Figure 1-1. Land use and cover in the Queenstown Planning Area.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coastal Regulation Zone
Advertisements

1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1 WATERSHED SPECIFIC AND REGIONAL SCALE SUSPENDED SEDIMENT LOAD ESTIMATES FOR BAY AREA SMALL TRIBUTARIES Mikołaj Lewicki and Lester McKee Sources Pathways.
Suspended Sediment Loads from Bay Area Small Tributaries Mikolaj Lewicki and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loading Workgroup May 14 th 2008 Item #3a.
Subject: Physiographic Provinces of Virginia Part I
The Impact of Climate Change on Hurricane Flooding Inundation and Economic Damages Ashley Frey Dr. Francisco Olivera, Dr. Jennifer Irish, Mir Emad Mousavi,
1 Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow April 10, 2013 Integrating Water Quality and Coastal Resources into Marine Spatial Planning in the Chesapeake.
1 Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow June 7, 2013 Integrating Water Quality and Coastal Resources into Marine Spatial Planning in the Chesapeake.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Federal and Regional Efforts Related to Marcellus Shale Exploration and Production David P. Russ,
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
STP Land Application Site Suitability and Selection Considerations in Montana What do I look for besides a willing landowner?
Still River Study Sponsored by Friends of the Lake Presented by Curtis Read November 17th, 2005.
State Waters and Stream Buffers
1/22 Energy for water management and production Alternative water production José Luis Fernández Zayas 3 October 2008.
Water in the West: Current Use and Future Challenges Christopher Goemans, Ph.D. Agricultural and Resource Economics 13 th Annual Farmers Cooperatives Conference.
Water Planning 101 Lower Colorado Regional Planning Group-Region K January 9, 2013 W. David Meesey, O.W.P. (Old Water Planner) 1.
Water Resources Section #1: Chapter 11.
A watershed is the land that water flows across, under, or through on its way to a stream, river, lake, wetland or other body of water.
Turning a Water Plan into Water Dan Hardin, Director of Water Resource Planning.
Management of Drainage Water in Illinois
Thomas Kjeldsen, Michael Hilden, and many others Henk Wolters
Addition 1’s to 20.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
Questions concerning the Halloween Flood in Onion Creek Presentation by David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at.
Climate Change Impacts in the United States Third National Climate Assessment [Name] [Date] Water.
An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
Landform Regions of North Carolina and Maps & Aerial Photographs
Practice – CP-39 Farmable Wetland Program Constructed Wetland.
Future Impacts to Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Julia Knisel Coastal Shoreline & Floodplain Manager.
USING A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) TO MODEL SLOPE INSTABILITY AND DEBRIS FLOW HAZARDS IN THE FRENCH BROAD RIVER WATERSHED, NORTH CAROLINA Anne.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Sea Level Rise – A Global Problem in Your Backyard ESI.
Potentiometric Surface Map - September 2007 Sources of Nitrate and Estimated Groundwater Travel Times to Springs of the Santa Fe River Basin, AMEC.
Visual Environmental Education Guide Eutrophication Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Cryosphere hazards from the perspective of a State Agency Gabriel Wolken Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 3354 College Road, Fairbanks,
Session 131 A community profile provides a base for overlay analysis and for discussing a hazard’s impacts on a community.
Sea Level Rise Impacts on Projected Future Growth in Newport News & Hampton, Virginia GEOG 594A Ray Moody.
OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
The three major regional watersheds in Virginia lead to the Chesapeake Bay, Gulf of Mexico and the North Carolina Sound. The mountains are the ridge line.
Gainesville Youth Center University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning URP 4273 Survey of Planning and Information Systems Spring 2003.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Using GIS to Compare East Coast United States and South East Asia.
Explorers Education Programme: Flooding & Coastal Communities.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
Riparian Buffers And Their Role In Coastal Georgia By Jackie Jackson & Bethany Jewell Water Resource Planners.
Water Quality or Carrying Capacity Loading (legacy N + new N – environmental denitrification) Residence Time Carrying Capacity.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
HUMBOLDT BAY SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLANNING PROJECT Funded by the State Coastal Conservancy Aldaron Laird Project Planner.
Sea Level Rise in the North East Jennifer Iacono.
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
By: Lucas Hendrickson, Ian Strasburg, John Koets, and Shenquan Li
Anne Arundel County Maryland
AstrA Case study areas: Cities Kokkola and Raahe May 2006
California Science Project
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1-1. Land use and cover in the Queenstown Planning Area. Modified from the Maryland Department of Planning by the Queen Anne’s County (2002)

Figure 1-2. 1998 and 2009 Planning Areas Figure 1-2. 1998 and 2009 Planning Areas. The 1998 planning area included 2,165 acres. With the Queenstown Creek and Route 18 extensions, the 2009 planning area includes 3,945 acres.

Figure 1-3. Growth potential across the Queenstown Planning Area

Figure 1-4. Community Workshop Results

Figure 1-5. Build-out of major proposed annexation properties in the Queenstown Planning Area under current County zoning. Additional smaller lots add 40 residential units to the calculated build-out, resulting in a total of 605 units under current County zoning.

Figure 1-6. Planned land use across the Queenstown Planning Area Figure 1-6. Planned land use across the Queenstown Planning Area. Sensitive areas include wetlands, 300 foot stream buffers, and Category III hurricane flood zones.

Figure 1-7. Queenstown lot sizes (acres).

Figure 1-8. Sensitive Areas in the Queenstown Planning Area

Figure 1-9. Preserved areas in the Queenstown Community Plan Figure 1-9. Preserved areas in the Queenstown Community Plan. Sensitive areas include 300 foot stream buffers, wetlands, and Category III Hurricane flood zones.

Figure 1-10. Examples of ideal growth strategies for future development in Queenstown.

Figure 1-12. Roads and Trails

Figure 1-13. Existing Queenstown production wells, distribution system, and waste water treatment plant (WWTP).

Figure 1-14. Watersheds in the Queenstown Planning Area Figure 1-14. Watersheds in the Queenstown Planning Area. Each watershed was divided into hydrologic subunits defined based on topographic flowpath analyses.

Figure 1-15. Land use and land cover currently IMDP 2002) and under alternative future growth scenarios in the Queenstown Planning Area.

Figure 1-16. Annual average total nitrogen loads (pounds per acre per year) estimated with the Maryland Department of Planning’s Nutrient Analysis Spreadsheet.

Figure 1-17. Annual average total phosphorus loads (pounds per acre per year) estimated with the Maryland Department of Planning’s Nutrient Analysis Spreadsheet

Figure 1-18. Flood inundation zones within Queenstown and across the planning area (inset). The dashed box in the inset indicates the extent of the aerial photograph. Sensitive areas identified in the Queenstown Comprehensive Plan include areas prone to flood from a category IIII hurricane (10 to 12 foot storm surge).

Figure 1-19. Timeline of potential build-out and infrastructure improvements in the Queenstown Planning Area. Green numbers indicate a supply surplus, and red numbers indicate a supply deficit.

Figure 2-1. Regional map and physiographic provinces of the East Coast.

Figure 2-2. Topography of the Queenstown Planning Area.

Figure 2-3. Map of major Quaternary paleochannel systems of the Susquehanna River beneath the Chesapeake Bay and the Delmarva Peninsula. From Coleman et al. 1990.

Figure 2-4. Silt content and permeability of surface soils in the Queenstown Planning Area. Sand content increases soil permeability and generally decreases with silt content.

Figure 2-5. Geologic cross-section of Maryland Coastal Plain Figure 2-5. Geologic cross-section of Maryland Coastal Plain. The geologic stratigraphy controls groundwater supply (yield ) and water quality.

Figure 2-6. Evidence of sea level rise in the Chesapeake Bay Figure 2-6. Evidence of sea level rise in the Chesapeake Bay. (A) Colonial and (B) modern map of the Chesapeake Bay evidencing the increase in its width and land lost due to sea level rise. (C) Gauge records at Solomons Island, MD, tide gauge, 1937-97. (D) Map of Sharps Island, showing extent of land mass in 1848 ( U.S. Coast Survey, 1848). Inset shows Sharps Island lighthouse, which was built in 1882 (photograph from Vojtech (1997); used with permission from Tidewater Publishers). The former Sharps Island is now submerged, and the lighthouse is surrounded by water three to four meters deeps. All figures are from Larson 1998 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs102-98/, accessed 9/9/09).

Figure 2-7. Natural resource areas in the Queenstown Planning Area.

Figure 2-8. Comparison of 100 foot stream buffers (thin black line) and 300 foot stream buffers (thick blue line).

Figure 2-9. Land use and land cover (MDP 2002) within the 300 foot stream buffer across the Queenstown Planning Area.

Figure 2-10. Queen Anne’s County Zoning.