Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Academics and CTE at a Crossroads June 21, 2007.
Advertisements

International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Why Should We Consider School Reform? April 11, 2008.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Community Choices for Wisconsins Young Children March 17, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work June 18, 2008.
Understanding the Classroom Implications of the Transition to the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 10, 2012.
Where Best Practices Meet Next Practices
The Need and Urgency to Personalize Education Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman December 6, 2012.
Verona Area School District Willard R. Daggett, CEO July 18, 2012.
Take Charge of Preparing Students for their Future Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 18, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor & Relevance August 22, 2007.
Rigor and Relevance for ALL Students.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Nations Most Successful Secondary Schools Lessons Learned January 9, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO April 18, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Strategies for Integrating CTE and Academic Education Using the R &
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Milan Special School District February 16, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years June 16,
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman December 6, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 15, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 16, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for Their Future, Not our Past – What They Need for Todays Technological.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Willard R. Daggett, CEO August 11, 2011.
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Three Years Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 21, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Agricultural Education Leaders Summit February 5, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett CTE – The Nations Best Rigor & Relevance Programs April 16, 2009.
A Comprehensive Solution to School Improvement Willard R. Daggett, CEO October 7, 2011.
Preparing Students for Their Future Opportunities and Challenges Dr. Willard R. Daggett September 12, 2011.
Creating Culture of High Expectations Common Core State Standards Rigor, Relevance, Relationships Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman August 21, 2012.
Building a System-Wide Focus on Student Achievement Willard R. Daggett Joe Shannon September 27-28, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work November 8, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Skills for the 21 st Century February 1, 2011.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 15, 2013.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor and Relevance.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for Their Future April 19, 2009.
Daggett System for Effective Instruction: Creating an Action Plan Willard R. Daggett Raymond McNulty.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Our Changing Education Landscape December 2, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Components and Characteristics of the Most Successful U.S. Schools October 14,
Daggett System for Effective Instruction: Where Research and Best Practices Meet Willard R. Daggett, Ed.D. Founder and CEO.
Preparing Pennsylvanias 21 st Century Workforce: An Education & Workforce Development Symposium Willard R. Daggett, CEO February 21, 2012.
Florida Regional Meeting Broward County Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 25, 2012.
Leading Change During Challenging Times Lessons Learned from our Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 2, 2013.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students August 17, 2010.
Common Core State Standards High Expectations 21 st Century Willard R. Daggett, CEO March 15, 2012.
Preparing Title I Eligible Students for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman March.
Brunson Elementary – Mr. Jeff Faullin, Principal
CALENDAR.
The 5S numbers game..
Common Core Standards: What they havent told you! Mel Riddile Associate Director High School Services
The basics for simulations
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Scholastic Superintendents Leadership Summit October 9, 2009.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Merced Union School District May 18, 2011.
Lynn Radicello, Lisa Schlegel, Patrick Shaw
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Middle School Math Initiative for Florida Rigor Relevance Reading Florida and the Islands Comprehensive Center at ETS International Center for Leadership.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett High Schools & Careers: The New Value Proposition April 29, 2008.
Preparing Students for Their Future Preparing Students for Their Future Teaching for Rigor & Relevance An Introduction CTE Technical Assistance Center.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Our Changing Education Landscape.
International Center for Leadership in Education Tom Welch Greyhills Academy High School August 8, 2008.
Leading Change in Schools Today Willard R. Daggett, CEO October, 2011.
Hebrew proverb Do not confine your children to your own learning, for they were born in another time.
Today’s Theme is… RigorRelevance Relationships. Look into the future through the eyes of a child?
Many Languages: One Core Mr. Stephen R. Adamson and Dr. Freddie A. Bowles ACTFL Annual Conference Many Languages: One United Voice November 16-18, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Madison County Business League Salute to Excellence in Education Education = Economic.
Classroom Management: Teaching for Rigor and Relevance.
Presentation transcript:

Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 18, 2012

Point of Departure Common Core State Standards

Point of Departure Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments

Point of Departure Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments Teacher Evaluation

Schools are Improving School Improvement

Schools are Improving Changing World School Improvement

Skills Gap

Schools are Improving Changing World School Improvement

Schools are Improving Changing World School Improvement

Schools are Improving School Improvement Changing World

WHY – WHAT - HOW

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS STRUCTURE ACTION PLAN BEST PRACTICES

Focus What is effective?

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor 52,637

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor Meta-analysis

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor Meta-analysis Visible Learning by John Hattie 52,637 800 meta-analyses

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor Meta-analysis Visible Learning by John Hattie 52,637 800 meta-analyses

Focus What is effective?

Focus What is effective? What is most efficient?

Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework High Cost Low Cost

Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework High Student Performance Ef fec t iveness High Cost Low Cost Low Student Performance

Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework Low Student Performance High Student Performance Ef fec t iveness C D A B High Cost Low Cost Low Student Performance

Application of Knowledge Effective Efficient

Student Teacher Relationship Effective Efficient

Teacher Expectations and Clarity Effective Efficient

Literacy Strategies Effective Efficient

PD Peer Tutor Class Size Summer School Ability Group Achieve Prior 0.22 0.90 0.90 0.60 0.72 0.90 0.75 0.90 0.69 0.80 0.55 0.75 0.62 0.75 0.40 0.67 0.60 0.65 0.30 0.55 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.20 PD Peer Tutor Class Size Summer School Ability Group Achieve Prior Teach Test Literacy Strats. Meta Strats. Form. Eval. Student Teacher Teacher Clarity

Greatest Impact Culture of High Expectations Relevance of Instruction Strong Relationships System-wide Focus on Literacy Focused and Sustained PD

What Works RESEARCH

Schools are Improving School Improvement Changing World

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS STRUCTURE

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS STRUCTURE BEST PRACTICES

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS STRUCTURE ACTION PLAN BEST PRACTICES

WHY – WHAT - HOW

WHY

Teacher Expectations and Clarity Effective Efficient

Literacy Strategies Effective Efficient

Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%) Reading Study Summary Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%) 1600 1400 1200 Text Lexile Measure (L) 1000 800 600 High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 % Georgia 87 % Wisconsin 83 % Texas 81 % Ohio 77 % Florida 71% Arkansas 53 % Massachusetts 48 %

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % Texas 84 % Ohio 82 % Wisconsin Florida 74% Arkansas 70 % Massachusetts 54 % Mississippi 52 %

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 % 161 Georgia 87 % 175 Wisconsin 83 % 189 Texas 81 % 190 Ohio 77 % 199 Florida 71% 202 Arkansas 53 % 217 Massachusetts 48 % 234

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % 178 Texas 84 % 188 Ohio 82 % 192 Wisconsin 189 Florida 74% 206 Arkansas 70 % 200 Massachusetts 54 % 234 Mississippi 52 % 210

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % (0) 178 (+3) Texas 84 % (+3) 188 (-2) Ohio 82 % (+5) 192 (-7) Wisconsin 82 % (-1) 189 (0) Florida 74% (+3) 206 (+4) Arkansas 70 % (+17) 200 (-17) Massachusetts 54 % (+6) 234 (0) Mississippi 52 % (-36) 210 (+49)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 94 % (+11) 201 (-24) Wisconsin 85 % (-1) 232 (+3) Georgia 77 % (-6) 209 (-15) Ohio 72 % (-8) 251 (+10) Arkansas 71 % (+14) 241 (-13) Florida 54 % (+10) 262 (-3) Mississippi 48 % (-10) 254 (+7) California 48 % (+9) 259 (-3)

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 85 % (+3) 214 (-5) Wisconsin 81 % (+7) 219 (-6) Mississippi 58 % (-21) 223 (+17) Georgia 75 % (0) 218 (+3) Ohio 78 % (+13) 219 (-14) Florida 75 % (+12) 225 (-5) Arkansas 78 % (+25) 216 (-20) Massachusetts 48 % (+9) 255 (0)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 83 % (+22) 254 (-19) Georgia 81 % (+12) 247 (-8) Wisconsin 79 % (+4) 262 (-1) Florida 66 % (+8) 266 (-3) Ohio 59 % (+8) 269 (-9) Arkansas 61 % (+27) 267 (-21) Mississippi 54 % (+1) 264 (+2) Massachusetts 49 % (+7) 300 (-1)

Application of Knowledge Effective Efficient

Application Model Knowledge in one discipline Application within discipline Application across disciplines Application to real-world predictable situations Application to real-world unpredictable situations

The Changing Landscape Technology

Semantic Web Analyze Documents Key words and headers (Google) Meaning / Concepts Wolfram Alpha Complete Task

Implications Homework Term Paper

-Wolfram Alpha- Will search all language and give you response in your language Will respond in writing or verbally (in your language)

SPOT Integrated Projection Projection Keyboard

Projection Keyboard

Projection Keyboard and Projector

Consumer Electronics Confernce Contacts Chips in devices to external to devices Medical examples

The Changing Landscape Technology Financial

2011 US Federal Budget -borrowing 41% of every dollar it is spending

The Changing Landscape Technology Financial Globalization

Equity and Excellence

Wal Mart Largest Corporation 8 times Size of Microsoft 2 % of GDP 1.4 Million Employees More Employees than: GM, Ford, G.E. and IBM Combined

“China today exports in a single day more than it exported in all of 1978.” Source: The Rise of India and China . . .

U.S. – 2nd Half of 20th Century Only Superpower Highest per Capita Income 1st in Economic Growth 5% of Population > 24% of Consumption Source: National Academy of Science

The Changing Landscape Technology Financial Globalization Demographics

Population 1950 2010 2050 Male Female

Our Changing World College Degrees to Men 1970 - 60 % 1980 50 % 2010 43 %

Our Changing World Growth in Earnings in Real Dollars (1970-2010) Women = 44 % Men 6 %

Our Changing World Out of Wedlock Birthrate 2010 - 40 % 2011 43 %

Our Changing World Attend Church Regularly 2010 Women - 47 % Men 39 %

“Today, 18 to 34 year-old men spend more time playing video games a day than do 12 to 17 year-old boys.” “The End of Men” -Hanna Rosin

The 20th Century American Education System was NOT Designed to Prepare Students for the 21st Century

why – WHAT - how

Common Core State Standards Fewer Clearer Higher

Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%) Reading Study Summary Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%) 1600 1400 1200 Text Lexile Measure (L) 1000 800 600 High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % (0) 178 (+3) Texas 84 % (+3) 188 (-2) Ohio 82 % (+5) 192 (-7) Wisconsin 82 % (-1) 189 (0) Florida 74% (+3) 206 (+4) Arkansas 70 % (+17) 200 (-17) Massachusetts 54 % (+6) 234 (0) Mississippi 52 % (-36) 210 (+49)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 94 % (+11) 201 (-24) Wisconsin 85 % (-1) 232 (+3) Georgia 77 % (-6) 209 (-15) Ohio 72 % (-8) 251 (+10) Arkansas 71 % (+14) 241 (-13) Florida 54 % (+10) 262 (-3) Mississippi 48 % (-10) 254 (+7) California 48 % (+9) 259 (-3)

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 85 % (+3) 214 (-5) Wisconsin 81 % (+7) 219 (-16) Mississippi 58 % (-21) 223 (+17) Georgia 75 % (0) 218 (+3) Ohio 78 % (+13) 219 (-14) Florida 75 % (+12) 225 (-5) Arkansas 78 % (+25) 216 (-20) Massachusetts 48 % (+9) 255 (0)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 83 % (+22) 254 (-19) Georgia 81 % (+12) 247 (-8) Wisconsin 79 % (+4) 262 (-1) Florida 66 % (+8) 266 (-3) Ohio 59 % (+8) 269 (-9) Arkansas 61 % (+27) 267 (-21) Mississippi 54 % (+1) 264 (+2) Massachusetts 49 % (+7) 300 (-1)

Common Core State Standards Fewer Clearer Higher Different

Application Model Knowledge in one discipline Application within discipline Application across disciplines Application to real-world predictable situations Application to real-world unpredictable situations

Where are the Jobs Non-Routine Routine Results Driven Decision Making More Innovation / Creativity More People Intensive Business Development Routine Rules Driven Problem Solving Less Innovation/Creativity Less People Intensive Business Operations 1980 2011

Where are the Jobs Non-Routine Routine Cannot Write an Algorithm Cannot be Digitized Cannot be Outsourced Routine Write an Algorithm Can be Digitized Can be Outsourced 1980 2011

Knowledge Taxonomy Awareness Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation

Application Model Knowledge in one discipline Application within discipline Application across disciplines Application to real-world predictable situations Application to real-world unpredictable situations

Levels Bloom’s C D A B 4 5 6 3 2 1 Application 1 2 3 4 5

D C B A Rigor/Relevance Framework 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. D C 5 4 3 Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. 2 A B 1 1 2 3 4 5

D C B A Rigor/Relevance Framework 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. D Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. C 5 4 3 Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. 2 A B 1 1 2 3 4 5

D C B A Rigor/Relevance Framework 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram. Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. D C 5 4 3 Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. 2 A B 1 1 2 3 4 5

Levels Bloom’s C D A B 4 5 6 3 2 1 Application 1 2 3 4 5

Rigor/Relevance Framework D C 3 A B Calculate with numbers, including decimals, ratios, percents, and fractions. Understand two-dimensional motion and trajectories by separating the motion of an object into x and y components. 2 1 1 2 3 4 5

Rigor/Relevance Framework D C 3 A B Know the characteristics and phenomena of sound waves and light waves. Understand the effect of sounds, words, and imagery on a listening audience. 2 1 1 2 3 4 5

Quad D Skills and Knowledge Decision Making Innovation/Creativity Goal Setting/Results Driven Multi Tasking Work with others

why – what - HOW

D C A B

Next Navigator

1 2 3 4 5

Road Map State Standards to State Test

Wisconsin English LA Achievement Frameworks Subskills/Descriptors Knowledge and Concepts Exam - CRT (WKCE)

A State Standards State Tests A

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research

National Essential Skills Study (NESS)

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings ELA Skill: Write clear and concise directions or procedures. Group Rank Overall 9 Business/Industry 2 Other Non-educators 10 English Language Arts Teachers 25 Other Educators 8

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings ELA Skill: Give clear and concise oral directions. Group Rank Overall 7 Business/Industry 3 Other Non-educators 9 English Language Arts Teachers 28 Other Educators

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings Math Skill: Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to right triangles. Group Rank Overall 20 Business/Industry 29 Other Non-educators 31 Mathematics Teachers 4 Other Educators 24

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings Math Skill: Understand accuracy and precision of measurement, round off numbers according to the correct number of significant figures, and determine percent error. Group Rank Overall 12 Business/Industry 3 Other Non-educators 10 Mathematics Teachers 30 Other Educators 8

Proficiency

Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%) Reading Study Summary Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%) 1600 1400 1200 Text Lexile Measure (L) 1000 800 600 High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics

A C State Standards State Tests NESS & Lexile C

A C State Standards State Tests NESS & Lexile Common Core Standards

Wisconsin Standards  CCSS

CCSS  Wisconsin Standards

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard State Test to CCSS Samples to NGA

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard State Test to CCSS Samples to NGA

State Test NGA Create a large spinner for a game that has at least eight sectors. Each sector should be assigned a different ‘prize’. Prizes should range in value from most appealing to least appealing. Vary the sectors so that the probability to win a desired prize is much less that the probability to win a lesser desired prize. Calculate the theoretical probability of landing on each prize. Conduct multiple trials with the spinner and determine the experimental probability of landing on each prize. Which price has the greatest probability and which prize has the least probability?

A D State Standards State Tests NESS & Lexile Common Core Standards Consortium Assessment

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard State Test to CCSS Samples to NGA NGA to CCSS

1 2 3 4 5

D C A B

Gold Seal Lessons 123

E-mail - info@LeaderEd.com 1587 Route 146 Rexford, NY 12148 Phone (518) 399-2776 Fax (518) 399-7607 E-mail - info@LeaderEd.com www.LeaderEd.com