Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A “Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAASTeam CFI Workshop 8 Pilot Deviations Including Runway Incursions
Advertisements

Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
1 Performance Indicators: Selection, Application, and Reporting Presented by John M Rodgers Federal Aviation Administration.
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
Overview of Continental En-route Navigation Specifications
1 PHARE Achievements Dr. H. Schröter PHARE Programme Manager EUROCONTROL version 1.1,
1 Air-Ground Integration Ed Bailey, Airborne Project Leader & Ian Wilson, PATs Project Leader.
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
Ground Human Machine Interface (GHMI): trends and the future
1 The PHARE Concept and Scenarios by Job Brüggen Head Air Transport Division National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR.
ASAS Thematic Network – Rome April 2003 Session 2-B Cost / Implications ASAS Impact on Ground Systems An Industry Viewpoint Thales ATM Peter.
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
1 NAS Performance and Analysis: The Role of the Airspace Laboratory Airspace Laboratory May 2002 Toulouse, France.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A Slot Swapping Applications for CDM P.R. de Waal, NLR M.H. van den.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Estimating safe separations.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OHA CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OHA.
FAA/Eurocontrol TIM 9 on Performance Metrics – INTEGRA Rod Gingell 16 May 2002.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR1/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG Agenda & Project Overview Thierry Arino (Sofréavia) CARE/ASAS Action FALBALA.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
1 Click here to End Presentation Software: Installation and Updates Internet Download CD release NACIS Updates.
Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice 1.
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
Using CNS/ATM to Dramatically Improve Gate-to-Gate Operations Captain Bob Hilb UPS Advanced Flight Systems October 8, 2007.
PETAL A major step Towards Cooperative Air Traffic Services Patrice BEHIER Manager of the Air/ground Co operative ATS Programme Directorate Infrastructure,
© DLR, Institute of Flight Guidance ASAS Thematic Network 2 nd Workshop 6-8 October 2003 – Malmö Session 1 – ATSA Application Track Bernhard Czerlitzki.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A AI Planning at airports:Departure Management PLANET Industry Day.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Transition Towards Free Flight: A Human Factors Evaluation of.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Designing for Safety: the Free Flight ATM concept Jacco Hoekstra.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Overview of NLR Free Flight project ‘97 - ‘99 Jacco Hoekstra
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Page 1 The ONESKY (Single-Sky) project and what it means for ASAS.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR AI Planning, Waiting for the Results? H.H. Hesselink R.R.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Free Flight Deck Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) S-7, “Flight.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A “Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
ASAS Thematic Network Workshop #2: TAGA - Traffic Awareness for General Aviation DFS Research and Development October 2003 TAGA - Traffic Awareness for.
Mediterranean Free Flight ASAS Separation and Spacing Presented by Andy Barff – Project Leader MFF Real-time Simulations ASAS-TN, Malmö
C ENTRE D'ETUDES DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE ASAS-TN, 2nd workshop - Malmö 6 ~ 8 october 2003page 1 Electronic separation Clearance Enabling the Crossing.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
International Civil Aviation Organization Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/25 Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
25 seconds left…...
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
PSSA Preparation.
Aviation Management System 1 2  Silver Wings Aircraft Aviation Management System represents a functional “high – end” suite of integrated applications.
Introduction The Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) is an airborne system that interrogates transponders in other aircraft. From the replies.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
TCAS Basics Capt Craig Hinkley. 2 TCAS HISTORY  Two planes collided over the Grand Canyon  Alternative airborne version using transponders.
NASA Self-Separation from the Air and Ground Perspective Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Melisa Dunbar, Sandra Lozito, Patricia Cashion, Alison McGann, Victoria.
© 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Enhanced Flight Rules (CEFR) Randall Bone October 7, 2003.
Computerised Air Traffic Management Tools - Benefits and Limitations OMAR BASHIR (March 2005)
ASAS-TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, MalmöSlide 1 Airborne Surveillance Applications included in ‘Package I’ Francis Casaux CARE/ASAS manager.
ASAS FRA OB/T ATM Projects Lufthansa point of view.
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.
ASAS TN2 Briefing Cyro Stone 15 April 2008.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Paris, April 2008 SL ASAS TN2 Workshop ppt ASAS & Business.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
A Cockpit Display Designed to Enable Limited Flight Deck Separation Responsibility Walter W. Johnson & Vernol Battiste NASA Ames Research Center Sheila.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
ADVANCED AIR TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES DISTRIBUTED AIR/GROUND-TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 5 th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar Budapest June 2003.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A l Humans smarter, meaner, more strategic, emotional, variable, etc.
Presentation transcript:

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A “Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled, dangerous jungle without a firm central controlling element such as ATC.” “Pilots haven’t got the time, the training nor the mental resources available to function as ATC on top of flying the aircraft.”

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-2A NASA/FAA/RLD/NLR Free Flight study Jacco Hoekstra Ronald van Gent Rob Ruigrok

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-3A Free Flight goals l Reduce Costs via user preferred routing –Horizontally direct to destination optimum speed –Vertically optimum level cruise climb l More capacity

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-4A Operational concept l No ATC –Probe the limits for HF problems l All aircraft fully equipped –Linked via e.g. ADS-B –EFIS-CDTI l Full user preferred routing –Direct routing –Optimal cruise altitude

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-5A 1997: Three sub-studies: l CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Tool: Traffic Manager: Off-line simulations –Find a suitable base-line concept l SAFETY ANALYSIS Tool: TOPAZ (Traffic Organization and Perturbation AnalyZer) –Compare safety of Airborne Separation with safety ATC l MAN-IN-THE-LOOP EXPERIMENT phase I Tool: Research Flight Simulator –Validation of concept with Man-in-the-Loop –Man Machine Interface Validation

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-6A 1998: Four sub-studies: l CONFLICT GEOMETRY STUDY Tool: Traffic Manager: Off-line simulations –Check critical geometries: wall, etc. l AVIONICS STUDY Literature survey –Check requirements for RNP, ADS-B etc. l COST-BENEFITS & PERFORMANCE Tool: Traffic Manager: Off-line simulations –Costs of conflict resolution l MAN-IN-THE-LOOP EXPERIMENT phase II Tool: Research Flight Simulator –Validation of PredASAS & mixed equipage

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-7A 1999: Three activities: l DISSEMINATION Conferences, Web site, Contract report, RTCA, ICAO –Explain results obtained so far l DATA ANALYSIS phase II trials - Analysing data generated in phase II trials l DEVELOPMENT HUMAN INTERACTION EXP Tool: Traffic Manager, Freesim & internet –Effect of competition

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-8A 2000+: Current and future activities l HUMAN INTERACTION EXPERIMENT Traffic Manager, FreeSim, internet - High number of participants, humans vs models, competition l PHASE III FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRIALS NLR simulator, NASA Langley Simulations, HIE cfg(?) - How low can you go? From cruise to final incl. SUA, weather, RTA l Continue dissemination efforts Web site, symposia, conferences, RTCA, SAE, (IF)ALPA

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-9A Traffic & Experiment Manager

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-10A l Resolution advisories Several concepts studied: –Altitude step –Cross product of speed vectors –Extended VFR rules (not implemented) –Variations of TCAS manoeuvres –Voltage potential l Co-operative manoeuvring vs. priority l Minimal bandwidth/HF: no intent in Conflict Detection Result Traffic Manager simulations

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-11A Conflict Detection & Resolution Intruder’s protected zone Heading distance Speed change Avoidance vector Minimum distance Ownship Intruder

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-12A Complex Conflict geometries l ‘Wall’ scenarios, ‘super conflict’ (n = 4,8,10,12,16) and ‘crossing the street’

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-13A Man-in-the-loop Simulation Configuration AIRSIM RFS TEM

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-14A Traffic Symbol added to ND l Symbology on Navigation display based on data available via ADS-B l Track indicated with arrow shaped symbol instead of track line to avoid clutter l Label text selectable with de-clutter switches l Call sign added to label of traffic symbol for inter-traffic and crew communication

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-15A Conflict Detection & Resolution l Symbology based on resolution algorithm l Provides insight into resolution l Colour indicates urgency: Amber = min Red = min (time to loss of separation)

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-16A Navigation Display

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-17A Man-in-the-Loop experiment Hypotheses First explorative HF experiment, so probably using ‘simple’ Mk 1 system would yield: l Less than acceptable l Subjectively less safe l More workload Result: MMI problem areas

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-18A Man-in-the-Loop experiment Results - Acceptability

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-19A Man-in-the-Loop experiment Results- Subjective Safety

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-20A Man-in-the-Loop experiment Results

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-21A Task comparison Controlled vs. Free Flight

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-22A Predictive ASAS Calculates which track, vertical speed and speed selections will result in a conflict within the look ahead time Predicts a conflict by the red/amber zone moving to the actual values Indications do not require pilot actions

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-23A Predictive ASAS Don’t go indications: Track Vertical speed Speed

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-24A Preliminary conclusions PASAS l With predictive ASAS even conflict alerts could be avoided l Enhances situational awareness l Might provide solution without use of intent information for Free Flight!

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-25A Mixed equipage ATM concepts l Flight Level division: Above FF level only equipped aircraft l Protected Airways: Controlled aircraft should stay on airways and have right of way l Fully Mixed: ATC uses longer ‘look ahead’ time, so equipped aircraft have effectively ‘right of way’

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-26A 1998 NASA / FAA / RLD Results: Workload Airborne Subjective:Objective:

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-27A 1998 NASA / FAA / RLD Results: Workload Ground F(2,8)= 9.7, P<.008

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-28A 1998 Man-in-the-loop Conclusions l The future ATM design has to be chosen very carefully: –Full Mixed ATM condition is best from the pilot’s perspective –Protected Airways ATM condition is sensitive to equipage level (transition in time) –Flight Level ATC condition is most optimal from Air Traffic Controller’s perspective (Hilburn, Pekela) l The flight deck crew was able to handle higher traffic densities than the ground controller

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-29A Current men-in-the-loop experiment: human interaction experiment l Logging into Traffic Manager via internet using downloadable FreeSim flight simulation program Goal: Test effect of humans vs models competition

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-30A Airport on FF perspective: bad news(?) l Dramatic airspace capacity increase in FF airspace (en-route) => airports will be bottleneck (again)

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-31A Airport perspective on FF: good news l ASAS equipment (especially traffic display) could facilitate more efficient use under IMC of: –airspace (curved, merging, station keeping) –runways (concurrent use of parallel and crossing runways) –taxiways (showing other a/c and ground vehicles) l => potential to increase sustained capacity

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-32A More information l Web site: l Comprehensive report on overall studies Will soon be published. Check web site for downloads! l Demo sessions of human interaction experiment configuration will be announced on the website