of the Smith Predictor Controller

Presentation transcript:

Example: PI-control of integrating process

Simulink, tunepid4

%tunepid4 s=tf('s') theta=0 g=(1/s)*exp(-theta*s) % integrating taud=0 taui=1 Kc=0.5 % oscillations (Kc*k'*taui = 0.5 < 4) sim tunepid4; plot(Tid,y); hold on % Kc=0.25 % more oscillations (Kc*k'*taui = 0.25 < 4) sim tunepid4; plot(Tid,y,'red'); Kc=1 % less oscillations (Kc*k'*taui = 1) sim tunepid4; plot(Tid,y,'green'); hold off Kc=0.5 Kc=1 Kc=0.25 PI-control of integrator (level control). G = 1/s, taui=1. VARY Kc Input disturbance at t=20 Setpoint change at t=0 NO DELAY, theta = 0 Conclusion: Get “slow” oscillations if controller gain is too small

taui=0.5 taui=4 taui=2 PI-control of integrator (level control). G = 1/s, Kc=1. VARY taui Input disturbance at t=20 Setpoint change at t=0 Conclusion. Kc=1, taui=4 looks OK (no oscillations) NO DELAY, theta = 0 Conclusion: Get “slow” oscillations if integral time is too small

Kc=1 Kc=0.25 Kc=0.5 PI-control of integrator (level control). G = 1/s, taui=4 ADD DELAY, theta = 1 Input disturbance at t=20 Setpoint change at t=0 %tunepid4 s=tf('s') theta=1 g=(1/s)*exp(-theta*s) % integrating with delay (level control) taud=0 taui=4 Kc=1 % Too high Kc. % -> “fast” oscillations because of delay!! sim tunepid4; plot(Tid,y); hold on % Kc=0.5 % OK sim tunepid4; plot(Tid,y,'red'); Kc=0.25 % Too low Kc. % -> “slow” oscillations from integrator sim tunepid4; plot(Tid,y,'green'); hold off Comment. SIMC-rule, Kc=0.5, taui=8 CONCLUSION Kc too small (Kc=1): “Slow” oscillations (integrator not stabilized) Kc too large (Kc=0.25): “Fast” oscillations (because of time delay)