WP-ESIP Federation Interoperability J AMES F REW University of California, Santa Barbara

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
웹 서비스 개요.
Advertisements

GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Clearinghouse, Catalogues, Registries Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey February 5, 2008.
Putting the Pieces Together Grace Agnew Slide User Description Rights Holder Authentication Rights Video Object Permission Administration.
ISPRS WG II/3 Chongjun YANG Sept th 2003, Thailand Co-Chair of ISPRS WG II/3 IRSA/Chinese Academy of Sciences.
® © 2006 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. OGC Catalog CEOS WGISS September 2006 Chuck Heazel
A Workflow Engine with Multi-Level Parallelism Supports Qifeng Huang and Yan Huang School of Computer Science Cardiff University
Web Service Architecture
CACORE TOOLS FEATURES. caCORE SDK Features caCORE Workbench Plugin EA/ArgoUML Plug-in development Integrated support of semantic integration in the plugin.
Retrieval of Information from Distributed Databases By Ananth Anandhakrishnan.
Web Service Ahmed Gamal Ahmed Nile University Bioinformatics Group
REASoN REASoN Project to link NASA's data, modeling and systems to users in research, education and applications Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools.
An Operational Metadata Framework For Searching, Indexing, and Retrieving Distributed GIServices on the Internet By Ming-Hsiang.
Interoperability of Distributed Component Systems Bryan Bentz, Jason Hayden, Upsorn Praphamontripong, Paul Vandal.
1 Introduction to XML. XML eXtensible implies that users define tag content Markup implies it is a coded document Language implies it is a metalanguage.
Planned Title: Review of Evaluation of Geospatial Search Allan Doyle.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
Integration of Applications MIS3502: Application Integration and Evaluation Paul Weinberg Adapted from material by Arnold Kurtz, David.
Interpret Application Specifications
Ch 12 Distributed Systems Architectures
Software Engineering Module 1 -Components Teaching unit 3 – Advanced development Ernesto Damiani Free University of Bozen - Bolzano Lesson 2 – Components.
Page 1Prepared by Sapient for MITVersion 0.1 – August – September 2004 This document represents a snapshot of an evolving set of documents. For information.
Mgt 240 Lecture Website Construction: Software and Language Alternatives March 29, 2005.
Web-based Portal for Discovery, Retrieval and Visualization of Earth Science Datasets in Grid Environment Zhenping (Jane) Liu.
NASA/ESA Interoperability Efforts CEOS Subgroup - CINTEX Alexandria, Sept 12, 2002 Ananth Rao Yonsook Enloe SGT, Inc.
OASIS ebXML Registry Standard Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries 10:30 – 11:15 January 20, 2003 Kathryn Breininger The Boeing Company Chair, OASIS.
GCMD/IDN STATUS AND PLANS Stephen Wharton CWIC Meeting February19, 2015.
1 HKU CSIS DB Seminar: HKU CSIS DB Seminar: Web Services Oriented Data Processing and Integration Speaker: Eric Lo.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
Web Services based e-Commerce System Sandy Liu Jodrey School of Computer Science Acadia University July, 2002.
1 A National Virtual Specimen Database for Early Cancer Detection June 26, 2003 Daniel Crichton NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Sean Kelly NASA Jet Propulsion.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
ILDG Middleware Status Chip Watson ILDG-6 Workshop May 12, 2005.
Virtual Data Grid Architecture Ewa Deelman, Ian Foster, Carl Kesselman, Miron Livny.
1 Advanced Software Architecture Muhammad Bilal Bashir PhD Scholar (Computer Science) Mohammad Ali Jinnah University.
1 Geospatial and Business Intelligence Jean-Sébastien Turcotte Executive VP San Francisco - April 2007 Streamlining web mapping applications.
System Concept Evaluation Criteria FTT (FIG Tiger Team) (Federation Interoperability Group)
ESIP & Geospatial One-Stop (GOS) Registering ESIP Products and Services with Geospatial One-Stop.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
Distribution and components. 2 What is the problem? Enterprise computing is Large scale & complex: It supports large scale and complex organisations Spanning.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California EDGE: The Multi-Metadata.
Documenting UAF Data Ted Habermann NOAA/NESDIS/National Geophysical Data Center.
Mercury – A Service Oriented Web-based system for finding and retrieving Biogeochemical, Ecological and other land- based data National Aeronautics and.
Kemal Baykal Rasim Ismayilov
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
CWIC Developers Meeting January 28 th 2014 Calin Duma CSW and OpenSearch from the CWIC Start client perspective.
1 G52IWS: Web Services Chris Greenhalgh. 2 Contents The World Wide Web Web Services example scenario Motivations Basic Operational Model Supporting standards.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
The Proliferation of Metadata Standards and the Evolution of NASA’s Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Standard for Uses in Earth Science Data Discovery.
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Mission “To assist the scientific community in the discovery of Earth science data, related services, and ancillary.
What is ECHO? ECHO Open Search ECHO Facts NASA’s Earth Observing System ClearingHOuse (ECHO) acts as the core metadata.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.
Distributed Archives Interoperability Cynthia Y. Cheung NASA Goddard Space Flight Center IAU 2000 Commission 5 Manchester, UK August 12, 2000.
ECHO Technical Interchange Meeting 2013 Timothy Goff 1 Raytheon EED Program | ECHO Technical Interchange 2013.
Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center THUANG June 9-13, 20089th GHRSST-PP Science Team Meeting GHRSST GDAC and EOSDIS PO.DAAC.
Cyberinfrastructure Overview of Demos Townsville, AU 28 – 31 March 2006 CREON/GLEON.
5/29/2001Y. D. Wu & M. Liu1 Content Management for Digital Library May 29, 2001.
A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services Jane Hunter Sharmin Choudhury DSTC PTY LTD, Brisbane, Australia Slides by Ananta.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
Grid Services for Digital Archive Tao-Sheng Chen Academia Sinica Computing Centre
DIAL Update Doug Ilg Raytheon ITSS
WEB SERVICES.
Distribution and components
EIN 6133 Enterprise Engineering
Outline Pursue Interoperability: Digital Libraries
Earth Data Search Tool Demo
Introduction of Week 11 Return assignment 9-1 Collect assignment 10-1
WGISS Connected Data Assets Oct 24, 2018 Yonsook Enloe
ESIP Winter Meeting 2016 January 2016
4/5 May 2009 The Palazzo dei Congressi di Stresa Stresa, Italy
Presentation transcript:

WP-ESIP Federation Interoperability J AMES F REW University of California, Santa Barbara

WP-ESIP Federation Interoperability Background –CAN interoperability requirements –Federation Interoperability Working Group (FIG) Interoperability criteria –System-wide Interface Layer (SWIL) –Catalog interoperability Proposed technologies

CAN Interoperability Requirements Specific –Make public-domain products available on Internet –Announce products and services through GCMD –Comply with Federal standards (e.g. FGDC) Philosophy –Interoperability best resolved experimentally –Federation must decide how much

CAN Interoperability Requirements Process –Each ESIP proposes one of {V0, ECS, CIP, FGDC GEO, custom} as System-Wide Interface Layer (SWIL) –custom: permits the ESIP to be searched and queried as if it is part of a larger whole –Federation determines and evolves these standards and interfaces –SWIL-specific funding available

cluster What is the SWIL? ESIP SWIL customer A common view of the Federation that all its participants agree to support

SWIL Elements Online services –How you can reach us Vocabularies and models –What language(s) we speak User interfaces –What we look like

Federation Interoperability Working Group (FIG) May 1998 (1 st Federation meeting) –FIG established; charged with coordinating development of SWIL –Kenn Gardels elected chair Summer/Fall 1998 –Inventory relevant systems, protocols, and standards, and ESIP activities

FIG Timeline (contd) Dec 1998 (2 nd Federation meeting) –Endorse layered implementation strategy metadata data functions –Endorse clusters of ESIPs as bottom-up interoperability mechanism Winter/Spring 1999 –FIG tiger team prepares catalog interoperability (CI) evaluation criteria –April 1999: loss of Kenn Gardels; Yonsook Enloe acting chair

FIG Timeline (contd) May 1999 (3 rd Federation meeting) –CI evaluation criteria presented and approved –James Frew elected chair Summer 1999 –CI-level SWIL candidate systems solicited 4 proposals as of 13 Jul 1999 Evaluation team forming –30 Aug - 02 Sep 1999 FIG at UCLA: synthesize CI SWIL

Light touch –Just metadata, not data Satisfies basic requirements –GCMD –FGDC Satisfies query larger whole sub-requirement max(!/$): best chance to do something quickly –Many existing or pending alternatives Catalog Interoperability Rationale

Overall Criteria Allow single, multiple, or composite solutions –Multiple: must be equivalent –Composite: should be seamless Security and access control –Expose subsets of catalog information Comply with relevant standards Discover and describe services as well as data

Overall Criteria: Risks Maturity Acceptance –By users –By providers Support Technological change –Continue to support obsolete technologies –Migrate to newer technologies

Catalog Interoperability Criteria Discovery / search Browse Logical data model User interface Local extensibility Technology Scalability / Bottlenecks Costs Compatibility

Discovery Specificity –Collection –Granule Retrieval capabilities –Ranking –Relevance –extent of search compliance Search capabilities –Geospatial bounding-box –including Z –Fielded search –Free text –Temporal –Common vs. local attributes Search

Browse Specificity –By collection E.g. coverage summaries –By granule Options –Static Fixed parameters –On-demand User-specified parameters Vocabularies –Valids / Domains –Use applicable standards Inter-attribute relationships –Parent-child –Thesauri –Other TBD Data Model

User Interface Implementation –Web browser –Other clients Java app Z39.50 Internet search engines Extensibility –APIs Open & complete –Encodings XML Attributes Vocabularies Search capabilities Retrieval capabilities Data access Provide access to local extensions Local Extensibility

Technology Portability –Platform dependencies Implementation –Language –communication Persistent connections Non-standard ports and/or protocols Firewalls Number of providers Number of users Volume of data Performance –Rates –Latencies Asymmetric degradation Fault tolerance Scalability and Bottlenecks

Costs plug-in –Purchase –Construction –Configuration –Administration Distribution –Providers –Federation Existing systems, clusters, and protocols –GCMD –V0 –Z39.50 Compatibility

Proposed Interoperability Technologies GCMD Mercury EOSDIS Version 0 Big Sur DIAL MOCHA

Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Purpose –Search and discovery tool for Earth science data set descriptions –Metadata services: search –Data services: subscription –Direct links to data through alternative interfaces –Z39.50 access to FGDC Clearinghouse

Mercury – Metadata Search and Data Retrieval Purpose –XML Web-based system providing common view of disparate metadata and data files –Metadata services: directory-level search –Data services: search and access –FGDC and Z39.50 compliant

EOSDIS Version 0 – Metadata Publication and Data Ordering Purpose –Automated search, order, and access for online and nearline archives –Metadata publication: search and access –V0 protocol (PRODUCT_REQUEST message): order and access –Access to local data services

Big Sur Purpose –Integrated, distributed data and metadata for search, browse, and access –Metadata services: input data attributes; data history –Data services: functional processing; links to visualization and access tools –Accessible from platforms connected to a Big Sur database

Data and Information Access Link (DIAL) Purpose –Web-based software tools for organizing and distributing metadata –Metadata services: search, query, browse, and access –Data services: access and order in multiple formats –Dynamic visualization, X-Y plotting, animation, subsetting, etc. –Integrated with EOSDIS V0 and GCMD

MOCHA - Middleware for Integrating Distributed Data Purpose –Java architecture for integrating distributed heterogeneous data –Metadata services: distributed queries using XML & RDF –Data services: executes shipped code at data sources for filtering and aggregation –Java middleware deploys plug & play code to data sources –Use XML to exchange and interpret metadata and code

Conclusion Bottom-up interoperability is already happening –Web, clusters, etc. Federation-wide challenge: synthesize a common view –Cook up a nourishing batch of SWIL without losing the flavors of each ingredient