Coulomb-excitation of 112, 114, 116Sn

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MP-41 Teil 2: Physik exotischer Kerne
Advertisements

Investigation of short-lived nuclei using RIBs
Relativistic Effects in Gold Chemistry Jan Stanek Jagiellonian University Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Krakow, Poland.
Worksheets.
The Antiproton-Ion Collider EC, 500 KV NESR R. Krücken Technische Universität München for the Antiproton Ion Collider Collaboration.
N. Pietralla and K. Sonnabend for the SFB 634
CALENDAR.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
3224 Nuclear and Particle Physics Ruben Saakyan UCL
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Wen-Te Magurele Nuclear Coherent Population Transfer with X-Ray Laser Pulses Bucharest-Magurele 1 Nuclear Coherent Population.
A brief introduction D S Judson. Kinetic Energy Interactions between of nucleons i th and j th nucleons The wavefunction of a nucleus composed of A nucleons.
Some Aspects of Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics University of Surrey Guildford, UK IASEN School 1 Dec 2013 iThemba.
Some (more) Nuclear Structure
SYNTHESIS OF SUPER HEAVY ELEMENTS
Before Between After.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Search for key nuclear structure states below 132 Sn M. Górska, M. Pfützner, H. Grawe et al.
LoI Relativistic Coulomb M1 excitation of neutron-rich 85 Br N. Pietralla G. Rainovski J. Gerl D. Jenkins.
Spectroscopy at the Particle Threshold H. Lenske 1.
Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Initial Science Case For GRETINA at ATLAS M.P. Carpenter Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory ANL Gretina Workshop March 1, 2013.
CEA DSM Irfu Shell evolution towards 100 Sn Anna Corsi CEA Saclay/IRFU/SPhN.
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
HL-3 May 2006Kernfysica: quarks, nucleonen en kernen1 Outline lecture (HL-3) Structure of nuclei NN potential exchange force Terra incognita in nuclear.
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Nuclear Collective Dynamics II, Istanbul, July 2004 Symmetry Approach to Nuclear Collective Motion II P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Symmetry and dynamical.
The Collective Model Aard Keimpema.
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Simple forces, simple physical interpretation.
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The nuclear shell model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Context and assumptions of the model Symmetries of.
Even-even nuclei odd-even nuclei odd-odd nuclei 3.1 The interacting boson-fermion model.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Neutron transfer reactions at large internuclear distances studied with the PRISMA spectrometer and the AGATA demonstrator.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Experimental evidence for closed nuclear shells Neutron Proton Deviations from Bethe-Weizsäcker mass formula: mass number A B/A (MeV per nucleon)
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
N = Z N=Z line coincides with doubly-magic core Single-particle states wrt 100 Sn core Neutron-proton correlations in identical orbitals Neutron-proton.
LLNL-PRES This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (I) Single-particle models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Start with 2-particle system, that is a nucleus „doubly magic + 2“ Consider two identical.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Shell model Notes: 1. The shell model is most useful when applied to closed-shell.
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Dipa Bandyopadhyay University of York
NN2012, San Antonio, May 27 - June 1, 2012 High-seniority states in spherical nuclei: Triple pair breaking in tin isotopes Alain Astier, CSNSM Orsay, France.
Variational Multiparticle-Multihole Configuration Mixing Method with the D1S Gogny force INPC2007, Tokyo, 06/06/2007 Nathalie Pillet (CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel,
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
The role of isospin symmetry in medium-mass N ~ Z nuclei
Search for key nuclear structure states below 132Sn
Emmanuel Clément IN2P3/GANIL – Caen France
Maria Kmiecik, Giovanna Benzoni, Daisuke Suzuki
Isospin Symmetry test on the semimagic 44Cr
Nuclear Chemistry CHEM 396 Chapter 4, Part B Dr. Ahmad Hamaed
PHL424: Shell model with residual interaction
Kernfysica: quarks, nucleonen en kernen
individual excitations of nucleons
Cluster and Density wave --- cluster structures in 28Si and 12C---
Coulomb Excitation of 114, 116Sn
Content of the talk Exotic clustering in neutron-rich nuclei
Natalia Cieplicka-Oryńczak
108Sn studied with intermediate-energy Coulomb excitation
Magnetic dipole excitation and its sum rule for valence nucleon pair
Presentation transcript:

Coulomb-excitation of 112, 114, 116Sn Pieter Doornenbal

The three faces of the shell model Pairing interaction: large spin-orbit splitting implies a jj coupling scheme.

Symmetries of the shell model Three bench-mark solutions: No residual interaction  IP shell model. Pairing (in jj coupling)  Racah’s SU(2). Quadrupole (in LS coupling)  Elliott’s SU(3). Symmetry triangle:

Racah’s SU(2) pairing model Assume large spin-orbit splitting ls which implies a jj coupling scheme. Assume pairing interaction in a single-j shell: Spectrum of 210Pb:

Solution of pairing hamiltonian Analytic solution of pairing hamiltonian for identical nucleons in a single-j shell: Seniority  (number of nucleons not in pairs coupled to J=0) is a good quantum number. Correlated ground-state solution (cfr. super-fluidity in solid-state physics). G. Racah, Phys. Rev. 63 (1943) 367

Superfluidity in semi-magic nuclei Even-even nuclei: Ground state has =0. First-excited state has =2. Pairing produces constant energy gap: Example of Sn nuclei:

Seniority scheme in Sn isotopes: 2 6+  = 0 2 4+  = 0 2 2+  = 2 0+ energy axis  jn J 6+ min   4+ j j j 2+ J j j j j J j J 0+ -residual interaction gives nice simple geometric rationale for Seniority Isomers from E(j2J) ~ -V0Frtan(/2) for T=1, even J

Example of the 8+ ( p1h9/2)2 isomers in nuclei with Z > 82 Seniority Scheme Seniority conserving Dn = 0 1-body even tensor B(E2: I  I – 2, I  2) Seniority changing Dn  0 B(E2: I  I – 2, I = 2) 2 8+ 2 6+ 2 4+ 2 2+ j = (9/2)n n = 0 0+ B(E2) Fractional Filling

e.g. Jp = (h9/2)2 coupled to 0+, 2+, 4+, 6+ and 8+. q q d-interaction gives nice simple geometric rationale for Seniority Isomers from DE ~ -VoFr tan (q/2) for T=1, even J 8 6 4 DE(j2J) 2 e.g. Jp = (h9/2)2 coupled to 0+, 2+, 4+, 6+ and 8+. 180 90 q 2 4 6 8 q

d-interaction gives nice simple geometric rationale for Seniority Isomers from DE ~ -VoFr tan (q/2) for T=1, even J 2 4 6 8

Reduced transition probability in a single J-shell ≈Nparticles*Nholes (2j+1) ≡ nucleons/orbital

Reduzierte Übergangswahrscheinlichkeit in einer einzelnen J-Schale ≈NTeilchen*NLöcher (2j+1) ≡ Anzahl der Nukleonen . in der j-ten Schale

Reduced transition probability in a complex shell ≈Nparticles*Nholes number of nucleons between shell closures.

Reduzierte Übergangswahrscheinlichkeit in einer komplexen Schale ≈NTeilchen*NLöcher Anzahl der Nukleonen zwischen den Schalenabschlüssen

Proton np-nh core excitations (t=n) Theoretical interpretation theory (neutron valence + proton core excitations and 90Zr as closed-shell core) theory (neutron valence and 100Sn as closed-shell core) Neutron/proton single-particle states in a nuclear shell-model potential: from A. Banu et al., cond. publ. t=0 t=2 t=4 Neutron number B(E2 ) e2 b2 This work •••••••• Proton np-nh core excitations (t=n) & 100Sn core is open

Previous measurements: 112Sn 2+ 112Sn 1257 320 (20) fs ≙ 0.244 (13) e2b2 75Gr30 0.229 (5) α, 16O Coul Ex 81Ba05 0.256 (6) 16O 57Al43 0.180 (40) α 61An07 0.33 (6) 14N, 20Ne 70St20 Reference* Measured Value Projectile Method 0+ 2+ 114Sn 1300 300 (60) fs ≙ 0.25 (5) e2b2 114Sn 0+ Coul Ex α 0.20 (7) 57Al43 14N, 20Ne 0.25 (6) 61An07 Coulex 16O 0.25 (5) 81Ba05 DSA 112Cd(α,2n) 0.238 (77) 91VIZW RDDS 100Mo(18O, 4n) 0.189 (39) 01Ga52 2+ 116Sn 1294 374 (10) fs ≙ 0.209 (5) e2b2 0+ *From NNDC

Coulomb excitation experiment 112,114,116Sn→58Ni at 3.6MeV/u Ex=1257MeV, 1300MeV, 1294MeV B(E2)↑=0.244(13), 0.25(5), 0.209(5)e2b2 Sn-excitation ~ 180 mb Ni-excitation ~115 mb γ-efficiency = 0.005 beam intensity = 1pnA target thickness = 1mg/cm2 10 % duty factor pγ-rate (Sn) = 1/s

Choosing the right target 2+ 1454 154 keV 2+ 184W → 120Sn @ 4.7 MeV/u 114Sn 1300 0+ 0+ 58Ni 184W 1120 1250 2+ 120Sn 1171 120Sn 2+ 0+ θγ = 25º 4+

Important to know: Transition Ratio 90º-140º 2+→0+ 1 4+→2+ 0.017 116Sn θγ = 25º 116Sn→58Ni Secure energy:

Conclusion: Very easy to perform, yet leads to interesting physical results All necessary equipment is already available at GSI. Only feasible using Sn ion beams We ask for a total of 3 times 7 shifts of beam time for the isotopes 112, 114, 116Sn.