Eye Clinic, Hospital of Legnago, Verona, Italy

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A prospective, randomized clinical trial

Advertisements

Toric and Modern IOL Technology

VisTor The new Toric IOL by Hanita Lenses

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.

Straylight (disability glare) results in case of a diffractive multifocal IOL design with apodization pattern adjusted to reduce glare. Ruth Lapid-Gortzak.

Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification trough 3.2, 2.2 and 1.8 clear corneal incision. Luis Izquierdo Jr MD. PhD. Maria.

Accuracy of Predicted Refractive Error in Resident-Performed Cataract Surgery Using Partial Coherence Interferometry Nickolas P. Katsoulakis, M.D., Paul.

A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi,

Long-Term Follow-Up of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Keratoconus Alejandro Navas, MD, MSc, Martha Jaimes, MD, Jesús Cabral, MD, Arturo Ramirez.

Action on cataract Whipps Cross Hospital Harold Wood Hospital North East London Eye Partnership.

Clear Corneal Vitrectomy Combined with Phacoemulsification and Foldable Intraocular Lens Implantation. Takeshi Iwase , Tsuyoshi Yoshita  and Kazuhisa.

A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES WITH A NEW DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) Pilar Casas de Llera Ana Belen Plaza Alfredo Vega-Estrada Jorge L Alio Vissum.

Eltutar, Kadir; Akcetin, Tulay A.; Ozcelik, N. Demet Istanbul Education and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology The authors state that they have.

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,

Disclosure of finanacial interest * Author has no financial interest in this paper. ** Author's research is partially funded by Imperial Medical Technologies.

Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.

Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.

Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.

The Effect of the Restor Multifocal IOL on Frequency Doubling Perimetry Elizabeth Yeu, MD1, Elizabeth Woznak, BS2, Nicole Kesten, BS2, Steven VL Brown,

Contrast-Enhanced Corneal Wound Imaging by Optical Coherence Tomography Preeya K. Gupta, MD Justis P. Ehlers, MD Terry Kim, MD Duke Eye Center, Durham,

Hyun Seung Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary’s hospital, The Catholic University of Korea Changes in Astigmatism After Clear Corneal Temporal.

1.PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age distributions.

The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age Distributions.

Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,

Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon.

Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,

Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.

Purpose: Introduction:  At initial evaluation: For post-op day # 0 patients: Pre-op VA was 20/50.6 (0.395 ± 0.198); Post-op VA was 20/102.0 (0.196 ± 0.162);

A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.

Clinical and simulation outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens with rotational asymmetry and two different levels of near addition Jorge Alió, MD,PhD.

Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,

Kaori Morii, M.D. Shinji Miura, M.D, Ph.D. Dept. of Ophthalmology, Asagiri Hospital, Hyogo, JPN We have no financial interest. This retrospective study.

Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF RESTOR IOL IMPLANTATION Lori Dao, Orkun Muftuoglu, V. Vinod Mootha, Steven M. Verity, R. Wayne Bowman, H. Dwight Cavanagh, James.

Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.

DR. TEJAS D. SHAH AMDAVAD EYE LASER HOSPITALS PVT LTD GOOD BYE GLASSES LASER CENTRE AHMEDABAD, INDIA NO FINANCIAL INTEREST

بسم اللة الرحمن الرحيم. Limbal relaxing incisions versus penetrating limbal relaxing incisions for the management of astigmatism in cataract surgery Sara.

LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.

Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.

Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL

Clinical Outcomes Post AcrySof Toric IOL Implantation In 231 Consecutive Eyes Johnny L. Gayton, MD, FSEE Eyesight Associates 216 Corder Road 216 Corder.

Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.

Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.

Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;

Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.

F.I. Camesasca, MD Zeiss Invent ZO Aspheric IOL: Long-Term Results of Refractive and Aberrometric Analysis F. I. Camesasca* P. Vinciguerra.

Corneal shape and corneal aberrations after MicroIncision Cataract Surgery (MICS) NOCHEZ Y, BUREL B, MAJZOUB S, PISELLA PJ C.H.U.

Dissatisfication After Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Taiwan Yu Wei Lin, MD (Presenting Author); Ching-Ju Hsieh; Lin-Chung Woung The authors.

"Mix and Match" approach implantation

Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD,

Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery

Authors have no any financial interest in the subject matter

Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.

Eye clinic of the 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts

Comparison in Reduction of Preoperative Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery with Toric IOLs versus Limbal Relaxing Incisions Alexander Chop PhD MD (no.

The authors have no financial interest

Results of corrective surgery: secondary lens implantation at a cataract surgery training centre Mehul Shah,shreya shah, adway appalware,pramod upadhyay,

DARIUSZ DOBROWOLSKI¹, EDWARD WYLĘGAŁA¹ ², DOROTA TARNAWSKA¹

성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.

Authors have no financial interests

Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL

Early Experience With Anterior Chamber Phakic IOL

SUBLUXATION LENS, A NO-RING APPROACH

Consultant Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

Eye Clinic, Hospital of Legnago, Verona, Italy Comparison of visual outcomes following cataract surgery between two multifocal intraocular lenses: Seelens MF and Acrisoft SN6AD1 G. Vizzari, N. Maccari, P. Bordin Disclosure block: G. Vizzari, None; N. Maccari, None; P. Bordin, None. ESCRS, Amsterdam 5 - 9 October 2013

PURPOSE To evaluate the postoperative visual outcomes following cataract surgery between two multifocal intraocular lenses: Seelens MF and Acrisoft SN6AD1 SEELENS MF ACRISOFT SN6AD1

METHODS Cross-sectional study: 52 eyes (13 patients). 26 eyes → Seelens (Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) 26 eyes → Acrisoft SN6AD1 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) Standardized Phacoemulsification technique: topical anesthesia with lidocaine 4% 1.75 mm clear cornea incision continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (5.5 mm) in-the-bag implantation of the IOL. incision closure without application of corneal suture Visual Acuity: Monocular UCDVA (at 5 m) with Snellen table Monocular UCIVA (at 80 cm) with a Snellen chart Monocular UCNVA (at 40 cm) with a Jaeger chart

INCLUSION CRITERIA Absence of ocular pathologies Bilateral cataract (bilateral Seelens MF implantation and bilateral Acrisoft SN6AD1 implantation) Astigmatism < 1 D Biometry with IOL Master (Carl Zeiss AG, Feldbach, Switzerland) or A-scan biometry (immersion technique) Power evaluation using SRK-T

RESULTS Seelens Acrisoft SN6AD1 Mean UCDVA: Pre = 0.52 ( 0.14) Post = 0.92 ( 0.07) [p<0.001] 30.0% achieved 1.0 Pre = 0.46 ( 0.06) Post = 0.89 ( 0.09) Mean UCIVA 0.93 ( 0.19) 1.01 ( 0.12) 46.2% achieved 1.25 Mean UCNVA 2.10 ( 0.60) Jaeger 26.9% achieved J1 38.0% achieved J2 2.38 ( 0.90) Jaeger 19.2% achieved J1 34.6% achieved J2 Mean Follow-Up period: 95.05 ( 22.4) days

CONCLUSIONS UCDVA improved significantly after surgery in all patients. The Seelens MF allowed a better UCNVA with 26.9% of the eyes achieving J1. The Acrisoft SN6AD1 provided a mildly better UCIVA, with 46.2% of the eyes achieving 1.25.