November 7, 2013 Petition to List Queen Conch Southeast Regional Office Protected Resources Division.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Signed on December 1973 and provides for the conservation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or significant portion of their.

Advertisements

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.

1 Environment Canada Environnement Canada Bill C-5, Species at Risk Act November 2002.

1 CDBG Citizen Participation For Grant Administrators.

PM NAAQS Review Update Joseph Paisie Air Quality Strategies & Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA WESTAR Fall Business.

Negotiated Rulemaking – What You Need to Know and How You Can Participate David Bergeron U.S. Department of Education 1.

THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.

2010 Changes – Physician Fee Schedule Billing & Reimbursement for Consultations December 16, 2009.

Rick Lacher Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Investment Banking Services 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1900 Dallas, TX Phone: (214)

[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name,

MSRA Environmental Review Requirement. Section 107 Requirements Revise and Update Procedures Consult with CEQ and Councils, involve public Sole environmental.

ARRT Update January Workgroup Commissioned in FEB 2011 “to ensure the AK Unified Plan complies with ESA section 7 consultation requirements” ESA.

CFSAN’s Peer Review for Risk Assessments Robert L. Buchanan, Sherri Dennis, and Marianne Miliotis.

Corals: Proposed ESA Listing On December 7, 2012, we published a Proposed Rule to list 12 corals as Endangered 5 Caribbean: Montastraea annularis, M. faveolata,

NOAA Coral Reef Ecosystems Research Plan. Identifies where and what kind of intervention is needed – mapping & assessment. Expands management options.

149 th Caribbean Fishery Management Council Meeting St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands April 22-23, 2014 Draft Scoping Document Timing of Accountability Measure-Based.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.

Intersection of the Magnuson Stevens Act with the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act Roger Williams University School of Law November.

1 Update on the Ongoing ESA Section 7 Consultation and DEIS Development for the Southeast Shrimp Fishery Louisiana Shrimp Task Force November 29, 2011.

Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.

Souvenir Collection: Corals and Other Marine Organisms

Assessing the Impact of a Toll-Free Number for Reporting Side Effects in Direct-to-Consumer Television Ads: Proposed Study Design Kathryn J. Aikin, Ph.D.

Preventing Endangered Species Listings with the Tongass Conservation Strategy Steve Brockmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Slide 1 Our Mission: “Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for.

Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.

1 OAR Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” May 21, 2012.

Two Proposed Rules for the Conservation of Elkhorn and Staghorn Corals Under the Endangered Species Act Jennifer Lee, Fishery Management Council Liaison.

Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.

Overview of the Impact of Research and Monitoring in the Columbia River Basin Rob Clapp Gary Rule Blane Bellerud Ritchie Graves.

Pacific Fishery Management Council Jurisdiction –3 miles to 200 miles –4 states (includes Idaho) Members -- appointed –State governments –Federal Agencies.

Pesticide Regulatory Process

Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.

Dwayne Meadows, Ph.D. Science, Service, Stewardship NOAA FISHERIES SERVICE Status of Conch Fisheries and National Summary for the.

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing

The Endangered Species Act: Species Listings and Implications for Development in Alaska Presented by: Cherise Oram Stoel Rives LLP.

08/10/20151 Queen Conch (Strombus gigas): A CITES-Fisheries Success Story Nancy Daves NOAA Fisheries Office of International Affairs CFMC/OSPESCA/WECAFC/CRFM.

08/10/20151 Queen Conch (Strombus gigas): A CITES-Fisheries Success Story Nancy K. Daves NOAA Fisheries Office of International Affairs Gulf and Caribbean.

Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.

Final Annual Catch Limit Guidance Prepared by Andy Strelcheck (NMFS, SERO) Presented by Joe Kimmel.

Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.

NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,

Species At Risk Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Legislation - Update on Status Bill C-5 currently before the Senate Has been given 1st and 2nd readings Bill.

FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -

Amendment 3 to the Fishery Management Plan for Queen Conch Resources of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 March 2007.

Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.

Endangered Species Act 2005 Legislative Action. House of Representatives  On Sept. 29, 2005 the House passed H.R. 3824: Threatened and Endangered Species.

MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.

NOAA Fisheries Update MAFAC Meeting Paul Doremus DAA for Operations September 23, 2014.

SEDAR Update Policies and Procedures, Assessment Classifications, & SEDAR 26 Activities Prepared for the June 2011 Caribbean Council Meeting Julie A Neer.

Structuring Species Closures that Work for Fishermen Kate Quigley Council Economist Ad Hoc Committee on Socio-Economic Impact of Yearly Closures July 24,

Action 1 Alternative 1: Status quo MANAGEMENT REFERENCE POINT STATUS QUO DEFINITION Maximum Sustainable Yield Queen Conch, Spiny Lobster & Reef Fish MSY.

ARE 309Ted Feitshans021-1 Unit 21 Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Department of Health and Human Services1 Update: October 2006 Public Meeting on Emergency Research Diane Maloney, J.D. Associate Director for Policy FDA.

Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.

2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.

Caribbean Fishery Management Council 154 th Meeting December St. Thomas/St. John Fishery Management Plan – Draft Actions and Alternatives.

9 th International HIA Conference A framework for public health officials to integrate HIA considerations in municipal project undertakings for the City.

“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.

Outreach and Education Advisory Panel (OEAP) Report to the Council 157th CFMC Regular Meeting Condado Vanderbilt Hotel San Juan, PR August 23 – 24, 2016.

Final ESA Listing Determination for Nassau Grouper

Endangered Species Act Listing Program

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System

The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988

MAC Input on Section 4.9 Review

S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.

Presentation transcript:

November 7, 2013 Petition to List Queen Conch Southeast Regional Office Protected Resources Division

2 Queen Conch (Strombus gigas) On March 2, 2012, we received a petition from WildEarth Guardians to list the queen conch as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Photo: NOAA

3 Petitions and the ESA Listing Process What are the Steps and Timelines for NOAA Fisheries Service Response to the Petition? Step One: 90- Day Finding (current step) -The 90-day finding determines whether or not the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing may be warranted. -The 90-day finding is solely based upon the information included in the petition and in NOAA Fisheries Service files. -We DO NOT request information from other sources at this time. -The 90-day finding for the queen conch is expected in May 2012.

4 Petitions and the ESA Listing Process Step One: 90- Day Finding (continued) -If we find that the petition does not present substantial information, we will publish a negative 90-day finding in the Federal Register. -No more action is required. -If we find that the petition presents substantial information, we will publish a positive 90-day finding in the Federal Register. -A positive finding would include a 60-day public comment period. Public comments received will help support a Status Review. - Substantial information is defined as that amount of information that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the measure proposed in the petition may be warranted and is a relatively low standard.

5 Petitions and the ESA Listing Process Step two: Status Review (possible future step) -A positive 90-day finding triggers a status review, which is conducted by NOAA Fisheries Service. -Status review teams are not exempt from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and, therefore, generally do not include non-federal personnel. -A status review is a comprehensive assessment of a species biological status and its threats, and is the basis for making determinations as to whether or not a species warrants listing under the ESA. -Status reviews are based on the best available science, consider public input received at the 90-day finding stage, and are peer-reviewed.

6 Petitions and the ESA Listing Process Step Three: 12-Month Determination (possible future step) -Once the status review is completed we must publish a 12-month determination as to whether or not listing is warranted. -In the 12-month determination, we consider the information in the status review, existing conservation efforts, and ESA policies. -We are prohibited from taking anything else into consideration, such as social or economic impacts. -If we determine that the information on the species does not support the need to list, our determination will state that the petitioned action is not warranted. -No more action is required

7 Petitions and the ESA Listing Process Step Four: Proposed Rule (possible future step) -If we determine that the information on the species supports the need to list, we will publish a Proposed Rule in the Federal Register at the 12-month stage. -A Proposed Rule would include a 60-day public comment period -Public hearings may also be held to solicit public comment

8 Petitions and the ESA Listing Process Step Five: Final Rule (possible future step) -Within one year of completing the Proposed Rule, we must publish a final decision as to whether or not the species should be listed under the ESA. -The rationale for listing and responses to public comments received must be included in the Final Rule published in the Federal Register.

9 Opportunities to Participate -We can not consider information or comments from sources outside NOAA Fisheries Service during the 90-day finding stage (current stage). -If we make a positive 90-day finding – The Fisheries Management Councils and Scientific and Statistical Committees will have opportunities to participate and provide information. -Peer-reviewers (We seek at least three peer reviews on the status review document, and we ask for suggestions of appropriate peer reviewers when we make a positive 90-day finding) -Species information, management programs, etc. - For more information or to track the status of the response to the queen conch petition, visit: