Some MET studies Niels van Eldik and Peter Kluit 29 May 2013 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 ttbar events with Atlantis   A lot of jets in this event !   Bjets (1 and 2) close in phi   Muon from semilep decay of b-jet1   Tau jet   Pb.

Advertisements

Introduction to Excel Formulas, Functions and References.

1 ttbar events with Atlantis   Tops back to back in the transverse plane, but objects in the barrel apart from c-jet (Extended tile)   Big activity.

B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.

Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.

H  4l in Full Simulation preliminary results 2 A. Khodinov * and K. Assamagan ** * State University of New York at Stony Brook ** Brookhaven National.

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.

Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.

1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.

1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.

1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.

1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.

Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.

MCP checks for the H-4l mass. Outline and work program The problems: – Higgs mass difference from the  – Possible single resonant peak mass shift (with.

‘2+1’ correlation – Tagging of Back to Back Jets GREESHMA K M IIT Bombay ALICE-India Meet 27 th & 28 th April

Muon momentum scale odd / even effects Peter Kluit, MATF/MCP meeting 23 October 1.

NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.

H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.

Energy loss improvements and tracking Niels van Eldik, Peter Kluit, Alan Poppleton, Andi Salzburger, Sharka Todorova Common Tracking Meeting 4 July 2013.

Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.

19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,

F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.

Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.

News from Jet/Etmiss Monica. Jet/Etmiss meeting yesterday (25/5) at P&P week – Mostly review of conf notes for ICHEP10 – Good review to check where we.

CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.

Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.

PFA on sidloi3: update Ron Cassell 4/27/10. 2 Proposed changes Calibration Tracking Extrapolation Subcluster finding Muon finding Structure.

D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collaboration mtg. 10/ Near Detector Efficiency.

HIGH GRANULARITY CALORIMETER ANALYSIS SARAH MARIE BRUNO CMS - CALTECH GROUP SUPERVISORS: ADOLF BORNHEIM, LINDSEY GRAY, MARIA SPIROPULU.

1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.

Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.

1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.

22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’

Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Soberi UMichigan-CERN Semester Program Thursday, 12 th February.

Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.

Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.

10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.

Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.

Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.

OverView Rel.16 SM D3PD skimmed(130GB) for local use with custom di-lep filters requiring at least ONE pair out of e/e, e/μ, μ/μ leptons which satisfying.

BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.

Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function.

H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.

The ATLAS Muon Landscape towards a common Muon Reconstruction Rosemarie Aben, Peter Kluit, John Ottersbach, Egge van der Poel, Marcel Raas, Nicole Ruckstuhl,

Muon reconstruction Peter Kluit Atlas NIKHEF Outing Hulsbeek.

Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).

XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.

2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis

Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.

Muons in ATLAS Overview

Northwestern University

Muon momentum scale calibration with J/y peak

OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS

Measurement of Muon Energy Loss in ATLAS

Atlantis and the Inner Detector

Visual Checks of the Reconstruction using Atlantis

Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS

Top Quark Production at the Large Hadron Collider

Last update at the RPVLL meeting:

Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL

Samples and MC Selection

Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).

Hit and Tracking Data set used: From loose to tight cuts Pythia p+p

Low pt muon identification

K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment

Presentation transcript:

Some MET studies Niels van Eldik and Peter Kluit 29 May

Introduction 2 Data set used for studies: mc12_8TeV PowhegPythia8_AU2CT10_Zmumu.merge.A OD.e1169_s1469_s1470_r3542_r3549 Two methods: -MET from AOD directly using the LocHadTopo and Muon corrections. Standard “out-of-the-box” for Staco and Muid. - MET using LocHadTopo recalculated for the muon term using: - Staco: all loose muons (CB+Tagged) - Muon: medium muons with additional momentum balance cut - CB muons (no tagged muons) - SA muons for |eta|>2.0 with inner station on track - All CB/Tag muons (for Muon or Staco) should pass the ID MCP selection Use for muon term (Staco/Muon): Sum p(vertex)-Eloss “Idea is that badly reconstructed muons give MET tails” Plots are shown for two and one muon (with the above selection)

Standard “out of the box” MET 3 Observe less tails in Muid than Staco But let’s look at the new recalculated MET

Recalculated MET for Muons 4 Also here we observe less tails in Muid than Staco Now look at 1 muons…

Recalculated MET for Muons only one muon found 5 This MUST give MET because the muon was not taken into account How important is this?

Recalculated MET for Muons only one muon found 6 How important is this? If one includes the one muon found one observes that the dominant tail is from one muon. So one has to be careful to remain consistent in the muon selection and the MET calculation. Inconsistencies can lead to large tails. And… a missing high pT muon can give a substantial tail

Recalculated loose MET 7 bool muonOK = false; if(muon_isLoose>0&&muon_pt>2.5&&muon_p>4.) { if(muon_mu_cb>0) { // loose MCP ID selection if(muon_npixel+muon_nsct>5) muonOK = true; // keep tracklets if(fabs(muon_eta)>2.0&&muon_npixel>3&&muon_nin>2) muonOK = true; } else if (muon_mu_tag>0) { // loose MCP ID selection if(muon_npixel+muon_nsct>5) muonOK = true; } else if (muon_mu_sa>0) { // loose Muon SA selection; require inner station precision hits (CSC/MDT) if(fabs(muon_eta)>2.5&&muon_nin>2) muonOK = true; } The selection has the feature that it keeps the CB muons that have only a tracklet in the ID (this would have 4 pixel hits and no SCT hits and fail the nsilicon > 5 cut). I don't know whether the number of muon precision hits in the inner station (muon_nin) is stored on the D3PD. One could then replace this cut by requiring isMedium. Here I did not yet add the Calorimeter muons around eta=0. It is rather close to what is done for Muid in the AOD.

Recalculated loose MET 8 Loose MET is similar to MET ‘medium’ muons But has a big advantage… One can use loose muons

Recalculated loose MET 9 Now selection loose muons… MET loose has tails that are OK. MET ‘medium’ has tail…. due inconsistent muon/MET selection For the MET one can apply a loose selection to match also analyses that do not apply strict requirements on all muons. One can think e.g. of the H -> 4 muon analysis where CB+Tagged+SA muons are used.