By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Valuable Asset School districts put a valuable asset of the nation’s schools at risk when they ignore the health of their employees. WHY? BECAUSE… Actions.
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Role of the DEC Elected/appointed for a four year term Develop and monitor the District Improvement Plan Review and make public District performance reports.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
TRUMANSBURG CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT’S ENTRY PLAN
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Committee? A Primer for New Visiting Committee Members.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Thursday, December 8 th The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) is the organization responsible for accrediting medical education programs.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
One System…One Mission Are You Considering a New Baccalaureate Degree Program? A Brief Guide 1.
Campus Improvement Plans
School Community Council Overview & Orientation Hawaii Department of Education For Training Use Only Office of Curriculum Instruction and Student Support.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
The District Technology Plan The District Technology Plan Melanie & David Dillard Melanie & David Dillard
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
New England Association of Schools and Colleges Commission on Public Elementary and Middle Schools The Accreditation Process.
BOLD’S WORLD’S BEST WORK FORCE, MISSION TO SUCCESS.
Natural Lifecycle of a Program: Program Development Currency Updates and Discontinuance Nabil Abu-Ghazaleh, Pierce College Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica.
Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
GUIDANCE AND SCHOOL COUNSELING UNIT. It Is the Law ACT 908 of 1991 Revised 1997, 1999, 2003, 2005, 2007 “Public School Student Services ACT” Ark. Code.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
The Middle States Accreditation Process Schreiber High School.
ITS Contract An Overview of the Instructional Telecommunications Services Contract.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
ASA Board Membership Board Members: (vote) Four Paraguayan Citizens Four U.S. Citizens One Third-country National Ex-Officio Members: (voice but no vote)
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
{ AAA Orientation Adventist Accrediting Association.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Preparing Your Self Study
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
AA-T and AS-T Program Approval July 15, 2011 Presenters:Stephanie Low Stephanie Ricks-Albert July 15, 2011– This content is subject to change during the.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
“Developing an Exemplary Self-Study”.  1. Effective organization and implementation  2. Comprehensive Assessment  3. Documenting Compliance  4. Compilation.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Program-Review Process Ohio University Link to Program Review Web Site.
Board of Education Public Charter School Application Review Process Virginia Board of Education April 21, 2010.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
The IEP: Progress Monitoring Process. Session Agenda Definition Rationale Prerequisites The Steps of Progress Monitoring 1.Data Collection –Unpack Existing.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Self-Study Instrument for Early Childhood Centers EDITION
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team?
Principal Evaluation Process
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Sam Houston State University
Sam Houston State University
Presentation transcript:

By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA

The Evaluative Rationale Contributes to the improvement of the instructional program Contributes to the improvement of the instructional program Encourages clarification of the goals of SDA education Encourages clarification of the goals of SDA education Increases understanding and involvement of the church community in the process of Christian education Increases understanding and involvement of the church community in the process of Christian education

The accreditation of SDA schools is based upon a process of Self-Evaluation and review. The School Board coordinates this self-evaluative process.

Components of Evaluation Process Self-Study Handbook Self-Study Handbook Self-Study Instrument Self-Study Instrument Visiting Committee Handbook Visiting Committee Handbook

Self- Study Handbook Guidebook to aid in completing the Self- Study Instrument which includes : Guidebook to aid in completing the Self- Study Instrument which includes : Responsibilities Responsibilities The use of rating scales The use of rating scales Possible Outcomes Possible Outcomes Parent Questionnaires Parent Questionnaires

School Board Responsibilities Study and discuss the Self-Study Handbook Study and discuss the Self-Study Handbook Appoint study committee members & chair Appoint study committee members & chair Prepare a timeline Prepare a timeline Review previous evaluation report Review previous evaluation report Prepare new progress report Prepare new progress report Distribute sections of instrument to committees Distribute sections of instrument to committees Serve on the study committees as appointed Serve on the study committees as appointed Edit and approve the schools mission statement Edit and approve the schools mission statement Edit the the final report Edit the the final report Mail completed copy to conference Mail completed copy to conference

Timeline Obtain Visitation Date Obtain Visitation Date One Month Prior is Mailing Date One Month Prior is Mailing Date Each committee meets once a month Each committee meets once a month Board review committee report each month Board review committee report each month

Self-Evaluation Instrument Philosophy Philosophy Administration and Finance Administration and Finance Facilities and Services Facilities and Services Library Library Curriculum Curriculum

Philosophy SDA Educational Statement of Philosophy is given SDA Educational Statement of Philosophy is given Local Mission Statement is developed Local Mission Statement is developed Board approves the Mission Statement Board approves the Mission Statement School program is guided and evaluated by the Statement of Philosophy and the Mission Statement School program is guided and evaluated by the Statement of Philosophy and the Mission Statement Develop criteria for accepting Non-Adventist Students Develop criteria for accepting Non-Adventist Students Consensus is required in Quality Review Section Consensus is required in Quality Review Section

Administration & Finance Principal and Treasurer complete Financial Data Principal and Treasurer complete Financial Data The constituency, board, and principals roles are evaluated The constituency, board, and principals roles are evaluated School Marketing plan is evaluated School Marketing plan is evaluated Areas of strength and concern are listed Areas of strength and concern are listed Recommendations for correcting concerns are developed Recommendations for correcting concerns are developed

Facilities and Services Facilities and site are physically surveyed by each member of the study committee Facilities and site are physically surveyed by each member of the study committee Lists of materials and equipment prepared Lists of materials and equipment prepared Custodial, grounds, maintenance, health, fire and safety services are reviewed Custodial, grounds, maintenance, health, fire and safety services are reviewed Positive aspects and concerns are listed Positive aspects and concerns are listed Recommendations for correcting concerns are developed Recommendations for correcting concerns are developed

Library Library collection is reviewed, counted, and evaluated Library collection is reviewed, counted, and evaluated Strengths of library collection stated Strengths of library collection stated Concerns regarding library collection compiled Concerns regarding library collection compiled Recommendations for correcting concerns are given Recommendations for correcting concerns are given

Curriculum Each area of the curriculum is reviewed and evaluated. These include: Each area of the curriculum is reviewed and evaluated. These include: Bible Career Awareness Computer Education Fine Arts Language Arts Mathematics Physical Education Reading Science & Health Social Studies Witnessing/Service

Curriculum Introductory Statement Introductory Statement Instructional Goals Instructional Goals The Instructional Process The Instructional Process Materials Materials Quality Review Quality Review

Rating Scale In using the rating scale each committee member votes for the rating which they feel that best describes the present practice at the school not what it should be. Each members vote is tallied in the appropriate column. There often may be differing views at times. That is normal. Just record the votes as received. In using the rating scale each committee member votes for the rating which they feel that best describes the present practice at the school not what it should be. Each members vote is tallied in the appropriate column. There often may be differing views at times. That is normal. Just record the votes as received.

Rating Scale II Sample Rating Scale Question from page 15 N – Never S – Sometimes R – Regularly B.VALUES DEVELOPMENT 7. Students have opportunities ___ ___ ___ 21 NSR to participate in service for others

Parent Questionnaire Form is duplicated by teacher and distributed to parents along with a self-addressed, return envelope marked Questionnaire. This is done at least one month prior to the on-site visit Form is duplicated by teacher and distributed to parents along with a self-addressed, return envelope marked Questionnaire. This is done at least one month prior to the on-site visit Questionnaires should be returned to the school in the sealed, self-addressed envelope. Questionnaires should be returned to the school in the sealed, self-addressed envelope. The principal collects and gives the sealed envelopes to the Superintendent. The principal collects and gives the sealed envelopes to the Superintendent. The questionnaires are reviewed by the Visiting Committee and recommendations are included in the Visiting Committee Report The questionnaires are reviewed by the Visiting Committee and recommendations are included in the Visiting Committee Report

Possible Terms of Accreditation Terms Terms Five years with an annual Progress Report Five years with an annual Progress Report Five years with an Interim Review and annual Progress Report Five years with an Interim Review and annual Progress Report One to three years with a Revisit and annual Progress Report One to three years with a Revisit and annual Progress Report Alternative Actions Alternative Actions Probationary status Probationary status Accreditation denied Accreditation denied

After the Visit Superintendent submits to the Conference Board of Education the Visiting Committee Report including the recommended term of accreditation. Superintendent submits to the Conference Board of Education the Visiting Committee Report including the recommended term of accreditation. The voted and edited report becomes the Evaluation Report. The voted and edited report becomes the Evaluation Report. A copy of this report is sent to the school for review. The board prioritizes the recommendations and develops a timeline for implementation of the recommendations. A copy of this report is sent to the school for review. The board prioritizes the recommendations and develops a timeline for implementation of the recommendations.

The End