Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Números.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
SKELETAL QUIZ 3.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
Slide 1Fig 25-CO, p.762. Slide 2Fig 25-1, p.765 Slide 3Fig 25-2, p.765.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
Western Public Lands Grazing: The Real Costs Explore, enjoy and protect the planet Forest Guardians Jonathan Proctor.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
ASCII stands for American Standard Code for Information Interchange
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
© 2010 Concept Systems, Inc.1 Concept Mapping Methodology: An Example.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
Figure 3–1 Standard logic symbols for the inverter (ANSI/IEEE Std
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Dynamic Access Control the file server, reimagined Presented by Mark on twitter 1 contents copyright 2013 Mark Minasi.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Midterm Review Part II Midterm Review Part II 40.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
Foundation Stage Results CLL (6 or above) 79% 73.5%79.4%86.5% M (6 or above) 91%99%97%99% PSE (6 or above) 96%84%100%91.2%97.3% CLL.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
ANALYTICAL GEOMETRY ONE MARK QUESTIONS PREPARED BY:
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES. 22 HILLSBOROUGH IS A REALLY BIG COUNTY.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
Chart Deception Main Source: How to Lie with Charts, by Gerald E. Jones Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
úkol = A 77 B 72 C 67 D = A 77 B 72 C 67 D 79.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples

AGVISE Laboratories % Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2012

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory % Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples Tested

Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2012 Fall 2012 Samples (lb/a 0-24 samples) MB ND SD MN

Average Soil Nitrate Following WHEAT in Canada Nitrate-N (0-24) lb/a Drought

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Wheat in Canada

Average Soil Nitrate following Canola in 2012 Fall 2012 Samples (lb/a 0-24 samples) MB ND SD MN

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Canola in Canada – 2012

Average Soil Nitrate Following Canola in Canada Nitrate-N (0-24) lb/a

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Barley in Canada

Average Soil Nitrate Following BARLEY in Canada Nitrate-N (0-24) lb/a

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Flax in Canada

Average Soil Nitrate Following FLAX in Canada Nitrate-N (0-24)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Potato in Canada

Average Soil Nitrate Following POTATO in Canada Nitrate-N (0-24)

Average Soil Nitrate following Corn in 2012 Fall 2012 samples (lb/a 0-24 samples) MB ND SD MN

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Corn in Canada

Average Soil Nitrate Following CORN in Canada Nitrate-N (0-24)

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Soybean in Canada 2012

Average Soil Nitrate Following Soybeans in Canada # of Fields Tested

56% 55% 66% 47% 68% 57% 78% 77% 69% 72% 34% 14% 20% 58% 50% 27% 60% % Soil Samples with Phosphorus less than 10 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 38% (Olsen P test) 35% 67% 32% 36% 50% 46% 60% 57%47% 71% 36%

21% 14% 3% 6% 7% 2% 48% 36% 17% 30% 32% 38% 11% 6% % Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 32% 11% 48% 21% 5% 35% 41% 31% 23% 4%1% 78% 77% 19%

65% 56% 72% 54% 77% 86% 83% 65% 78% 35% 24% 35% 32% 59% 53% 49% 66% % Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 34% 35% 26% 59% 20% 36% 50% 49% 74% 91% 22% 44% 65%

8% 14% 18% 49% 40% 54% 22% 21% 9% 12% 10% 5% 9% 7% 11% 15% 12% % Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 10% 46% 49% 69% 27% 38% 32% 44% 29% 19% 20% 59% 67%

26% 22% 33% 25% 38% 60% 71% 43% 28% 21% 25% 17% 33% 8% 20% 29% % Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0% Fall 2012 Samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 9% 3% 9% 75% 26% 17% 9% 28% 26% 55% 12% 26% 13%

48% 38% 56% 59% 87% 85% 89% 65% 84% 41% 20% 77% 70% 57% 44% 30% 47% 13% 78% 55% 42% 59% % Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a Fall 2012 Samples (0-24 samples) MB ND SD MN 51% 78% 85% 34% 57% 63%

12% 17% 7% 13% 10% 2% 1% 4% 20% 29% 26% 5% 0% 2% 5% 16% 14% 26% 24% 10% 12% % Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 15% 7% 10% 5% 14% 45% 41% 4%

3% 7% 5% 2% 15% 2% 39% 5% 1% 13% 4% 1% 8% 2% % Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 1% 9% 47% 75% 17% 9%8% 12% 9% 35% 27% 4% 0%

65% 76% 70% 38% 35% 39% 62% 51% 25% 54% 79% 96% 43% 36% 22% 23% 75% 72% 74% 82% 42% 71% % Soil Samples with Soil pH greater than 7.3 Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 65% 27% 34% 23% 15% 6% 67% 92% 84%

12% 26% 10% 6% 7% 10% 29% 23% 44% 4% 9% 2% 17% 40% 22% 14% 10% % Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0% Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 36% 1% 10% 24% 55% 13% 3% 1% 3% 9% 6%

27% 37% 15% 10% 1% 4% 2% 8% 1% 4% 19% 3% 11% 2% 21% 17% 12% 23% 17% 8% 10% % Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0 Fall 2012 Samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 11% 12% 7% 6% 2% 0% 6% 17% 21%

Manitoba - % Samples Testing with Salts greater than 1.0 1:1 salt method – expressed as mmhos/cm 582 NE ND R0G R0K

The Salt Problem may be Worse than this? Composite samples –Avoid areas that dont represent most of the field Saline areas Sandy ridges Many salty fields dont get tested Zone sampling –The salty zones often do not get tested or fertilized